Prognostic Value of Plasma HER2 Gene Copy Number in HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer Treated with First-Line Trastuzumab

Endocrine therapy plus HER2-targeted therapy, another favorable option for HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer patients

Advanced breast cancer (ABC) that is positive for hormone receptors (HRs) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a cancer subtype with distinctive characteristics. The primary treatment guidelines suggest that a combination therapy comprising anti-HER2 therapy and chemotherapy should be administered as the initial treatment for HR-positive/ HER2-positive (HR+/HER2+) ABC. However, crosstalk between the HR and HER2 pathways can partially account for the resistance of HR+/HER2+ disease to HER2-targeted therapy. This, in turn, provides a rationale for the concomitant administration of HER2-targeted therapy and endocrine therapy (ET). Many clinical studies have confirmed that the combination of HER2-targeted therapy and ET as a first-line treatment is not inferior to the combination of HER2-targeted therapy and chemotherapy, and support its use as a first-line treatment choice for HR+/HER2+ ABC. Other drugs, such as antibody-drug conjugates, cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-protein kinase B (AKT)-mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors, and programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1 inhibitors, may also improve the prognosis of patients with breast cancer by blocking signaling pathways associated with tumor proliferation and break new ground for the treatment of HR+/HER2+ ABC.

Can we define breast cancer HER2 status by liquid biopsy?

Human Epidermal growth factor Receptor 2 (HER2) assessment is crucial for breast cancer treatment. Therapeutic decisions for recurrent cases often rely on primary tumor status. However, mounting evidence suggests that tumors show dynamic changes and up to 10% of breast cancer modify their initial status during progression. It is still debated whether these changes reflect a biological evolution of the disease or are secondary to primary tumor heterogeneity. Certainly, repeating HER2 assessment during breast cancer trajectory is important for the increasing availability of effective anti-HER2 drugs. In response to this need, circulating biomarkers such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offer the potential to safely and repeatedly assess HER2 status over time. This chapter outlines current methods for testing HER2 in CTCs and ctDNA, and reviews clinical trials evaluating its prognostic and predictive value in patients with breast cancer, as well as recent advances in the field.

Molecular and clinicopathological characteristics of ERBB2 gene fusions in 32,131 Chinese patients with solid tumors

ERBB2 amplification is one of the most important and mature targets for HER2-targeted drug therapy. Somatic mutations of ERBB2 in the tyrosine kinase domain have been studied extensively, and play a role in response to anti-HER2 therapy among different cancer types. However, ERBB2 fusion has not been got attention and its relevance to HER2-targeted therapy is unclear. We comprehensively characterized ERBB2 fusions from next-generation sequencing (NGS) data between May 2018 and October 2021 in 32,131 various solid tumors. Among the tumors, 0.28% harbored ERBB2 fusions, which occurred more commonly in gastroesophageal junction cancer (3.12%; 3/96), breast cancer (1.89%; 8/422), urothelial carcinoma (1.72%; 1/58), and gastric cancer (1.60%; 23/1,437). Our population presented with a median age of 65 years (range 28 to 88 years), a high proportion of men (55 men vs 34 women; 61.80%). Among the patients with ERBB2 fusions, TP53 (82%), APC (18%), and CDK4 (15%) were the top3 co-mutant genes. What’s more, most patients with ERBB2 fusion also had ERBB2 amplification (75.28%; 67/89), which was similar to the data in the TCGA database (88.00%; 44/50). Furthermore, TCGA database shows that patients with ERBB2 fusions in pan-cancer had a worse prognosis than those without ERBB2 fusions, as well as in breast cancer. Besides, ERBB2 amplification combined with ERBB2 fusion had worse prognosis than those with only ERBB2 amplification. ERBB2 fusion may interfere the effect of anti-HER2-targeted antibody drugs and influence the prognosis of patients with ERBB2 amplification. Prospective clinical trials are warranted to confirm the results in the future.

Clinical Utility of Liquid Biopsy-Based Actionable Mutations Detected via ddPCR

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death worldwide and remains a major public health challenge. The introduction of more sensitive and powerful technologies has permitted the appearance of new tumor-specific molecular aberrations with a significant cancer management improvement. Therefore, molecular pathology profiling has become fundamental not only to guide tumor diagnosis and prognosis but also to assist with therapeutic decisions in daily practice. Although tumor biopsies continue to be mandatory in cancer diagnosis and classification, several studies have demonstrated that liquid biopsies could be used as a potential tool for the detection of cancer-specific biomarkers. One of the main advantages is that circulating free DNA (cfDNA) provides information about intra-tumoral heterogeneity, reflecting dynamic changes in tumor burden. This minimally invasive tool has become an accurate and reliable instrument for monitoring cancer genetics. However, implementing liquid biopsies across the clinical practice is still ongoing. The main challenge is to detect genomic alterations at low allele fractions. Droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) is a powerful approach that can overcome this issue due to its high sensitivity and specificity. Here we explore the real-world clinical utility of the liquid biopsy ddPCR assays in the most diagnosed cancer subtypes.

Analysis of plasma HER2 copy number in cell-free DNA of breast cancer patients: a comparison with HER2 extracellular domain protein level in serum

BACKGROUND

HER2 (human epidermal growth factor receptor 2) status has been evaluated in breast cancer (BC) tissues by immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization. We evaluated HER2 copy number (CN) assay in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from blood samples and compared it with protein measurements of HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) in serum.

METHODS

Serum HER2-ECD levels were measured by chemi-luminescence immunoassay using anti-HER2 monoclonal antibodies. Analyses were performed on 120 cases of primary BC, 30 cases of metastatic BC and 34 cases treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). This study was approved by Medical Research Review Advancement No. 1857 for Kumamoto University.

RESULTS

There was a positive correlation between HER2-CN ratios and HER2-ECD levels, in primary (n = 54) and metastatic (n = 30) HER2-positive BC (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). HER2-ECD levels were significantly higher in patients with a larger number of metastatic sites (P = 0.02). The usefulness of HER2 levels in discriminating primary and metastatic HER2-positive BC evaluated by ROC curve analysis was better in the HER2-ECD assay than in the HER2-CN assay. In 34 patients who received NAC, there was a small decrease in HER2-CN ratios between before and after NAC (P = 0.10), while there was an obvious decrease in HER2-ECD levels between before and after NAC (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Compared to HER2-ECD levels, the clinical usefulness of HER2-CN ratio was somewhat inferior. Improved measurement methods and further examination of the association with long-term prognosis and the response to anti-HER2 treatment analyzed by HER2-CN and HER2-ECD assay are required.

Which Is the Most Appropriate PI3K Inhibitor for Breast Cancer Patients with or without PIK3CA Status Mutant? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Objective

The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway is a promising treatment target for patients with breast cancer (BC). Our study aimed to evaluate the most effective and safe PI3K inhibitor for patients with BC, especially in PIK3CA mutation.

Methods

Electronics databases were systematically searched from their inception to June 2020 for published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PI3K inhibitor therapy versus non-PI3K inhibitor therapy in patients with BC that mentioned or reported data of PIK3CA-mutated patient subgroups. Eligible RCTs had to report at least one of the following clinical outcomes: objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), or adverse events (AE).

Results

Nine eligible RCTs involving 3872 BC patients and four PI3K inhibitor therapy arms (i.e., alpelisib, buparlisib, pictilisib, and taselisib) were included. In evaluating ORR, beneficial significant results of PI3K inhibitors could be found in the PIK3CA mutated group (1.952, 1.012 to 3.766); analogous results could also be found in 6m-PFS (1.519, 1.144 to 2.018) and PFS from HR data (-0.346, -0.525 to -0.168). From pairwise and network meta-analyses, buparlisib showed the most favorable ORR, as it was significantly different from fulvestrant in the PIK3CA-mutated patient group (2.80, 1.56 to 5.03). Alpelisib ranked first in the assessment of 6m-PFS and was significantly different from fulvestrant in the PIK3CA-mutated group (2.33, 1.45 to 3.44). The above PI3K inhibitors had good safety with few serious AEs. PROSPERO registration CRD42020193932.

Conclusion

The PI3K inhibitors alpelisib and buparlisib appear to have superior efficacy and safety therapeutic choices for patients with BC, especially in PIK3CA-mutated patients.