Profile of pomalidomide and its potential in the treatment of myelofibrosis

Assessing pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of the combination therapy of myelofibrosis with ruxolitinib and lenalidomide by a new eco-friendly HPLC method for their simultaneous determination in plasma

Ruxolitinib (RUX), a Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) inhibitor, and lenalidomide (LEN), an immunomodulatory agent, have recently been proposed as a combined treatment for myelofibrosis (MF). This combination has demonstrated improved efficacy, safety, and tolerability compared to monotherapy. To further refine these findings, an efficient analytical tool is needed to simultaneously determine RUX and LEN concentrations in blood plasma. This tool would enable the study of their pharmacokinetics, drug-drug interactions, and therapeutic monitoring during MF therapy. Unfortunately, such a method has not been existed in the literature. This study presents the first HPLC method with UV detection for the simultaneous quantitation of RUX and LEN in plasma. The method was validated according to the ICH guidelines for bioanalytical method validation. It exhibited linearity in the concentration ranges of 10 to 3150 ng mL- 1 for RUX and 80 to 5200 ng mL- 1 for LEN. The limits of quantitation were determined to be 25 and 90 ng mL- 1 for RUX and LEN, respectively. All other validation parameters were satisfactory. The HPLC-UV method was successfully employed to study the pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions of RUX and LEN in rats following oral administration of single doses. The results demonstrated that the pharmacokinetics of both drugs were changed substantially by their coadministration. LEN exhibited synergistic effects on the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) and total bioavailability of RUX, meanwhile it exhibited diminishing effect on the values of volume of distribution (Vd) and clearance (CL). Additionally, RUX decreased the Cmax and total bioavailability of LEN, meanwhile it increased its Vd and CL. These data suggest that the use of RUX, as a combination with LEN, is a better therapeutic approach for MF, compared with RUX as a monotherapy. The effects of LEN on the pharmacokinetics of RUX should be considered and can be useful in determining the appropriate RUX dosage and dosing regimen to achieve the desired therapeutic effect when used as a combination therapy with LEN. The method's environmental friendliness was confirmed through three comprehensive tools. This method represents a valuable tool for determining the appropriate dosage and dosing regimen of RUX in combination therapy with LEN to achieve the desired therapeutic effect. Furthermore, it can aid in predicting drug distribution in different patients and assessing the drug accumulation or insufficient drug levels in specific body compartments.

Reshaping the tumor microenvironment: The versatility of immunomodulatory drugs in B-cell neoplasms

Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) such as thalidomide, lenalidomide and pomalidomide are antitumor compounds that have direct tumoricidal activity and indirect effects mediated by multiple types of immune cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME). IMiDs have shown remarkable therapeutic efficacy in a set of B-cell neoplasms including multiple myeloma, B-cell lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. More recently, the advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatment of these B-cell neoplasms. However, the success of immunotherapy is restrained by immunosuppressive signals and dysfunctional immune cells in the TME. Due to the pleiotropic immunobiological properties, IMiDs have shown to generate synergetic effects in preclinical models when combined with monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors or CAR-T cell therapy, some of which were successfully translated to the clinic and lead to improved responses for both first-line and relapsed/refractory settings. Mechanistically, despite cereblon (CRBN), an E3 ubiquitin ligase, is considered as considered as the major molecular target responsible for the antineoplastic activities of IMiDs, the exact mechanisms of action for IMiDs-based TME re-education remain largely unknown. This review presents an overview of IMiDs in regulation of immune cell function and their utilization in potentiating efficacy of immunotherapies across multiple types of B-cell neoplasms.

Pomalidomide in myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis

Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis is a MPN characterized by bone marrow fibrosis, cytopenias, splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms. Pomalidomide, an immune-modifying drug, is reported to improve anaemia and thrombocytopenia in some patients with MPN-associated myelofibrosis. We designed a phase 2 study of pomalidomide in patients with MPN-associated myelofibrosis and anaemia and/or thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia. Subjects received pomalidomide 2.0 mg/day in cohort 1 (n=38) or 0.5 mg/day in cohort 2 (n=58). Prednisolone was added if there was no response after 3 months in cohort 1 and based on up-front randomization in cohort 2 if there was no response at 3 or 6 months. Response rates were 39% (95% confidence interval (CI), 26-55%) in cohort 1 and 24% (95% CI, 15-37%) in cohort 2. In a multivariable logistic regression model pomalidomide at 2.0 mg/day (odds ratio (OR), 2.62; 95% CI, 1.00-6.87; P=0.05) and mutated TET2 (OR, 5.07; 95% CI, 1.16-22.17; P=0.03) were significantly associated with responses. Median duration of responses was 13.0 months (range 0.9-52.7). There was no significant difference in response rates or duration in subjects receiving or not receiving prednisolone. Clinical trial MPNSG 01-09 is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00949364) and clinicaltrialsregister.eu (EudraCT Number: 2009-010738-23).

A randomized study of pomalidomide vs placebo in persons with myeloproliferative neoplasm-associated myelofibrosis and RBC-transfusion dependence

RBC-transfusion dependence is common in persons with myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN)-associated myelofibrosis. The objective of this study was to determine the rates of RBC-transfusion independence after therapy with pomalidomide vs placebo in persons with MPN-associated myelofibrosis and RBC-transfusion dependence. Two hundred and fifty-two subjects (intent-to-treat (ITT) population) including 229 subjects confirmed by central review (modified ITT population) were randomly assigned (2:1) to pomalidomide or placebo. Trialists and subjects were blinded to treatment allocation. Primary end point was proportion of subjects achieving RBC-transfusion independence within 6 months. One hundred and fifty-two subjects received pomalidomide and 77 placebo. Response rates were 16% (95% confidence interval (CI), 11, 23%) vs 16% (8, 26% P=0.87). Response in the pomalidomide cohort was associated with ⩽4 U RBC/28 days (odds ratio (OR)=3.1; 0.9, 11.1), age ⩽65 (OR=2.3; 0.9, 5.5) and type of MPN-associated myelofibrosis (OR=2.6; 0.7, 9.5). Responses in the placebo cohort were associated with ⩽4 U RBC/28 days (OR=8.6; 0.9, 82.3), white blood cell at randomization >25 × 10⁹/l (OR=4.9; 0.8, 28.9) and interval from diagnosis to randomization >2 years (OR=4.9; 1.1, 21.9). Pomalidomide was associated with increased rates of oedema and neutropenia but these adverse effects were manageable. Pomalidomide and placebo had similar RBC-transfusion-independence response rates in persons with MPN-associated RBC-transfusion dependence.