Targeted therapy and immunotherapy for platinum-refractory advanced ovarian adenosquamous carcinoma: a case report

Differences between complex epithelial neoplasms of the ovary and high-grade serous ovarian cancer: a retrospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Complex epithelial neoplasms of the ovary (CENO), an uncommon pathological histotype in ovarian cancer, comprises adenosquamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma with metaplasia. Owing to the rarity of relevant reports, there are currently no statistics on outcomes based on large samples. Meanwhile high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common histotype in ovarian cancer which has a recognized first-line treatment regimen and poor prognosis. Thus, we aimed to determine the characteristics, prognosis, and independent predictors of survival for CENO, compare them with those of HGSOC and construct prognostic predictive models and nomograms.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to determine patients diagnosed with CENO or HGSOC from 2000 to 2017. Clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics were compared between these groups. Propensity score matching, Cox risk regression analysis, Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator regression analysis were employed for analyzing the data.

RESULTS

Here, 31,567 patients with HGSOC and 216 patients with CENO between 2000 and 2017 in the SEER database were enrolled. Age < 57 years, unmarried, and early-stage diseases were more common in patients with CENO than in those with HGSOC. Women with CENO were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (65.7% vs. 79.4%) but more likely to receive radiotherapy (6.0% vs. 0.8%; both p < 0.001) than those with HGSOC. Year of diagnosis, surgery status, number of primary tumors, grade, and FIGO stage were independent prognostic factors for overall and cancer-specific survival in CENO. Overall survival rates were significantly lower for CENO than for more malignant HGSOC.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, CENO was rare in ovarian cancer, while the year of diagnosis, surgery status, number of primary tumors, grade, and FIGO stage were independent prognostic factors. Compared with other common malignant ovarian tumors, CENO had a poor prognosis. Prognostic predictive models and nomograms had been determined to predict the individual survival rates of patients with CENO. These methods could improve evaluations of survival and therapeutic decisions for patients.

Are antiangiogenics a good 'partner' for immunotherapy in ovarian cancer?

Ovarian cancer (OC) is associated with poor survival because there are a limited number of effective therapies. Two processes key to OC progression, angiogenesis and immune evasion, act synergistically to promote tumor progression. Tumor-associated angiogenesis promotes immune evasion, and tumor-related immune responses in the peritoneal cavity and tumor microenvironment (TME) affect neovascular formation. Therefore, suppressing the angiogenic pathways could facilitate the arrival of immune effector cells and reduce the presence of myeloid cells involved in immune suppression. To date, clinical studies have shown significant benefits with antiangiogenic therapy as first-line therapy in OC, as well as in recurrent disease, and the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor bevacizumab is now an established therapy. Clinical data with immunomodulators in OC are more limited, but suggest that they could benefit some patients with recurrent disease. The preliminary results of two phase III trials have shown that the addition of immunomodulators to chemotherapy does not improve progression-free survival. For this reason, it could be interesting to look for synergistic effects between immunomodulators and other active drugs in OC. Since bevacizumab is approved for use in OC, and is tolerable when used in combination with immunotherapy in other indications, a number of clinical studies are underway to investigate the use of bevacizumab in combination with immunotherapeutic agents in OC. This strategy seeks to normalize the TME via the anti-VEGF actions of bevacizumab, while simultaneously stimulating the immune response via the immunotherapy. Results of these studies are awaited with interest.

Responses of metastatic primary fallopian tube carcinoma to pembrolizumab and nab-paclitaxel: A case report

RATIONALE

Primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) is an extremely rare but invasive malignancy with a dismal prognosis. Very few data exist on the salvage treatment for patients with PFTC. Here we report a case showing an impressive response to immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, which have never been reported before on patients with metastatic PFTC.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 42-year-old woman, who was diagnosed with PFTC in 2010, had been failed of multiple systemic therapies and antiangiogenic therapy because of the disease recurrence and progression.

DIAGNOSIS

Metastatic primary fallopian tube carcinoma.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent surgery in May 2010 and had multi-line chemotherapies plus an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) monoclonal antibody for about 9 years. Due to treatment failure the patient accepted the immunotherapy with the checkpoint inhibitor, pembrolizumab, combined with nab-paclitaxel from December 2018 to April 2019.

OUTCOMES

The patient showed a complete response after 6 cycles treatment. Thus far, the patient is taking pembrolizumab as maintenance and remains in good health.

LESSONS

Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy for treatment of PFTC may provide a positive antitumor effect in multiple metastatic lesions, but more clinical evidence is needed to confirm the efficacy and safety.

Combinatorial therapy of immune checkpoint and cancer pathways provides a novel perspective on ovarian cancer treatment

An increasing number of studies have reported that immunotherapy serves a significant role in ovarian cancer treatment. In recent years, blockade of checkpoint pathways, including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed death-1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4, has demonstrated significant clinical and preclinical benefits in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Additionally, tumor-associated angiogenesis and homologous recombination deficiency frequently occurs in patients with high-grade ovarian cancer, which makes cancer cells more susceptible to targeted therapies, including therapies targeting poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, and anti-angiogenic approaches. Additionally, targeted therapy has been associated with elevated PD-L1 expression in tumor cells, increased T-cell infiltration in tumors and dendritic cell stimulation. This synergistic effect provides the rationale for the joint application of targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Checkpoint blockades are able to elicit durable antitumor immune reactions and complement the transient antitumor effect of targeted therapies. The current review discusses the underlying mechanism of these therapies and novel developments in combined therapy for the treatment of ovarian cancer.