Proton therapy for early stage prostate cancer: is there a case?

Proton therapy- the modality of choice for future radiation therapy management of Prostate Cancer?

BACKGROUND

Proton Therapy (PR) is an emerging treatment for prostate cancer (Pca) patients. However, limited and conflicting data exists regarding its ability to result in fewer bladder and rectal toxicities compared to Photon Therapy (PT), as well as its cost efficiency and plan robustness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An electronic literature search was performed to acquire eligible studies published between 2007 and 2018. Studies comparing bladder and rectal dosimetry or Gastrointestinal (GI) and Genitourinary (GU) toxicities between PR and PT, the plan robustness of PR relative to motion and its cost efficiency for Pca patients were assessed.

RESULTS

28 studies were eligible for inclusion in this review. PR resulted in improved bladder and rectal dosimetry but did not manifest as improved GI/GU toxicities clinically compared to PT. PR plans were considered robust when specific corrections, techniques, positioning or immobilisation devices were applied. PR is not cost effective for intermediate risk Pca patients; however PR may be cost effective for younger or high risk Pca patients.

CONCLUSION

PR offers improved bladder and rectal dosimetry compared to PT but this does not specifically translate to improved GI/GU toxicities clinically. The robustness of PR plans is acceptable under specific conditions. PR is not cost effective for all Pca patients.

Quantification of the uncertainties of a biological model and their impact on variable RBE proton treatment plan optimization

PURPOSE

In proton radiation therapy, a relative biological effectiveness (RBE) equal to 1.1 is currently assumed, although biological experiments show that it is not constant. The purpose of this study was to quantify the uncertainties of a published biological model and explore their impact on variable RBE treatment plan (TP) optimization.

METHODS

Two patient cases with a high and a low (α/β)_x tumor were investigated. Firstly, intensity modulated proton therapy TPs assuming constant RBE were derived, and subsequently the variable RBE weighted dose (RWD), including the uncertainty originating in the fit to the experimental data and the uncertainty of the (α/β)_x, were calculated. Secondly, TPs optimized for uniform biological effect assuming a variable RBE were created using the worst case tissue specific (α/β)_x.

RESULTS

For the nasopharyngeal cancer patient, the uncertainty of (α/β)_x corresponded to a CTV D₉₈ confidence interval (CI) of (-2, +4)% while for the fit parameter CI was (-2,+1)%. For the standard fractionation prostate case the (α/β)_x CI was (-7,+5)% and the fit parameter CI was (-3,+3)%. For the hypofractionated case both CIs were (-1,+1)%. In both patient cases, the RBE in most organs at risk (OARs) was significantly underestimated by the constant RBE approximation, whereas the situation was not as definite in the target volumes. Overdosage of OARs was reduced by using the biological effect optimization.

CONCLUSION

For the two patient cases, the RWD uncertainty from the fit parameter in the biological model contributed non-negligibly to the total uncertainty, depending on the patient case and the organ. The presented optimization strategy is a basic method for robust biological effect optimization to reduce potential consequences caused by the (α/β)_x uncertainty.