Triple combination therapy with amlodipine, valsartan, and hydrochlorothiazide vs dual combination therapy with amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide for stage 2 hypertensive patients

Fixed-dose Combination of Metoprolol, Telmisartan, and Chlorthalidone for Essential Hypertension in Adults with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: Phase III Study

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fixed-dose combination (FDC) of metoprolol, telmisartan, and chlorthalidone in patients with essential hypertension and stable coronary artery disease (CAD) who showed inadequate response to dual therapy.

METHODS

In this phase III, open-label, multicenter study, 254 adults with stable CAD having uncontrolled hypertension despite being treated with FDC of metoprolol (25/50 mg) and telmisartan (40 mg) were included. Patients received either of the following FDC for 24 weeks: metoprolol (25 mg), telmisartan (40 mg), and chlorthalidone (12.5 mg) (FDC1; n = 139) or metoprolol (50 mg), telmisartan (40 mg), and chlorthalidone (12.5 mg) (FDC2; n = 115) tablets once daily. The FDCs were developed using the novel Wrap Matrix™ platform technology. Primary endpoint assessed the mean change in seated diastolic blood pressure (SeDBP) and seated systolic blood pressure (SeSBP) from baseline to 24 weeks. Secondary efficacy endpoints included proportion of patients achieving < 90 mmHg SeDBP (SeDBP responder) and < 140 mmHg SeSBP (SeSBP responder) at weeks 12, 16, 20, and 24. Safety was assessed throughout the study.

RESULTS

A total of 243 (95.70%) patients completed study. The mean change in BP from baseline (FDC1, 155/96 mmHg; FDC2, 165/98 mmHg) to week 24 (FDC1, 128/82 mmHg; FDC2, 131/83 mmHg) was statistically significant (both groups p < 0.0001). Within FDC1 and FDC2, the mean change from baseline to week 24 in SeDBP (82.60 mmHg and 83.09 mmHg) and SeSBP (128.07 mmHg and 131.29 mmHg) was statistically significant (both groups p < 0.0001). At week 24, in FDC1, 80.15% and 84.73% were SeDBP and SeSBP responders, respectively; in FDC2, 79.46% and 74.11% were SeDBP and SeSBP responders, respectively. No serious adverse events or deaths were reported.

CONCLUSION

Triple FDCs of metoprolol, telmisartan, and chlorthalidone were considered effective and well tolerated in patients with hypertension who respond inadequately to dual therapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

CTRI/2016/11/007491.

An LC-MS/MS Method for Determination of Triple Drugs Combination of Valsartan, Amlodipine and Hydrochlorothiazide in Human Plasma for Bioequivalence Study

Background:

Current guidelines for the treatment of hypertension recommend combination therapy, which intends to control blood pressure and enhance cardiovascular protection.

Materials and Methods:

A sensitive, reliable and selective tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) method has been developed for simultaneous quantification of amlodipine (AML), valsartan (VAL) and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) in human plasma. The chromatographic system was equipped with ACE 5 C8 (50 X 2.1 mm) column and utilized a mobile phase composition of 0.5 mM Ammonium Chloride & 0.04% FA-Methanol (45:55% v/v). The method used three internal standards; AML-D4, HCTZ-D2 C13 and VAL-D3 with 10% intra- and inter-day precision, and 6% bias for all the analytes.

Results:

The assay was found to be linear with R-2 > 0.998, and the limits of quantification for AML, VAL and HCTZ were 0.2, 50.0 and 2.0 ng/mL, respectively. The analytes were found to be stable in plasma samples over short and long term storage.

:

The developed method is rapid with a run time of 3.5 min and cost-effective since the simple sample preparation method is adopted. This method was successfully applied for the bioequivalence study of AML, VAL, and HCTZ in human plasma after administration of the fixed-dose combination tablet of (10/160/25 mg). Pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax and AUC0-72) for AML and (Cmax, AUC0-t, AUC0-∞) for VAL and HCTZ were used for bioequivalence assessment. These were determined by noncompartmental analysis of concentration data.

Conclusion:

The result showed 90% confidence intervals (obtained by ANOVA) which were within the predefined ranges. As a consequence, this method can be successfully applied for measuring and quantifying a large number of samples.

Efficacy and safety of amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide single pill combination in Egyptian patients with hypertension uncontrolled on any dual therapy: an observational study

Objective: Hypertension is a serious health problem in Egypt, with prevalence rate of 17% as reported in 2015. Despite receiving treatment, many do not achieve blood pressure (BP) control. The current study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine/valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide (Aml/Val/HCTZ) single pill combination (SPC) in patients with hypertension from Egypt, who were uncontrolled on any dual therapy.Methods: In this prospective, open label, multicenter, 12-week observational, cohort study, two doses of Aml/Val/HCTZ (5/160/12.5 mg or 10/160/25 mg) SPC were used to evaluate mean change in BP after 12 weeks (primary endpoint). Safety assessments included presence and intensity of ankle edema and other adverse events (AEs).Results: Data were collected from 1080 patients who were treated according to the routine medical practice across 47 centers in Egypt. Significant reduction in systolic and diastolic BP (SBP/DBP) was observed from 165.5 ± 12.83/100.8 ± 7.03 mmHg at baseline to 129.7 ± 8.35/80.6 ± 5.25 mmHg after 12 weeks of treatment (p < .0001). Majority of patients (76.85%) reached the BP goal of <140/90 mmHg. The most commonly reported AE was ankle edema (10.92%).Conclusions: Aml/Val/HCT SPC significantly reduced BP and was well tolerated in Egyptian patients with hypertension not controlled on any previous dual therapy.

TRIPLE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY: FOCUS ON EFFICACY AND PROGNOSIS

In the article, with regard to current clinical recommendations, the place of combined antihypertensive therapy, especially triple drugs regimens, is considered in the treatment of patients with arterial hypertension. Special focus is given to the body of evidence for the efficacy of valsartan and amlodipine, as the reference drug of angiotensin II receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers, respectively. Not only their high antihypertensive properties are demonstrated, but also a favorable effect on target-organ protection and prognosis is described. In particular, the possibilities of valsartan in reducing the severity of left ventricular hypertrophy and microalbuminuria are described, and its unique properties in the class of sartans that allow the use of this drug in patients with ischemic heart disease and chronic heart failure are emphasized. Data on the antiatherosclerotic effects of amlodipine and its proven ability to reduce cardiovascular risk are presented. Current data are presented about their use in a fixed-dose combination with hydrochlorothiazide, including real clinical practice settings. The evidence base of high clinical efficacy, safety and metabolic neutrality of the triple combination of antihypertensive drugs valsartan, amlodipine and hydrochorothiazide is presented. The issues of increasing adherence of patients to treatment when prescribing fixed-dose combinations are considered. An algorithm for the selection of antihypertensive drugs in the form of monotherapy and combination therapy of two or three drugs depending on the clinical situation (the presence of certain target-organs damages and associated clinical conditions, primarily ischemic heart disease, atherosclerosis of carotid arteries and chronic heart failure) and the severity of the additional risk of cardiovascular complications.

S-amlodipine plus chlorthalidone vs. S-amlodipine plus telmisartan in hypertensive patients unresponsive to amlodipine monotherapy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

The efficacy of a combination of a calcium channel blocker (CCB) plus chlorthalidone (diuretic) versus a CCB plus an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) in patients not responding to CCB monotherapy has not been evaluated previously. We plan to compare the efficacy and safety of S-amlodipine (CCB) plus chlorthalidone versus S-amlodipine plus telmisartan (ARB) combinations among hypertension patients unresponsive to amlodipine monotherapy.

Methods/design

This study is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, parallel, non-inferiority phase 4 study. Hypertension patients who have been treated with amlodipine (5 mg) or S-amlodipine (2.5 mg) monotherapy for ≥2 weeks and whose mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is greater than 90 mmHg will be randomized to either S-amlodipine (2.5 mg) plus chlorthalidone (25 mg) or S-amlodipine (2.5 mg) plus telmisartan (40 mg) therapy. The primary efficacy endpoint is mean sitting DBP change after 12 weeks of treatment. The study objective is to prove the non-inferiority of the former combination (test drug) as compared to the latter one (control) with a non-inferiority margin of 3 mmHg in mean DBP change. The secondary endpoints are 6-week DBP change, 6- and 12-week sitting systolic BP (SBP) change, and the attainment of the target BP (SBP < 140 mmHg or DBP < 90 mmHg). Urine albumin, albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR), pulse wave velocity, central BP, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring, and body fluid composition analysis will be performed at each hospital’s discretion. The sample size was estimated as 170 in total with 1:1 randomization.

Discussion

This is the first study comparing the efficacy of a CCB plus chlorthalidone versus a CCB plus an ARB in patients who are not responding to CCB single therapy. The study result will help clinicians to choose between chlorthalidone and telmisartan in CCB-unresponsive patients.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03226340. Registered on 2 December 2015.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13063-018-2636-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Comparative efficacy and safety of triple therapy (ramipril, telmisartan, hydrochlorothiazide) vs dual anti hypertensive therapy (ramipril or telmisartan, hydrochlorothiazide) in stage 2 hypertensive patients

AIM

To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of ramipril 5mg plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5mg (R + HCTZ), telmisartan 40mg plus hydrochlorothiazide12.5mg (T + HCTZ) and ramipril 2.5mg plus telmisartan 20mg plus hydrochlorothiazide12.5mg (R + T + HCTZ) in patients with stage 2 hypertension.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective, open label, randomized comparative study was conducted to study the comparative efficacy and safety of R+HCTZ (group 1), T+HCTZ (group 2)and R+T+TCTZ (group3) in 88 patients with stage 2 hypertension without co-morbid conditions. Echocardiography was done to assess left ventricular function. Patients were followed up to 24 weeks and any ADR occurring in this period was recorded.

RESULTS

All the three treatment groups showed significant fall in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared to the baseline scores (p<0.0001). Intergroup comparison did not reveal any significant difference. Total number of adverse drug events reported were 15. Group III had higher percentage ADRs. Dry cough (8) was most common ADR. The echocardiography parameters did not change from baseline values with all three treatment regimens.

CONCLUSION

All three medications were of equal efficacy in patients with stage 2 hypertension without co morbid conditions, failing to prove superiority over each other.

The efficacy and safety of triple vs dual combination of angiotensin II receptor blocker and calcium channel blocker and diuretic: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Many hypertensive patients require ≥2 drugs to achieve blood pressure targets. This study aims to review and analyze the clinical studies conducted with dual or triple combination of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and diuretics. Medical literature between January 1990 and April 2012 was reviewed systematically and data from eligible studies were abstracted. Data were analyzed using random-effects models. Of the 224 studies screened, 7563 eligible patients from 11 studies were included. Triple combinations of ARBs (olmesartan or valsartan), CCBs (amlodipine), and diuretics (hydrochlorothiazide) at any dose provided more blood pressure reduction in office and 24-hour ambulatory measurements than any dual combination of these molecules (P<.0001 for both). Significantly more patients achieved blood pressure targets with triple combinations (odds ratio, 2.16; P<.0001). Triple combinations did not increase adverse event risk (odds ratio, 0.96; P=.426). Triple combinations at any dose seem to decrease blood pressure more effectively than dual combination of the same molecules without any remarkable risk elevation for adverse events. Further prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of triple combinations, especially in the form of single pills, are required.

Effects of valsartan or ramipril addition to amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide combination on left ventricular mass in diabetic hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare valsartan or ramipril addition to amlodipine + hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) on blood pressure (BP) and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) in hypertensive diabetic patients with LVH.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

293 patients were treated with amlodipine 10 mg + HCTZ 12.5 combination and then randomized to receive valsartan 160 mg or ramipril 5 mg, in addition to the previous therapy, for 1 year.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Clinic BP was measured every month; echocardiographic assessments were performed at the end of the placebo period, both before the randomization and after 1-year of triple combination therapy.

RESULTS

Both triple regimens similarly reduced SBP/DBP values (-13.5/10.9 mm Hg in the valsartan group and -13.4/10.4 mm Hg in the ramipril group). Triple combination including valsartan better reduced LVMI (-20.1%, p < 0.001), interventricular septal thickness (IVST) (-20.3%, p < 0.001) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness (PWT) (-16.3%, p < 0.001), compared with triple combination including ramipril (-14%, p < 0.01; -16.2%, p < 0.001 and -9%, p < 0.01, respectively); the difference between treatments being statistically significant (p < 0.05). Triple combination with valsartan gave a greater increase of E/A ratio (p < 0.05 between groups).

CONCLUSIONS

Valsartan addition to dual therapy with amlodipine + HCTZ was more effective than ramipril addition in reducing LVH.