Efficacy and safety analysis on dendritic cell-based vaccine-treated high-grade glioma patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Review: Neurological Complications From Therapies for Pediatric Brain Tumors

Surgery, chemotherapy and radiation have been the mainstay of pediatric brain tumor treatment over the past decades. Recently, new treatment modalities have emerged for the management of pediatric brain tumors. These therapies range from novel radiotherapy techniques and targeted immunotherapies to checkpoint inhibitors and T cell transfer therapies. These treatments are currently investigated with the goal of improving survival and decreasing morbidity. However, compared to traditional therapies, these novel modalities are not as well elucidated and similarly has the potential to cause significant short and long-term sequelae, impacting quality of life. Treatment complications are commonly mediated through direct drug toxicity or vascular, infectious, or autoimmune mechanisms, ranging from immune effector cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome with CART-cells to neuropathy with checkpoint inhibitors. Addressing treatment-induced complications is the focus of new trials, specifically improving neurocognitive outcomes. The aim of this review is to explore the pathophysiology underlying treatment related neurologic side effects, highlight associated complications, and describe the future direction of brain tumor protocols. Increasing awareness of these neurologic complications from novel therapies underscores the need for quality-of-life metrics and considerations in clinical trials to decrease associated treatment-induced morbidity.

Efficacy and safety of dendritic cell vaccines for patients with glioblastoma: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Dendritic cell (DC)-based vaccination has been suggested to be promising for glioblastoma. However, the evidence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is inconsistent. We aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of DC vaccine for glioblastoma via a meta-analysis of RCTs.

METHODS

Related randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified via a search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane's Library. We used a random-effect model to pool the results.

RESULTS

Six phase II RCTs with 347 patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent glioblastoma that underwent conventional treatments were included. Compared to the control group with placebo or blank treatment, DC vaccine was associated with significantly improved overall survival in patients with glioblastoma (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49 to 0.97, p = 0.03) with moderate heterogeneity (p for Cochrane's Q test = 0.07, I² = 51%). A trend of improved progression-free survival was also detected in patients allocated to the DC vaccine group compared to those in the control group (HR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.56 to 1.02, p = 0.07), with no significant heterogeneity (I² = 0%). Moreover, the incidence of adverse events was not significant between patients treated with DC vaccine or control (odds ratio = 1.52, 95% CI: 0.88 to 2.62, p = 0.14; I² = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence based on phase II RCTs suggests that DC vaccine may improve the survival of patients with glioblastoma. Large-scale RCTs are needed to validate the findings and determine the optimal regimens for DC vaccine.