Prognostic value of selected preoperative inflammation-based scores in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy

Prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with non-metastatic and metastatic prostate cancer: A meta-analysis and systematic review

Objective

To analyze data available in the literature regarding a possible prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients stratified in non-metastatic and metastatic diseases.

Methods

A literature search process was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. In our meta-analysis, the pooled event rate estimated and the pooled hazard ratio were calculated using a random effect model.

Results

Forty-two articles were selected for our analysis. The pooled risk difference for non-organ confined PCa between high and low NLR cases was 0.06 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.03-0.15) and between high and low PLR cases increased to 0.30 (95% CI: 0.16-0.43). In non-metastatic PCa cases, the pooled hazard ratio for overall mortality between high and low NLR was 1.33 (95% CI: 0.78-1.88) and between high and low PLR was 1.47 (95% CI: 0.91-2.03), whereas in metastatic PCa cases, between high and low NLR was 1.79 (95% CI: 1.44-2.13) and between high and low PLR was 1.05 (95% CI: 0.87-1.24).

Conclusion

The prognostic values of NLR and PLR in terms of PCa characteristics and responses after treatment show a high level of heterogeneity of results among studies. These two ratios can represent the inflammatory and immunity status of the patient related to several conditions. A higher predictive value is related to a high NLR in terms of risk for overall mortality in metastatic PCa cases under systemic treatments.

The Negative Impact of Inflammation-Related Parameters in Prostate Cancer after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan (the MSUG94 Group)

Background and Objectives: We aimed to examine the relationship between the inflammation-related parameters, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and the pathological findings and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Materials and Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study of patients with PCa who underwent RARP at 10 institutes in Japan was conducted. This study enrolled 3195 patients. We focused on patients undergoing RARP who underwent the preoperative measurement of their inflammation-related parameters and who did not receive any neo- or adjuvant therapy. Data on the pre- and postoperative variables for the enrolled patients were obtained. The primary endpoint of this study was the association between BCR and the inflammation-related parameters after RARP. The secondary endpoint was the association between the inflammation-related parameters and the pathological diagnosis of PCa. Results: Data from 2429 patients with PCa who met the study's eligibility criteria were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 25.1 months. The inflammation-related parameters were divided into two groups, and cutoff values were determined based on the receiver operating characteristics. There were no statistically significant differences in biochemical recurrence-free survival for any of the parameters. In the univariate analysis, the NLR was predictive of pathological T3 and lymphovascular invasion; however, there were no significant differences in the multivariate analysis. Conclusions: The inflammation-related parameters did not significantly affect the incidence of BCR, at least among patients with PCa who underwent RARP.

A Novel Scoring System in Predicting Prognosis After Adjuvant FOLFOX Chemotherapy in Gastric Cancer

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) on prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) after adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy. Materials and Methods: Data on 749 GC patients who received operation after by adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy between January 2013 and December 2015 were enrolled in this study, retrospectively. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was employed to assess optimal cutoff thresholds for PNI and NLR. The GC subjects having a low PNI (<52.8) and high NLR (>1.79) received a score of 2. Any variable that met these standards was scored as 1. If none of the two variables met these standards of the patient was assigned a score of 0. Correlation between PNI-NLR score and GC stage was also evaluated. Results: The mean overall survival (OS) and 5-year OS rate for subjects with PNI-NLR = 2 was lower than those of subjects with PNI-NLR = 1, or 0 (40.9% vs. 52.1%, 76.4% [46.0 vs. 61.0], 68.0 months, p ≤ 0.001). In multivariate analyses, the PNI-NLR score (p ≤ 0.001) and WHO grade (p ≤ 0.001) showed potential to independently influence OS. Conclusions: High PNI-NLR scores can independently affect worse prognosis of GC. Thus, it can be utilized to differentiate low risk from high risk subjects.

Long-term and short-term prognostic value of the prognostic nutritional index in cancer: a narrative review

Objective

To perform a narrative review of the prognostic value of prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in cancers.

Background

Prognostic estimation greatly determines the treatment approach in various cancers. The PNI, calculated using the serum albumin level and total lymphocyte count, is a useful indicator to assess nutritional and immunological conditions. The PNI represents a low-cost, easy-to-perform, noninvasive, rapid, and standardized tool for estimating the prognosis of cancer. Many studies have aimed to clarify the prognostic value of PNI for various types of cancer.

Methods

We summarize the studies, particularly the systematic reviews and meta-analyses, that have examined the prognostic value of PNI in common cancers.

Conclusions

The relevant studies indicate that low PNI is an independent prognostic factor for decreasing overall survival in many types of cancers. Disease-free survival and progression-free survival were also associated with PNI in some types of cancer including lung cancer and renal cell carcinoma. Therefore, we suggest that the measurement of PNI is a useful method to identify cancer patients that have a worse prognosis and that the treatment strategy for these patients be adjusted accordingly. We hypothesize that maintaining good nutritional status during treatment may improve outcomes of various cancers.

Hematologic parameters are not predictors of upgrading or treatment in a racially diverse prospective study of men with prostate cancer on active surveillance

INTRODUCTION

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios (PLR) are useful clinical biomarkers for prognosis in several malignancies. Their predictive value has been less clearly demonstrated with prostate cancer (PCa), particularly, their utility within active surveillance (AS) protocols. We aim to evaluate NLR and PLR in AS patients.

METHODS

We identified 98 patients who met inclusion criteria in our cohort of 274 men diagnosed with PCa on AS. Patients were then categorized into high and low NLR and PLR groups.

RESULTS

The 2.5 and 5-year Gleason upgrading free probability for our high NLR cohort was 73.9%(CI 56.3% to 97.0%) and 46.2%(CI 22.4% to 95.1%) compared to 76.3%(CI 65.7% to 88.7%) and 61.7%(CI 47.7% to 80.0%) in the low NLR cohort(p = .73). The 2.5 and 5-year Gleason upgrading free probability for our High PLR cohort was 73.5%(CI 57.3% to 94.2%) and 60.1(CI 41.4% to 87.4%) compared to 76.8%(CI 65.8% to 89.65) and 58.1%(CI 42.2% to 80.1%) in our low PLR group(p = .41). A multivariant analysis demonstrated these groups were not significant predictors of upgrading or treatment.

CONCLUSION

Despite their usefulness in many types of malignancy, NLR and PLR were not predictors of upgrading or treatment in men on AS for localized PCa in our cohort.

Prognostic role of pretreatment derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in urological cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To investigate the possible prognostic role of pretreatment derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) in urological cancers, including renal cell carcinoma (RCC), prostate cancer (PCa), and urothelial cancer (UCa).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Eligible studies were comprehensively searched from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science, up to April 2019. Pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to assess the relationships.

RESULTS

A total of 12 studies embracing 6585 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Our results indicated that a higher pretreatment dNLR was associated with a decreased cancer-specific survival (CSS, HR 2.67, 95% CI 1.06-6.71, P = 0.037) and disease-free survival (DFS, HR 2.02, 95% CI 1.03-3.94, P = 0.040) in RCC, but not for overall survival (OS, HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.71-1.53, P = 0.818). A higher dNLR was associated with an inferior biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS, HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.00-2.87, P = 0.049) and OS (HR 1.35, 95% CI 1.20-1.51, P < 0.001) in PCa. A higher dNLR was associated with a worse OS (HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03-1.61, P = 0.029) and CSS (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.06-2.15, P = 0.024) in UCa, but not for DFS (HR 1.44, 95% CI 0.89-2.34, P = 0.139).

CONCLUSION

A higher dNLR level was negatively associated with OS, CSS, DFS and BRFS, forecasting that it could be an independent prognosis predictor in urological cancers.