1
|
Porto JG, Bhatia AM, Bhat A, Suarez Arbelaez MC, Blachman-Braun R, Shah K, Malpani A, Lopategui D, Herrmann TRW, Marcovich R, Shah HN. Transurethral resection of the prostate across continents: a meta-analysis evaluating quality of gold standard in the twenty-first century. World J Urol 2025; 43:85. [PMID: 39856398 PMCID: PMC11761131 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05439-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 12/31/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare outcomes of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) across different regions worldwide over the past two decades. METHODS A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials indexed to PubMed that assessed TURP. A total of 102 studies with 8,454 patients were included and grouped by continents: Europe, Asia, Africa, and Others (North America, South America, and Australia). International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak flow (Qmax), postvoid residual urine (PVR), PSA levels, prostate volume, and Sexual Health Inventory for Men scores (at 3, 12, and 36 months) were assessed, along with postoperative complications. Heterogeneity across studies was classified as low (I2 < 25%), moderate (I2 = 25-75%), or high (I2 > 75%). RESULTS TURP consistently exhibited significant enhancements in IPSS, Qmax, and PVR across various regions. Notably, PVR demonstrated high heterogeneity (I²=100%). TURP presented low complication rates with TURP syndrome (2%), bleeding (8%), and blood transfusion (6%). However, significant heterogeneity was observed, particularly for clot evacuation (I2 = 87%), irritative symptoms (I2 = 96%), and incontinence (I2 = 84%). The retreatment rates at 1 and 3 years were 5% and 7%, respectively, with significant differences across regions. CONCLUSION Global outcomes of TURP lack a discernible trend. The substantial heterogeneity observed among continents suggests a lack of standardization. Nevertheless, uniform symptomatic improvements among patients still support TURP as the gold-standard surgical treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia, despite variations in its results worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao G Porto
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St #2107, 15th Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Ansh M Bhatia
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA
- Seth GS Medical College and KEM Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Abhishek Bhat
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St #2107, 15th Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Maria Camila Suarez Arbelaez
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St #2107, 15th Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Ruben Blachman-Braun
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St #2107, 15th Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Khushi Shah
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St #2107, 15th Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Ankur Malpani
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St #2107, 15th Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Diana Lopategui
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St #2107, 15th Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | | | - Robert Marcovich
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St #2107, 15th Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA
| | - Hemendra N Shah
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami, 1120 NW 14th St #2107, 15th Floor, Miami, FL, 33136, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Porto JG, Bhatia AM, Bhat A, Suarez Arbelaez MC, Blachman-Braun R, Shah K, Malpani A, Lopategui D, Herrmann TRW, Marcovich R, Shah HN. Evaluating transurethral resection of the prostate over twenty years: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. World J Urol 2024; 42:639. [PMID: 39547977 PMCID: PMC11568034 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05332-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 10/20/2024] [Indexed: 11/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this systematic review is to assess the temporal changes in outcomes and complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) from 2000 to 2022. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 103 randomized clinical trials from PubMed on TURP, involving 8521 patients. Studies were grouped by years: 2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2022. We assessed International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Peak Flow (Qmax), Post-void residue of urine (PVR), and post-operative complications. Heterogeneity was ranked as low (I2 < 25%), moderate (I2 = 25-75%), or high (I2 > 75%). RESULTS TURP significantly improved IPSS, Qmax, and PVR, with the most recent studies showing superior results in IPSS and Qmax after 3 years compared to 2000-2004 studies. Heterogeneity in PVR was high (I2 = 100%). No negative impact on erectile function was observed. Complication rates included TURP syndrome (2%), bleeding (8%), and blood transfusion (6%), but elevated heterogeneity with difference between the groups was seen in clot evacuation (I2 = 83%) and urinary tract infections (I2 = 82%). Other complications were urinary retention (4%), incontinence (8%), urethral stricture (3%), bladder neck stenosis (2%). CONCLUSION In the last 20 years there has not been a clear trend in the results of TURP. The found heterogeneity may indicate a lack of standardization in TURP procedures. However, symptomatic improvement among patients is uniform, which supports this procedure as a historical benchmark surgical treatment for BPH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joao G Porto
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
| | - Ansh M Bhatia
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
| | - Abhishek Bhat
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
| | | | - Ruben Blachman-Braun
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
| | - Khushi Shah
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
| | - Ankur Malpani
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
| | - Diana Lopategui
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
| | | | - Robert Marcovich
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA
| | - Hemendra N Shah
- Desai Sethi Urology Institute, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu Y, Wang J, Zhao T, Wei Y, Han L, Liu X, Lin T, Wei G, Wu S. Complications Following Primary Repair of Non-proximal Hypospadias in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Pediatr 2020; 8:579364. [PMID: 33363061 PMCID: PMC7756017 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2020.579364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature on the complications and postoperative outcomes of children with non-proximal hypospadias. Methods: Electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library CENTRAL were searched systematically from January 1990 to June 2020 for the literature that reported the postoperative outcomes of patients with non-proximal hypospadias. Non-proximal hypospadias encompassed distal and mid-penile hypospadias. Results: We included 44 studies involving 10,666 subjects. Urethrocutaneous fistula (UCF) was the most common complication with an incidence of 4.0% (95% CI, 3.1-5.0%). Incidence of overall complications was 8.0% (95% CI, 6.3-9.8%). Meta-regression analysis revealed that length of urethral stent indwelling (coefficient 0.006; 95% CI, 0.000-0.011; p = 0.036) and penile dressing (coefficient 0.010; 95% CI, 0.000-0.021; p = 0.048) were two risk factors for UCF. Multivariate meta-regression analysis did not identify any independent risk factors for UCF. No differences were found between stent and stentless groups in non-proximal hypospadias regarding incidences of UCF (OR, 0.589; 95% CI, 0.267-1.297), meatal stenosis (OR, 0.880; 95% CI, 0.318-2.437), and overall complications (OR, 0.695; 95% CI, 0.403-1.199). No differences were found between foreskin preservation and circumcision in terms of complications either. Conclusions: UCF is the most common complication following hypospadias repair with an incidence of 4.0%. Independent risk factors for UCF were not identified in the current research. Distal hypospadias repair without stent indwelling is not likely to compromise the postoperative outcome. Further studies should be designed to explore the differences between different surgical approaches and the potential risk factors for complications following hypospadias repair.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhao Wu
- Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Children Urogenital Development and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
| | - Junke Wang
- Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Children Urogenital Development and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
| | - Tianxin Zhao
- Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Children Urogenital Development and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
| | - Yuexin Wei
- Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Children Urogenital Development and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
| | - Lindong Han
- Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Children Urogenital Development and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
| | - Xing Liu
- Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Children Urogenital Development and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
| | - Tao Lin
- Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Children Urogenital Development and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
| | - Guanghui Wei
- Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Children Urogenital Development and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
| | - Shengde Wu
- Department of Urology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Pediatrics, Chongqing Key Laboratory of Children Urogenital Development and Tissue Engineering, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, China International Science and Technology Cooperation Base of Child Development and Critical Disorders, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Chongqing, China
| |
Collapse
|