|
1
|
Hikage M, Hato S, Uemura K, Yura M, Sato Y, Matsushita H, Cho H, Hiki N, Kunisaki C, Inoue K, Choda Y, Boku N, Yoshikawa T, Katai H, Terashima M. Late complication after gastrectomy for clinical stage I cancer: supplementary analysis of JCOG0912. Surg Endosc 2022; 37:2958-2968. [PMID: 36512122 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09804-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Late complications following gastric cancer surgery, including postgastrectomy syndromes, are complex problems requiring a solution. Reported risk factors for developing late complications include surgery-related factors, such as the surgical approach and the extent of resection and reconstruction. However, this has not been assessed in a prospective study with a large sample size. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications. Data from the JCOG0912 trial were used. It compared laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) to open distal gastrectomy (ODG) in clinical stage I gastric cancer patients. METHODS This study included 881/921 patients enrolled in the JCOG0912 trial. The incidence of late complications was compared between the ODG and the LADG arms. In addition, associations between surgery-related factors and the development of late complications were assessed by multivariable analyses using the proportional odds model to identify relevant risk factors. RESULTS There was no difference in the type or number of patients with late complications between the LADG and the ODG arms. The multivariable analysis for each late complication revealed that the Billroth-I reconstruction (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a lower risk of cholecystitis [odds ratio (OR) 0.187, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.039-0.905, P = 0.037] or ileus (OR 0.116, 95%CI 0.033-0.406, P < 0.001), and pylorus-preserving gastrectomy (vs. R-en-Y or Billroth-II) had a higher risk of reflux esophagitis (OR 3.348, 95% CI 1.371-8.176, P = 0.008). The surgical approach was not a risk factor for any late complications. CONCLUSION Differences in surgical approaches did not constitute a risk for developing late complications after gastrectomy. Billroth-I reconstruction reduced the risk of ileus and cholecystitis, but pylorus-preserving gastrectomy carried a risk for reflux esophagitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Makoto Hikage
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan
| | - Shinji Hato
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Kohei Uemura
- JCOG Data Center/Operations Office, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiro Yura
- Gastric Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuya Sato
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Haruhiko Cho
- Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Hiki
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kitasato University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Chikara Kunisaki
- Department of Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kentaro Inoue
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yasuhiro Choda
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Narikazu Boku
- Department of Oncology and General Medicine, IMSUT Hospital, The Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takaki Yoshikawa
- Department of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hitoshi Katai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Tachikawa Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masanori Terashima
- Division of Gastric Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 1007 Shimonagakubo, Nagaizumi-cho, Sunto-gun, Shizuoka, 411-8777, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Hu Y, Zaydfudim VM. Quality of Life After Curative Resection for Gastric Cancer: Survey Metrics and Implications of Surgical Technique. J Surg Res 2020; 251:168-179. [PMID: 32151826 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide, and radical gastrectomy is an integral component of curative therapy. With improvements in perioperative morbidity and mortality, attention has turned to short- and long-term post-gastrectomy quality of life (QoL). This article reviews the common psychometric surveys and preference-based measures used among patients following gastrectomy. It also provides an overview of studies that address associations between surgical decision-making and postoperative health-related QoL. Further attention is focused on reported associations between technical aspects of the operation, such as extent of gastric resection, minimally-invasive approach, pouch-based conduits, enteric reconstruction, and postoperative QoL. While there are several randomized studies that include QoL outcomes, much remains to be explored. The relationship between symptom profiles and preference-based measures of health state utility is an area in need of further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinin Hu
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Victor M Zaydfudim
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia; Department of Surgery, Surgical Outcomes Research Center, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|