1
|
Manti M, Shah J, Papaefthymiou A, Facciorusso A, Ramai D, Tziatzios G, Papadopoulos V, Paraskeva K, Papanikolaou IS, Triantafyllou K, Arvanitakis M, Archibugi L, Vanella G, Hollenbach M, Gkolfakis P. Endoscopic Management of Difficult Biliary Stones: An Evergreen Issue. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:340. [PMID: 38399627 PMCID: PMC10890215 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2023] [Revised: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Choledocholithiasis is one of the most common indications for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in daily practice. Although the majority of stones are small and can be easily removed in a single endoscopy session, approximately 10-15% of patients have complex biliary stones, requiring additional procedures for an optimum clinical outcome. A plethora of endoscopic methods is available for the removal of difficult biliary stones, including papillary large balloon dilation, mechanical lithotripsy, and electrohydraulic and laser lithotripsy. In-depth knowledge of these techniques and the emerging literature on them is required to yield the most optimal therapeutic effects. This narrative review aims to describe the definition of difficult bile duct stones based on certain characteristics and streamline their endoscopic retrieval using various modalities to achieve higher clearance rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Magdalini Manti
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio-Patision” General Hospital of Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece; (M.M.); (G.T.); (K.P.)
| | - Jimil Shah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh 160012, India;
| | - Apostolis Papaefthymiou
- Endoscopy Unit, Cleveland Clinic London, London SW1X 7HY, UK;
- Department of Gastroenterology, General University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece;
| | - Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, 00161 Foggia, Italy;
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA;
| | - Georgios Tziatzios
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio-Patision” General Hospital of Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece; (M.M.); (G.T.); (K.P.)
| | - Vasilios Papadopoulos
- Department of Gastroenterology, General University Hospital of Larissa, 41110 Larissa, Greece;
| | - Konstantina Paraskeva
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio-Patision” General Hospital of Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece; (M.M.); (G.T.); (K.P.)
| | - Ioannis S. Papanikolaou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine—Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.S.P.); (K.T.)
| | - Konstantinos Triantafyllou
- Hepatogastroenterology Unit, Second Department of Internal Medicine—Propaedeutic, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Attikon University General Hospital, 12462 Athens, Greece; (I.S.P.); (K.T.)
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Brussels (HUB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Livia Archibugi
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (G.V.)
| | - Giuseppe Vanella
- Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy; (L.A.); (G.V.)
| | - Marcus Hollenbach
- Medical Department II, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Paraskevas Gkolfakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, “Konstantopoulio-Patision” General Hospital of Nea Ionia, 14233 Athens, Greece; (M.M.); (G.T.); (K.P.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Brussels (HUB), 1070 Brussels, Belgium;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu Y, Zhang Y, Jiang XM, Xu CJ, Wang YY, Gu JY, Li Y, Xu SF. Risk Factors for Single and Multiple Recurrences for Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography and Open Choledochotomy in Treating Choledocholithiasis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2023; 2023:4738985. [PMID: 37941974 PMCID: PMC10630008 DOI: 10.1155/2023/4738985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background There are few studies comparing recurrences between endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and open choledochotomy (OCT). Aims To compare the effect of different surgical methods on single and multiple recurrences of choledocholithiasis. Methods A total of 1255 patients with choledocholithiasis who underwent ERCP or OCT were retrospectively studied. The recurrence of choledocholithiasis was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses of recurrent choledocholithiasis were performed by introducing variables with P < 0.20 in univariate analysis into the logistic regression model. Results A total of 204 (16.7%, 204/1225) patients relapsed. Among the 204 patients, 74.5% relapsed within three years after surgery, of whom 39.7% (81/204) had multiple relapses (≥ 2). The recurrence rate of ERCP (17.2%, 119/692) was higher than that of OCT (15.1%, 85/563), but the difference was not statistically significant. The independent risk factors for a single recurrence of choledocholithiasis were diabetes, stone number ≥ 2, maximum stone diameter ≥ 15 mm, sedentary occupation, the approach of ERCP (EST or EPBD), periampullary diverticulum, primary suture, high-fat diet (postoperative), frequency of weekly vegetable intake (< 4, postoperative), and drinking (postoperative). However, the ERCP approach (EST or EPBD), OCT approach (LCBDE), primary suture, high-fat diet (postoperative), and frequency of weekly vegetable intake (< 4, postoperative) were independent risk factors for multiple recurrences of choledocholithiasis. Conclusion Patients with choledocholithiasis should be followed up regularly for one to three years after treatment. Stone number ≥ 2, diabetes mellitus, periampullary diverticulum, surgical methods, and lifestyle are all risk factors for the recurrence of choledocholithiasis. ERCP is still the preferred surgical method based on the advantages of low risk of cholangitis recurrence, less hospital stay, minimally invasive surgery, fewer postoperative complications, and easier acceptance by elderly patients. In addition to optimizing the treatment plans, postoperative lifestyle management is also vital.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Wu
- Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211100, China
| | - Ying Zhang
- School of Public Health, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
| | - Xiao Meng Jiang
- Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211100, China
| | - Chen Jing Xu
- Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| | - Yan Yan Wang
- Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211100, China
| | - Jin Yuan Gu
- Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211100, China
| | - Yi Li
- Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211100, China
| | - Shun Fu Xu
- Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 211100, China
- Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fujita N, Yasuda I, Endo I, Isayama H, Iwashita T, Ueki T, Uemura K, Umezawa A, Katanuma A, Katayose Y, Suzuki Y, Shoda J, Tsuyuguchi T, Wakai T, Inui K, Unno M, Takeyama Y, Itoi T, Koike K, Mochida S. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2021. J Gastroenterol 2023; 58:801-833. [PMID: 37452855 PMCID: PMC10423145 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-023-02014-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Abstract
The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology first published evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis in 2010, followed by a revision in 2016. Currently, the revised third edition was published to reflect recent evidence on the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of cholelithiasis conforming to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Following this revision, the present English version of the guidelines was updated and published herein. The clinical questions (CQ) in the previous version were reviewed and rearranged into three newly divided categories: background questions (BQ) dealing with basic background knowledge, CQ, and future research questions (FRQ), which refer to issues that require further accumulation of evidence. Finally, 52 questions (29 BQs, 19 CQs, and 4 FRQs) were adopted to cover the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, complications, and prognosis. Based on a literature search using MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Igaku Chuo Zasshi databases for the period between 1983 and August 2019, along with a manual search of new information reported over the past 5 years, the level of evidence was evaluated for each CQ. The strengths of recommendations were determined using the Delphi method by the committee members considering the body of evidence, including benefits and harms, patient preference, and cost-benefit balance. A comprehensive flowchart was prepared for the diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder stones, common bile duct stones, and intrahepatic stones, respectively. The current revised guidelines are expected to be of great assistance to gastroenterologists and general physicians in making decisions on contemporary clinical management for cholelithiasis patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naotaka Fujita
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan.
- Miyagi Medical Check-up Plaza, 1-6-9 Oroshi-machi, Wakabayashi-ku, Sendai, Miyagi, 984-0015, Japan.
| | - Ichiro Yasuda
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Itaru Endo
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Isayama
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Takuji Iwashita
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Toshiharu Ueki
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Uemura
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Akiko Umezawa
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Akio Katanuma
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Yu Katayose
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Yutaka Suzuki
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Junichi Shoda
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Toshio Tsuyuguchi
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Toshifumi Wakai
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Kazuo Inui
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Michiaki Unno
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Yoshifumi Takeyama
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Takao Itoi
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Koike
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| | - Satoshi Mochida
- Guidelines Committee for Creating and Evaluating the "Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines for Cholelithiasis'', The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, 6F Shimbashi i-MARK Building, 2-6-2 Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-0004, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mohammed HI, Nada ASE, Seddik RM, ElGazara AR. Combined endoscopic large balloon dilation with limited sphincterotomy versus sole sphincterotomy for removal of large or multiple common bile duct stones. EGYPTIAN LIVER JOURNAL 2023. [DOI: 10.1186/s43066-023-00235-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) after sphincterotomy (EST) was introduced for the removal of large (≥ 10 mm) or multiple bile duct stones. This method combines the advantages of EST and EPLBD by increasing the efficacy of stone extraction while minimizing complications of EST and EPLBD when used alone. This prospective study aimed to compare between EPLBD with prior limited EST and sole sphnicterotomy for extraction of multiple and/or large common bile duct stones.
Results
Statistical analysis revealed insignificant difference between the studied groups as regards the presence of periamullary diverticulum (23% vs. 19%, P > 0.05) and the use of mechanical lithotripsy (4% vs. 9%, P > 0.05). The rates of overall and initial stone clearance were not significantly different between both groups [94% vs. 90%), P > 0.05; and 84% vs. 78%, P > 0.05, respectively]. The procedure-related pancreatitis and bleeding in EST/EPLBD group were lower compared to EST group (3% vs. 5%, P > 0.05; and 2% vs. 6%, P > 0.05, respectively). None of the studied groups’ patients died or developed procedure-related perforation or cholangitis.
Conclusion
Endoscopic large balloon dilation with prior limited sphincterotomy is an effective and safe endoscopic technique for removing multiple and/or large CBDSs.
Collapse
|
5
|
Takimoto Y, Irisawa A, Hoshi K, Yamamiya A, Nagashima K, Minaguchi T, Yamabe A, Izawa N, Haruyama Y, Tominaga K. The impact of endoscopic sphincterotomy incision size on common bile duct stone recurrence: A propensity score matching analysis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2022; 29:1274-1282. [PMID: 34826207 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE The aim of this study is to clarify the relation between the incision size for endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) and common bile duct stone (CBDS) recurrence. METHODS Patients who underwent elective endoscopic treatment for CBDS between January 2013 and December 2017 were enrolled, excluding those who met the exclusion criteria. The clinical characteristics were investigated using propensity score matching analysis. RESULTS A total of 243 patients were investigated. Propensity scores were calculated using multinomial logistic regression with five relevant variables (age, gender, follow-up time, maximum stone size, and bile duct diameter), which led to extraction of 188 cases to compose cohorts of the small and medium EST incision groups. The CBDS recurrence rate was 17.0% in the small incision group and 6.4% in the medium incision group. Multivariate analysis identified the medium incision as an independent predictor of CBDS recurrence (hazard ratio 0.350, 95% confidence interval 0.133-0.922, P = .034). The CBDS non-recurrence rate of the medium incision group was significantly higher than that of the small incision group (log-rank test P = .019). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that the CBDS recurrence rate was lower in EST with medium incision size than with small incision size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoichi Takimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan.,Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Atsushi Irisawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Koki Hoshi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Akira Yamamiya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Kazunori Nagashima
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Takahito Minaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Akane Yamabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Naoya Izawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Yasuo Haruyama
- Integrated Research Faculty for Advanced Medical Sciences, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Keiichi Tominaga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dokkyo Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cheng C, Tang K, Cheng S, Fang H, Shiue S, Suk F, Lien G, Wu M. Comparison of endoscopic papillary large‐balloon dilatation with endoscopic sphincterotomy in clearing large common bile duct stones: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. ADVANCES IN DIGESTIVE MEDICINE 2022. [DOI: 10.1002/aid2.13295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Chao‐Ling Cheng
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
| | - Kung‐Pei Tang
- Department of Education and Humanities in Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
| | - Sheng‐Wei Cheng
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
| | - Hua‐Chen Fang
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
| | - Sheng‐Jie Shiue
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
| | - Fat‐Moon Suk
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
| | - Gi‐Shih Lien
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
| | - Ming‐Shun Wu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Wan Fang Hospital Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
- Integrative Therapy Center for Gastroenterologic Cancers, Wan Fang Hospital Taipei Medical University Taipei Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kamezaki H, Iwanaga T, Maeda T, Senoo JI, Sakamoto D, Yasui S, Sugiyama H, Tsuyuguchi T, Kato N. Long-term effects of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation in patients with challenging bile duct calculi: A retrospective observational study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e27227. [PMID: 34516527 PMCID: PMC8428757 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) can be used to treat challenging common bile duct stones. No previous studies have reported intractable cases treated either by EPLBD or mechanical lithotripter use. We aimed to evaluate and compare the long-term effects of EPLBD with mechanical lithotripter use.This retrospective cohort study reviewed data from 153 patients admitted to the Eastern Chiba Medical Center from April 2014 to March 2020, presenting with common bile duct calculi that could not be removed using a basket or balloon catheter. Patients were divided into groups depending on whether the treatment was performed using a mechanical lithotripter or EPLBD. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate of common bile duct calculi, and the secondary outcome was the rate of postoperative adverse events. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare the 2 groups. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.The median age of patients included in the lithotripter and EPLBD groups were 73 years and 83 years, respectively (P = .006), while the sex ratio (male:female) in the groups was 18:13 and 55:67, respectively. The EPLBD group showed a statistically larger median bile duct diameter (13 mm [range: 8-24 mm] vs 11 mm [range: 5-16 mm]; P < .001), larger maximal calculus diameter (median, 13.5 mm [range: 8-25 mm] vs 11 mm [range: 7-16 mm]; P < .001), and shorter median cumulative treatment time after reaching the duodenal papilla (35.5 minutes [range: 10-176 minutes] vs 47 minutes [range: 22-321 minutes]; P = .026) in comparison to the lithotripter group. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the EPLBD and the mechanical lithotripter groups. The recurrence rate was significantly lower (P = .014) in the EPLBD group.EPLBD increases therapeutic efficacy and reduces treatment duration for patients in whom calculus removal is difficult, without increasing the frequency of adverse events. No serious adverse events were observed. Additionally, EPLBD appears to reduce the risk of long-term recurrence. Future studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes in younger patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hidehiro Kamezaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Chiba, Japan
| | - Terunao Iwanaga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takahiro Maeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Chiba, Japan
| | - Jun-ichi Senoo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Chiba, Japan
| | - Dai Sakamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Chiba Medical Center, Togane, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shin Yasui
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Toshio Tsuyuguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chiba Prefectural Sawara Hospital, Katori, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoya Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zhu F, Guan Y, Wang J. Efficacy and safety of the rotatable sphincterotome during ERCP in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy (with videos). Surg Endosc 2021; 35:4849-4856. [PMID: 33733322 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-021-08417-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selective biliary cannulation (SBC) is currently accepted as the first challenge of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), especially in patients with altered anatomy such as Billroth II gastrectomy. A rotatable sphincterotome (RS) might be considered useful for guiding the directional axis of SBC. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RS for biliary cannulation in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study conducted to compare the efficacy and safety between RS (RS group) and conventional sphincterotome of pulling arciform knife (PAF, PAF group). The success rate of SBC and endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) were evaluated in both the groups. Moreover, the outcomes of the procedure and adverse events were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS Eighty-six consecutive prior Billroth II gastrectomy patients who underwent ERCP with RS or PAF during the study period were enrolled. After excluding 7 patients, there were 41 patients in the RS group and 38 in the PAF group. The baseline characteristics were similar in both the groups. There was no significant difference in the clinical success rates of SBC in RS group (95.12%) versus PAF group (84.21%), (P = 0.1082). Successful SBC within 5 min was 87.80% in RS group and 23.68% in PAF group (P < 0.0001). The success rate of EST was 89.74% in RS group and 28.13% in PAF group (P < 0.0001). The incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) showed significant differences between RS (2.44%) and PAF groups (21.05%; P = 0.0061). CONCLUSIONS Although RS has comparable success rates of SBC over PAF in patients with prior Billroth II gastrectomy, RS has facilitated the procedure by increasing the success rate of EST and SBC within 5 min, and the incidence of PEP was lowered as well.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 150 Jimo Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200120, China.
| | - Yaping Guan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 150 Jimo Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200120, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shanghai East Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, No. 150 Jimo Road, Pudong New District, Shanghai, 200120, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wu Y, Xu CJ, Xu SF. Advances in Risk Factors for Recurrence of Common Bile Duct Stones. Int J Med Sci 2021; 18:1067-1074. [PMID: 33456365 PMCID: PMC7807200 DOI: 10.7150/ijms.52974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Choledocholithiasis is a chronic common disease. The incidence of cholelithiasis is 5%-15%, of which 5%-30% are combined with Choledocholithiasis. Although endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) + endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) is the most common treatment procedure, which clearance rate is up to 95%, the incidence of recurrent choledocholithiasis was 4%-25%. The risk factors of recurrence after choledocholithiasis clearance are the focuses of current researches, which are caused by multiple factors. We first systematically summarize the risk factors of common bile duct stones (CBDS) recurrence into five aspects: first-episode stone related factors, congenital factors, biological factors, behavioral intervention factors, and the numbers of stone recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yao Wu
- Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211100, China
| | - Chen Jing Xu
- Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211100, China
| | - Shun Fu Xu
- Sir Run Run Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 211100, China.,Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210029, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lyu Y, Cheng Y, Wang B, Zhao S, Chen L. Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Three Endoscopic Methods to Manage Large Common Bile Duct Stones: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 31:443-454. [PMID: 32762611 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2020.0511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The optimal choice of endoscopic method between endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD), and EST plus EPLBD (endoscopic sphincterotomy and large balloon dilation [ESLBD]) for patients with large common bile duct stones is unclear. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov from August 1, 1990 to December 1, 2019. Randomized clinical trials comparing at least two of the following methods EST, ESLBD, or EPLBD were included in this study. The primary outcomes were the overall success rate and initial success rate of common bile duct stone removal. Results: We identified 13 trials comprising 1990 patients. Regarding the overall success rate and initial success rate, EPLBD had the highest probability of being the most successful (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 82.8% and 52.9%, respectively) and the lowest probability of bleeding (53.8%). ESLBD had the highest probability (SUCRA) of having the lowest morbidity (88.8%), requiring mechanical lithotripsy (54.9%), perforation (68%), and the lowest mortality (89.3%). EST had the least probability of postendoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis and cholangitis (SUCRA: 66.4% and 62.3%, respectively). Conclusions: EPLBD was most successful, and ESLBD was safest for large common bile duct stones. Postendoscopic pancreatitis after EST was less common than that after EPLBD and ESLBD. However, more high-quality trials are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yunxiao Lyu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, China
| | - Yunxiao Cheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, China
| | - Bin Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, China
| | - Sicong Zhao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, China
| | - Liang Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Dongyang People's Hospital, Dongyang, China
| |
Collapse
|