Evaluating Elacestrant in the Management of ER-Positive, HER2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer: Evidence to Date

Standardized molecular pathology workflow for ctDNA-based ESR1 testing in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer

Mutations in the estrogen receptor alpha gene (ESR1) can lead to resistance to endocrine therapy (ET) in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/ HER2- metastatic breast cancer (MBC). ESR1 mutations can be detected in up to 40 % of patients pretreated with ET in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Data from prospective randomized trials highlight those patients with HR+/HER2- MBC with detectable ESR1 mutations experience better outcomes when receiving novel selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs). There is a high need for optimizing ESR1 testing strategies on liquid biopsy samples in HR+/HER2- MBC, including a hugh quality workflow implementation and molecular pathology reporting standardization. Our manuscript aims to elucidate the clinical and biological rationale for ESR1 testing in MBC, while critically examining the currently available guidelines and recommendations for this specific type of molecular testing on ctDNA. The objective will extend to the critical aspects of harmonization and standardization, specifically focusing on the pathology laboratory workflow. Finally, we propose a clear and comprehensive model for reporting ESR1 testing results on ctDNA in HR+/HER2- MBC.

Targeting Unique Ligand Binding Domain Structural Features Downregulates DKK1 in Y537S ESR1 Mutant Breast Cancer Cells

Resistance to endocrine therapies remains a major clinical hurdle in breast cancer. Mutations to estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) arise after continued therapeutic pressure. Next generation selective estrogen receptor modulators and degraders/downregulators (SERMs and SERDs) show clinical efficacy, but responses are often non-durable. A tyrosine to serine point mutation at position 537 in the ERα ligand binding domain (LBD) is among the most common and most pathogenic alteration in this setting. It enables endocrine therapy resistance by superceding intrinsic structural-energetic gatekeepers of ER hormone-dependence, it enhances metastatic burden by enabling neomorphic ER-dependent transcriptional programs, and it resists SERM and SERD inhibiton by reducing their binding affinities and abilities to antagonize transcriptional coregulator binding. However, a subset of SERMs and SERDs can achieve efficacy by adopting poses that force the mutation to engage in a new interaction that favors the therapeutic receptor antagonist conformation. We previously described a chemically unconventional SERM, T6I-29, that demonstrates significant anti-proliferative activities in Y537S ERα breast cancer cells. Here, we use a comprehensive suite of structural-biochemical, in vitro, and in vivo approaches to better T6I-29's activities in breast cancer cells harboring Y537S ERα. RNA sequencing in cells treated with T6I-29 reveals a neomorphic downregulation of DKK1, a secreted glycoprotein known to play oncogenic roles in other cancers. Importantly, we find that DKK1 is significantly enriched in ER+ breast cancer plasma compared to healthy controls. This study shows how new SERMs and SERDs can identify new therapeutic pathways in endocrine-resistant ER+ breast cancers.

Targeting aberrant fatty acid synthesis and storage in endocrine resistant breast cancer cells

Background

Lipid metabolic reprogramming is an emerging characteristic of endocrine therapy (ET) resistance in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. We explored changes in lipid metabolism in ER+ breast cancer cell lines following acquired resistance to common endocrine treatments and tested efficacy of an inhibitor in current clinical trials.

Methods

We derived ER+ breast cancer cell lines resistant to Tamoxifen (TamR), Fulvestrant (FulvR), and long-term estrogen withdrawal (EWD). Parental and ET resistant cells were subjected to global gene expression and unbiased lipidomic profiling. Lipid storage changes were assessed via neutral lipid staining with Oil Red O (ORO). The impact of the fatty acid synthase (FASN) inhibitor TVB-2640 on the growth and lipid storage of these cell lines was evaluated. Additionally, 13 C 2 -acetate tracing was used to examine FASN activity in parental and ET resistant cells in the absence or presence of TVB-2640.

Results

Compared to parental cells, lipid metabolism and processing pathways were notably enriched in ET resistant cells, which exhibited distinct lipidomes characterized by increased triglyceride and polyunsaturated FA (PUFA) species. ET-resistant cells displayed enhanced cytoplasmic lipid droplets. Increased FASN protein levels were observed in ET-resistant cells, and TVB-2640 effectively inhibited FASN activity. FASN inhibition reduced cell growth in some but not all cell lines and ET resistance types and did not correlate to lipid storage reduction. 13 C 2 -acetate tracing confirmed reduced palmitate synthesis and enhanced PUFA synthesis in ET-resistant cells, especially when combined with FulvR.

Conclusion

ET resistant breast cancer cells exhibit a shift towards enhanced triglyceride storage and complex lipids enriched with PUFA acyl chains. While targeting FASN alongside ET may not fully overcome ET resistance in our models, focusing on the unique lipid metabolic dependencies, such as PUFA pathways, may present a promising alternative strategy for treating ET resistant breast cancer.

Targeting Unique Ligand Binding Domain Structural Features Downregulates DKK1 in Y537S ESR1 Mutant Breast Cancer Cells

Resistance to endocrine therapies remains a major clinical hurdle in breast cancer. Mutations to estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) arise after continued therapeutic pressure. Next generation selective estrogen receptor modulators and degraders/downregulators (SERMs and SERDs) show clinical efficacy, but responses are often non-durable. A tyrosine to serine point mutation at position 537 in the ERα ligand binding domain (LBD) is among the most common and most pathogenic alteration in this setting. It enables endocrine therapy resistance by superceding intrinsic structural-energetic gatekeepers of ER hormone-dependence, it enhances metastatic burden by enabling neomorphic ER-dependent transcriptional programs, and it resists SERM and SERD inhibiton by reducing their binding affinities and abilities to antagonize transcriptional coregulator binding. However, a subset of SERMs and SERDs can achieve efficacy by adopting poses that force the mutation to engage in a new interaction that favors the therapeutic receptor antagonist conformation. We previously described a chemically unconventional SERM, T6I-29, that demonstrates significant anti-proliferative activities in Y537S ERα breast cancer cells. Here, we use a comprehensive suite of structural-biochemical, in vitro, and in vivo approaches to better T6I-29's activities in breast cancer cells harboring Y537S ERα. RNA sequencing in cells treated with T6I-29 reveals a neomorphic downregulation of DKK1, a secreted glycoprotein known to play oncogenic roles in other cancers. Importantly, we find that DKK1 is significantly enriched in ER+ breast cancer plasma compared to healthy controls. This study shows how new SERMs and SERDs can identify new therapeutic pathways in endocrine-resistant ER+ breast cancers.

Novel oral selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) to target hormone receptor positive breast cancer: elacestrant as the poster-child

INTRODUCTION

Estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer is the most common breast cancer subtype, and therapeutic management relies primarily on inhibiting ER signaling. In the metastatic setting, ER signaling is typically targeted by selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) or aromatase inhibitors (AIs), the latter of which prevent estrogen production. Activating ESR1 mutations are among the most common emergent breast cancer mutations and confer resistance to AIs.

AREAS COVERED

Until 2023, fulvestrant was the only approved SERD; fulvestrant is administered intramuscularly, and in some cases may also have limited efficacy in the setting of certain ESR1 mutations. In 2023, the first oral SERD, elacestrant, was approved for use in ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- advanced breast cancer and represents a new class of therapeutic options. While the initial approval was as monotherapy, ongoing studies are evaluating elacestrant (as well as other oral SERDs) in combination with other therapies including CDK4/6 inhibitors and PI3K inhibitors, which parallels the current combination uses of fulvestrant.

EXPERT OPINION

Elacestrant's recent approval sheds light on the use of biomarkers such as ESR1 to gauge a tumor's endocrine sensitivity. Ongoing therapeutic and correlative biomarker studies will offer new insight and expanding treatment options for patients with advanced breast cancer.

Estrogen Receptor Alpha Mutations, Truncations, Heterodimers, and Therapies

Annual breast cancer (BCa) deaths have declined since its apex in 1989 concomitant with widespread adoption of hormone therapies that target estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), the prominent nuclear receptor expressed in ∼80% of BCa. However, up to ∼50% of patients who are ER+ with high-risk disease experience post endocrine therapy relapse and metastasis to distant organs. The vast majority of BCa mortality occurs in this setting, highlighting the inadequacy of current therapies. Genomic abnormalities to ESR1, the gene encoding ERα, emerge under prolonged selective pressure to enable endocrine therapy resistance. These genetic lesions include focal gene amplifications, hotspot missense mutations in the ligand binding domain, truncations, fusions, and complex interactions with other nuclear receptors. Tumor cells utilize aberrant ERα activity to proliferate, spread, and evade therapy in BCa as well as other cancers. Cutting edge studies on ERα structural and transcriptional relationships are being harnessed to produce new therapies that have shown benefits in patients with ESR1 hotspot mutations. In this review we discuss the history of ERα, current research unlocking unknown aspects of ERα signaling including the structural basis for receptor antagonism, and future directions of ESR1 investigation. In addition, we discuss the development of endocrine therapies from their inception to present day and survey new avenues of drug development to improve pharmaceutical profiles, targeting, and efficacy.

Therapies for the Treatment of Advanced/Metastatic Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer: Current Situation and Future Directions

The hormone receptor-positive (HR+) type is the most frequently identified subtype of breast cancer. HR+ breast cancer has a more positive prognosis when compared to other subtypes, such as human epidermal growth factor protein 2-positive disorder and triple-negative disease. The advancement in treatment outcomes for advanced HR+ breast cancer has been considerably elevated due to the discovery of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors and their combination effects with endocrine therapy. However, despite the considerable effectiveness of tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERMs), and aromatase inhibitors (AI), the issue of treatment resistance still presents a significant challenge for HR+ breast cancer. As a result, there is a focus on exploring new therapeutic strategies such as targeted protein degradation and covalent inhibition for targeting ERα. This article discusses the latest progress in treatments like oral selective ER degraders (SERDs), complete estrogen receptor antagonists (CERANs), selective estrogen receptor covalent antagonists (SERCAs), proteolysis targeting chimera (PROTAC) degraders, and combinations of CDK4/6 inhibitors with endocrine therapy. The focus is specifically on those compounds that have transitioned into phases of clinical development.

Therapeutic evolution in HR+/HER2- breast cancer: from targeted therapy to endocrine therapy

Breast cancer, a complex and varied disease, has four distinct subtypes based on estrogen receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) levels, among which a significant subtype known as HR+/HER2-breast cancer that has spurred numerous research. The prevalence of breast cancer and breast cancer-related death are the most serious threats to women's health worldwide. Current progress in treatment strategies for HR+/HER2-breast cancer encompasses targeted therapy, endocrine therapy, genomic immunotherapy, and supplementing traditional methods like surgical resection and radiotherapy. This review article summarizes the current epidemiology of HR+/HER2-breast cancer, introduces the classification of HR+/HER2-breast cancer and the commonly used treatment methods. The mechanisms of action of various drugs, including targeted therapy drugs and endocrine hormone therapy drugs, and their potential synergistic effects are deeply discussed. In addition, clinical trials of these drugs that have been completed or are still in progress are included.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of elacestrant versus standard endocrine therapy for second-/third-line treatment of patients with HR+/HER2- advanced or metastatic breast cancer: a US payer perspective

Background

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of elacestrant (ELA) and standard-of-care (SOC) as second-/third-line treatment for pretreated estrogen receptor (ER)- positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced or metastatic breast cancer (A/MBC) in the US.

Methods

The 3 health states partitioned survival model (PSM) was conducted from the perspective of the US third-party payers. The time horizon for the model lasted 10 years. Effectiveness and safety data were derived from the EMERALD trial (NCT03778931). Costs were derived from the pricing files of Medicare and Medicaid Services, and utility values were derived from published studies. One-way sensitivity analysis as well as probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to observe model stability.

Result

ELA led to an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $8,672,360/quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained compared with SOC in the overall population and $2,900,560/QALY gained compared with fulvestrant (FUL) in the ESR1(estrogen receptor 1) mutation subgroup. The two ICERs of ELA were significantly higher than the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold values of $150,000/QALY.

Conclusions

ELA was not cost-effective for the second-/third-line treatment of patients with ER+/HER2-A/MBC compared with SOC in the US.

ESR1 Gene Mutations and Liquid Biopsy in ER-Positive Breast Cancers: A Small Step Forward, a Giant Leap for Personalization of Endocrine Therapy?

The predominant forms of breast cancer (BC) are hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumors characterized by the expression of estrogen receptors (ERs) and/or progesterone receptors (PRs). Patients with HR+ tumors can benefit from endocrine therapy (ET). Three types of ET are approved for the treatment of HR+ BCs and include selective ER modulators, aromatase inhibitors, and selective ER downregulators. ET is the mainstay of adjuvant treatment in the early setting and the backbone of the first-line treatment in an advanced setting; however, the emergence of acquired resistance can lead to cancer recurrence or progression. The mechanisms of ET resistance are often related to the occurrence of mutations in the ESR1 gene, which encodes the ER-alpha protein. As ESR1 mutations are hardly detectable at diagnosis but are present in 30% to 40% of advanced BC (ABC) after treatment, the timeline of testing is crucial. To manage this resistance, ESR1 testing has recently been recommended; in ER+ HER2- ABC and circulating cell-free DNA, so-called liquid biopsy appears to be the most convenient way to detect the emergence of ESR1 mutations. Technically, several options exist, including Next Generation Sequencing and ultra-sensitive PCR-based techniques. In this context, personalization of ET through the surveillance of ESR1 mutations in the plasma of HR+ BC patients throughout the disease course represents an innovative way to improve the standard of care.

Elacestrant: a new FDA-approved SERD for the treatment of breast cancer

Elacestrant (RAD-1901), a selective estrogen receptor degrader, was approved by USFDA on January 27, 2023, for the treatment of breast cancer. It has been developed by Menarini Group under the brand name Orserdu®. Elacestrant showed anticancer activity both in vitro and in vivo in ER+ HER2-positive breast cancer models. The present review delebrates the development stages of Elacestrant, with its medicinal chemistry, synthesis, mechanism of action, and pharmacokinetic studies. Clinical data and safety profile has also been discussed, including data from randomized trials.