1
|
Maurano M, Bukusi D, Masyuko S, Bosire R, Gitau E, Guthrie BL, Monroe-Wise A, Musyoki H, Owuor MA, Sambai B, Sinkele W, Kingston H, Farquhar C, Mbogo L, Ludwig-Barron NT. "We only trust each other": A qualitative study exploring the overdose risk environment among persons who inject drugs living with HIV in Nairobi, Kenya. PLOS GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH 2024; 4:e0003435. [PMID: 38954694 PMCID: PMC11218959 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
In Kenya, overdose remains a major public health concern with approximately 40% of persons who inject drugs (PWID) reporting personal overdoses. PWID living with HIV (PWID-LH) are particularly vulnerable to experiencing fatal and non-fatal overdoses because of the surrounding physical, social, economic, and political environments, which are not fully understood in Kenya. Through qualitative inquiry, this study characterizes Kenya's overdose risk environment. Participants were purposively recruited from a larger cohort study from September to December 2018 using the following inclusion criteria: HIV-positive, age ≥18 years, injected drugs in the last year, and completed cohort study visits. Semi-structured interviews explored experiences of personal and observed overdoses, including injection settings, sequence of events (e.g., pre-, during, and post-overdose), safety strategies, and treatment. Interviews were transcribed, translated (Swahili to English), reviewed, and analyzed thematically, applying a risk environment framework. Nearly all participants described personal and/or observed overdose experiences (96%) and heroin was the most frequently reported substance (79%). Overdose precursors included increased consumption, polysubstance use, recent incarceration, and rushed injections. There were also indications of female-specific precursors, including violence and accessing prefilled syringes within occupational settings. Overdose safety strategies included avoiding injecting alone, injecting drugs incrementally, assessing drug quality, and avoiding polysubstance use. Basic first-aid techniques and naloxone use were common treatment strategies; however, naloxone awareness was low (25%). Barriers to treatment included social network abandonment, police discrimination, medical stigma, fatalism/religiosity, medical and transportation costs, and limited access to treatment services. In Kenya, the overdose risk environment highlights the need for comprehensive overdose strategies that address the physical, social, economic, and political environments. Morbidity and mortality from overdose among PWID-LH could be reduced through overdose prevention initiatives that support harm reduction education, naloxone awareness, and access, destigmatization of PWID, and reforming punitive policies that criminalize PWID-LH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan Maurano
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - David Bukusi
- VCT and HIV Care, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Sarah Masyuko
- National AIDS and STI Control Program (NASCOP), Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Rose Bosire
- Centre for Clinical Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Esther Gitau
- Support for Addictions Prevention and Treatment in Africa (SAPTA), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Brandon L. Guthrie
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Aliza Monroe-Wise
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Helgar Musyoki
- National AIDS and STI Control Program (NASCOP), Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Mercy Apiyo Owuor
- University of Washington Global Assistance Program-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Betsy Sambai
- University of Washington Global Assistance Program-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - William Sinkele
- Support for Addictions Prevention and Treatment in Africa (SAPTA), Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Hanley Kingston
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Carey Farquhar
- Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Loice Mbogo
- University of Washington Global Assistance Program-Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Natasha T. Ludwig-Barron
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington School of Public Health and School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cousien A, Donadille C, Madrid LB, Maradan G, Jauffret-Roustide M, Lalanne L, Auriacombe M, Roux P, Boyer S. Cost-effectiveness of drug consumption rooms in France: a modelling study. BMC Public Health 2024; 24:1426. [PMID: 38807111 PMCID: PMC11135012 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18909-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who inject drugs (PWID) experience many health problems which result in a heavy economic and public health burden. To tackle this issue, France opened two drug consumption rooms (DCRs) in Paris and Strasbourg in 2016. This study assessed their long-term health benefits, costs and cost-effectiveness. METHODS We developed a model to simulate two fictive cohorts for each city (n=2,997 in Paris and n=2,971 in Strasbourg) i) PWID attending a DCR over the period 2016-2026, ii) PWID attending no DCR. The model accounted for HIV and HCV infections, skin abscesses and related infective endocarditis, drug overdoses and emergency department visits. We estimated the number of health events and associated costs over 2016-2026, the lifetime number of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS The numbers of abscesses and associated infective endocarditis, drug overdoses, and emergency department visits decreased significantly in PWID attending DCRs (-77%, -69%, and -65%, respectively) but the impact on HIV and HCV infections was modest (-11% and -6%, respectively). This resulted in savings of €6.6 (Paris) and €5.8 (Strasbourg) millions of medical costs. The ICER of DRCs was €30,600/QALY (Paris) and €9,200/QALY (Strasbourg). In scenario analysis where drug consumption spaces are implemented inside existing harm reduction structures, these ICERs decreased to €21,400/QALY and €2,500/QALY, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our findings show that DCRs are highly effective and efficient to prevent harms in PWID in France, and advocate extending this intervention to other cities by adding drug consumption spaces inside existing harm reduction centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Cousien
- Université Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, IAME, F-75018, Paris, France.
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France.
| | - Cécile Donadille
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France
| | - Laélia Briand Madrid
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France
| | - Gwenaëlle Maradan
- ORS PACA, Observatoire régional de la santé Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur, Marseille, France
| | - Marie Jauffret-Roustide
- Centre d'Etudes des Mouvements Sociaux, Inserm U1276, CNRS UMR 8044, EHESS, Paris, France
- British Columbia Center on Substance Use (BCCSU), Vancouver, Canada
- Baldy Center on Law and Social Policy, Buffalo University, New York, USA
- Institut universitaire sur les dépendances, Université de Sherbrooke, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Laurence Lalanne
- UMR 1329, Team Addictions, Centre de recherche en biomédecine de Strasbourg, Department of addiction medicine, University hospital of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Marc Auriacombe
- UMR 6033, Bordeaux University, SANPSY, CNRS, Bordeaux, France
| | - Perrine Roux
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France
| | - Sylvie Boyer
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l'Information Médicale, ISSPAM, Marseille, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Greene C, Maier K, Urbanik MM. "It's just not the same": Exploring PWUD' perceptions of and experiences with drug policy and SCS services change in a Canadian City. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DRUG POLICY 2023; 111:103934. [PMID: 36549200 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2022.103934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/05/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Shifting political contexts can significantly alter drug policy approaches and available supports for People Who Use Drugs (PWUD). The purpose of this study was to explore how shifts in provincial drug policy approaches, specifically the replacement of a Safe Consumption Site (SCS) with a smaller mobile Overdose Prevention Site (OPS) in Lethbridge, Alberta Canada, impacted PWUD' access to and experiences with harm reduction services. METHODS We conducted semi-structured interviews with 50 PWUD in the City of Lethbridge, Canada. Through traditional fieldwork, we recruited participants within, and just outside of, downtown Lethbridge. Using a standardized general prompt guide to begin interviews, participants were asked a variety of questions about their experiences with and perceptions of SCS access and changes to SCS provisions. Interviews were audio recorded, then transcribed, coded, and analyzed. RESULTS Participants reported regular and frequent access and overall positive experiences with the SCS, despite also noting certain operational barriers (e.g., long wait times). By contrast, participants reported more limited use of the new OPS compared to the SCS because of three main reasons: (1) concerns about location; (2) smoking room elimination; and (3) lack of social space and activities. Overall, changes to SCS provision produced a range of negative consequences for PWUD in Lethbridge. These relate to perceived increases in drug-related harms (e.g., increased overdoses) as well as negative social impacts (e.g., lack of place to meet other people). CONCLUSION Findings from this study provide preliminary indications of the importance of understanding how contextual and locally-specific elements (location, limits on permitted route administration, and social aspects) can work together to facilitate SCS uptake and even overcome traditional SCS barriers. Conversely, the absence of such elements can hinder SCS uptake. Results show that the value of SCS might differ across locations, pointing to the need for further locally-grounded examinations of harm reduction service uptake and experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn Greene
- Athabasca University, 1 University Drive, Athabasca, AB, Canada.
| | - Katharina Maier
- University of Winnipeg, 515 Portage Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parkes T, Price T, Foster R, Trayner KMA, Sumnall HR, Livingston W, Perkins A, Cairns B, Dumbrell J, Nicholls J. 'Why would we not want to keep everybody safe?' The views of family members of people who use drugs on the implementation of drug consumption rooms in Scotland. Harm Reduct J 2022; 19:99. [PMID: 36038919 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-022-00679-5.pmid:36038919;pmcid:pmc9421633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who use drugs in Scotland are currently experiencing disproportionately high rates of drug-related deaths. Drug consumption rooms (DCRs) are harm reduction services that offer a safe, hygienic environment where pre-obtained drugs can be consumed under supervision. The aim of this research was to explore family member perspectives on DCR implementation in Scotland in order to inform national policy. METHODS Scotland-based family members of people who were currently or formerly using drugs were invited to take part in semi-structured interviews to share views on DCRs. An inclusive approach to 'family' was taken, and family members were recruited via local and national networks. A convenience sample of 13 family members were recruited and interviews conducted, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically using the Structured Framework Technique. RESULTS Family members demonstrated varying levels of understanding regarding the existence, role, and function of DCRs. While some expressed concern that DCRs would not prevent continued drug use, all participants were in favour of DCR implementation due to a belief that DCRs could reduce harm, including saving lives, and facilitate future recovery from drug use. Participants highlighted challenges faced by people who use drugs in accessing treatment/services that could meet their needs. They identified that accessible and welcoming DCRs led by trusting and non-judgemental staff could help to meet unmet needs, including signposting to other services. Family members viewed DCRs as safe environments and highlighted how the existence of DCRs could reduce the constant worry that they had of risk of harm to their loved ones. Finally, family members emphasised the challenge of stigma associated with drug use. They believed that introduction of DCRs would help to reduce stigma and provide a signal that people who use drugs deserve safety and care. CONCLUSIONS Reporting the experience and views of family members makes a novel and valuable contribution to ongoing public debates surrounding DCRs. Their views can be used to inform the implementation of DCRs in Scotland but also relate well to the development of wider responses to drug-related harm and reduction of stigma experienced by people who use drugs in Scotland and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Parkes
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK.
| | - Tracey Price
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - Rebecca Foster
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - Kirsten M A Trayner
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Harry R Sumnall
- Liverpool John Moores University, Public Health Institute, Liverpool, Scotland, UK
| | - Wulf Livingston
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Glyndwr University, Wrexham, Wales, UK
| | | | - Beth Cairns
- Figure 8 Consultancy Ltd, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Josh Dumbrell
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - James Nicholls
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Parkes T, Price T, Foster R, Trayner KMA, Sumnall HR, Livingston W, Perkins A, Cairns B, Dumbrell J, Nicholls J. 'Why would we not want to keep everybody safe?' The views of family members of people who use drugs on the implementation of drug consumption rooms in Scotland. Harm Reduct J 2022; 19:99. [PMID: 36038919 PMCID: PMC9421633 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-022-00679-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND People who use drugs in Scotland are currently experiencing disproportionately high rates of drug-related deaths. Drug consumption rooms (DCRs) are harm reduction services that offer a safe, hygienic environment where pre-obtained drugs can be consumed under supervision. The aim of this research was to explore family member perspectives on DCR implementation in Scotland in order to inform national policy. METHODS Scotland-based family members of people who were currently or formerly using drugs were invited to take part in semi-structured interviews to share views on DCRs. An inclusive approach to 'family' was taken, and family members were recruited via local and national networks. A convenience sample of 13 family members were recruited and interviews conducted, audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed thematically using the Structured Framework Technique. RESULTS Family members demonstrated varying levels of understanding regarding the existence, role, and function of DCRs. While some expressed concern that DCRs would not prevent continued drug use, all participants were in favour of DCR implementation due to a belief that DCRs could reduce harm, including saving lives, and facilitate future recovery from drug use. Participants highlighted challenges faced by people who use drugs in accessing treatment/services that could meet their needs. They identified that accessible and welcoming DCRs led by trusting and non-judgemental staff could help to meet unmet needs, including signposting to other services. Family members viewed DCRs as safe environments and highlighted how the existence of DCRs could reduce the constant worry that they had of risk of harm to their loved ones. Finally, family members emphasised the challenge of stigma associated with drug use. They believed that introduction of DCRs would help to reduce stigma and provide a signal that people who use drugs deserve safety and care. CONCLUSIONS Reporting the experience and views of family members makes a novel and valuable contribution to ongoing public debates surrounding DCRs. Their views can be used to inform the implementation of DCRs in Scotland but also relate well to the development of wider responses to drug-related harm and reduction of stigma experienced by people who use drugs in Scotland and beyond.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa Parkes
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK.
| | - Tracey Price
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - Rebecca Foster
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - Kirsten M A Trayner
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Harry R Sumnall
- Liverpool John Moores University, Public Health Institute, Liverpool, Scotland, UK
| | - Wulf Livingston
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Glyndwr University, Wrexham, Wales, UK
| | | | - Beth Cairns
- Figure 8 Consultancy Ltd, Dundee, Scotland, UK
| | - Josh Dumbrell
- Salvation Army Centre for Addiction Services and Research, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| | - James Nicholls
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nicholls J, Livingston W, Perkins A, Cairns B, Foster R, Trayner KMA, Sumnall HR, Price T, Cairney P, Dumbrell J, Parkes T. Drug Consumption Rooms and Public Health Policy: Perspectives of Scottish Strategic Decision-Makers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19116575. [PMID: 35682161 PMCID: PMC9180147 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19116575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
There is widespread support for the introduction of Drug Consumption Rooms (DCRs) in Scotland as part of a policy response to record levels of drug-related harm. However, existing legal barriers are made more complex by the division of relevant powers between the UK and Scottish Governments. This paper reports on a national, qualitative study of key decision-makers in both local and national roles across Scotland. It explores views on the political barriers and enablers to the adoption of Drug Consumption Rooms and the potential role of these facilities in the wider treatment system. It also considers approaches to evidence, especially the types of evidence that are considered valuable in supporting decision-making in this area. The study found that Scottish decision-makers are strongly supportive of DCR adoption; however, they remain unclear as to the legal and political mechanisms that would make this possible. They view DCRs as part of a complex treatment and support system rather than a uniquely transformative intervention. They see the case for introduction as sufficient, on the basis of need and available evidence, thus adopting a pragmatic and iterative approach to evidence, in contrast to an appeal to traditional evidence hierarchies more commonly adopted by the UK Government.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Nicholls
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
- Correspondence:
| | - Wulf Livingston
- Faculty of Social and Life Sciences, Glyndwr University, Wrexham LL11 2AW, UK;
| | - Andy Perkins
- Figure 8 Consultancy, Dundee DD4 0HU, UK; (A.P.); (B.C.)
| | - Beth Cairns
- Figure 8 Consultancy, Dundee DD4 0HU, UK; (A.P.); (B.C.)
| | - Rebecca Foster
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK; (R.F.); (T.P.); (J.D.); (T.P.)
| | - Kirsten M. A. Trayner
- School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK;
| | - Harry R. Sumnall
- Faculty of Health, Liverpool John Moores University, Liverpool L2 2QB, UK;
| | - Tracey Price
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK; (R.F.); (T.P.); (J.D.); (T.P.)
| | - Paul Cairney
- Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK;
| | - Josh Dumbrell
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK; (R.F.); (T.P.); (J.D.); (T.P.)
| | - Tessa Parkes
- Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK; (R.F.); (T.P.); (J.D.); (T.P.)
| |
Collapse
|