The use of capecitabine in daily practice: a study on adherence and patients' experiences

Factors affecting medication adherence in patients using oral chemotherapy: A descriptive study

INTRODUCTION

The utilization of oral chemotherapy agents for cancer treatment has witnessed a steady rise in recent years. The pivotal determinant for the success of oral chemotherapy lies in the adherence of cancer patients to the prescribed treatment. This study aims to explore oral chemotherapy adherence and identify factors influencing medication adherence among cancer patients.

METHODS

A total of 103 cancer patients participated in this descriptive study. Data were collected using the Oral Chemotherapy Adherence Scale, the Turkish Translation of the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ-T) and The Functional Living Index-Cancer.

RESULTS

Of the participants, 66% reported good adherence to oral chemotherapy. Key findings indicate that access to health services (β = -1.473, p = 0.009), cancer stage (β = -1.570, p = 0.015) and the BMQ-T subscale of General Overuse (β = .696, p = 0.041) were independent predictors of medication adherence.

CONCLUSION

The study observed medication non-adherence in one-third of patients undergoing oral chemotherapy. Primary contributors to non-adherence included difficulties in accessing health services, advanced cancer stage and the belief that drugs are over-recommended by doctors. These results underscore the need for a heightened focus on preventable factors, such as improving access to health services and addressing beliefs about drug overuse, to enhance medication adherence in patients receiving oral chemotherapy.

A Rare Case of Non-immune Hemolytic Anemia in a Stage IV Breast Cancer Patient Treated With Capecitabine

Incremental changes in the diagnosis of breast cancer leave drastic impacts on patients. There are detrimental shifts in cost, psychological disorders in terms of depression, and morbidities. Stage IV breast cancer has a high mortality rate and was afflicting our patient who was diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) neo negative, and low Ki-67. Among the various management modalities and effective treatments, capecitabine was selected because of its benefits; however, there are several commonly known adverse effects when using capecitabine including non-immune hemolytic anemia, a very rare and unexpected side effect despite the many research and clinical trials performed. Immune mediate or Coombs positive hemolytic anemia was reported with the usage of capecitabine, but this patient developed Coombs negative or non-immune hemolytic anemia. Capecitabine, a form of fluoropyrimidine, hypothetically affects the erythrocyte membrane structure resulting in the destruction of these cells. Additionally, discontinuation of capecitabine in the patient led to the resolution of the condition; this made us more aware of the precise diagnosis, also considering that the bone marrow biopsy came back negative. 

Milk fermented by Lactobacillus casei CRL431 administered as an immune adjuvant in models of breast cancer and metastasis under chemotherapy

Chemotherapy is the most common treatment for breast cancer and its metastasis; however, it affects the patients' quality of life. Previously, it was demonstrated that milk fermented by Lactobacillus casei CRL431 (probiotic fermented milk (PFM)) exerted benefits against breast cancer metastasis by modulating the immune response in a mouse model. The aim of this work was to evaluate PFM administration on the side effects of capecitabine and on its anti-tumour/anti-metastatic effects. In vitro, 4T1 breast cancer cells were treated with capecitabine in the presence of immune cells' conditioned media from mice administered with PFM. Cell viability was evaluated by MTT assay. In vivo, BALB/c mice (healthy, bearing breast cancer or with potential metastasis) were treated or not with capecitabine and administered with PFM. Blood cell counts, intestinal damages, lung histology and serum cytokines were evaluated. Results showed that capecitabine's toxicity on 4T1 cells was improved by the immune cells from mice that received PFM when the lower dose of capecitabine was evaluated. PFM reduced capecitabine side effects in all the mouse models and decreased intestinal mucositis and mortality. PFM administration to mice under chemotherapy maintained the anti-cancer/anti-metastasis effect of capecitabine with similar or decreased values for serum IL-10 and TNF-α and decreased IL-6, a cytokine related to poor prognosis in advanced cancer patients. In addition, PFM by itself reduced metastasis without side effects and improved the host's immune response. PFM has a potential to be administered as an immune adjuvant in patients under chemotherapy without affecting the treatment. KEY POINTS: • Milk fermented by L. casei CRL431 (PFM) diminished capecitabine side effects. • Capecitabine's toxicity on 4T1 cells was improved by the PFM-stimulated immune cells. • PFM maintained anti-cancer/anti-metastasis effect of capecitabine in mouse models. Graphical abstract.

A new, sensitive and versatile assay for quantitative determination of α-fluoro-β-alanine (AFBA) in human urine by using the reversed-phase ultrahigh performance-tandem mass spectrometry (rp-UHPLC-MS/MS) system

A method for the quantitation of α-fluoro-β-alanine (AFBA), the main metabolite of capecitabine (Cape) and 5-fluoruracil (5-FU), is described. Among antineoplastic drugs (ADs), 5-FU and Cape (the new oral prodrug) are the most commonly applied drugs in cancer therapy. The main objective of this study was to develop a reliable method that would be easy to run on a reversed-phase UHPLC system coupled to tandem mass spectrometry. AFBA was derivatized with Sanger's reagent to ensure complete yield of a stable 2,4 dinitrophenil-α-fluoro-β-alanine derivative. This method was based on the use of a mixed-mode anion exchange solid phase extraction enabling urinary extracts to be clear of endogenous interferences affecting quantitative results. The assay was validated in human urine according to FDA criteria with the use of a labeled internal standard (β-alanine-d4) to minimize experimental error. Good accuracy and precision were demonstrated by determining spiked urine QC samples in four consecutive days. The recovery of AFBA was between 70.0 and 82.6%, with a matrix effect that was 12.8%-18.5%. The lower limit of quantitation (LOQ) was 0.5 ng/mL with a coefficient of variation of 5.3%. This assay was successfully applied to determine the levels of this metabolite in a large number of urine samples taken from personnel who were occupationally exposed to ADs.

Patient-doctor relationship and adherence to capecitabine in outpatients of a German comprehensive cancer center

PURPOSE

The prescribing of oral chemotherapy agents has introduced the new challenge of ensuring patients' adherence to therapy. Aspects of a close patient-doctor relationship are reported to be correlated with adherence to oral anticancer drugs, but data on capecitabine are scarce.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-four outpatients with a diagnosis of cancer and prescribed capecitabine were recruited from a German Comprehensive Cancer Center. We used the Patient-Doctor Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9), the Medical Adherence Rating Scale (MARS), the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ), and the Satisfaction with Information about Medicines Scale (SIMS) to assess patients' perceptions and behavior. Medical data were extracted from the charts.

RESULTS

Non-adherence was reported by 20% of the 64 participants. The perceived quality of the patient-doctor relationship was high in general, but it did not emerge as a predictor of adherence in our survey (odds ratio [OR]=0.915, P=0.162, 95% CI=0.808-1.036). However, beliefs about medicine (OR=1.268, P<0.002; 95% CI=1.090-1.475) as well as satisfaction with information about medicine (OR=1.252, P<0.040, 95% CI=1.010-1.551) were predictors of adherence and the quality of the patient-doctor relationship was correlated with both variables (r=0.373, P=0.002 for SIMS sum score; r=0.263, P=0.036 for BMQ necessity/concern difference). Overall, adherence to capecitabine was high with a conviction that the therapy is necessary. However, concerns were expressed regarding the long-term effect of capecitabine use. Patients have unmet information needs regarding interactions of capecitabine with other medicines and the impairment of their intimate life.

CONCLUSIONS

In order to ensure adherence to capecitabine, our results seem to encourage the default use of modern and perhaps more impersonal means of information brokerage (eg, email, internet). However, the contents of some of patients' informational needs as well as the associations of patients' beliefs and satisfaction about the information received suggest a benefit from a trustful patient-doctor relationship.

Adherence and Patients' Experiences with the Use of Capecitabine in Daily Practice

Introduction: Capecitabine is a widely prescribed oral anticancer agent. We studied medication adherence and explored its use in daily practice from a patients' perspective.

Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 92) starting capecitabine were followed up to five 3-week cycles. Adherence was assessed using a pill count, pharmacy data and dosing information from the patients' medical file. Self-reported adherence was measured using the Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS). At baseline and during week 2 of cycles 1, 3, and 5, patients filled out questionnaires about quality of life, symptoms, attitude toward medicines and disease and use in daily practice. Simultaneously, blood samples were taken to determine the area under the curve (AUC) of 5′-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5′-DFUR), 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and α-fluoro-β-alanine (FBAL) by a population pharmacokinetic model. Associations between AUCs and patient-reported symptoms were tested for cycles 3 and 5.

Results: Most patients (84/92; 91%) had an adherence rate of ≥95 and ≤ 105%. The percentage of patients reporting any non-adherence behavior measured with MARS increased from 16% at cycle 1 to 29% at cycle 5. Symptoms were reported frequently and the dosing regimen was adjusted by the physician at least once in 62% of patients. In multivariate analysis the probability of an adjustment increased with the number of co-medication (OR 1.19, 95% CI: 1.03–1.39) and a stronger emotional response to the disease (OR 1.32, 95% CI: 1.10–1.59). The AUC of 5′-DFUR was associated with weight loss (OR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01–1.19), AUC of FBAL with hand-foot syndrome (OR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83–0.99), rhinorrhea (OR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03–1.42 weight loss (OR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.00–1.20) and depression (OR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.82–0.99). Side effects were reported by one third of patients as the reason to discontinue treatment.

Conclusion: Adherence to capecitabine was generally high. Nevertheless, adherence measured with MARS decreased over time Adherence management to support implementation of correct capecitabine use is specifically relevant in longer term treatment. In addition, it appears that adverse event management is important to support persistence. With the extending armamentarium of oral targeted anticancer agents and prolonged treatment duration, we expect the issue of medication adherence of increasing importance in oncology.

Over compliance with capecitabine oral chemotherapy

CASE

A case study of a patient who over complied with adjuvant capecitabine monotherapy on several occasions is described. The patient suffered worsening side effects, predominantly palmar plantar erythrodysesthesia which resulted in dose reduction and delay. The patient had disregarded advice to stop taking the capecitabine as he perceived it as "important to fight his cancer". The patient refused review with a psychologist.

CONCLUSION

There is a lack of evidence regarding the issue of over compliance. Pharmacists should consider discussing patient's attitudes towards taking their medication and its importance to them in treating their cancer. Tools that are used to assess non-compliance could be utilised to identify patients who over comply. Further research is required to gain further understanding of the psychological factors behind patient's decisions to over comply with treatment.

Understanding patients' adherence-related beliefs about medicines prescribed for long-term conditions: a meta-analytic review of the Necessity-Concerns Framework

BACKGROUND

Patients' beliefs about treatment influence treatment engagement and adherence. The Necessity-Concerns Framework postulates that adherence is influenced by implicit judgements of personal need for the treatment (necessity beliefs) and concerns about the potential adverse consequences of taking it.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of the NCF in explaining nonadherence to prescribed medicines.

DATA SOURCES

We searched EMBASE, Medline, PsycInfo, CDSR/DARE/CCT and CINAHL from January 1999 to April 2013 and handsearched reference sections from relevant articles.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Studies using the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) to examine perceptions of personal necessity for medication and concerns about potential adverse effects, in relation to a measure of adherence to medication.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with long-term conditions.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of methodological quality was assessed by two independent reviewers. We pooled odds ratios for adherence using random effects models.

RESULTS

We identified 3777 studies, of which 94 (N = 25,072) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Across studies, higher adherence was associated with stronger perceptions of necessity of treatment, OR = 1.742, 95% CI [1.569, 1.934], p<0.0001, and fewer Concerns about treatment, OR = 0.504, 95% CI: [0.450, 0.564], p<0.0001. These relationships remained significant when data were stratified by study size, the country in which the research was conducted and the type of adherence measure used.

LIMITATIONS

Few prospective longitudinal studies using objective adherence measures were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

The Necessity-Concerns Framework is a useful conceptual model for understanding patients' perspectives on prescribed medicines. Taking account of patients' necessity beliefs and concerns could enhance the quality of prescribing by helping clinicians to engage patients in treatment decisions and support optimal adherence to appropriate prescriptions.

Assessing adherence to oral chemotherapy using different measurement methods: Lessons learned from capecitabine

Purpose

Adherence to oral medication is important in oncology. Few studies have evaluated adherence with cancer agents such as capecitabine, which is given on a complicated schedule. Furthermore, little guidance exists regarding the best methods for monitoring adherence with oral cancer drugs. The purpose of our study was to evaluate adherence to capecitabine using several accepted measures.

Patients and methods

Patients treated with capecitabine for gastrointestinal cancers were included in this prospective cohort study. Adherence was evaluated during two consecutive cycles of capecitabine using three assessment methods: self-report, pill count, and use of a microelectronic monitoring system. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients adherent to capecitabine (>80% of adherence according to the three methods of measurement); the secondary objective was to compare the three methods of measurement.

Results

Nineteen patients were accrued to this study. Further accrual was stopped after the first planned analysis, because 18 and 19 patients were adherent by self-report and pill count, respectively. The overall adherence rates were 99, 100, and 61% with self-report, pill count, and microelectronic monitoring system cap, respectively. Ten (53%) patients were classified as nonadherent (<80% of adherence according to at least one method of measurement), but four of them transferred their pills into another medication container suggesting that measurement of adherence using microelectronic monitoring system technology may not be useful.

Conclusion

While we did not identify a major adherence issue with capecitabine in our study, it provides insight into problems associated with measurement of adherence in oncology and suggests that combining measures of adherence maximizes accuracy.