Use of electronic brachytherapy to deliver postsurgical adjuvant radiation therapy for endometrial cancer: a retrospective multicenter study

A dosimetric comparison of brachytherapy sources for endometrial cancer: an electronic brachytherapy and an iridium-192 source with multichannel cylinders and a three-dimensional technique

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Ir192 vaginal brachytherapy (IBT) is commonly used for patients with postoperative endometrial cancer (EC). We devised a novel multichannel vaginal applicator that could be equipped with an electronic brachytherapy (EBT) device. We aimed to explore the differences in physical parameters between the EBT and IBT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 20 EC patients who received adjuvant IBT from March 1, 2023, to May 1, 2023. Multichannel vaginal cylinders were used, and three-dimensional plans were generated. We designed an electronic multichannel vaginal applicator model and simulated a three-dimensional EBT plan. In order to ensure comparability, D90 of the CTV for the EBT plan was normalized to be equivalent to that of the IBT plan for the same patient.

RESULTS

Twenty EBT plans were compared with 20 IBT plans. Results showed, the mean D90 value of clinical target volume (CTV) was 536.1 cGy for both treatment plans. For the mean dose of CTV, the EBT was significantly greater (738.3 vs. 684.3 cGy, p = 0.000). There was no significant difference in CTV coverage between the EBT and IBT plans. For high-dose areas (V200% and V150%), the EBTs were significantly greater. There were no significant differences in the maximum doses to the vaginal mucosa between the EBT and IBT, whether at the apex or in the middle segment. For the bladder and rectum, both the low-dose area and high-dose area were significantly lower in the EBT plans. For the conformity index, there was no significant difference between the EBT and IBT plans. For the dose homogeneity index, the EBT value was lower.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, under the premise of a three-dimensional brachytherapy plan, for patients receiving multichannel vaginal applicator brachytherapy, compared with IBT, EBT could reduce the dose to the surrounding organs at risk while maintaining the dose in the target area.

Electronic brachytherapy for gynecological cancers - a systematic review

Background

The purpose of this manuscript is to provide an in-depth literature review of the management of endometrial and cervical cancers with electronic brachytherapy.

Materials and methods

An extensive literature search was performed and 9 articles were selected based on preset criteria.

Results

The reviewed studies provided dosimetric and clinical results. Patient populations were diverse and prescribed doses varied. When treatment plans were compared to those using cobalt 60 (⁶⁰Co) and iridium 192 (¹⁹²Ir) sources researchers found lower or equivalent doses in organs at risk while the doses at the applicator surface were significantly higher for electronic brachytherapy. In the eligible studies, a total of 72 patients received treatment with AxxentXoft vaginal applicator, 29 were treated with the Intrabeam vaginal applicator, and 8 with AxxentXoft cervical applicator.

Conclusions

All authors found that electronic brachytherapy was safe and well tolerated as higher mucosal doses did not present as adverse clinical effects. Electronic brachytherapy for gynecological cancers has the potential to achieve equivalent tumor control while minimizing bowel and urinary toxicity thus improving the quality of life. More clinical data is needed to stratify patients who would benefit the most.

Benchmarking failure mode and effects analysis of electronic brachytherapy with data from incident learning systems

PURPOSE

Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) is a prospective risk assessment tool for identifying failure modes in equipment or processes and informing the design of quality control systems. This work aims to benchmark the performance of FMEAs for electronic brachytherapy (eBT) of the skin and for breast by comparing predicted versus actual failure modes reported in multiple incident learning systems (ILS).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Two public and our institution's internal ILS were queried for Xoft Axxent eBT-related events over 9 years. The failure modes and Risk Priority Numbers (RPNs) were taken from FMEAs previously performed for Xoft eBT of nonmelanoma skin cancer and breast intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT). For each event, the treatment site and primary failure mode was compared with the failure modes and RPNs from that site's FMEA.

RESULTS

49 events involving Xoft eBT were identified. Thirty-one (63.3%) involved breast IORT, and 18 (36.7%) involved the skin. Three events could not be linked to an FMEA failure mode. In 87.7% of events, the primary failure mode ranked in the FMEA top 10 by RPNs. In 83.3% of skin events, the failure modes ranked in the top 10 by RPN or severity. In 90.3% of IORT events, the failure modes ranked within the top 10 by RPN or severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Evaluating FMEA failure modes against ILS data demonstrates that FMEA is effective at predicting failure modes but can be dependent on user experience. ILS data can improve FMEA by identifying potential failure modes and suggesting realistic occurrence, detectability, and severity values.

Adjuvant electronic brachytherapy for endometrial carcinoma: A 4-year outcomes report

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to report the outcomes of a single-center adjuvant electronic brachytherapy (e-BT) experience for patients with endometrial carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were retrospectively assessed. Intracavitary e-BT was applied through a cylindrical applicator (diameters 2.5-3.5 cm). e-BT single doses ranged between 4 and 7 Gy (EQD2 ∼ 6-12, α/β of 10 Gy and an relative biological effectiveness of 1.3) at 5-mm depth. Adverse events are reported at first week, 1-3 months, 3-12 months, 12-24 months, and >24 months. The overall survival, disease-free survival, distant disease control rate, and local control rate were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were assessed. The median age was 68 [48-86] years. External beam radiotherapy was added in n = 8 (27.6%) patients. Staging was 13.8% for T1a, 51.7% for T1b, 24.1% for T2, 6.9% for T3a, and 3.4% for T3b. Grading was G3 in 51.7% (n = 15), G2 in 20.7% (n = 6), and G1 in 27.6% (n = 8). Median followup was 47 months [5-88]. Overall Grade 1, 2, and 3 toxicity was 89.7% (n = 26), 17.2% (n = 5), and 6.9% (n = 2), respectively. No Grade 3 cystitis or proctitis or any Grade 4 or 5 toxicity occurred during followup. No local recurrences were detected. Estimated distant disease control rate was 92.1% (n = 2, distant metastasis at 7 and 11 months). Estimated 4-year overall survival was 84.8% (n = 4 events, two unrelated to disease) and disease-free survival was 84.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that e-BT resembles a very-low-toxicity profile and a high local control rate in the adjuvant scenario for patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Postoperative endometrial cancer treatments with electronic brachytherapy source

Purpose

This study is a dosimetric and acute toxicity comparison of endometrial cancer patients treated with either Axxent (Xoft, Inc., San José, CA, USA) electronic and interstitial brachytherapy versus interstitial high dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT).

Materials and Methods

Between 2015 and 2017, 94 patients with postoperative endometrial cancer were treated in our centre with the Axxent electronic brachytherapy (eBT) system. The V150 and V200 are evaluated prospectively for each plan. The mean age of patients was 65.9 years (age range 33–84 years), with different tumour staging. Of the 94 patients, 37 received exclusive adjuvant brachytherapy (25 Gy in five sessions); the remaining patients received external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with a regimen of 23 sessions of 2 Gy each to the entire pelvis, followed by eBT (15 Gy in three sessions). Additionally, the absorbed doses received by the organs at risk (OAR), urinary bladder, rectum and sigmoid colon were compared with HDRBT plans, evaluating D2cc, V50% and V35%. Median follow-up was done for each of the 94 patients to assess the toxicity of the treatment: vaginal mucosa toxicity, rectal and urinary toxicity; and results are presented for acute toxicity, toxicity at 1 month after the end of treatment and follow-up after 12 months for a portion of patients according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) toxicity criteria.

Results

The doses in OAR for eBT plans were lower than that for HDRBT plans, both Ir-192 and Co-60 plans, whose doses were similar. The dose in bladder with eBT was 63.8% of the prescribed dose for D2cc versus 70.1% for HDRBT Ir-192, for V50% was 7.2% versus 12.7% and for V35% was 15.2% versus 28.2%. In rectum the D2cc was 61.2% versus 68.4%, for V50% was 7.9% versus 14.3% and for V35% was 16.7% versus 32%. Results demonstrated lower doses to OAR in all eBT plans. Acute toxicity in eBT was very low in cases of mucositis, with only one case of toxicity greater than grade 1, rectal toxicity and urinary toxicity; results at 1 month are equally good, toxicity symptoms disappeared and no relapses have occurred to date.

Conclusions

The results of treatment with the Axxent eBT unit for 94 patients are very good, as no recurrence has been observed and the toxicity of the treatment is very low. The increase in V150 and V200 has not produced an increase in vaginal mucosa toxicity, and the doses in the OAR are lower than in the plans implemented for HDRBT with Ir-192 or Co-60. eBT is a good alternative to treat endometrial cancer in centres without conventional HDR availability. To date, there are limited published studies reporting on outcomes from patients treated with eBT.

Dosimetric comparison of brachytherapy sources for high-dose-rate treatment of endometrial cancer: (192)Ir, (60)Co and an electronic brachytherapy source

OBJECTIVE

To compare high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy systems with (192)Ir, (60)Co and electronic brachytherapy source (EBS) for treatment of endometrial cancers.

METHODS

Two additional plans were generated per patient fraction using a (60)Co source and Xoft-EBS on 10 selected patients, previously treated with a vaginal cylinder applicator using a (192)Ir source. Dose coverage of "PTV_CYLD", a 5-mm shell surrounding the cylinder, was evaluated. Doses to the following organs at risk (OARs) the rectum, bladder and sigmoid were evaluated in terms of V35% and V50%, the percentage volume receiving 35% and 50% of the prescription dose, respectively, and D2cm(3), the highest dose to a 2-cm(3) volume of an OAR.

RESULTS

Xoft-EBS reduces doses to all OARs in the lower dose range, but it does not always provide better sparing of the rectum in higher dose range as does evaluation using D2cm3. V150% and V200% for PTV_CYLD was up to four times greater for Xoft-EBS plans than for plans generated with (192)Ir or (60)Co. Surface mucosal (vaginal cylinder surface) doses were also 23% higher for Xoft-EBS than for (192)Ir or (60)Co plans.

CONCLUSION

Xoft-EBS is a suitable HDR source for vaginal applicator treatment with advantages of reducing radiation exposure to OARs in the lower dose range, while simultaneously increasing the vaginal mucosal dose.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This work presents newer knowledge in dosimetric comparison between (192)Ir or (60)Co and Xoft-EBS sources for endometrial vaginal cylinder HDR planning.

A comparison of the biological effective dose of 50-kV electronic brachytherapy with (192)Ir high-dose-rate brachytherapy for vaginal cuff irradiation

PURPOSE

Advantages for electronic brachytherapy (EBT) of the vaginal cuff include decreased physical dose to the bladder and rectum. Here we compare (192)Ir with EBT using biological effective dose (BED) to account for the different radiobiological effectiveness (RBE) predicted for low-energy x-rays.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifteen data sets from five consecutive postoperative endometrial cancer patients treated with EBT were analyzed. Treatment planning was performed using PLATO software. The dose was prescribed as 21Gy in three fractions to a depth of 0.5cm. Physical dose, BED(3), and BED(10) were evaluated for the mucosa, bladder, and rectum. An RBE value of 1.5 was used for BED calculations.

RESULTS

Mucosal physical dose is 28.4% greater with EBT (36.6 vs. 28.5Gy, p<0.05). However, the BED(10) is increased by 79.1% (55.6 vs. 99.6Gy, p<0.05) and the BED(3) by 71.5% (118.8 vs. 203.7Gy, p<0.05). The physical dose (dose to 50% volume of the organ) to the bladder (9.3 vs. 6.6Gy, p<0.05) and rectum (7.2 vs. 4.2Gy, p<0.05) are reduced with EBT. BED(3) to the rectum and bladder are also reduced but to a lesser extent (13 vs. 8.3Gy, p<0.05; 18.9 vs. 14.7Gy, p=0.06, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

BED takes into account the higher RBE of low-energy photons generated with EBT and provides a more accurate estimate of the biological effect. When using EBT, physical dose may underestimate the biological effect on the vaginal mucosa and overestimate the benefit for the bladder and rectum. Dose adjustment for EBT based on BED should be considered.