Development of a Risk Scoring System for Predicting Anastomotic Leakage Following Laparoscopic Rectal Cancer Surgery

Predictors of Colorectal Resection and Primary Anastomosis outcome at Muhimbili National Hospital

Background

Anastomotic leakage is among the most common complications after bowel resection and primary anastomosis, causing considerable morbidity and mortality. As a result it tends to affect the quality of life and increase burden to the patients and caretakers. This study focused on the assessment of the predictors and outcome of anastomotic leakage among patients who underwent large bowel surgery that involved resection and primary anastomosis.

Methodology

Hospital based prospective observational study at Muhimbili National Hospital. Data of the patients who underwent colorectal resection and primary anastomosis were collected by using a structured questionnaire. Consecutive recruitment sampling technique was applied to get the required sample size and followed for 30 days. Subjects' information including age, sex, perioperative information was documented and analyzed by using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23 software.

Results

The study included 141 participants. Among those operated, 23 (16.3%) developed anastomotic leakage with a mortality rate of 30.4%. Predictors which were statistically significantly associated with anastomotic leakage were hypertension, body mass index > 30kg/m2, history of radiation therapy, female sex, high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade III-IV score and peritonitis. Increased length of hospital stay, re-admission and re-operation rate together with high mortality are among the outcomes of anastomotic leakage found in this study. No loss to follow up event occurred.

Conclusion

Anastomotic leakage remains a considerable problem among patients undergoing large bowel surgery at Muhimbili National Hospital. From the study site, factors such as peritonitis, HIV/AIDS, hypertension, history of radiation, obesity, high ASA score (III-IV) and female sex were found to be independent predictors of anastomotic leakage. Optimization of co-morbidities conditions before surgery, choosing best surgical option such as creating temporary stoma versus primary anastomosis in dirty wound may help to reduce the rate of anastomotic leakage.

Predictive Factors for Anastomotic Leakage Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Where Are We and Where Are We Going?

Anastomotic leakage (AL) remains one of the most severe complications following colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery. Indeed, leaks that may occur after any type of intestinal anastomosis are commonly associated with a higher reoperation rate and an increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. At first, our review aims to identify specific preoperative, intraoperative and perioperative factors that eventually lead to the development of anastomotic dehiscence based on the current literature. We will also investigate the role of several biomarkers in predicting the presence of ALs following colorectal surgery. Despite significant improvements in perioperative care, advances in surgical techniques, and a high index of suspicion of this complication, the incidence of AL remained stable during the last decades. Thus, gaining a better knowledge of the risk factors that influence the AL rates may help identify high-risk surgical patients requiring more intensive perioperative surveillance. Furthermore, prompt diagnosis of this severe complication may help improve patient survival. To date, several studies have identified predictive biomarkers of ALs, which are most commonly associated with the inflammatory response to colorectal surgery. Interestingly, early diagnosis and evaluation of the severity of this complication may offer a significant opportunity to guide clinical judgement and decision-making.

The Risk Factors of Anastomotic Leakage After Rectal Cancer Surgery

Background: Anastomotic leakage is a significant complication after colorectal anastomosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the risk factors and preventive measures for anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery. Methods: A total of 171 patients who had undergone laparoscopic and open rectal cancer resection with a double stapling participated in this study. Twelve independent variables include age, sex, obesity, smoking, ASA grading, medical diseases, preoperative radiotherapy, preoperative chemotherapy, splenic flexure mobilization, diverting ileostomy, and the number of stapler firing were analyzed. Results: The anastomotic leakage rate was 2.33% (4 of 171). The mean age of the patients was 58.33 years old while their mean body mass index (BMI) was calculated as 24.10 kg/m2. In our study, 16.3% of patients were cigarette smokers. Of the 171 rectal surgeries, 69.0% of patients were diverted by loop ileostomy and 1.16% were supported by ghost ileostomy. Of 171 patients included in this study, 17.5 % of patients required a single staple firing for rectal division. In contrast, 47.9% of patients required 2 linear staplers, others, 24.5% of patients required 3 cartridges for rectal division, and 9.9% of patients required 4 cartridges in their surgeries. There were significant differences between men and women in the number of cartridges used (P = 0.023). Conclusions: All our leakage cases were men and the higher number of stapler firings for rectal division, history of smoking; male gender, and level of anastomosis were independent risk factors for the anastomotic leak.

High Ligation of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery Induces Hypoperfusion of the Sigmoid Colon Stump During Anterior Resection

Background: Anastomotic leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery is associated with insufficient vascular perfusion of the anastomotic ends. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of high vs. low ligation of the ileocolic artery and inferior mesenteric artery, respectively, on the vascular perfusion of the bowel stumps during ileocecal resection (ICR) and anterior rectal resection (AR). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent ICR or AR between 2016 and 2020. Real-time indocyanine green fluorescence angiography was performed to measure the fluorescence time (FT) as a marker of the blood flow in the proximal and distal stumps before anastomosis. Results: Thirty-four patients with lower right-sided colon cancer underwent laparoscopic ICR. Forty-one patients with rectosigmoid colon or rectal cancer underwent robotic high AR (HAR) (n = 8), robotic low AR (LAR) (n = 6), laparoscopic HAR (n = 8), or laparoscopic LAR (n = 19). The FT was similar in the ileal and ascending colon stumps (p = 1.000) and did not differ significantly between high vs. low ligation of the ileocolic artery (p = 0.934). The FT was similar in the sigmoid colon and rectal stumps (p = 0.642), but high inferior mesenteric artery ligation significantly prolonged FT in the sigmoid colon during AR compared with low ligation (p = 0.004), indicating that the high ligation approach caused significant hypoperfusion compared with low ligation. The AL rate was similar after low vs. high ligation. Conclusions: Low vascular perfusion of the bowel stumps may not be an absolute risk factor for AL. High inferior mesenteric artery ligation could induce sigmoid colon stump hypoperfusion during anterior rectal resection.