1
|
Bruce C, Saraf K, Rogers S, El-Omar M, Kirkwood G, Kelland NF, Shah D, Chalil S, Fullwood C, Wright M, Jamil-Copley S, Fox D, Abozguia K, Thachil J, McCollum C, Morris GM. Deep Vein Thrombosis is Common After Cardiac Ablation and Pre-Procedural D-Dimer Could Predict Risk. Heart Lung Circ 2022; 31:1015-1022. [PMID: 35301985 DOI: 10.1016/j.hlc.2022.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Cardiac catheter ablations are an established treatment for supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) involving prolonged cannulation of the common femoral vein with multiple catheters. This study aimed to identify the risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by studying the frequency of this complication after catheter ablation. METHODS This was a prospective multi-centre cohort study of patients undergoing cardiac ablation for atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia or right-sided accessory atrioventricular connection. Those taking anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy prior to the procedure were excluded. Following the procedure, bilateral venous duplex ultrasonography from the popliteal vein to the inferior vena cava for DVT was undertaken at 24 hours and between 10 to 14 days. RESULTS Eighty (80) patients (mean age 47.6 yrs [SD 13.4] with 67% female) underwent cardiac ablation (median duration 70 mins). Seven (7) patients developed acute DVT in either the femoral or external iliac vein of the intervention leg, giving a frequency of 8.8% (95% CI 3.6-17.2%). No thrombus was seen in the contralateral leg (p=0.023). An elevated D-dimer prior to the procedure was significantly more frequent in patients developing DVT (42.9% vs 4.1%, p=0.0081; OR 17.0). No other patient or procedural characteristics significantly influenced the risk of DVT. CONCLUSION In patients without peri-procedural anticoagulation catheter ablation precipitated DVT in the catheterised femoral or iliac veins in 8.8% of patients. Peri-procedure prophylactic anticoagulation may be considered for all patients undergoing catheter ablation for SVT. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03877770.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charo Bruce
- Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Karan Saraf
- Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cardiovascular Sciences within the School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Steven Rogers
- Independent Vascular Services Ltd, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Magdi El-Omar
- Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Graeme Kirkwood
- Department of Cardiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Nicholas F Kelland
- Department of Cardiology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Dinakshi Shah
- Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Shajil Chalil
- Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiologist at Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine Huntington, WV, USA
| | - Catherine Fullwood
- Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Matthew Wright
- Department of Cardiology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Shahnaz Jamil-Copley
- Department of Cardiology, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Nottingham, UK
| | - David Fox
- North West Heart Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Khalid Abozguia
- Clinical Cardiac Electrophysiologist at Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine Huntington, WV, USA
| | - Jecko Thachil
- Department of Haematology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Charles McCollum
- North West Heart Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Academic Surgery Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gwilym M Morris
- Manchester Heart Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cardiovascular Sciences within the School of Medicine, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yao J, Lang Y, Su H, Dai S, Ying K. Construction of Risk Assessment Model for Venous Thromboembolism After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Chinese Single-Center Study. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2022; 28:10760296211073748. [PMID: 35167387 PMCID: PMC8851938 DOI: 10.1177/10760296211073748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective A retrospective study was carried out to construct a postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk assessment model (RAM) applicable for Chinese colorectal cancer patients. Methods 541 Patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery from June 2019 to May 2020 at Sir-Run-Run-Shaw Hospital affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine were enrolled in this study. Multi-factor analysis was used to determine the independent risk factors of VTE. A novel RAM of VTE which we called Sir-Run-Run-Shaw VTE RAM were constructed basing on the independent risk factors. Another study cohort consisted of 287 colorectal cancer patients underwent surgery from January 2021 to June 2021was used for model evaluation. Results The incidence of VTE after colorectal cancer surgery was 12.0%(65/541). Among the 65 VTE Patients, DVT accounted for 92.3% (60/65) and DVT + PE accounted for 7.7% (5/65). Multi-factor analysis showed that age ≥ 69 years ( P < 0.01), preoperative plasma D-dimer ≥ 0.49 mg/L ( P = .004), stage IV of cancer ( P = .018) and transfusion ( P = .004) are independent risk factors of VTE after surgery. Sir-Run-Run-Shaw VTE RAM includes the above 4 factors, and the total score is 4 points. The score of the low, medium and high risk groups are 0, 1 and ≥2 points. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of Sir-Run-Run-Shaw VTE RAM is 0.769, while Caprini RAM is 0.656. There is statistical difference between the two risk score tables ( Z = 2.337, P = .0195). Conclusion A VTE RAM is constructed basing on a single center retrospective study. This score table may be applicable for Chinese patients with colorectal cancer surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianchang Yao
- Sir-Run-Run-Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Deqing People’s Hospital, Deqing, China
| | - Yina Lang
- Sir-Run-Run-Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Deqing People’s Hospital, Deqing, China
| | - Hua Su
- Sir-Run-Run-Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Sheng Dai
- Sir-Run-Run-Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Kejing Ying
- Sir-Run-Run-Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|