1
|
Üstündağ S, Yeşilbalkan ÖU, Kabay SC. The effect of a mobile education application (MobilMS) developed for multiple sclerosis patients in Turkey on symptom management and quality of life: A randomized controlled study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2024; 81:105342. [PMID: 38091808 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 11/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disease that affects the central nervous system (CNS) and is caused by immune dysfunction. MS results in a variety of symptoms that affect physical, emotional, social, and cognitive functioning. Effective symptom management is a critical factor in improving the quality of life (QoL) of patients with MS. PURPOSE To determine the effects of a comprehensive mobile education application developed for Turkish patients with MS on symptom management and QoL. METHODS The study was conducted as a randomized controlled trial and included 63 patients with MS older than 18 years who had an Expanded Disability Status Scale score of ≤6 and were actively using smart phones (intervention group, n = 31; control group, n = 32). Data were collected using a patient information form, the Multiple Sclerosis-Related Symptom (MS-RS) checklist, the Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life Scale (MSQoL-54), and the Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Adherence Questionnaire (MS-TAQ). The scales were administered three times: at baseline, first month, and third month. Patients with MS in the intervention group were followed up for three months using MobilMS. RESULTS In the intervention group, the mean rating of MobilMS was 8.74±1.29. Most patients indicated that MobilMS was an "informative and useful application". None of the patients in the study reported any side effects or difficulties when using MobilMS application. The mean MSQL-54 score of the intervention group was significantly higher compared to that of the control group at the first and third months (p = 0.001). The mean scores on the MS-RS checklist (p = 0.985), MS-TAQ subscale, Disease modifying therapies (DMT) barriers (p = 0.237), DMT side effects (p = 0.994), DMT coping strategies (p = 0.469), and Missing Doze Rate (MDR) (p = 0.765) were lower in the intervention group than in the control group, but these results were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION The results of the study showed that MobilMS was highly appreciated, accepted, and used by patients with MS. MobilMS has the potential to meet the requirements for a free and accessible symptom management tool for patients with MS. The innovative MobilMS-based education intervention for support and symptom management is recommended as part of supportive care for this patient population. It is hoped that this study will pave the way for future studies on the utility of mobile applications for symptom management in patients with MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sema Üstündağ
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Nursing Department, Kütahya Health Sciences University, Kütahya, Turkey.
| | | | - Sibel Canbaz Kabay
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neurology, Dokuz Eylül University, İzmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prinssen P, Jongen PJ, Heerings M, Wyverkens E, T’Sjoen G, Deschepper E, Dewitte M. Sexual Motivation in Persons with Multiple Sclerosis: A Controlled Cross-Sectional Study. Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis 2023; 13:33-44. [PMID: 37404329 PMCID: PMC10315151 DOI: 10.2147/dnnd.s401457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose Sexual motives are major determinants of sexual behaviour. It has been known that sexual motives may vary according to circumstances. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic disease causing a broad range of symptoms and disabilities, that often interfere with sexual activities. We aimed to investigate the sexual motives in persons with MS. Patients and Methods Cross-sectional study in 157 persons with MS and 157 controls matched for age, gender, relationship, duration of relationship and educational status via propensity score matching. The Reasons for Having Sex (YSEX) questionnaire assessed the proportion with which a person had engaged in sexual intercourse for each of 140 distinct motives to have sex. Estimated mean differences in scores for four primary factors (Physical, Goal attainment, Emotional, Insecurity) and 13 sub-factors, and sexual satisfaction and importance of sex were calculated as Average Treatment Effect of the Treated using 99% confidence intervals. Results Persons with MS reported a lower proportion of engaging in sex compared with the controls for the factors Physical (-0.29), Emotional (-0.23) and Insecurity (-0.10); and for the physical sub-factors Pleasure (-0.48), Experience seeking (-0.32), Stress reduction (-0.24), and Physical desirability (-0.16), the emotional sub-factors Love and commitment (-0.27) and Expression (-0.17), and the insecurity sub-factor Self-esteem boost (-0.23). In the control group seven of the top 10 sexual motives were physical versus five in the MS group. The importance of sex was lower in the MS group (-0.68). Conclusion Findings of this controlled cross-sectional study suggest a reduction in the number of sexual motives in persons with MS, especially of physical motives related to pleasure and experience seeking. Health care professionals may consider assessing sexual motivation when dealing with persons with MS who suffer from decreased sexual desire or another sexual dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Prinssen
- Praktijk Seksualiteit en welzijn, Roermond, 6045 GL, the Netherlands
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| | - Peter Joseph Jongen
- MS4 Research Institute, Nijmegen, 6522 KJ, the Netherlands
- Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, 9713 AV, the Netherlands
| | - Marco Heerings
- Dutch National MS Foundation, Rotterdam, 3044 AT, the Netherlands
| | - Elia Wyverkens
- Department of Endocrinology, Center for Sexology and Gender, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| | - Guy T’Sjoen
- Department of Endocrinology, Center for Sexology and Gender, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| | - Ellen Deschepper
- Biostatistics Unit, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, 9000, Belgium
| | - Marieke Dewitte
- Department of Clinical Psychological Science, Faculty of Psychology and Neurosciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6229 ER, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guilcher SJ, Cadel L, He A, Cimino SR, Ahmed M, Ho CH, Hitzig SL, McCarthy LM, Patel T, Hahn-Goldberg S, Lofters AK, Packer TL. Medication self-management toolkits for adults with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review. EXPLORATORY RESEARCH IN CLINICAL AND SOCIAL PHARMACY 2023; 10:100282. [PMID: 37396110 PMCID: PMC10314208 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2023] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease that is often treated with multiple medications. Managing multiple medications, also known as polypharmacy, can be challenging for persons with MS. Toolkits are instructional resources designed to promote behaviour change. Toolkits may support medication self-management for adults with MS, as they have been useful in other populations with chronic conditions. Objective The main purpose of this review was to identify and summarize medication self-management toolkits for MS, as related to the design, delivery, components, and measures used to evaluate implementation and/or outcomes. Methods A scoping review was conducted following guidelines by JBI. Articles were included if they focused on adults (18 years or older) with MS. Results Six articles reporting on four unique toolkits were included. Most toolkits were technology-based, including mobile or online applications, with only one toolkit being paper-based. The toolkits varied in type, frequency, and duration of medication management support. Varying outcomes were also identified, but there were improvements reported in symptom management, medication adherence, decision-making, and quality of life. The six studies were quantitative in design, with no studies exploring the user experience from a qualitative or mixed-methods design. Conclusions There is limited research on medication self-management toolkits among adults with MS. Future development, implementation, and evaluation mixed-methods research are needed to explore user experiences and overall design of toolkits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara J.T. Guilcher
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S3M2, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario L5B1B8, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G1V7, Canada
- St. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario M2M2G1, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5T3M6, Canada
| | - Lauren Cadel
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S3M2, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario L5B1B8, Canada
| | - Andrea He
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S3M2, Canada
| | - Stephanie R. Cimino
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S3M2, Canada
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G1V7, Canada
- St. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario M2M2G1, Canada
| | - Maham Ahmed
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S3M2, Canada
| | - Chester H. Ho
- Division of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta T6G2G4, Canada
| | - Sander L. Hitzig
- Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G1V7, Canada
- St. John's Rehab Research Program, Sunnybrook Research Institute, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario M2M2G1, Canada
- Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G1V7, Canada
| | - Lisa M. McCarthy
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S3M2, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Mississauga, Ontario L5B1B8, Canada
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, Ontario N2G 1C5, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G1V7, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5G1N8, Canada
| | - Tejal Patel
- School of Pharmacy, University of Waterloo, Kitchener, Ontario N2G 1C5, Canada
- Schlegel-University of Waterloo Research Institute of Aging, Waterloo, Ontario N2J0E2, Canada
| | - Shoshana Hahn-Goldberg
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S3M2, Canada
- OpenLab, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario M5G2C4, Canada
| | - Aisha K. Lofters
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5G1V7, Canada
- Women's College Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario M5G1N8, Canada
| | - Tanya L. Packer
- Schools of Occupational Therapy and Health Administration, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H4R2, Canada
- Department of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Salimzadeh Z, Damanabi S, Ferdousi R, Shaafi S, Kalankesh LR. A mobile app (IDoThis) for multiple sclerosis self-management: development and initial evaluation. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2022; 22:328. [PMID: 36514043 PMCID: PMC9745928 DOI: 10.1186/s12911-022-02078-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common neurological disorders worldwide, and self-management is considered an essential dimension in its control. This study aimed to develop an evidence-based mobile application for MS self-management and evaluate it. METHODS This study was undertaken in three phases: content preparation, design, and evaluation. In the content preparation phase, the researchers extracted MS self-management needs based on related guidelines and guides, existing apps on the self-management of MS, and the field experts' views and confirmation. The design phase was conducted in five steps: defining app functionalities, depicting the wireframe, preparing the media, coding the app, and testing the app's performance. The app was developed using the Android Studio environment and Java programming language for the Android operating system. The performance of the developed app was tested separately in several turns, and existing defects were corrected in each turn. Finally, after using the app for three weeks, the app was evaluated for its short-term impact on MS management and user-friendliness using a researcher-constructed questionnaire from participants' (N = 20) perspectives. RESULTS The IDoThis app is an offline app for people with MS that includes five main modules: three modules for training or informing users about different aspects of MS, one module for monitoring the user's MS condition, and a reporting module. In the initial evaluation of the app, 75% (n = 15) of participants mentioned that using this app improved MS self-management status at intermediate and higher levels, but 25% (n = 5) of the participants mentioned that the effect of using the app on the self-management tasks was low or was very low. The majority of users rated the user-friendliness of the app as high. The users found the sections "exercises in MS" and "monitoring of MS status" beneficial to their self-management. Still, the fatigue and sleep management sections are needed to meet users' expectations. CONCLUSION Using IDoThis app as a self-management tool for individuals with MS appears feasible, that can meet the need for a free and accessible self-management tool for individuals with MS. Future directions should consider the users' fatigue and sleep management expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeinab Salimzadeh
- grid.412888.f0000 0001 2174 8913Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Daneshgah Ave, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Shahla Damanabi
- grid.412888.f0000 0001 2174 8913Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Daneshgah Ave, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Ferdousi
- grid.412888.f0000 0001 2174 8913Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Daneshgah Ave, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Sheida Shaafi
- grid.412888.f0000 0001 2174 8913Department of Neurology, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Leila R. Kalankesh
- grid.412888.f0000 0001 2174 8913Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Daneshgah Ave, Tabriz, Iran ,grid.412888.f0000 0001 2174 8913Health Care Services Management Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran ,grid.412888.f0000 0001 2174 8913Research Center of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hoving M, Jongen PJ, Evers SMAA, Edens MA, Zeinstra EMPE. MSmonitor-plus program and video calling care (MPVC) for multidisciplinary care and self-management in multiple sclerosis: study protocol of a single-center randomized, parallel-group, open label, non-inferiority trial. BMC Neurol 2022; 22:423. [DOI: 10.1186/s12883-022-02948-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 10/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
We designed a new multi-modal version of the MSmonitor, called the MSmonitor-Plus and Video calling Care (MPVC), a self-management and education program with e-health interventions that combines frequent use of specific questionnaires with video calling in treating multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.
Objective
To assess the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and feasibility of MPVC compared to care as usual (CAU), with the goal of achieving equal or better quality of life for MS patients and their partners/informal caregivers.
Our hypothesis is that by using MPVC, monitoring will become more efficient, that patients’ self-efficacy, quality of life, and adherence to treatment will improve, and that they will be able to live their lives more autonomously.
Methods
A randomized, parallel-group, open label, non-inferiority trial will be conducted to compare MPVC with CAU in MS patients and their partners/informal caregivers. A total of 208 patients will be included with follow-up measurements for 2 years (at baseline and every 3 months). One hundred four patients will be randomized to MPVC and 104 patients to CAU. Partners/informal caregivers of both groups will be asked to participate.
The study will consist of three parts: 1) a clinical effectiveness study, 2) an economic evaluation, and 3) a process evaluation. The primary outcome relates to equal or improved disease-specific physical and mental quality of life of the MS patients. Secondary outcomes relate to self-efficacy, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, autonomy, satisfaction with the care provided, and quality of life of partners/informal caregivers.
Discussion
The idea behind using MPVC is that MS patients will gain more insight into the individual course of the disease and get a better grip on their symptoms. This knowledge should increase their autonomy, give patients more control of their condition and enable them to better and proactively interact with health care professionals.
As the consulting process becomes more efficient with the use of MPVC, MS-related problems could be detected earlier, enabling earlier multidisciplinary care, treatment or modification of the treatment. This could have a positive effect on the quality of life for both the MS patient and his/her partner/informal caregiver, reducing health and social costs.
Trial registration
NCT05242731 Clinical Trials.gov. Date of registration: 16 February 2022 retrospectively registered.
Collapse
|
6
|
Sieber C, Chiavi D, Haag C, Kaufmann M, Horn AB, Dressel H, Zecca C, Calabrese P, Pot C, Kamm CP, von Wyl V. Electronic Health Diary Campaigns to Complement Longitudinal Assessments in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: Nested Observational Study (Preprint). JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2022; 10:e38709. [PMID: 36197713 PMCID: PMC9582921 DOI: 10.2196/38709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2022] [Revised: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Electronic health diaries hold promise in complementing standardized surveys in prospective health studies but are fraught with numerous methodological challenges. Objective The study aimed to investigate participant characteristics and other factors associated with response to an electronic health diary campaign in persons with multiple sclerosis, identify recurrent topics in free-text diary entries, and assess the added value of structured diary entries with regard to current symptoms and medication intake when compared with survey-collected information. Methods Data were collected by the Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry during a nested electronic health diary campaign and during a regular semiannual Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry follow-up survey serving as comparator. The characteristics of campaign participants were descriptively compared with those of nonparticipants. Diary content was analyzed using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count 2015 software (Pennebaker Conglomerates, Inc) and descriptive keyword analyses. The similarities between structured diary data and follow-up survey data on health-related quality of life, symptoms, and medication intake were examined using the Jaccard index. Results Campaign participants (n=134; diary entries: n=815) were more often women, were not working full time, did not have a higher education degree, had a more advanced gait impairment, and were on average 5 years older (median age 52.5, IQR 43.25-59.75 years) than eligible nonparticipants (median age 47, IQR 38-55 years; n=524). Diary free-text entries (n=632; participants: n=100) most often contained references to the following standard Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count word categories: negative emotion (193/632, 30.5%), body parts or body functioning (191/632, 30.2%), health (94/632, 14.9%), or work (67/632, 10.6%). Analogously, the most frequently mentioned keywords (diary entries: n=526; participants: n=93) were “good,” “day,” and “work.” Similarities between diary data and follow-up survey data, collected 14 months apart (median), were high for health-related quality of life and stable for slow-changing symptoms such as fatigue or gait disorder. Similarities were also comparatively high for drugs requiring a regular application, including interferon beta-1a (Avonex) and glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), and for modern oral therapies such as fingolimod (Gilenya) and teriflunomide (Aubagio). Conclusions Diary campaign participation seemed dependent on time availability and symptom burden and was enhanced by reminder emails. Electronic health diaries are a meaningful complement to regular structured surveys and can provide more detailed information regarding medication use and symptoms. However, they should ideally be embedded into promotional activities or tied to concrete research study tasks to enhance regular and long-term participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloé Sieber
- Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Deborah Chiavi
- Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christina Haag
- Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Marco Kaufmann
- Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Andrea B Horn
- University Research Priority Program "Dynamics of Healthy Aging", University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Competence Center of Gerontology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Holger Dressel
- Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of Zurich and University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Chiara Zecca
- Multiple Sclerosis Center, Neurocenter of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Biomedical Sciences, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Pasquale Calabrese
- Neuropsychology and Behavioral Neurology Unit, Division of Molecular and Cognitive Neuroscience, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Clinic of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Caroline Pot
- Service of Neurology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Christian Philipp Kamm
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Neurocenter, Cantonal Hospital Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Viktor von Wyl
- Swiss Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Damanabi S, Salimzadeh Z, Kalankesh LR, Shaafi S, Ferdousi R. Exploring Self-management Needs of Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Qualitative Study for Mobile Application Development. Int J MS Care 2022; 24:1-7. [PMID: 35261564 PMCID: PMC8883810 DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2019-129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a common cause of neurologic disability in young adults. Individuals with MS deal with the day-to-day effects of the disease on their lives. Self-management can help with these challenges. This study aimed to explore MS self-management needs according to experiences of persons with MS and was conducted as part of a research project to develop an MS self-management mobile application. METHODS We used a qualitative method to elicit self-management needs among 12 individuals with MS and conducted semistructured interviews with them. The participants were chosen based on snowball sampling. The interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Finally, qualitative data were analyzed using a content analysis method (inductive way) to identify the underlying themes and subthemes. RESULTS The analysis resulted in the emergence of 7 themes: the source of information, basic needs, understanding MS, physical exercises in MS, useful nutrition in MS, MS monitoring, and communication. Within these 7 themes we identified 23 subthemes. CONCLUSIONS The themes that emerged in this study show what needs are essential to help persons with MS improve their self-management capacity. These findings can help in the development of self-management mobile applications for supporting individuals in managing MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahla Damanabi
- From the Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics (SD, ZS, LRK, RF), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Zeinab Salimzadeh
- From the Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics (SD, ZS, LRK, RF), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Leila R. Kalankesh
- From the Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics (SD, ZS, LRK, RF), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- Health Care Services Management Research Center (LRK), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
- Research Center of Psychiatry and Behavioural Sciences (LRK), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Sheida Shaafi
- From the Department of Health Information Technology, School of Management and Medical Informatics (SD, ZS, LRK, RF), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Reza Ferdousi
- Department of Neurology (SS), Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gromisch ES, Turner AP, Haselkorn JK, Lo AC, Agresta T. Mobile health (mHealth) usage, barriers, and technological considerations in persons with multiple sclerosis: a literature review. JAMIA Open 2021; 4:ooaa067. [PMID: 34514349 PMCID: PMC8423420 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) can face a number of potential healthcare-related barriers, for which mobile health (mHealth) technology can be potentially beneficial. This review aimed to understand the frequency, current uses, and potential barriers with mHealth usage among persons with MS. METHODS A query string was used to identify articles on PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore that were published in English between January 2010 and December 2019. Abstracts were reviewed and selected based on a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifty-nine peer-reviewed research studies related to the study questions are summarized. RESULTS The majority of persons with MS were reported as using smartphones, although rates of mHealth utilization varied widely. mHealth usage was grouped into 3 broad categories: (1) disability and symptom measurement; (2) interventions and symptom management; and (3) tracking and promoting adherence. While there have been an increasing number of mHealth options, certain limitations associated with MS (eg, poor dexterity, memory problems) may affect usage, although including persons with MS in the design process can address some of these issues. DISCUSSION Given the increased attention to mHealth in this population and the current need for telehealth and at home devices, it is important that persons with MS and healthcare providers are involved in the development of new mHealth tools to ensure that the end product meets their needs. Considerations for addressing the potential mHealth use barriers in persons with MS are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth S Gromisch
- Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital, Trinity Health Of New England, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Medical Sciences, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Aaron P Turner
- Multiple Sclerosis Center for Excellence West, Veterans Affairs, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Rehabilitation Care Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jodie K Haselkorn
- Multiple Sclerosis Center for Excellence West, Veterans Affairs, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Rehabilitation Care Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Albert C Lo
- Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital, Trinity Health Of New England, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Thomas Agresta
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
- Center for Quantitative Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Meirte J, Hellemans N, Anthonissen M, Denteneer L, Maertens K, Moortgat P, Van Daele U. Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review. JMIR Perioper Med 2020; 3:e15588. [PMID: 33393920 PMCID: PMC7709853 DOI: 10.2196/15588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important in clinical practice and research. The growth of electronic health technologies provides unprecedented opportunities to systematically collect information via PROMs. Objective The aim of this study was to provide an objective and comprehensive overview of the benefits, barriers, and disadvantages of the digital collection of qualitative electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs). Methods We performed a systematic review of articles retrieved from PubMED and Web of Science. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed during all stages. The search strategy yielded a total of 2333 records, from which 32 met the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The relevant ePROM-related information was extracted from each study. Results Results were clustered as benefits and disadvantages. Reported benefits of ePROMs were greater patient preference and acceptability, lower costs, similar or faster completion time, higher data quality and response rates, and facilitated symptom management and patient-clinician communication. Tablets were the most used ePROM modality (14/32, 44%), and, as a platform, Web-based systems were used the most (26/32, 81%). Potential disadvantages of ePROMs include privacy protection, a possible large initial financial investment, and exclusion of certain populations or the “digital divide.” Conclusions In conclusion, ePROMs offer many advantages over paper-based collection of patient-reported outcomes. Overall, ePROMs are preferred over paper-based methods, improve data quality, result in similar or faster completion time, decrease costs, and facilitate clinical decision making and symptom management. Disadvantages regarding ePROMs have been outlined, and suggestions are provided to overcome the barriers. We provide a path forward for researchers and clinicians interested in implementing ePROMs. Trial Registration PROSPERO CRD42018094795; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=94795
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jill Meirte
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI-MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Nick Hellemans
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI-MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Mieke Anthonissen
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI-MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lenie Denteneer
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI-MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Koen Maertens
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Peter Moortgat
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium
| | - Ulrike Van Daele
- Department of Rehabilitation Science and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy (REVAKI-MOVANT), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jongen PJ, Ter Veen G, Lemmens W, Donders R, van Noort E, Zeinstra E. The Interactive Web-Based Program MSmonitor for Self-Management and Multidisciplinary Care in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: Quasi-Experimental Study of Short-Term Effects on Patient Empowerment. J Med Internet Res 2020; 22:e14297. [PMID: 32149713 PMCID: PMC7091023 DOI: 10.2196/14297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2019] [Revised: 08/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Empowerment helps persons with a chronic disease to self-manage their condition and increase their autonomy and participation. MSmonitor (Curavista bv) is an interactive Web-based program for self-management and multidisciplinary care in multiple sclerosis (MS). It includes, among others, short questionnaires on fatigue (Modified Fatigue Impact Scale-5 [MFIS-5]) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL, Leeds Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life [LMSQoL]); long questionnaires on disabilities, perception of disabilities (Multiple Sclerosis Impact Profile), and HRQoL (Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54); a Medication and Adherence Inventory and an Activity Diary. The combination MFIS-5, LMSQoL, and Medication and Adherence Inventory constitutes the Quick Scan. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the short-term effects of MSmonitor on empowerment in patients with MS. METHODS We conducted a quasi-experimental study in a general hospital. Of the 180 patients with MS, 125 were eligible, 30 used MSmonitor, and 21 participated in the study (mean age 45.4 years, SD 10.2 years). A total of 24 eligible patients who did not use MSmonitor constituted the control group (mean age 49.3 years, SD 11.4 years). At baseline and at 4 months, we assessed self-efficacy (Multiple Sclerosis Self-Efficacy Scale [MSSES]), participation and autonomy (Impact on Participation and Autonomy [IPA] questionnaire), and self-management (Partners In Health [PIH] questionnaire). Differences between time points and groups were tested with paired t tests and χ² tests. RESULTS In the MSmonitor group, follow-up values remained unchanged for MSSES control (P=.19), MSSES function (P=.62), IPA limitations (P=.26), IPA problems (P=.40), PIH recognition and management of symptoms (P=.52), PIH adherence to treatment (P=.80), and PIH coping (P=.73), whereas the PIH knowledge score had improved (mean 27.8, SD 1.7 vs mean 28.7, SD 2.0; P=.02). The overall utilization rate of the program components was 83% and that of the Quick Scan was 95%. In the control group, all outcomes had remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS The results suggest that for first-time users of the MSmonitor program and their health care providers, it may not be justified to expect a short-term improvement in empowerment in terms of self-efficacy, self-management, autonomy, or participation. Furthermore, a lack of effect on empowerment is not because of nonusage of the program components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Joseph Jongen
- Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.,MS4 Research Institute, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Gezien Ter Veen
- Zorggroep Noorderboog, Meppel, Netherlands.,Isala Hospital, Meppel, Netherlands
| | - Wim Lemmens
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Rogier Donders
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Marziniak M, Brichetto G, Feys P, Meyding-Lamadé U, Vernon K, Meuth SG. The Use of Digital and Remote Communication Technologies as a Tool for Multiple Sclerosis Management: Narrative Review. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol 2018; 5:e5. [PMID: 29691208 PMCID: PMC5941090 DOI: 10.2196/rehab.7805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2017] [Revised: 01/08/2018] [Accepted: 01/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite recent advances in multiple sclerosis (MS) care, many patients only infrequently access health care services, or are unable to access them easily, for reasons such as mobility restrictions, travel costs, consultation and treatment time constraints, and a lack of locally available MS expert services. Advances in mobile communications have led to the introduction of electronic health (eHealth) technologies, which are helping to improve both access to and the quality of health care services. As the Internet is now readily accessible through smart mobile devices, most people can take advantage of eHealth apps. The development of digital applications and remote communication technologies for patients with MS has increased rapidly in recent years. These apps are intended to complement traditional in-clinic approaches and can bring significant benefits to both patients with MS and health care providers (HCPs). For patients, such eHealth apps have been shown to improve outcomes and increase access to care, disease information, and support. These apps also help patients to participate actively in self-management, for example, by tracking adherence to treatment, changes in bladder and bowel habits, and activity and mood. For HCPs, MS eHealth solutions can simplify the multidisciplinary approaches needed to tailor MS management strategies to individual patients; facilitate remote monitoring of patient symptoms, adverse events, and outcomes; enable the efficient use of limited resources and clinic time; and potentially allow more timely intervention than is possible with scheduled face-to-face visits. These benefits are important because MS is a long-term, multifaceted chronic condition that requires ongoing monitoring, assessment, and management. We identified in the literature 28 eHealth solutions for patients with MS that fall within the four categories of screening and assessment, disease monitoring and self-management, treatment and rehabilitation, and advice and education. We review each solution, focusing on any clinical evidence supporting their use from prospective trials (including ASSESS MS, Deprexis, MSdialog, and the Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test) and consider the opportunities, barriers to adoption, and potential pitfalls of eHealth technologies in routine health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Marziniak
- Department of Neurology, Isar-Amper-Klinikum Munich-East, Haar, Germany
| | - Giampaolo Brichetto
- Scientific Research Area, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation, Genova, Italy
| | - Peter Feys
- Rehabilitation Research Center, Biomedical Research Center, Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Diepenbeek, Belgium
| | | | - Karen Vernon
- Department of Neurology, Salford Royal National Health Service Foundation Trust, Salford, United Kingdom
| | - Sven G Meuth
- Department of Neurology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) has a profound impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL), a comprehensive subjective measure of the patient's health status. Assessment of HRQoL informs on the potential advantages and disadvantages of disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) beyond their effects on observer-based disability and magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities. This article reviews published data from randomized controlled trials and observational studies regarding the effects of currently available DMDs on HRQoL. Data indicate that DMD treatment is associated with prevention of worsening or with improvement of HRQoL, and that, in general, second-line DMDs may have a greater impact on HRQoL than first-line DMDs. In clinical practice, monitoring of HRQoL provides clinicians with unique information regarding disease impact and potential benefits and adverse effects of DMD treatment that may not be obtained otherwise; it might also permit early detection of an unfavorable disease course. It is suggested to assess HRQoL at the time of diagnosis and before starting or switching DMD treatment. Regular HRQoL measurements contribute to a comprehensive clinical evaluation, and may help to elucidate and quantify the patient's contribution to shared decision making regarding DMD treatment. Further studies are needed to better determine the role of HRQoL assessments in daily MS care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Joseph Jongen
- Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713 AV, Groningen, The Netherlands.
- MS4 Research Institute, Ubbergseweg 34, 6522 KJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jongen PJ, Lemmens WA, Hoogervorst EL, Donders R. Glatiramer acetate treatment persistence - but not adherence - in multiple sclerosis patients is predicted by health-related quality of life and self-efficacy: a prospective web-based patient-centred study (CAIR study). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2017; 15:50. [PMID: 28292329 PMCID: PMC5351176 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-017-0622-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2016] [Accepted: 03/03/2017] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In patients with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) the persistence of and adherence to disease modifying drug (DMD) treatment is inadequate. To take individualised measures there is a need to identify patients with a high risk of non-persistence or non-adherence. As patient-related factors have a major influence on persistence and adherence, we investigated whether health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and self-efficacy could predict persistence or adherence. Methods In a prospective web-based patient-centred study in 203 RRMS patients, starting treatment with glatiramer acatete (GA) 20 mg subcutaneously daily, we measured physical and mental HRQoL (Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54 questionnaire), functional and control self-efficacy (Multiple Sclerosis Self-Efficacy Scale), the 12-month persistence rate and, in persistent patients, the percentage of missed doses. HRQoL and self-efficacy were compared between persistent and non-persistent patients, and between adherent and non-adherent patients. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess whether persistence and adherence were explained by HRQoL and self-efficacy. Results Persistent patients had higher baseline physical (mean 58.1 [standard deviation, SD] 16.9) and mental HRQoL (63.8 [16.8]) than non-persistent patients (49.5 [17.6]; 55.9 [20.4]) (P = 0.001; P = 0.003) with no differences between adherent and non-adherent patients (P = 0.46; P = 0.54). Likewise, in persistent patients function (752 [156]) and control self-efficacy (568 [178]) were higher than in non-persistent patients (689 [173]; 491 [192]) (P = 0.009; P = 0.004), but not in adherent vs. non-adherent patients (P = 0.26; P = 0.82). Logistic regression modelling identified physical HRQoL and control self-efficacy as factors that explained persistence. Based on predicted scores from the model, patients were classified into quartiles and the percentage of non-persistent patients per quartile was calculated: non-persistence in the highest quartile was 23.4 vs. 53.2% in the lowest quartile. Risk differentiation with respect to adherence was not possible. Based on these findings we propose a practical work-up scheme to identify patients with a high risk of non-persistence and to identify persistence-related factors. Conclusions Findings suggest that pre-treatment physical HRQoL and control self-efficacy may identify RRMS patients with a high risk of early discontinuation of injectable DMD treatment. Targeting of high-risk patients may enable the efficient use of persistence-promoting measures. Trial Registration Nederlands Trial Register code: NTR2432. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0622-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Joseph Jongen
- University Medical Centre Groningen, Department of Community and Occupational Medicine, University Groningen, Antonius Deusinglaan 1, 9713, AV, Groningen, The Netherlands. .,MS4 Research Institute, Ubbergseweg 34, 6522, KJ, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Wim A Lemmens
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rogier Donders
- Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500, HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|