A retrospective study on the prognostic value of preoperative neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in patients with primary small-cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Sex differences in survival following surgery for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The impact of sex on the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer remains unclear. Evidence supports that sex- based disparities in esophageal cancer survival could be attributed to sex- specific risk exposures, such as age at diagnosis, race, socioeconomic status, smoking, drinking, and histological type. The aim of our study is to investigate the role of sex disparities in survival of patients who underwent surgery for esophageal cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing literature in PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL from December 1966 to February 2023, was held. Studies that reported sex-related differences in survival outcomes of patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were identified. A total of 314 studies were included in the quantitative analysis. Statistically significant results derived from 1-year and 2-year overall survival pooled analysis with Relative Risk (RR) 0.93 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.90-0.97, I2 = 52.00) and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95, I2 = 0.00), respectively (RR < 1 = favorable for men). In the postoperative complications analysis, statistically significant results concerned anastomotic leak and heart complications, RR: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.01-1.16) and 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.75), respectively. Subgroup analysis was performed among studies with <200 and > 200 patients, histology types, study continent and publication year. Overall, sex tends to be an independent prognostic factor for esophageal carcinoma. However, unanimous results seem rather obscure when multivariable analysis and subgroup analysis occurred. More prospective studies and gender-specific protocols should be conducted to better understand the modifying role of sex in esophageal cancer prognosis.

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus: progression in the last decade

Primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE) is a highly malignant tumor that is diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy and immunohistochemistry. Because of its low incidence, a high degree of malignancy, and rapid progress, it is difficult to conduct large, randomized controlled trials and to establish a standard treatment plan for this disease. In recent years, several retrospective studies have been reported, and with the rise of emerging therapies, PSCCE has gradually become a focus of thoracic surgery. This paper reviews progress in the diagnosis and treatment of PSCCE in recent years.

Prognostic value of pretreatment inflammatory biomarkers in primary small cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Background

Growing evidence indicates that several inflammatory biomarkers may predict survival in patients with malignant tumors. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of pretreatment biomarkers in patients with primary small‐cell carcinoma of the esophagus (PSCCE).

Methods

A total of 73 PSCCE patients enrolled between January 2009 and December 2017 at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University. The total lymphocyte counts (TLC), neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR) prior to anticancer therapy were collected as inflammation biomarkers. The cutoff value was determined by Receiver operating characteristic (ROC). The Kaplan‐Meier method was utilized to analyze overall survival (OS). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify univariate and multivariate prognostic factors.

Results

Univariate analysis showed that high NLR group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.685; 95% CI: 1.001–2.838; P = 0.047) and high PLR group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.716; 95% CI: 1.039–2.834; P = 0.033) were associated with poor OS, and TLC was not correlated with OS. On multivariate analysis, high PLR (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.751; 95% CI: 1.042–2.945; P = 0.035) was an independent prognostic factor of unfavorable OS.

Conclusions

Pretreatment PLR and NLR are correlated with OS. These biomarkers are easily accessible, cost effective, and can serve as a marker to identify high‐risk patients for further designing personalized treatment and predicting treatment outcomes.