Efficacy of eribulin in breast cancer: a short report on the emerging new data

Marine Power on Cancer: Drugs, Lead Compounds, and Mechanisms

Worldwide, 19.3 million new cancer cases and almost 10.0 million cancer deaths occur each year. Recently, much attention has been paid to the ocean, the largest biosphere of the earth that harbors a great many different organisms and natural products, to identify novel drugs and drug candidates to fight against malignant neoplasms. The marine compounds show potent anticancer activity in vitro and in vivo, and relatively few drugs have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of metastatic malignant lymphoma, breast cancer, or Hodgkin's disease. This review provides a summary of the anticancer effects and mechanisms of action of selected marine compounds, including cytarabine, eribulin, marizomib, plitidepsin, trabectedin, zalypsis, adcetris, and OKI-179. The future development of anticancer marine drugs requires innovative biochemical biology approaches and introduction of novel therapeutic targets, as well as efficient isolation and synthesis of marine-derived natural compounds and derivatives.

Enriching cancer pharmacology with drugs of marine origin

Marine natural products have proven, over the last half-century, to be effective biological modulators. These molecules have revealed new targets for cancer therapy as well as dissimilar modes of action within typical classes of drugs. In this scenario, innovation from marine-based pharmaceuticals has helped advance cancer chemotherapy in many aspects, as most of these are designated as first-in-class drugs. Here, by examining the path from discovery to development of clinically approved drugs of marine origin for cancer treatment-cytarabine (Cytosar-U®), trabectedin (Yondelis®), eribulin (Halaven®), brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris®), and plitidepsin (Aplidin®)- together with those in late clinical trial phases-lurbinectedin, plinabulin, marizomib, and plocabulin-the present review offers a critical analysis of the contributions given by these new compounds to cancer pharmacotherapy.

New designs in early clinical drug development

The availability of an unprecedented massive amount of data has provided a magnificent window of opportunity for the development of new drugs. There are currently more drugs in development targeting cancer than any other disease. While this has brought us new waves of drugs, the counterpart is that with these new molecules we have different mechanisms of action, drug kinetics and dynamics, response types and toxicity profiles, which impair classical early clinical trial designs from being effective and efficient. What we once treated as a 'one-size-fits-all' homogeneous disease, has now been uncovered to be a rather heterogeneous condition with multiple targetable mutations. As this generates endless scenarios, it will be impossible to design single 'me-too' trials for every different disease, target, biomarker and agent. To overcome this, we must focus on improving early phase studies, undoubtedly the most critical step from bench to bedside. Goals include decreasing clinical development times, lowering research and development costs and optimizing decisions in advancing through the several phases with a higher degree of certainty in exchange for less failed attempts. We need more informative and, really, transformative early phase designs that seek to obtain the typical late phase objectives in a time continuum and to allow for more robust and efficient go/no-go decisions. With this in mind, different classes of drugs seem to fit with different designs, which present solutions to the different challenges that they pose after finding the maximum tolerated dose/optimum biological dose. This article reviews these concepts and designs and how they can adapt to this new reality in early phase investigation.

Experience with eribulin in the treatment of elderly women with metastatic breast cancer: case studies

Although advancing age can greatly increase the complexities of treating metastatic breast cancer, chronological age alone is insufficient to determine the type or intensity of treatment. Older patients require an individualized approach that takes into account the patient's physical ability, social circumstances and mental capacity to tolerate treatment. This section features three older women treated with eribulin for metastatic breast cancer. In the first case, a 70-year-old woman maintained stable disease into her 34th month of treatment with third-line eribulin. In the remaining cases, two heavily pretreated women (80 and 90 years, respectively) with metastatic disease and liver involvement presented objective radiological benefit to later-line eribulin along with prolonged clinical improvement and good tolerability.