Retrospective study of the efficacy and toxicity of lobaplatin in combined chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer

New imidazolidindionedioximes and their Pt(II) complexes: synthesis and investigation of their antitumoral activities on breast cancer cells

Breast cancer is one of the most common types of cancer worldwide and has the most lethality ratio for females among all cancers. Although current cancer therapeutics have made considerable advancements, there is still room for improvement in terms of efficacy. Many anticancer drugs have a risk of causing serious adverse effects due to their nonspecific cytotoxic effects on both tumor and healthy cells. New therapeutics might have a greater ability to kill cancer cells, reduce the volume of tumors, and improve overall therapy response rates. Herein, we report the efficient synthesis and characterization of three amphi vic-dioximes and their six novel mono-, which are extremely rare in platinum chemistry, and bisplatinum(II) complexes for breast cancer treatment. Antitumoral activities of Pt(II) complexes have been investigated on CCD-1079Sk healthy fibroblast cell line, MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cell lines. Cytotoxicity, cell cycle, and apoptotic assays were performed. All new Pt(II) complexes exhibited selective antiproliferative effects on breast cancer cells by showing less cytotoxicity to healthy cells than known anticancer drugs cisplatin and bicalutamide. In vitro studies show that these new Pt complexes have high anticancer and antiproliferative effects and may be new alternatives to existing anticancer drugs.

Platinum-based targeted chemotherapies and reversal of cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Lung cancer is the one of the most prevalent cancer in the world. It kills more people from cancer than any other cause and is especially common in underdeveloped nations. With 1.2 million instances, it is also the most prevalent cancer in men worldwide, making about 16.7% of the total cancer burden. Surgery is the main form of curative treatment for early-stage lung cancer. However, the majority of patients had incurable advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) recurrence after curative purpose surgery, which is indicative of the aggressiveness of the illness and the dismal outlook. The gold standard of treatment for NSCLC patients includes drug targeting of specific mutated genes drive in development of lung cancer. Furthermore, patients with advanced NSCLC and those with early-stage illness needing adjuvant therapy should use cisplatin as it is the more active platinum drug. So, this review encompasses the non-small cell lung cancer microenvironment, treatment approaches, and use of cisplatin as a first-line regimen for NSCLC, its mechanism of action, cisplatin resistance in NSCLC and also the prevention strategies to revert the drug resistance.

A prospective, open-label, multicenter phase IV clinical trial on the safety and efficacy of lobaplatin-based chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND

Since lobaplatin (LBP) has been approved to treat metastatic breast cancer in China, this study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LBP-based chemotherapy in clinical practice.

METHODS

This trial was a prospective, open-label, multicenter phase IV clinical trial that enrolled patients with unresectable locally advanced or recurrent/metastatic breast cancer from 34 sites between July 2013 and March 2017. Patients were treated with LBP monotherapy or in combination for four to six cycles. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR).

RESULTS

A total of 1179 patients were analyzed; 59 (5.0%) were treated with LBP alone, 134 (11.4%) with LBP plus paclitaxel, 263 (22.3%) with LBP plus docetaxel, 237 (20.1%) with LBP plus gemcitabine, 403 (34.2%) with LBP plus vinorelbine, and 83 (7.0%) with other LBP-based regimens. The overall incidence of adverse events (AEs) was 95.2%, and 57.9% of patients had grade >3 AEs. The most common grade >3 AEs were neutropenia (43.9%), leukopenia (39.4%), anemia (17.8%), and thrombopenia (17.7%). LBP monotherapy showed the lowest incidence of grade >3 AEs (39.0%), followed by LBP plus docetaxel (52.9%), LBP plus paclitaxel (59.0%), LBP plus vinorelbine (62.5%), and LBP plus gemcitabine (62.9%). The ORR and DCR were 36.8 and 77.0%, respectively. The median PFS was 5.5 months (95% confidence interval: 5.2-5.9).

CONCLUSION

LBP-based chemotherapy shows favorable efficacy in patients with advanced breast cancer, with manageable safety profile.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was registered with ChiCTR.org.cn, ChiCTR-ONC-13003471.

Application of Approved Cisplatin Derivatives in Combination Therapy against Different Cancer Diseases

The problems with anticancer therapy are resistance and toxicity. From 3000 Cisplatin derivatives tested as antitumor agents, most of them have been rejected, due to toxicity. The aim of current study is the comparison of therapeutic combinations of the currently applied in clinical practice: Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Oxaliplatin, Nedaplatin, Lobaplatin, Heptaplatin, and Satraplatin. The literature data show that the strategies for the development of platinum anticancer agents and bypassing of resistance to Cisplatin derivatives and their toxicity are: combination therapy, Pt IV prodrugs, the targeted nanocarriers. The very important strategy for the improvement of the antitumor effect against different cancers is synergistic combination of Cisplatin derivatives with: (1) anticancer agents-Fluorouracil, Gemcitabine, Cytarabine, Fludarabine, Pemetrexed, Ifosfamide, Irinotecan, Topotecan, Etoposide, Amrubicin, Doxorubicin, Epirubicin, Vinorelbine, Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, Nab-Paclitaxel; (2) modulators of resistant mechanisms; (3) signaling protein inhibitors-Erlotinib; Bortezomib; Everolimus; (4) and immunotherapeutic drugs-Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Bevacizumab, Cemiplimab, Cetuximab, Durvalumab, Erlotinib, Imatinib, Necitumumab, Nimotuzumab, Nivolumab, Onartuzumab, Panitumumab, Pembrolizumab, Rilotumumab, Trastuzumab, Tremelimumab, and Sintilimab. An important approach for overcoming the drug resistance and reduction of toxicity of Cisplatin derivatives is the application of nanocarriers (polymers and liposomes), which provide improved targeted delivery, increased intracellular penetration, selective accumulation in tumor tissue, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy. The advantages of combination therapy are maximum removal of tumor cells in different phases; prevention of resistance; inhibition of the adaptation of tumor cells and their mutations; and reduction of toxicity.

Multicentre Comparison of the Toxicity and Effectiveness of Lobaplatin-Based Versus Cisplatin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Oesophageal Carcinoma

Objectives

Lobaplatin (LBP), a third-generation cisplatin derivative has shown promising activity and few side effects in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in previous reports. We compared LBP plus docetaxel with cisplatin plus docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy in ESCC patients to determine the effects on overall survival (OS) and toxicity.

Methods

A multicentre retrospective study was performed using propensity score matching (PSM) with the Medicine-LinkDoc database. Patients diagnosed with stage II-III ESCC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (cisplatin plus docetaxel or LBP plus docetaxel) between January 2013 and December 2016 were selected from 6 centres in China.

Results

There were 733 eligible ESCC patients. After PSM (1:1 ratio), 458 patients remained. The 5-year OS rates of the cisplatin and LBP groups were 25.9% and 23.6%, respectively (P=0.457). Leukopenia (grade III-IV/I-II/0: 2.62%/34.5%/59.39% versus 5.24%/43.23%/45.85%; P=0.0176), neutropenia (grade III-IV/I-II/0: 6.55%/37.56%/51.09% versus 4.37%/53.28%/36.34%; P=0.0015), nephrotoxicity (grade I-II/0: 13.97%/76.86% versus 26.64%/65.94%; P<0.001) and gastrointestinal symptoms (grade III-IV/I-II/0: 2.18%/54.59%/32.31% versus 6.55%/65.07%/20.88%; P=0.0011) were more frequent in the cisplatin group.

Conclusions

Compared with cisplatin plus docetaxel, LBP plus docetaxel provided the same survival benefits but lower side effects of myelosuppression and gastrointestinal symptoms. LBP plus docetaxel might be a choice for adjuvant chemotherapy in ESCC.

Clinical Trial Registration

Lobaplatin or Cisplatin in Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Oesophageal Carcinoma, identifier NCT03413436.

A study of the efficacy and tolerability of capecitabine and lobaplatin in advanced HER-2 negative breast cancer patients

Background

This study sought to examine the efficacy and adverse reactions of capecitabine and lobaplatin in the treatment of metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative breast cancer (BC).

Methods

This retrospective study examined 45 patients diagnosed with advanced HER-2 negative BC. Patients were enrolled in this study from November 2015 to June 2019. The patients received capecitabine and lobaplatin combination therapy. The therapeutic efficacy and side effects were evaluated after at least 2 cycles of treatment.

Results

Therapeutic efficacy and adverse reactions were evaluated in 38 patients, comprising 12 cases of partial response (PR), 19 cases of stable disease (SD), and 7 cases of progressive disease (PD). Among these, 3 patients required treatment delays or dose reductions for subsequent cycles, and 2 patients discontinued treatment. The overall response rate (ORR) was 31.58% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 81.58%. The ORR and DCR for hormone receptor positive, HER-2 negative (HR+/HER-2−) and triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients were 31.82% and 31.25%, and 86.36% and 75%, respectively. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 8 months, 6 months, and 6 months in patients receiving the therapeutics as a first-line, second-line, or third-line and beyond treatment, respectively. The main side effects were myelosuppression, including granulocytopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia. Among patients with grade 1 side effects or above, 28 patients (73.68%) had myelosuppression, and 13 patients (34.21%) had gastrointestinal reactions. Further, we investigated the association between side effects and clinical outcomes, and found that PFS was increased in patients with myelosuppression and gastrointestinal reactions.

Conclusions

Capecitabine and lobaplatin combination therapy was effective and well tolerated among patients with advanced HER-2 negative BC.

The timing of targeted therapy initiation in metastatic sarcoma as an adjuvant to first-line chemotherapy or a second-line agent

58 cases of metastatic sarcoma were reviewed retrospectively in order to compare the efficacy and safety of concurrent (n=24, group A) versus sequential (n=34, group B) use of chemotherapy and targeted therapy in metastatic sarcoma. Progression-free survival (PFS) 1 was defined as the duration between initiation of first-line treatment to disease progression or recurrence. PFS' was defined as the duration between initiation of first-line treatment to the failure of chemotherapy and targeted therapy, and overall survival (OS) was defined as the duration between initiation of first-line treatment to the date of last follow-up or death. The results revealed that patients in group A possessed a higher tumor burden compared to those in group B (P=0.049). Survival curves revealed that the median PFS1 (15.2 vs. 5.4 months, P=0.000), median PFS' (15.2 vs. 10.8 months, P=0.049), and median OS (42.3 vs. 25.3 months, P=0.041) of subjects in group A were remarkably longer than those of group B. Subgroup analysis showed that patients in group A experienced more favorable PFS1 (15.2 vs. 3 months, P=0.000), PFS' (15.2 vs. 5.8 months, P=0.003), and OS (35.2 vs. 15.7 months, P=0.011) than those in group B, with findings especially prominent in patients with tumor burden ≥ 10 cm in comparison to patients with tumor burden < 10 cm (P ≥ 0.05). All grades of leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, and oral mucositis were more frequently diagnosed in patients of group A compared to those of group B. However, there were no significant differences between the rates of Grade 3-4 adverse events between the two groups. This investigation suggests that the concurrent use of targeted therapy and chemotherapy may be useful and safe as a first-line treatment in patients with metastatic sarcoma who possess a high tumor burden.

Machine learning integrated ensemble of feature selection methods followed by survival analysis for predicting breast cancer subtype specific miRNA biomarkers

Breast cancer is the second leading cancer type among females. In this regard, it is found that microRNAs play an important role by regulating the gene expressions at the post-transcriptional phase. However, identification of the most influencing miRNAs in breast cancer subtypes is a challenging task, while the recent advancement in Next Generation Sequencing techniques allows analyzing high throughput expression data of miRNAs. Thus, we have conducted this research with the help of NGS data of breast cancer in order to identify the most significant miRNA biomarkers. The selected miRNA biomarkers are highly associated with the multiple breast cancer subtypes. For this purpose, a two-phase technique, called Machine Learning Integrated Ensemble of Feature Selection Methods, followed by survival analysis, is proposed. In the first phase, we have selected the best among seven machine learning techniques based on classification accuracy using the entire set of features (in this case miRNAs). Subsequently, eight different feature selection methods are used separately in order to rank the features and validate each set of top features using the selected machine learning technique by considering a multi-class classification task of the breast cancer subtypes. In the second phase, based on the classification accuracy values, the top features from each feature selection method are considered to make an ensemble to provide further categorization of the miRNAs as 8*, 7* up to 1*. The 8* miRNAs provide the highest average classification accuracy of 86% after 10-fold cross-validation. Thereafter, 27 miRNAs are identified from the list that is confined within 8* to 4* miRNAs based on their importance in survival for breast cancer subtypes using Cox regression based survival analysis. Moreover, expression analysis, regulatory network analysis, protein-protein interaction analysis, KEGG pathway and gene ontology enrichment analysis are performed in order to validate biological significance of the proposed solution. Additionally, we have prepared a miRNA-protein-drug interaction network to identify possible drug for the selected miRNAs. Thus, our findings may be considered during a clinical trial for the treatment of breast cancer patients.

Comparison of the therapeutic effects of lobaplatin and carboplatin on retinoblastoma in vitro and in vivo

Retinoblastoma (RB) is one of the most aggressive malignancies affecting infants and children. Platinum drugs are commonly used in the treatment of RB; however, their efficacy is often compromised by drug resistance and severe toxicity. The present study aimed to investigate and compare the toxicity and antitumor activity of the third-generation platinum drugs, carboplatin and lobaplatin, in vitro and in vivo. The Y79 RB cell line was treated with carboplatin or lobaplatin in vitro and then used to establish xenografts in immunodeficient nude mice in vivo; the effects of pharmacological doses of these drugs were then assessed. High concentrations of carboplatin and lobaplatin markedly inhibited Y79 RB cell proliferation in vitro. In addition, the lobaplatin group exhibited higher proportions of early-stage apoptotic cells than the carboplatin group, while no significant differences in the proportions of cells in the S phase were observed between the 2 groups, as shown by flow cytometry. Significant changes in the E2F1/Cdc25a/Cdk2 pathway in the RB cells were detected by RNA-seq following carboplatin or lobaplatin intervention. RT-qPCR, immunofluorescence and immunohistochemical analyses in vivo and in vitro demonstrated that the trends of drug-induced inhibition of tumor pathological changes may have been regulated through the E2F1/Cdc25a/Cdk2 pathway, and that lobaplatin was more effective than carboplatin in controlling tumors in vivo. On the whole, the findings of the present study demonstrate that lobaplatin is associated with lower cytotoxicity and exerts more prominent therapeutic effects than carboplatin on Y79 RB cells in vitro and in mice in vivo.