A Diagnostic Test Combining Molecular Testing with Phenotypic Pooled Antibiotic Susceptibility Improved the Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Non-E. coli or Polymicrobial Complicated Urinary Tract Infections

Pooled Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing Performs Within CLSI Standards for Validation When Measured Against Broth Microdilution and Disk Diffusion Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing of Cultured Isolates

Background/Objectives: While new methods for measuring antimicrobial susceptibility have been associated with improved patient outcomes, they should also be validated using standard protocols for error rates and other test metrics. The objective of this study was to validate a novel susceptibility assay for complicated and recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs): pooled antibiotic susceptibility testing (P-AST). This assay was compared to broth microdilution (BMD) and disk diffusion (DD), following Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines for assessment of error rates and agreement. Methods: This study analyzed consecutive fresh clinical urine specimens submitted for UTI diagnostic testing. Upon receipt, the urine samples were subjected in parallel to standard urine culture and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) for microbial identification and quantification. Specimens with the same monomicrobial non-fastidious bacteria detected by both M-PCR and standard urine culture (SUC) underwent standard antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) and P-AST antibiotic susceptibility testing. Analysis was also undertaken to assess the presence of heteroresistance for specimens with P-AST-resistant and BMD/DD consensus-susceptible results. Results: The performance measures without correction for heteroresistance showed essential agreement (EA%) of ≥90%, very major errors (VMEs) of <1.5%, and major errors (MEs) of <3.0% for P-AST, all meeting the threshold guidelines established by CLSI for AST. The categorical agreement (CA%) also met acceptable criteria (>88%), as the majority of the errors were minor (mEs) with essential agreement. The very major and major error rates for P-AST decreased to <1.0% when heteroresistance was accounted for. Conclusions: The P-AST assay methodology is validated within acceptable parameters when compared to broth microdilution and disk diffusion using CLSI criteria.

Noninferiority of Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Compared to Standard Urine Culture for Urinary Tract Infection Diagnosis in Pediatric Patients at Hackensack Meridian Health Children's Hospital Emergency Department

Objective

To establish the noninferiority of the rapid and sensitive multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) method versus standard urine culture (SUC) in pediatric urinary tract infection (UTI) diagnostic testing.

Methods

A United States of America (USA)-based single-center prospective observational study of 44 female and four male patients aged 3-21 years old presenting to a Pediatric Emergency Department in New Jersey with clinically suspected UTI. Urine specimens were primarily collected via midstream voiding. Patients with antibiotic exposure within the week prior to presentation were excluded. Patient demographic data, clinical manifestations, and urinalysis results were recorded. Noninferiority testing comparing M-PCR and SUC was conducted using a method for paired binary data, with a noninferiority margin set at 5%. Noninferiority was concluded if the lower bound of the 95% confidence interval of the difference in detection rates between M-PCR and SUC lies entirely to the right of the value minus the noninferiority margin. All statistical calculations were performed using Python 3.10.12.

Results

The two methods were concordant in two-thirds of cases. Of the 14 M-PCR-positive/SUC-negative discordant specimens, 13 (93%) contained a fastidious and/or emerging uropathogen (A. urinae, A. schaalii, G. vaginalis, C. riegelii, U. urealyticum, Viridans group Streptococci (VGS), and/or Coagulase-negative Staphylococci (CoNS)). Neither symptom presentation nor urinalysis results differed significantly between participants with concordant positive results for UTI diagnosis and those with concordant negative results (non-UTI group).

Conclusion

In this pediatric population, similar to previous findings in an older adult population, M-PCR established not only noninferiority but also superiority over SUC in detecting microorganisms in the urine.

From Awareness to Action: Pioneering Solutions for Women's UTI Challenges in the Era of Precision Medicine

This article aims to bring clinicians' awareness to the widespread impact of urinary tract infection (UTI) on the lives of women and to the advances that offer hope for future improvements in the diagnosis and management of UTI. Thanks to physiological, anatomical, and lifestyle factor differences, women face heightened vulnerability to UTIs compared to men. In fact, women are four times more likely than men to develop a UTI and around half of these women encounter UTI recurrence, which is a significant source of both physical and psychosocial burdens. Despite the current shortcomings in diagnosis and management, emerging diagnostic technologies promise to identify UTIs more accurately and rapidly, offering women hope for a revolution in UTI management. Meanwhile, clinicians have the opportunity to reduce the psychosocial burden by recognizing the value of patients' lived experiences and ensuring their care plan is in alignment with their patients' goals and expectations for medical care.

Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing with conventional urine culture for the diagnosis of urinary tract infections: A meta-analysis

The limitations of conventional urine culture methods can be avoided by using culture-independent approaches like polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). However, the efficacy of these approaches in this setting is still subject to contention. PRISMA-compliant searches were performed on MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Sciences, and the Cochrane Database until March 2023. The included articles compared PCR or NGS to conventional urine culture for the detection of urinary tract infections (UTIs). RevMan performed meta-analysis, and the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool assessed study quality. A total of 10 selected studies that involved 1,291 individuals were included in this meta-analysis. The study found that PCR has a 99% sensitivity and a 94% specificity for diagnosing UTIs. Furthermore, NGS was shown to have a sensitivity of 90% for identifying UTIs and a specificity of 86%. The odds ratio (OR) for PCR to detect Gram-positive bacteria is 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.61), while the OR for NGS to detect Gram-negative bacteria is 0.23 [95% CI 0.09-0.59]. UTIs are typically caused by Gram-negative bacteria like Escherichia coli and Gram-positive bacteria like Staphylococci and Streptococci. PCR and NGS are reliable, culture-free molecular diagnostic methods that, despite being expensive, are essential for UTI diagnosis and prevention due to their high sensitivity and specificity.

The Prevalence and Association of Different Uropathogens Detected by M-PCR with Infection-Associated Urine Biomarkers in Urinary Tract Infections

Background

Many emerging uropathogens are currently identified by multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) in suspected UTI cases. Standard urine culture (SUC) has significantly lower detection rates, raising questions about whether these organisms are associated with UTIs and truly cause inflammation.

Objective

To determine if microbes detected by M-PCR were likely causative of UTI by measuring inflammatory biomarkers in the urine of symptomatic patients.

Design Setting and Participants

Midstream voided urine was collected from subjects ≥60 years presenting to urology clinics with symptoms of UTI (n = 1132) between 01/2023 and 05/2023. Microbe detection was by M-PCR and inflammation-associated biomarker (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, interleukin 8, and interleukin 1β) was by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Biomarker positivity was measured against individual and groups of organisms, E. coli and non-E. coli cases, emerging uropathogens, monomicrobial and polymicrobial cases.

Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis

Distributions were compared using 2-sample Wilcoxon Rank Sum test with 2-tailed p-values < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results and Limitations

M-PCR was positive in 823 (72.7%) specimens with 28 of 30 (93%) microorganisms/groups detected. Twenty-six of twenty-eight detected microorganisms/groups (93%) had ≥2 biomarkers positive in >66% of cases. Both non-E. coli cases and E. coli cases had significant biomarker positivity (p < 0.05). Limitations were that a few organisms had low prevalence making inferences about their individual significance difficult.

Conclusion

The majority of microorganisms identified by M-PCR were associated with active inflammation measured by biomarker positivity, indicating they are likely causative of UTIs in symptomatic patients. This includes emerging uropathogens frequently not detected by standard urine culture.

Emerging and Fastidious Uropathogens Were Detected by M-PCR with Similar Prevalence and Cell Density in Catheter and Midstream Voided Urine Indicating the Importance of These Microbes in Causing UTIs

Introduction

This study compared microbial compositions of midstream and catheter urine specimens from patients with suspected complicated urinary tract infections to determine if emerging and fastidious uropathogens are infecting the bladder or are contaminants.

Methods

Urine was collected by in-and-out catheter (n = 1000) or midstream voiding (n = 1000) from 2000 adult patients (≥60 years of age) at 17 DispatchHealth sites across 11 states. The two groups were matched by age (mean 81 years), sex (62.1% female, 37.9% male), and ICD-10-CM codes. Microbial detection was performed with multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) with a threshold for "positive detection" ≥ 10,000 cells/mL for bacteria or any detection for yeast. Results were divided by sex.

Results

In females, 28 of 30 microorganisms/groups were found by both collection methods, while in males 26 of 30 were found by both. There were significant overlaps in the detection and densities of classical uropathogens including Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Klebsiella pneumoniae, as well as emerging uropathogens including Actinotignum schaalii and Aerococcus urinae. In females, detection rates were slightly higher in midstream voided compared to catheter-collected (p = 0.0005) urine samples, while males showed the opposite trend (p < 0.0001). More polymicrobial infections were detected in midstream voided compared to catheter-collected samples (64.4% vs 45.7%, p < 0.0001) in females but the opposite in males (35.6% vs 47.0%, p = 0.002).

Discussion

In-and-out catheter-collected and midstream voided urine specimens shared significant similarities in microbial detections by M-PCR, with some differences found for a small subset of organisms and between sexes.

Conclusion

Non-invasive midstream voided collection of urine specimens for microbial detection and identification in cases of presumed UTI does not result in significantly more contamination compared to in-and-out catheter-collected specimens. Additionally, organisms long regarded as contaminants should be reconsidered as potential uropathogens.

Comparison Shows that Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Identifies Infection-associated Urinary Biomarker-positive Urinary Tract Infections That Are Missed by Standard Urine Culture

Background

Multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) has increased sensitivity for microbial detection compared with standard urine culture (SUC) in cases diagnosed as urinary tract infections (UTIs), leading to questions whether detected microbes are likely causative of UTIs or are incidental findings.

Objective

To compare infection-associated biomarker levels against M-PCR and SUC results in symptomatic cases with a presumptive diagnosis of a UTI by a urologist.

Design setting and participants

Participants were ≥60 yr old and presented to urology clinics between January and April 2023 with symptoms of UTIs (n = 583). Urine microbial detection was by M-PCR and SUC. Three infection-associated biomarkers (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, interleukin-8, and interleukin-1β) were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Symptomatic cases with elevated biomarkers, detection of uropathogens, and a specialist clinical diagnosis of a UTI were considered definitive UTI cases.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Distributions were compared using two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test, with two-tailed p values of <0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results and limitations

In cases with M-PCR-positive/SUC-negative results (n = 80), all median biomarker levels were significantly higher (p < 0.0001) than in cases with M-PCR-negative/SUC-negative results (n = 107). Two or more biomarkers were positive in 76% of M-PCR-positive/SUC-negative specimens. Limitation was an inability to examine associations between each individual organism and inflammation.

Conclusions

A significant number of M-PCR-positive/SUC-negative cases had elevated levels of infection-related urinary biomarkers, especially when infection was caused by organisms other than Escherichia coli. This is a strong indication that microbes detected by M-PCR, which would be missed by SUC, are associated with UTIs.

Patient summary

We compared infection-associated biomarkers in patients diagnosed with urinary tract infections (UTIs) against the detection of microorganisms by standard urine culture (SUC) and multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR). We found that most patients with microorganisms detected by M-PCR, which were missed by SUC, had elevated markers of inflammation, indicating that these organisms were likely causative of UTIs.