Application of caspofungin in China compared with amphotericin B and fluconazole

Adverse Effects Associated With Currently Commonly Used Antifungal Agents: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background: Invasive fungal infections (IFI) is an important contributing factor in morbidity and mortality of immunocompromised and critically ill patients. Although the therapeutic effects of these drugs on IFI have been well documented, the long-term use of antifungal agents has raised concerns about drug tolerability and treatment-related toxicity risks.

Methods: We searched articles published before June 30, 2020 in four electronic databases: Web of Science, Cochrane Library, embase and PubMed.

Results: 66 trials were determined to meet our inclusion criteria, providing data on 18,230 participants. We sorted out 23 AEs by system organ classes and six laboratory AEs, 13 of these were used to construct 13 network meta-analyses. Compared with LAmB, anidulafungin, caspofungin, micafungin, fluconazole, and posaconazole had a significantly low incidence of discontinuation of therapy due to AEs (OR = 0.24 (0.09,0.65), 0.24 (0.13,0.43), 0.32 (0.19,0.52), 0.38 (0.23,0.62) and 0.35 (0.17,0.69), respectively).

Conclusion: We found that echinocandins are the most tolerated antifungal agents with high safety. The AEs of triazole drugs are mainly concentrated on the increase in liver enzymes, nervous system disorders, especially visual disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, and cardiac diseases. LAmB is the least tolerated and has the most abundant AEs.

Efficacy of Caspofungin in Unclassified Invasive Fungal Infection Cases: A Retrospective Analysis of Patients with Hematological Malignancies in China

Background

The management of invasive fungal infection (IFI) is challenging in immunocompromised patients who do not fully satisfy the EORTC/MSG diagnostic criteria of proven or probable IFI. Our study assessed caspofungin efficacy in 582 Chinese patients with hematological malignancies exhibiting unclassified signs or symptoms of IFI.

Material/Methods

This retrospective study included caspofungin treatment outcomes of an unclassified group A (n=401) of patients without microbiological or biomarker results and group B (n=181) patients with positive microbiological or biomarker results. Factors that correlated with clinical outcomes were determined using univariate and multivariate analyses.

Results

Cough (41.8%), expectoration (29.6%), and chest tightness (14.6%) were the most common clinical features, and changes in CT images (88.1%) were more frequently detected than in X-ray images (19.6%) in all patients. Favorable response rates for caspofungin as first-line treatment were 58.2% for group A and 56.3% for group B. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score, cardiovascular disease, hemoptysis, and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1000/mm³ before antifungal treatment without recovery were associated with unfavorable clinical outcome (P<0.05 for all). Cough and ANC recovery >1000/mm³ were significantly associated with favorable (complete or partial resolution) outcome.

Conclusions

Caspofungin was effective for treating unclassified IFIs of immunocompromised patients. Cardiovascular disease, ECOG score, cough, and/or hemoptysis, as well as ANC count, represent a potential index for estimating response of unclassified IFI patients to caspofungin treatments.

Drug safety assessment of oral formulations of ketoconazole

INTRODUCTION

Ketoconazole was the first broad-spectrum oral antifungal approved by the FDA in 1981. Post-marketing reports of drug-related hepatotoxicity, endocrine dysregulation and drug interactions resulted in market withdrawal of the drug in some countries and strict product relabeling in others.

AREAS COVERED

This drug safety review summarizes reports of oral ketoconazole-related adverse events retrieved from a search of the PubMed database using the search strategy 'ketoconazole OR Nizoral AND hepat*', references from relevant publications, and data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.

EXPERT OPINION

Although oral ketoconazole is effective in treating fungal infections, the potential for drug interactions, endocrine dysregulation, and hepatotoxicity may outweigh its benefits. Newer oral antifungals have similar or greater efficacy in treating dermatologic conditions and are associated with less risk. Likewise, newer agents with specific targets and fewer drug interactions have been developed to treat systemic fungal infections. Therefore, by the time ketoconazole prescribing guidelines were amended, its use had already largely been replaced with newer antifungals. Being that ketoconazole was the first broad-spectrum oral antifungal, experience with the drug made patient safety, and especially hepatic safety, an important consideration in future antifungal development.