Eliciting Health State Utilities for Aromatic L-Amino Acid Decarboxylase (AADC) Deficiency: A Vignette Study in France

Long-Term Outcomes of Eladocagene Exuparvovec Compared with Standard of Care in Aromatic L-Amino Acid Decarboxylase (AADC) Deficiency: A Modelling Study

INTRODUCTION

Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) deficiency is a rare disease with symptoms including movement disorders, developmental delays, and autonomic symptoms starting from birth; further, patients with AADC deficiency are at a high risk of death in the first decade of life. Limited information on the impact of treatment with gene therapy on patients' disease trajectories and survival, quality-of-life, and resource usage benefits are available.

METHOD

A cohort-based model with a lifetime horizon has been developed, based on motor milestones, to estimate the long-term benefits for patients after treatment with eladocagene exuparvovec compared to best supportive care (BSC). The model takes a National Health Service (NHS) perspective using a UK setting. The model comprises two parts: the developmental phase, in which patients with initially no motor function can progress to other motor milestone states, and a long-term projection phase. Efficacy for eladocagene exuparvovec is derived from clinical trial data with a duration up to 120 months. As the incidence of AADC deficiency is low, data for key model inputs is lacking; therefore estimates of survival by motor milestone were based on proxy diseases. A disease-specific utility study provided quality of life inputs and a burden of illness study informed inputs for disease management.

RESULTS

The model indicates survival (25.25 undiscounted life years gained) and quality-of-life benefits (20.21 undiscounted quality-adjusted life years [QALYs] gained) for patients treated with eladocagene exuparvovec compared to BSC. Resource usage costs are greater for patients treated with eladocagene exuparvovec, mainly due to the increased life expectancy during which patients accrue additional healthcare resource usage. Scenario analyses indicate robust results.

CONCLUSION

This study assessed long-term outcomes for patients with AADC deficiency. Patients treated with eladocagene exuparvovec were found to have improved survival and quality of life benefits compared to patients treated with BSC.

A Discrete Choice Experiment to Derive Health Utilities for Aromatic L-Amino Acid Decarboxylase (AADC) Deficiency in France

Purpose

Cost-effectiveness evaluations of interventions require health utility data. However, in medical conditions, such as aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) deficiency, this presents problems due to the rarity of the disease. The study aim therefore was to employ a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to generate health utilities for AADC deficiency.

Methods

A previous literature review, clinician and parent interviews had identified six key AADC deficiency attributes: mobility, muscle weakness, oculogyric crises (OCG), feeding ability, cognitive impairment and screaming. A representative sample of the French general population was recruited. Participants rated 5 health state vignettes describing AADC deficiency using time-trade-off (TTO) and standard gamble (SG). Additionally, participants rated the worst health state using the Health Utility Index version 3 (HUI3). Subsequently, participants completed DCE 11 choice sets. Indirect DCE part-worth utilities were converted to health utilities using the anchors from the TTO, SG and HUI3.

Results

The DCE was completed online by 1001 participants (50.9% female; mean age 45.7 years). Most participants (596, 59.5%) provided consistent responses to the repeated choice task. Five models were evaluated, and one preference reversal (“head control”/“sitting unaided”) was identified in all models. The rescaled utilities ranged from 0.3891 to 0.5577 (difference of 0.17 utilities) for TTO anchors corresponding to the worst (633233) and best (111111) health states. Health utilities ranged from 0.5534 to 0.7093 for the SG anchors. The disutility associated with a transition from “no problems walking” to “bedridden” was −0.0533, whereas disutility of moving from “constant screaming” relative to “no screaming” was −0.0248. The disutility associated with daily OCG was −0.0167. Disutilities for the other attributes were small although there were exceptions.

Conclusion

A DCE was used to derive health utilities for AADC deficiency. These health utilities will subsequently be used in an economic model evaluating an AADC deficiency intervention.