Clinical importance of achieving biochemical control with medical therapy in adult patients with acromegaly

Acromegaly increases depressive symptoms and reduces quality of life of cohabitants

PURPOSE

To assess how living with patients with acromegaly affects people's psychology and quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

Acromegaly patients and their cohabitants included in this study. Patients were administered Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (AcroQoL), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Cohabitants were administered quality of life questionnaire (SF-36), BAI, BDI, and Zarit Caregiver Burden Interview (ZBI).

RESULTS

This study included 84 patients with acromegaly and 84 cohabitants. Sixty-nine patients (n = 84, 82.1%) had an acromegalic appearance. Cohabitants who were affected by the acromegalic appearance had higher BAI, BDI, and ZBI scores than those who were not affected (p < 0.001 for all). Cohabitants who were affected by the acromegalic appearance had a significantly lower SF-36 score (p = 0.015). The BAI (r=-0.535, p < 0.001), BDI (r=-0.592, p < 0.001), and ZBI (r=-0.465, p < 0.001) scores of the cohabitants showed a negative correlation with AcroQoL. SF-36 scores showed correlation with AcroQoL (r = 0.387, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The chronic process of acromegaly and the external appearance of patients with this disease can negatively affect both the patients and the people living with them. Physicians being aware of this effect and taking counteractive measures may contribute positively to the course of acromegaly.

Preferences for different treatment options among people living with acromegaly in the US

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is a rare hormonal disorder that results in enlargement of the face, hands and feet. It is associated with comorbidities, increased mortality, reduced quality of life and economic burden. Adequate treatment is critical to alleviate symptoms; however, the treatment burden is substantial. To understand how different treatment aspects might ease the burden, this study investigated preferences for treatment options among people with acromegaly in the US, using a choice experiment (CE).

METHODS

An online CE was conducted based on a similar study among the US general population. Respondents were recruited through Acromegaly Community in the US, and all eligible respondents were included. The survey assessed six treatment options that varied according to administration, frequency, storage, treatment setting, needle type and injection pain.

RESULTS

109 adults with acromegaly completed the survey between October and December 2022. On average, the population had lived with symptoms for 15 years, while the average number of years with the diagnosis was eight. Respondents preferred subcutaneous injections every fourth week and preferred them at home rather than at the hospital. Most respondents preferred subcutaneous injections right under the skin administered once every fourth week with a pen at home over oral capsules administered twice daily at home.

CONCLUSION

The results indicate that new treatment options administered as subcutaneous injections right under the skin once every fourth week at home have the potential to lower the treatment burden among people with acromegaly, emphasizing the importance of taking each person's preference into consideration when choosing treatment.

Evaluating the Impact of Acromegaly on Quality of Life

Acromegaly has a substantial negative impact on quality of life (QoL). This review aims to discuss the impact of acromegaly on QoL from the clinical perspective as well as from the patient perspective. Furthermore, it aims to evaluate the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in acromegaly and how PROMs aid decision-making. The recommendations presented in this review are based on recent clinical evidence on the impact of acromegaly on QoL combined with the authors' own clinical experience treating patients with acromegaly. We recommend that a patient-centered approach should be considered in treatment decisions, integrating conventional biochemical outcomes, tumor control, comorbidities, treatment complications, and PROMs, including QoL measures. This more integrated approach seems effective in treating comorbidities and improving patient-reported outcomes and is critical, as many patients do not achieve biochemical or tumor control and comorbidities, impairment in QoL may not remit even when full biochemical control is achieved.

Economic and clinical burden of comorbidities among patients with acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

Acromegaly is a rare, pituitary hormonal disorder that requires improved awareness worldwide. The objective of this analysis was to quantify the clinical and economic burden of comorbidities for patients with acromegaly and examine the influence of biochemical control on these outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Markov cohort decision analytic model consisting of two states, including alive (with and without comorbidity) and dead.

METHODS

A cohort of patients with acromegaly who had achieved biochemical control, a cohort of patients with acromegaly who had not achieved biochemical control, and a cohort of individuals from the general US population were tracked over a lifetime time horizon. The model tracked the proportion of the alive population that had each comorbidity based on age, sex, presence of acromegaly, and biochemical control status. The proportion of patients with each acromegaly-associated comorbidity were assigned comorbidity-associated costs, disutilities, and increased risk of mortality.

RESULTS

Compared with the general population, controlled acromegaly resulted in $192,000 additional comorbidity-related costs, 0.7 fewer years of life, 2.9 fewer quality-adjusted life years, and 1.1 more comorbidities across the remaining lifespan. Compared with the general population, uncontrolled acromegaly resulted in $285,000 additional comorbidity-related costs, 0.9 fewer years of life, 4.2 fewer quality-adjusted life years, and 1.6 more comorbidities across the remaining lifespan.

CONCLUSIONS

Achieving biochemical control is associated with improvements in cost, quality of life, and mortality, albeit not to the level of the general population. A multimodal treatment strategy including biochemical control and management of comorbidities is necessary to improve patient outcomes.

The effect of somatostatin analogs and acromegaly on the upper gastrointestinal system

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effects of somatostatin analogs and disease activity status on the upper gastrointestinal system in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

One hundred eighty-one patients with acromegaly were retrospectively assessed. The demographic, biochemical, pathologic, and radiologic data of the patients were evaluated. The upper gastrointestinal endoscopies and endoscopic biopsies were investigated. We divided patients into four groups according to the use of somatostatin analogs, and into two groups according to disease activity. We compared the data of patients between groups A, B, C, and D, and controlled/uncontrolled groups separately.

RESULTS

Before and in the peri-endoscopic period, 67 and 27 patients were being treated with octreotide long-acting release (LAR) (group A) and lanreotide autogel (group B), respectively. Twenty-one patients used somatostatin analogs, but they were stopped for various reasons before upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (group C), and 66 patients did not use a somatostatin analog (group D). In the peri-endoscopic period, 103 (60%) patients were responsive to medical and/or surgical treatment and 67 (40%) patients were non-responsive. The rate of gastritis was higher in group A than in groups B and D. The incidence of duodenitis and gastric ulcer was much higher in group D. The rate of gastritis was higher in the controlled group compared to the uncontrolled group.

CONCLUSION

The study showed that octreotide LAR treatment could be a risk factor in addition to known factors for the development of gastritis in patients with acromegaly.

Discordant GH and IGF-1 Results in Treated Acromegaly: Impact of GH Cutoffs and Mean Values Assessment

CONTEXT

Discordant growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) values are frequent in acromegaly.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of different GH cutoffs on discordance rate. To investigate whether the mean of consecutive GH measurements impacts discordance rate when matched to the last available IGF-1 value.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Referral center for pituitary diseases.

PATIENTS

Ninety acromegaly patients with at least 3 consecutive evaluations for GH and IGF-1 using the same assay in the same laboratory (median follow-up 13 years).

INTERVENTIONS

Multimodal treatment of acromegaly.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Single fasting GH (GHf) and IGF-1 (IGF-1f). Mean of 3 GH measurements (GHm), collected during consecutive routine patients' evaluations.

RESULTS

At last evaluation GHf values were 1.99 ± 2.79 µg/L and age-adjusted IGF-1f was 0.86 ± 0.44 × upper limit of normality (mean ± SD). The discordance rate using GHf was 52.2% (cutoff 1 µg/L) and 35.6% (cutoff 2.5 µg/L) (P = 0.025). "High GH" discordance was more common for GHf <1.0 µg/L, while "high IGF-1" was predominant for GHf <2.5 µg/L (P < 0.0001). Using GHm mitigated the impact of GH cutoffs on discordance (GHm <1.0 µg/L: 43.3%; GHm <2.5 µg/L: 38.9%; P = 0.265). At receiver-operator characteristic curve (ROC) analysis, both GHf and GHm were poor predictors of IGF-1f normalization (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.611 and AUC = 0.645, respectively). The prevalence of disease-related comorbidities did not significantly differ between controlled, discordant, and active disease patients.

DISCUSSION

GH/IGF-1 discordance strongly depends on GH cutoffs. The use of GHm lessen the impact of GH cutoffs. Measurement of fasting GH levels (both GHf and GHm) is a poor predictor of IGF-1f normalization in our cohort.

Somatostatin receptors in normal and acromegalic somatotroph cells: the U-turn of the clinician to immunohistochemistry report - a review

This is a narrative review of literature introducing somatostatin receptors (SSTRs) as part of understanding the somatotroph cells since they are positive in normal cells but also in tumoral cells as seen in somatotropinoma, a growth hormone (GH)-producing neoplasia, which causes acromegaly. They are five subtypes of SSTRs (1 to 5), which are immunohistochemically positive in different proportions in somatotropinomas. SSTR types 2 and 5 are most frequent in GH-secreting adenomas and they are both targeted by medical therapy with somatostatin analogues (SSTAs) like first generation Octreotide and Lanreotide (mainly targeting SSTR2) and second generation Pasireotide (with highest affinity for SSTR5), thus heterogeneous SSTRs configuration into the tumor explains different pattern of response to treatment and it might predict it once the SSTRs immunostaining is performed. Monoclonal antibodies are used for immunohistochemical detection of SSTRs; currently, a lack of standardization is presented, and scoring systems, such as Volante, H-score or human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-score, are applied. Immunoreactive markers like SSTRs are the U-turn in clinical practice regarding somatotropinomas since the configuration of subtypes 2 and 5 explains the responsiveness to medical therapy like SSTA. Further achievement of disease control is imperiously necessary because acromegaly has an increased rate of morbidity and mortality.

Octreotide-Resistant Acromegaly: Challenges and Solutions

Acromegaly is a rare and severe disease caused by an increased and autonomous secretion of growth hormone (GH), thus resulting in high circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1). Comorbidities and mortality rate are closely related to the disease duration. However, in most cases achieving biochemical control means reducing or even normalizing mortality and restoring normal life expectancy. Current treatment for acromegaly includes neurosurgery, radiotherapy and medical therapy. Transsphenoidal surgery often represents the recommended first-line treatment. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) are the drug of choice in patients with persistent disease after surgery and are suggested as first-line treatment for those ineligible for surgery. However, only about half of patients treated with octreotide (or lanreotide) achieve biochemical control. Other available drugs approved for clinical use are the second-generation SRL pasireotide, the dopamine agonist cabergoline, and the GH-receptor antagonist pegvisomant. In the present paper, we revised the current literature about the management of acromegaly, aiming to highlight the most relevant and recent therapeutic strategies proposed for patients resistant to first-line medical therapy. Furthermore, we discussed the potential molecular mechanisms involved in the variable response to first-generation SRLs. Due to the availability of different medical therapies, the choice for the most appropriate drug can be currently based also on the peculiar clinical characteristics of each patient.

Association between biochemical control and comorbidities in patients with acromegaly: an Italian longitudinal retrospective chart review study

PURPOSE

Achieving biochemical control (normalization of insulin-like growth factor-1 [IGF-1] and growth hormone [GH]) is a key goal in acromegaly management. However, IGF-1 and GH fluctuate over time. The true potential impact of time-varying biochemical control status on comorbidities is unclear and relies on multiple, longitudinal IGF-1 and GH measurements. This study assessed the association between time-varying biochemical control status and onset of selected comorbidities in patients with acromegaly.

METHODS

Medical charts of adults with confirmed acromegaly and ≥ 6 months of follow-up at an Italian endocrinology center were reviewed. Patients were followed from the first diagnosis of acromegaly at the center until loss to follow-up, chart abstraction, or death. Biochemical control status was assessed annually and defined as IGF-1 ≤ the upper limit of normal, or GH ≤ 2.5 µg/L in the few cases where IGF-1 was unavailable. Time-varying Cox models were used to assess the association between biochemical control status and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Among 150 patients, 47% were female, average age at diagnosis was 43.1, and mean length of follow-up was 10.4 years. Biochemical control was significantly associated with a lower hazard of diabetes (HR = 0.36, 95% CI 0.15; 0.83) and cardiovascular system disorders (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.31; 0.93), and a higher hazard of certain types of arthropathy (HR = 1.68, 95% CI 1.04; 2.71); associations for other comorbidities did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Results further support the importance of achieving biochemical control, as this may reduce the risk of high-burden conditions, including diabetes and cardiovascular system disorders. The association for arthropathy suggests irreversibility of this impairment. Due to limitations, caution is required when interpreting these results.

Current perspectives on the impact of clinical disease and biochemical control on comorbidities and quality of life in acromegaly

Acromegaly is a rare chronic, systemic disorder caused by excessive growth hormone (GH) secretion from a somatotroph pituitary adenoma. GH hypersecretion leads to overproduction of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), which contributes to the somatic overgrowth, physical disfigurement, onset of multiple systemic comorbidities, reduced quality of life (QoL) and premature mortality of uncontrolled patients. Somatostatin receptor ligands, dopamine agonists and a GH receptor antagonist are currently available for medical therapy of acromegaly. The main aim of treatment is biochemical normalisation, defined as age-normalised serum IGF-1 values and random GH levels <1.0 μg/L. However, there is an increasing evidence suggesting that achieving biochemical control does not always decrease the burden of disease-related comorbidities and/or improve patients' QoL. This lack of correlation between biochemical and clinical control can be due to both disease duration (late diagnosis) or to the peculiarity of a given comorbidity. Herein we conducted ad hoc literature searches in order to find the most recent and relevant reports on biochemical and clinical disease control during medical treatment of acromegaly. Particularly, we analyse and describe the relationship between biochemical, as well as clinical disease control in patients with acromegaly receiving medical therapy, with a focus on comorbidities and QoL. In conclusion, we found that current literature data seem to indicate that clinical disease control (besides biochemical control), encompassing clinical signs and symptoms, comorbidities and QoL, emerge as a primary focus of acromegaly patient management.

PREDICTIVE MARKERS FOR POSTSURGICAL MEDICAL MANAGEMENT OF ACROMEGALY: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND CONSENSUS TREATMENT GUIDELINE

Objective: To clarify the selection of medical therapy following transsphenoidal surgery in patients with acromegaly, based on growth hormone (GH)/insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) response and glucometabolic control. Methods: We carried out a systematic literature review on three of the best studied and most practical predictive markers of the response to somatostatin analogues (SSAs): somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression, tumor morphologic classification, and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal intensity. Additional analyses focused on glucose metabolism in treated patients. Results: The literature survey confirmed significant associations of all three factors with SSA responsiveness. SSTR expression appears necessary for the SSA response; however, it is not sufficient, as approximately half of SSTR2-positive tumors failed to respond clinically to first-generation SSAs. MRI findings (T2-hypo-intensity) and a densely granulated phenotype also correlate with SSA efficacy, and are advantageous as predictive markers relative to SSTR expression alone. Glucometabolic control declines with SSA monotherapy, whereas GH receptor antagonist (GHRA) monotherapy may restore normoglycemia. Conclusion: We propose a decision tree to guide selection among SSAs, dopamine agonists (DAs), and GHRA for medical treatment of acromegaly in the postsurgical setting. This decision tree employs three validated predictive markers and other clinical considerations, to determine whether SSAs are appropriate first-line medical therapy in the postsurgical setting. DA treatment is favored in patients with modest IGF-1 elevation. GHRA treatment should be considered for patients with T2-hyperintense tumors with a sparsely granulated phenotype and/or low SSTR2 staining, and may also be favored for individuals with diabetes. Prospective analyses are required to test the utility of this therapeutic paradigm. Abbreviations: DA = dopamine agonist; DG = densely granulated; GH = growth hormone; GHRA = growth hormone receptor antagonist; HbA1c = glycated hemoglobin; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; MRI = magnetic resonance imaging; SG = sparsely granulated; SSA = somatostatin analogue; SSTR = somatostatin receptor.

The impact of growth hormone on proteomic profiles: a review of mouse and adult human studies

Growth hormone (GH) is a protein that is known to stimulate postnatal growth, counter regulate insulin's action and induce expression of insulin-like growth factor-1. GH exerts anabolic or catabolic effects depending upon on the targeted tissue. For instance, GH increases skeletal muscle and decreases adipose tissue mass. Our laboratory has spent the past two decades studying these effects, including the effects of GH excess and depletion, on the proteome of several mouse and human tissues. This review first discusses proteomic techniques that are commonly used for these types of studies. We then examine the proteomic differences found in mice with excess circulating GH (bGH mice) or mice with disruption of the GH receptor gene (GHR^-/-). We also describe the effects of increased and decreased GH action on the proteome of adult patients with either acromegaly, GH deficiency or patients after short-term GH treatment. Finally, we explain how these proteomic studies resulted in the discovery of potential biomarkers for GH action, particularly those related with the effects of GH on aging, glucose metabolism and body composition.