Health Related Quality of Life of Rosacea Patients in China Assessed by Dermatology Life Quality Index and Willingness to Pay

Exploring the psychodermatologic burden and associated psychiatric manifestations in rosacea: a systemic review

Rosacea is an inflammatory skin disorder possessing significant mental health implications, including anxiety and depression. Although the disease's link to psychiatric outcomes has been explored, recent data highlights the need for a deeper examination of underlying pathways and overall burden. This systematic review aims to synthesize and evaluate the current literature on the association between rosacea and anxiety and depression, with particular attention to establishing multidisciplinary treatment approaches. A comprehensive review of the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases was performed to select peer-reviewed English studies relevant to our topic. Our results reveal that anxiety and depression continue to affect a majority of rosacea patients, with certain demographic variables such as age and gender modulating psychiatric burden. The complex interaction between rosacea and its psychological outcomes is thought to rely on inflammatory mediators, lipid metabolism, and neurotropic factors. Certain treatment options, including carvedilol, paroxetine and Cortexin, may target these core processes and hence, help alleviate psychological sequalae. Bearing these insights in mind, dermatologists should focus on adopting interdisciplinary treatment plans. Future research should prioritize longitudinal designs, diverse populations, and standardized methodologies to deepen our understanding of the relationship between anxiety, depression, and rosacea.

Assessment of Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms and Health-Related Quality of Life in Rosacea Patients: A Case-Control Study

Background: Rosacea, a chronic facial dermatosis, poses a substantial global prevalence burden. Its impact extends beyond physical symptoms, affecting patient quality of life, self-esteem, and psychosocial functioning. This study aims to assess the health-related quality of life and emotional well-being in Jordanian rosacea patients in comparison to healthy controls. Methods: A case-control study, matching for age and sex, was conducted among rosacea patients attending the outpatient department at a governmental secondary hospital in the north of Jordan between September 2022 and November 2023. Adult patients with a confirmed rosacea diagnosis for a duration of ≥ 3 months were paired with healthy controls. Health-related quality of life, anxiety, and depression were evaluated using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), respectively. Disease severity was assessed using the Clinician's Erythema Assessment (CEA) grading system. Results: The study included 198 rosacea patients and 198 healthy controls. Rosacea patients exhibited significantly higher DLQI scores (mean 11.32 ± 5.4) compared to controls (mean 4.28 ± 2.3), indicating diminished quality of life. Subscale analysis revealed prominent differences in symptoms/feelings and daily activities. Additionally, rosacea patients reported elevated scores on the HADS anxiety (mean 9.38 ± 3.2) and depression (mean 8.19 ± 4.3) subscales in contrast to controls (mean 3.88 ± 2.18 and mean 3.41 ± 1.87, respectively). More than half (57%) of rosacea patients experienced moderate or severe anxiety, and nearly a third (31%) reported moderate or severe depression. Regression analyses revealed that higher disease severity significantly predicted worse quality of life (β = 0.384), anxiety (β = 0.352), and depression (β = 0.312). Conclusion: The study demonstrated that rosacea patients in Jordan experience significantly diminished quality of life and higher rates of anxiety and depression compared to healthy controls. Disease severity and multiple facial lesions emerged as strong predictors of poor psychological outcomes, while female gender increased vulnerability and longer disease duration showed a protective effect. These findings emphasize the need for routine psychological screening and a holistic treatment approach, particularly for newly diagnosed patients with severe disease manifestations.

Health-related Quality of Life of Patients with Rosacea: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Real-world Data

Patients with rosacea commonly experience stigmatization, which induces stress and thereby exacerbates their symptoms. Given the strong effects of rosacea on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), addressing the physical and psychosocial aspects of rosacea is essential. To examine the effects of rosacea on HRQoL, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis involving real-world data. PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cross-sectional studies, and case series evaluating the HRQoL of patients with rosacea were included. HRQoL assessment tools such as the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Rosacea-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire (RosaQoL) were used. Data on 13,453 patients were retrieved from 52 eligible studies: 4 RCTs, 15 case series, and 33 cross-sectional studies. Compared with healthy controls, patients with rosacea had significantly lower DLQI scores (standardized mean difference [SMD] = -1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.81 to -1.37). The DLQI scores after treatment were higher than those before treatment (SMD = -1.451, 95% CI = -1.091 to -1.810). The pooled estimates for the overall DLQI and RosaQoL scores were 8.61 and 3.06, respectively. In conclusion, patients with rosacea have lower HRQoL compared with healthy individuals, and treatment for rosacea improves their HRQoL.

Investigation of skincare habits and possible rosacea triggers of patients with rosacea: A prospective case-control study

OBJECTIVE

Skincare is a part of rosacea treatment; patients benefit from complementary dermo-cosmetic care as well as medical treatments. Some skincare habits are known to trigger and exacerbate rosacea, but there are very few epidemiological studies on this matter.

METHODS

A total of 200 people, including 100 patients with rosacea and 100 controls, were included in the study. We questioned the methods used by the participants in daily facial cleansing. Sun and heat exposure, makeup habits, the history of the use of topical steroids, and outdoor working status were noted. A dermoscopic examination, a non-invasive and valuable method to evaluate the presence and severity of Demodex, was performed.

RESULTS

We evaluated 30% of our rosacea patients as erythematotelangiectatic rosacea, 13% as papulopustular rosacea, and 57% of our patients had mixed type, which could not be distinguished from one of these subtypes. In the case group, the proportion of people who used daily facial cleansers and daily soaps was lower than in the control group, while the proportion of those who cleaned their face with only water and those who used facial cleansers less frequently was higher (p<0.001). In the case group, while the rate of daily make-up and use of make-up products was lower (p=0.001, p<0.001, respectively), the rate of not wearing make-up was higher (p=0.001). The history of hot bath use was higher in the case group than in the control group (p=0.011). We found a significant relationship between the severity of plaque and dry appearance and the increase in Demodex density (p=0.007, p<0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

We recommend that patients with rosacea clean their faces daily with soap or facial cleansers and not take a bath with very hot water. Patients should be evaluated for increased Demodex mites, especially if skin dryness is accompanied.

Psychological Burden and Willingness to Pay Among Korean Rosacea Patients and Their Association With Rosacea Phenotype and Severity: A Multi-Center Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Rosacea is a chronic inflammatory disorder that can adversely affect the patient's quality of life (QOL). However, few studies have examined the association between the psychological burden and willingness to pay (WTP) with rosacea features and severity.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to determine the overall psychological burden and WTP among Korean rosacea patients and identify factors that may contribute, such as patient demographics, clinical features, and rosacea severity.

METHODS

This prospective cross-sectional study recruited Koreans with rosacea. All were asked to complete a questionnaire on their demographics, rosacea-related symptoms, self-rated severity, dermatology life quality index (DLQI), and WTP. The clinical features were assessed by a board-certified dermatologist. The investigator's global assessment and global flushing severity score (GFSS) were used to determine the clinical severity of rosacea. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to identify factors contributing to the psychological burden and WTP.

RESULTS

Out of 201 rosacea patients, 147 (73.1%) were female, and 54 (26.9%) males, with a median age of 50.1 years. Their median DLQI score was 8 (interquartile range [IQR]): 4.0-13.0). The median WTP per month for the control of rosacea was $100, with relative WTP (WTP/household income per month x 100) being 3.3%. According to the multiple regression model, phymatous change (β = .153, p = .030), DLQI score (β = .152, P = .045), and GFSS (β = .154, P = .041) contributed most to the WTP.

CONCLUSION

Rosacea patients experience substantial psychological and economic burdens. More vigorous treatment should be performed for those with phyma and severe flushing whose QOL is most severely affected.

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Pilot Study to Assess the Response and Tolerability of Cold Atmospheric Plasma for Rosacea

INTRODUCTION

Rosacea is a common, facial, chronic inflammatory skin disease. Due to its complex pathogenesis, adequate therapy of rosacea can be challenging. An innovative recent therapeutic tool is cold atmospheric plasma (CAP), which is already established in the treatment of chronic wounds and promising in different other skin diseases.

METHODS

In a split-face pilot study we investigated dielectric-barrier-discharged CAP in erythemato-telangiectatic (ETR) and/or papulopustular rosacea (PPR). CAP treatment was applied on lesional skin of a randomized side once daily (90 s/area) for 6 weeks. The other untreated side served as control. Co-primary endpoints were ≥1 improvement of the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score on the treated side compared to control and a decline of the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) after 6 weeks. Secondary endpoints included inflammatory lesion count (papules and pustules), skin redness intensity and erythema size. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded constantly. Additionally, participants were weekly assessed for symptoms, skin condition, trigger factors, skin care, treatment success, and local tolerance parameters. All p values were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

RESULTS

Twelve subjects (ETR, n = 3; ETR and PPR, n = 9) completed the study. DLQI was significantly improved after 6 weeks (p = 0.007). On the CAP-treated side, lesions (p = 0.007) and erythema size (p = 0.041) were significantly reduced compared to the control. IGA (p = 0.2) and skin redness intensity (p = 0.5) did not differ significantly between control and CAP-treated side. No serious AEs occurred and treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

CAP is a promising new treatment of rosacea, especially for PPR.

Quality of life measurement in rosacea. Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Forces on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa

The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Forces (TFs) on Quality of Life (QoL) and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and Acne, Rosacea and Hidradenitis Suppurativa (ARHS) do not recommend the use of any generic instrument as a single method of Health Related (HR) QoL assessment in rosacea, except when comparing quimp (quality of life impairment) in rosacea patients with that in other non-dermatologic skin diseases and/or healthy controls. The EADV TFs on QoL and Patient-Oriented Outcomes and ARHS recommend the use of the dermatology-specific HRQoL instrument the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the rosacea-specific HRQoL instrument RosaQoL in rosacea patients. The DLQI minimal clinically important difference may be used as a marker of clinical efficacy of the treatment and DLQI score banding of 0 or 1 corresponding to no effect on patients' HRQoL could be an important treatment goal. This information may be added to consensuses and guidelines for rosacea.

A Cross-Sectional Study on the Relationship Between Rosacea Severity and Quality of Life or Psychological State

Background

Rosacea appears predominantly in highly visible areas of the facial region.

Objective

To investigate the psychological status and quality of life(QOL) of rosacea.

Methods

We used a hospital-based cross-sectional analytical study design between Jan 1, 2020, and Jan 1, 2021. We analyzed the differences and correlations in the severity of rosacea and its impacts on QOL and mental health, separately.

Results

469 patients with rosacea were included. The mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) score was 12.6±7.7 and the affected level of DLQI was moderately severe. The total score of Rosacea-specific Quality-of-Life instrument (RosQol) was 2.34 ± 0.84, and the scores of emotion, symptoms, and function were 2.41 ± 0.99, 2.37 ±0.82, and 2.03 ± 0.89, respectively. 44.8% of patients suffered from anxiety and 37.5% from depression. There were statistically significant differences in the incidence of anxiety (p <0.001), the DLQL (p =0.02), RosQol emotion (p =0.04), symptom (p <0.01) and function (p =0.02) scores in the different severity. In addition, worsening QOL was significantly associated with increased disease severity [Spearman's rank correlation index (r) ranging from 0.171 to 0.266,p<0.01 (RosQol); r =0.104,p =0.024 (DLQI)]. There was also a positive correlation between anxiety [r =0.155; p<0.01] and the different severity levels.

Conclusion

Rosacea maybe has a greater significant impact on patient's QOL and mental health. And the impact of QOL and mental health tend to deteriorate significantly with increasing disease severity. The relationship suggests that QOL assessment is of great interest in clinical practice and should be further explored.