Stiffness Analysis of Reinforced Ureteral Stents Against Radial Compression: In vitro Study

Investigating the encrustation of reinforced ureteral stents by computational flow dynamic simulations

PURPOSE

In cases of extrinsic ureteral obstruction, obstruction due to encrustation is particularly detrimental to functioning of the stent. A thorough understanding of the causes that lead to stent encrustation is essential. Computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulations may provide a reliable screening platform for investigating the interplay between flow processes and encrustation dynamics in stents.

METHODS

Using a tailor-made program, we attempted to evaluate a number of reinforced ureteral stents by CFD simulations with an obstructed or unobstructed ureter and steady or discontinuous flow patterns to identify critical regions with abrupt changes in shape susceptible to stagnant flow and encrustation.

RESULTS

For the Vortek^® and Urosoft stents, the longitudinal opening of the stents confirmed the presence of critical regions. No critical region was observed for the Superglide stent. CFD simulations showed that cavities formed near the critical regions represented patently stagnant flow and were potentially susceptible to the formation of encrusting deposits. Encrustations were greater in the obstructed design than in the unobstructed design. In the model with a suddenly interrupted laminar flow, the peristaltic motion resulted in new discontinuous encrustation areas scattered throughout the entire external and internal surface of the stent.

CONCLUSION

The analysis of fluid dynamics through the tested stents confirmed that encrustations are possible in regions of stagnant flow and showed that stent models with the smoothest possible surface are preferable. The discontinuous flow model provided results that are closer to the findings observed in the clinic and should be more often integrated into CFD simulations.

New Stent Technologies

Ureteral stents are an indispensable part of any (endo-) urologic practice. Despite the widely demonstrated advantages of stents, they also carry a considerable risk of side effects and complications, such as urinary symptoms, pain, hematuria, decreased quality of life, stent-related infection, and encrustation. Multiple pathways in preventing or mitigating these side effects and complications and improving stent efficacy have been and are being investigated, including stent architecture and design, biomaterials, and coatings. This article provides an update on currently researched and available stents as well as future perspectives.

Analysis of Ureteral Tumour Stents for Malignant Ureteral Obstruction: Towards Reshaping an Optimal Stent

Introduction

Ureteral obstruction hinders the management of malignant diseases. Adequate stent placement does not necessarily guarantee renal decompression. The stent stiffness may play a major role to maintain patency. We carried out the present study in order to evaluate drainage efficiency by using stents with distinctive degrees of stiffness and to identify the physical factors that could prevent obstruction of the stent in patients with malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO).

Materials and Methods

We performed an analysis of 150 patients with MUO drainage at a single institution from June 2009 to June 2019. A progressive choice of stents was shaped to overcome each failure by focusing on the criterion of increasingly stiff stents.

Results

During the study period, 556 ureteral stent procedures (USP) were analysed separately. The stent failure with obstruction occurred in 23.0% (128/556) of USP at a mean of 4.4±3.6 months and depended on the type of stent. Stent failure occurred in 34.2% (70/205) of Vortek^® stents, in 42.9% (15/35) of Urosoft stents, in 15.4% (39/254) of Superglide or ureteral catheters and in 6.5% (4/62) of tandem stents. No significant differences were found between Vortek^® and Urosoft stents regarding stent failures, but there were significant differences between Superglide or Tandem stents and Vortek^® or Urosoft stents (p<10⁻⁷). The study demonstrated that ureteral stent obstruction significantly decreased with a larger lumen or a stiffer stent (p<10⁻⁷).

Conclusion

In the present study, Superglide and tandem stents were the best stents against stent failure, and the lumen and the stiffness of the stent have been shown to be critical factors in controlling patency. The results suggest that the lumen seems more important than the stiffness, and the stiffness would be the only means of keeping the lumen intact. Future stents for MUO should integrate the importance of the lumen of the stent.

10-Year Experience with Reinforced Ureteral Stents for Malignant Ureteral Obstruction

Introduction

Malignant ureteral obstruction (MUO) hinders the management of malignant diseases. Indwelling stent is a common method to release renal obstruction, but stent failure with obstruction is frequent. The studies conclude that stent obstruction divides survival by 2 or even 4. We carried out the present study in order to evaluate drainage efficiency and overall survival by using stents with distinctive degrees of stiffness.

Materials and Methods

We performed an analysis of 156 patients with MUO drainage at a single institution from June 2009 to June 2019.

Results

Of the 156 patients, 128 (82.1%) died with a mean survival time of 15.3 ± 14.4 months after the first ureteral stent procedure (USP). In order to study stent failure and overall survival, the patients were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 with patients died soon after only one USP (n=37). Group 2 with patients had more than one USP and no obstruction (n=41). Patients in Group 3 had more than one USP and at least one stent obstruction (n=62). During the study period, 556 USPs were analysed separately. The stent failure with obstruction occurred in 23.0% (128/556) of USP at a mean of 4.4 ± 3.6 months. In case of stent failure, a progressive choice of stents was shaped to overcome each failure by focusing on the criterion of increasingly stiff stents. Patients in Group 1 died soon at mean of 4.9 ± 4.8 months. The mean survival time of patients in Groups 2 and 3 were, respectively, 19.4 ± 11.2 and 21.5 ± 16.3 months (P = 0.19).

Conclusion

MUO is a serious disease but this study is the first to prevent survival rate from falling by choosing the stent stiffness suitable for the patient. The active detection of stent failure has been shown to be essential for preserving survival.