Intra-arterial chemotherapy improved survival of stage 2-3 gallbladder cancer after curative resection

Effect of different lymph node dissection methods on the number of lymph nodes detected and prognosis in gallbladder cancer

At present, the extent of lymph node dissection (LND) for radical gallbladder cancer (GBC) is still controversial, and there is no evidence that LND improves prognosis, however, the latest guidelines for GBC recommend that removal of more than 6 lymph nodes facilitates staging of regional lymph nodes. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of different LND methods on the number of lymph nodes detected and assess the prognostic factors during radical resection of GBC. This study retrospectively analyzed 133 patients (46 men and 87 women; average age: 64.01, range: 40-83 years) who underwent radical resection of GBC in a single center between July 2017 and July 2022, of which 41 underwent fusion lymph node dissection (FLND) and 92 underwent standard lymph node dissection (SLND). Baseline data, surgical results, number of LNDs, and follow-up data were analyzed. Each patient was followed up every 3 months. The total number of lymph nodes detected after the operation was 12.00 ± 6.95 versus 6.10 ± 4.71 (P < .05). The number of positive lymph nodes detected was (mean) 1.85 versus 0.78 and (percentage) 15.45% versus 12.83% (P < .05). Postoperative complications (8 vs 23, P > .05). The progression-free survival was 13 versus 8 months, the median survival time was 17 versus 9 months (P < .05). This study concluded that FLND can increase the detection rate of total lymph nodes and positive lymph nodes after surgery, which can prolong the survival time of patients.

The Effectiveness of the Combination of Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy for Biliary Tract Cancer: A Prospective Pilot Study

The standard treatment of unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC) has shown an insufficient response rate (RR). Our retrospective setting revealed that a combination therapy consisting of intra-arterial chemotherapy plus radiation therapy (IAC + RT) provided a high RR and long-term survival benefits in unresectable BTC. This prospective study aimed to test the effectiveness and safety of IAC + RT as the first-line therapy. The regimen included one-shot IAC with cisplatin, 3-6 months of reservoir IAC (5-FU and cisplatin, q/week), and 50.4 Gy of external radiation. The primary endpoints include the RR, disease control rate, and adverse event rate. This study included seven patients with unresectable BTC without distant metastasis, with five cases classified as stage 4. RT was completed in all cases, and the median number of reservoir IAC sessions was 16. The RR was 57.1% for imaging and 71.4% for clinical assessment, and the disease control rate was 100%, indicating a high antitumor efficacy, which allowed two cases to be transferred to surgery. Five cases of leukopenia and neutropenia; four cases of thrombocytopenia; and two cases of hemoglobin depletion, pancreatic enzyme elevation, and cholangitis were observed, but with no treatment-related deaths. This study revealed a very high antitumor effect with IAC + RT for some unresectable BTC, and it could be useful for conversion therapy.

Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Adjuvant Chemotherapy vs. No Chemotherapy for Patients with Carcinoma of Gallbladder Undergoing Curative Resection

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) has a dismal prognosis even after curative resection. The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with GBC undergoing curative resection in a randomized control trial (RCT).

METHODS

A single-center open-labeled prospective RCT was done from January 2012 to June 2018. R0 curative resected GBC patients were randomized in 1:1 to either surveillance alone (control group) or adjuvant chemotherapy (gemcitabine and cisplatin (GemCis group)) for 6 cycles. The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and toxicity profile.

RESULTS

On the evaluation of 362 patients with GBC, 50 patients were enrolled in each control or GemCis group. Per protocol (PP), it comprised 96 patients. The demographic and clinical profile was similar between the two groups except in the lower nodal stage where patients were higher in the control group (p = 0.01). Recurrences were similar between groups (control 44% vs GemCis 56%; p = 0.23). On the intention to treat (ITT), analyses of median DFS (not reached vs. 24 months, p = 0.14) and OS (not reached vs. 31 months, p = 0.10) were similar between groups. On PP, analyses of median DFS (not reached vs. 24 months, p = 0.16) and OS (not reached vs. 31 months, p = 0.09) were similar between groups. The common toxicity profile was hematological followed by gastrointestinal symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant GemCis therapy for 6 cycles does not improve DFS or OS than R0 surgery alone patients with GBC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02778308 ( https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ).

The Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Early-Stage Gallbladder Adenocarcinoma Depends on the Tumor Invasion Depth and Differentiation Level

BACKGROUND

Although the performance of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (ACRT) for resected gallbladder cancer may improve the survival for certain patients, its impact on the survival in early-stage resected gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC) patients remains underexplored. This study aimed to determine the ACRT effects on the survival of early-stage resected GBAC patients.

METHODS

Patients with early-stage resected GBAC diagnosed between 2010 and 2016 were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The covariables included gender, age, race, tumor differentiation, TNM stage (AJCC TNM staging system, 7th edition), adjuvant radiotherapy (ART), and adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT). The effects of ACRT on survival were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 1,586 patients with resected GBAC met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. Patients who received ACT were older, with poorer tumor differentiation or higher TNM stage (all p < 0.05), while patients who underwent ART were proved to be significantly correlated with poorer tumor differentiation (p = 0.010) and higher TNM stage (p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival (OS) showed that age (p < 0.001; HR, 2.039; 95% CI, 1.718-2.420), tumor grade (p < 0.001; HR, 1.887; 95% CI, 1.530-2.370), and AJCC 7th TNM stage (p < 0.001; HR, 1.417; 95% CI, 1.182-1.699) were independent prognostic risk factors. Interestingly, ART and ACT were not independently associated with improved OS in the overall cohort analysis. However, when patients were subgrouped according to tumor differentiation, ART (p = 0.049; HR, 0.639; 95% CI, 0.409-0.999) has been identified as a significant prognostic factor for grade III/IV patients. Meanwhile, ARC (p = 0.011; HR, 0.739; 95% CI, 0.586-0.932) was associated with improved OS among tumor stage II patients (p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

ACRT may have specific survival benefits for early-stage resected GBAC patients. ART can improve survival in patients with poor or absent tumor differentiation. Besides, patients with tumor invasion beyond muscularis (stage II tumor) may benefit from ACT. Our study provides supporting evidence for the clinical applications of ACRT in early-stage GBAC patients.

High Response Rate and Prolonged Survival of Unresectable Biliary Tract Cancer Treated With a New Combination Therapy Consisting of Intraarterial Chemotherapy Plus Radiotherapy

SYNOPSIS

A new combination therapy consisting of intraarterial chemotherapy plus radiotherapy was demonstrated to have the potential to improve the response rate and survival time in patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer.

PURPOSE

We retrospectively investigated the effectiveness and safety of a new combination therapy consisting of intraarterial chemotherapy plus radiation therapy (AI+RT), which may have the potential to improve unresectable biliary tract cancer (BTC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 52 BTC cases treated with AI+RT and analyzed the anti-tumor effect, survival time and adverse events. The AI+RT regimen consisted of one-shot intraarterial chemotherapy (AI) at the first angiography session, almost 6 months of reservoir AI (5-FU and cisplatin, q/week) and external radiation with a maximum dose of 50.6 Gy.

RESULTS

The response rate and disease control rate were high, at 40.4% and 96.2%, respectively, and the median overall and progression-free survival time were 463 and 431 days; thus, long-term survival was achieved. A univariate analysis identified 12 prognostic factors, and a performance status of 2 (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.82, p=0.02), jaundice (HR: 3.22, p<0.01), peritoneal dissemination (HR: 22.5, p<0.01), number of AI (HR: 0.35, p=0.01) and response to AI+RT (HR: 0.23, p<0.01) were extracted as significant prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis. The following: grade ≥3 adverse events occurred: leucopenia (11.5%), neutropenia (1.9%), anemia (15.4%), thrombocytopenia (11.5%), anorexia (3.8%), gastroduodenal ulcer (25.0%), and cholangitis (23.1%). There were no cases of treatment-related death.

CONCLUSIONS

AI+RT was shown to contribute to a high response rate and prolonged survival in patients with unresectable BTC. A sufficient number of AI and the response to this therapy were thought to be significant prognostic factors in patients receiving AI+RT. Advances in multidisciplinary therapies, such as AI+RT, which was described in the present study, are also considered to be important for the future.

Efficacy and safety of intra-arterial chemotherapy combined with intravesical chemotherapy for high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is the most common bladder cancer. Many studies have reported that intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) combined with intravesical chemotherapy (IVC) could effectively reduce the recurrence rate of NMIBC. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of IAC combined with IVC for patients with high-risk NMIBC.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, Web of Science, and 4 Chinese databases will be searched for eligible studies published without language restrictions from their inception up August 31, 2019. Subgroup analysis will be mainly explored in study design, types of chemotherapy drugs, and sample size. Cochrane Collaboration Risk of bias Tool will be applied in evaluating the quality of enrolled articles. Statistical analysis will be carried out by the Stata version 14.0 software.

RESULTS

The primary outcome is recurrence-free survival (RFS). The secondary outcomes include overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse reactions and toxicity grade coded by common toxicity criteria for adverse events.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study will provide latest evidence to verify whether IAC combined with IVC is more effective and safer than IVC alone for patients with high-risk NMIBC.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019146847.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of adjuvant therapy for patients with gallbladder cancer

BACKGROUND

Equipoise exists regarding the benefit of adjuvant therapy (AT) in patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC). The aim of this study was to critically review the available evidence for the effectiveness of AT in patients with GBC following surgery with curative intent.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed. Relevant studies were identified from Trip Database, BIREME-BVS, SciELO, Cochrane Central Register, WoS, MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS. Adjuvant therapies considered included chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and radiotherapy. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Subgorup analysis of patients with positive lymph node disease (PLND), positive surgical margin (PSM), or advanced stage (AS) were performed.

RESULTS

748 related articles were identified; 27 met the selection criteria (3 systematic reviews and 24 observational studies). Evidence provided was moderate, poor and very poor for chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, and radiotherapy. Existing evidence is not robust, but suggests certain benefits with AT in improving OS, especially in patients with PLND, PSM and AS.

CONCLUSION

Results do not provide strong evidence that AT is effective in patients who undergo resection for GBC. Subgroups of PLND and PSM may have a survival advantage. Future studies with appropriate internal validity and adequate number of patients are required to better answer this question.