Measuring Patient Quality of Life Following Treatment for Alopecia

Factors Affecting Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Improving survival and health-related quality of life (HRQOL), along with symptom relief, is important for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). This study measured HRQOL and analyzed its influence on sociodemographic and clinical factors in patients with MBC.

METHODS

We interviewed 298 patients with MBC to investigate their sociodemographic characteristics and HRQOL by using EuroQol-5D-5L (EQ-5D) between September and October 2014. We also reviewed medical records to examine the clinical condition of the patients, including disease progression, adverse events, treatments, chronic disease, and metastatic areas. The distribution of the EQ-5D index was compared between different clinical conditions by using the Kruskal-Wallis test. We also conducted multiple regression analyses to identify the factors affecting HRQOL in patients with MBC.

RESULTS

The mean EQ-5D index was 0.79 for all patients surveyed. The mean EQ-5D index score was significantly lower in patients in the progressed state than in those in the progression-free survival state (0.73 vs. 0.80, p = 0.0002). The HRQOL of patients treated with chemotherapy alone was significantly lower than that of patients treated with hormonal or targeted therapy (0.76 vs. 0.82 or 0.85; p = 0.0020). Regression analysis revealed that the clinical factors associated with lower HRQOL were progressed state, chemotherapy, and adverse events, such as hair loss or stomatitis. Finally, young age, high income, and employment were the sociodemographic factors that were positively associated with better HRQOL.

CONCLUSION

This study provides new information on the health utility of MBC patients on the basis of various patient characteristics and offers insights that can assist medical professionals in treating patients with MBC and help policymakers implement cancer strategies. Further research is needed to reflect the changing environment of cancer treatment and enrich available evidence.

Trichoscopic Features of Syphilitic Alopecia and Alopecia Areata: A Comparative Study

Background

Syphilitic alopecia (SA) and alopecia areata (AA) are two distinct conditions that frequently present diagnostic difficulties, especially when differentiating between them due to their similar clinical presentations. Trichoscopy may help in differential diagnosis, but a comparison between trichoscopic features of SA and AA is yet to be researched.

Objective

To compare trichoscopic features between SA and AA and determine their discriminative values.

Methods

Electronic medical records and trichoscopic images of patients diagnosed with SA or AA between January 2000 and February 2022 were retrieved. Trichoscopic features were statistically compared, and their discriminative values were demonstrated as sensitivity, specificity, predictive value, likelihood ratio, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

Results

A total of 69 patients were included: 23 SA and 46 AA cases were matched with a 1:2 ratio. Black dots, broken hairs, pigtail hairs, exclamation mark hairs, tapered hairs, angulated hairs, and non-pigmented regrowing hairs were significantly more prevalent in AA than in SA (all P<0.05), whereas erythematous background was more prevalent in SA than in AA patients (P=0.008). Among the aforementioned trichoscopic features, exclamation mark hairs and non-pigmented regrowing hairs had a high positive likelihood ratio for AA (16.17 and 8.34, respectively); however, only exclamation mark hairs revealed high AUC (AUC=0.816).

Conclusion

Despite the presence of several similar trichoscopic features between SA and AA, trichoscopy can aid in distinguishing between the two diseases. Exclamation mark hairs are the only trichoscopic feature that can be used to differentiate patients with clinically suspicious SA from those with AA.

Beyond health-related quality of life: initial psychometric validation of a new scale for addressing the gap in assessing the full range of alopecia areata psychosocial burden

BACKGROUND

Patients with alopecia areata (AA) report a broad range of psychosocial outcomes beyond those assessed in existing health-related quality of life measures. Yet, to date, no psychometrically validated scale based on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) appears to exist to comprehensively measure these AA-specific psychosocial outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to develop such a scale, the Scale of Alopecia Areata Distress (SAAD), and to provide its initial validation evidence.

METHODS

Using existing qualitative research on PROs for patients with AA, a pool of 144 items was generated and subsequently reviewed for relevance, redundancy, clarity and comprehensiveness by subject matter experts in AA psychosocial impacts and the research team. This review resulted in a reduced pool of 122 items, which was then administered to adult patients with AA residing in the USA. Exploratory Factor Analysis using Principal Axis Factoring extraction with oblique rotation identified the SAAD's underlying factor structure. To reduce the SAAD item length, additional item-reduction strategies were used.

RESULTS

There were 392 participants who responded to the 122 items, each with four or fewer missing item responses. Three iterations of the data analysis plan resulted in a 41-item SAAD with seven underlying factors of psychosocial impact: Emotional and Cognitive Functioning, Romantic Relationships, Family Relationships, Primary Life Responsibilities, Non-Primary Life Responsibility Activities, Stigma, and Self-Perception Change. Each factor demonstrated acceptable to high levels of internal consistency reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial validation evidence of the SAAD-41 scale supports its potential as a comprehensive measure of AA-related psychosocial distress for US-based adults. Further scale validation is needed.

Comparison between topical cetirizine with minoxidil versus topical placebo with minoxidil in female androgenetic alopecia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss in both genders with a higher psychological impact on females. Currently, topical minoxidil is the only FDA-approved treatment for female AGA and it needs life-long application and causes side effects. Cetirizine is an antihistamine that may be effective in hair loss treatment. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of topical cetirizine with minoxidil (group 1) versus topical minoxidil with placebo (group 2) in female patients with AGA. This was a double-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel study conducted at Dermatology Clinic, Cairo University Teaching Hospital (Kasr- Al- Ainy), Egypt. Sixty-six patients with female AGA, aged 20-50 years, Sinclair (II-IV), were randomly assigned to one of the 2 groups for 24 weeks. The trichoscopic parameters, patients' self-assessment, side effects and global photographic assessment were evaluated. There was a statistically significant change from baseline in frontal and vertex terminal and vellus hair density (P < 0.0005) with a significant increase in vertex hair shaft thickness and average number of hairs per follicular unit in group 1 (P < 0.05). Patients reported significantly better scores in patient self-assessment in group 1 (P < 0.05). Side effects were not significantly different between groups (P > 0.05). Topical cetirizine increases hair shaft thickness and results in a higher clinical improvement from patients' perspective with a good safety profile (NCT04481412, study start date: July 2020).

Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review

Background

Immune-mediated alopecias (IMAs), a group of hair disorders associated with immunological reactions, remain a therapeutic challenge since available treatments are generally unfavorable with potential side effects. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been recently proposed as a treatment option based on several limited-quality studies; however, there is no systematic evaluation of PRP efficacy on IMAs in the literature.

Objective

To assess PRP's effects in treating IMAs using a systematic review.

Methods

Electronic searches were conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases. A search strategy was designed to retrieve all studies exploring PRP in treating IMAs, including alopecia areata (AA) and primary cicatricial alopecias (PCAs). In addition, all randomized and non-randomized studies reporting subjective and/or objective outcomes of alopecia treatment with PRP were included.

Results

Thirty-two studies were included, comprising 621 patients with AA and 19 patients with PCAs. PRP had superior efficacy as monotherapy in five studies, comparable to intralesional corticosteroids in six studies in AA treatment. In addition, in the analysis of PCAs, including lymphocytic and neutrophilic subtypes, PRP was efficacious in alleviating disease progression in nine studies.

Conclusion

PRP is considered a promising treatment for AA and PCAs in patients who experienced unfavorable outcomes from conventional treatment. However, its clinical application remains to be standardized, and its recommendation as a treatment for IMAs could not be ascertained due to a lack of high-quality evidence.

Systematic review registration

[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=353859], identifier [CRD42022353859].

Characterizing the relationships between patient reported outcomes and clinician assessments of alopecia areata in a phase 2a randomized trial of ritlecitinib and brepocitinib

Background

The phase 2a ALLEGRO trial (NCT02974868) investigated the safety and efficacy of ritlecitinib (PF‐06651600) and brepocitinib (PF‐06700841) in adults with alopecia areata. No randomized controlled trial for alopecia areata has evaluated correlations between clinician‐assessed hair loss and patient‐reported outcomes.

Objectives

Report scores from the Alopecia Areata Symptom Impact Scale (AASIS; a patient‐reported outcome tool) and explore the relationships of those scores with clinician‐assessed Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) scores at baseline and week 24 of the ALLEGRO trial.

Methods

Adults with alopecia areata were randomized to ritlecitinib (n = 48), brepocitinib (n = 47) or placebo (n = 47). After 24 weeks, the mixed‐effects model with repeated measures was used to calculate the active treatment groups' AASIS score least‐squares mean differences. Relationships between AASIS and SALT scores at baseline and week 24 were evaluated by Pearson's correlation coefficients using pooled data.

Results

Baseline AASIS and SALT scores were similar among treatment groups. Both active treatment groups reported significant improvements in AASIS scores at week 24 (least‐squares mean differences vs. placebo for ritlecitinib, −0.8 to −2.3; brepocitinib, −0.9 to −3.7; P < 0.05 for all). At week 24, the mean SALT scores (standard deviation) improved compared with baseline [ritlecitinib, 54.4 (40.3) vs. 89.4 (15.8); brepocitinib, 31.9 (35.7) vs. 86.4 (18.1)]. The correlation coefficients between AASIS global and subscale scores and SALT scores at week 24 ranged from 0.34 to 0.58; P < 0.05 for all.

Conclusions

Patients randomized to ritlecitinib or brepocitinib reported significantly improved AASIS and SALT scores at week 24 of the ALLEGRO trial compared to placebo. At week 24, medium‐to‐large correlations can be seen between AASIS global and subscale scores and SALT scores. Our experience with AASIS instrument highlighted several aspects that suggest new patient‐reported outcome tools are needed to accurately assess patients' relevant alopecia areata related signs, symptoms and daily functioning.

Linked Commentary: H.A. Ramírez‐Marín & A. Tosti J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2022; 36: 494–495. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.17984.

Intramuscular Corticosteroid Therapy in the Treatment of Alopecia Areata: A Time-to-Event Analysis

Introduction

Intramuscular corticosteroids (IMC) have gained popularity for the treatment of severe alopecia areata (AA) in recent years; however, evidence on their efficacy and safety is still limited.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy, relapse rate, and tolerability of IMC in the treatment of AA, as well as factors associated with treatment outcomes.

Methods

Time-to-event analysis was performed on patients with severe, extensive, or rapidly progressive AA receiving IMC. The IMC regimen comprised triamcinolone acetonide 20–40 mg/mL injected every 4–6 weeks. The evaluated outcomes included initial (25% regrowth), significant (75% regrowth), and complete hair regrowth (100% regrowth). Relapse and adverse events were also noted. Factors associated with treatment outcomes and relapse were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

A total of 101 patients were eligible for analysis. Significant hair regrowth was obtained in 80.2% of the patients (n = 81), in a median time of 3.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.9–4.4). Complete hair regrowth was achieved in 48.5% of the subjects (n = 49), and relapse was observed in 47.5% (n = 48). Acneiform eruption was the most common adverse effect. Multivariable analysis revealed that nail involvement was a negative predictor of significant hair regrowth (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.01–0.55; P = 0.015), whereas duration of AA longer than 6 months was associated with disease recurrence (adjusted HR = 4.02, 95% CI = 1.52–4.66; P = 0.005).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of IMC in the treatment of severe or active AA; however, the relapse rate remained relatively high after discontinuation of the therapy. Nail involvement was a negative predictor of significant hair regrowth, while disease duration longer than 6 months predicted AA relapse.

Metformin Promotes the Hair-Inductive Activity of Three-Dimensional Aggregates of Epidermal and Dermal Cells Self-Assembled In Vitro

INTRODUCTION

Although it has been reported that the anti-diabetic drug metformin has multiple extra-hypoglycemic activities, such as anti-oxidation, anti-aging and even anti-tumor, topical metformin also can induce hair regeneration, but the precise mechanism involved in that process is still unclear.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effect of metformin on hair growth in a mouse hair follicle reconstitution model generated by in vitro self-assembled three-dimensional aggregates of epidermal and dermal cells (3D aggregates).

METHODS

Epidermal cells and dermal cells were isolated and cultured from the mouse skin of fifty C57BL/6 mouse pups (1-day-old). For tracing the distribution of dermal cells during the self-assembly process of 3D aggregates, the dermal cells were labeled with Vybrant Dil cell-labelling solution and mixed with epidermal cells at 1:1 ratio. Formed 3D aggregates were treated with 10 mM metformin and then were grafted into recipient BALB/c nude mice. The biomarkers (HGF, CD133, ALP, β-catenin and SOX2) associated with the hair-inductive activity of dermal cells were detected in the grafted skin tissues and in cultured 3D aggregates treated with metformin using immunofluorescent staining, quantitative real-time RT-PCR (qRT-PCR), and western blotting. Furthermore, the expression levels of CD133 were also examined in dermal cells with different passage numbers using qRT-PCR and western blotting.

RESULTS

Metformin directly stimulates the activity of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) of cultured 3D aggregates, upregulates both the protein and mRNA expression levels of molecular markers (HGF, CD133, ALP, β-catenin and SOX2) and improves the survival rate of reconstituted hair follicles. Moreover, we also found that metformin increases the expression of CD133 in dermal cells thus maintaining their trichogenic capacity that would normally be lost by serial subculture.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that metformin can promote hair follicle regeneration in vitro through up-regulation of the hair inductive capability of dermal cells, warranting further evaluation in the clinical treatment of male or female pattern hair loss.