Postpartum thromboembolism: severe events might be preventable using a new risk score model

Estimating the value of future research into thromboprophylaxis for women during pregnancy and after delivery: a value of information analysis

BACKGROUND

Risk assessment models (RAMs) are used to select women at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy and the puerperium for thromboprophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the value of potential future studies that would reduce the decision uncertainty associated with offering thromboprophylaxis according to available RAMs in the following groups: high-risk antepartum women (eg, prior VTE), unselected postpartum women, and postpartum women with risk factors (obesity or cesarean delivery).

METHODS

A decision-analytic model was developed to simulate clinical outcomes, lifetime costs, and quality-adjusted life-years for different thromboprophylaxis strategies, including thromboprophylaxis for all, thromboprophylaxis for none, and RAM-based thromboprophylaxis. The expected value of perfect information analysis was used to determine which factors are associated with high decision uncertainty. The value of future research studies was estimated using expected value of sample information analysis. Costs were assessed from a health and social services perspective.

RESULTS

The expected value of perfect information analysis identified high decision uncertainty for high-risk antepartum women (£21.8 million) and obese postpartum women (£13.4 million), which was largely attributable to uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis in reducing VTE. A randomized controlled trial of thromboprophylaxis compared with none in obese postpartum women is likely to have substantial value (£2.8 million; 300 participants per arm). A trial in women with previous VTE would have higher value but would be less acceptable.

CONCLUSION

Future research should focus on estimating the effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis in obese postpartum women with additional risk factors who have not had a previous VTE.

Thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and the puerperium: a systematic review and economic evaluation to estimate the value of future research

Background

Pharmacological prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism is currently recommended for women assessed as being at high risk of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or in the 6 weeks after delivery (the puerperium). The decision to provide thromboprophylaxis involves weighing the benefits, harms and costs, which vary according to the individual's venous thromboembolism risk. It is unclear whether the United Kingdom's current risk stratification approach could be improved by further research.

Objectives

To quantify the current decision uncertainty associated with selecting women who are pregnant or in the puerperium for thromboprophylaxis and to estimate the value of one or more potential future studies that would reduce that uncertainty, while being feasible and acceptable to patients and clinicians.

Methods

A decision-analytic model was developed which was informed by a systematic review of risk assessment models to predict venous thromboembolism in women who are pregnant or in the puerperium. Expected value of perfect information analysis was used to determine which factors are associated with high decision uncertainty and should be the target of future research. To find out whether future studies would be acceptable and feasible, we held workshops with women who have experienced a blood clot or have been offered blood-thinning drugs and surveyed healthcare professionals. Expected value of sample information analysis was used to estimate the value of potential future research studies.

Results

The systematic review included 17 studies, comprising 19 unique externally validated risk assessment models and 1 internally validated model. Estimates of sensitivity and specificity were highly variable ranging from 0% to 100% and 5% to 100%, respectively. Most studies had unclear or high risk of bias and applicability concerns. The decision analysis found that there is substantial decision uncertainty regarding the use of risk assessment models to select high-risk women for antepartum prophylaxis and obese postpartum women for postpartum prophylaxis. The main source of decision uncertainty was uncertainty around the effectiveness of thromboprophylaxis for preventing venous thromboembolism in women who are pregnant or in the puerperium. We found that a randomised controlled trial of thromboprophylaxis in obese postpartum women is likely to have substantial value and is more likely to be acceptable and feasible than a trial recruiting women who have had a previous venous thromboembolism. In unselected postpartum women and women following caesarean section, the poor performance of risk assessment models meant that offering prophylaxis based on these models had less favourable cost effectiveness with lower decision uncertainty.

Limitations

The performance of the risk assessment model for obese postpartum women has not been externally validated.

Conclusions

Future research should focus on estimating the efficacy of pharmacological thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy and the puerperium, and clinical trials would be more acceptable in women who have not had a previous venous thromboembolism.

Study registration

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020221094.

Funding

This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR131021) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 9. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Swedish obstetric thromboprophylaxis guideline: background and update

Risk estimation concerning venous thromboembolism (VTE) and thromboprophylaxis for those at risk is routine in pregnancy. For 20 years, Swedish obstetricians have followed a weighted-risk algorithm guideline for risk estimation, based on which patient selection, timing, duration and dosage of thromboprophylaxis are determined. This article presents the latest update, the basis for the algorithm and its application for assessing moderate- to high obstetric VTE risk, defined as equal or greater absolute risk per time unit than the antepartum risk of women with one prior VTE. The risk score is based on risk factors conferring approximately fivefold increased risk of VTE or a multiple thereof. This article also presents algorithm efficacy data and describes lifestyle advice provided to patients. In our experience, the Swedish guideline for obstetric VTE risk estimation is easy to follow. It helps identify women at high risk. The risk of under- or overtreatment is thus minimised.

Risk assessment models for venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and in the puerperium: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To assess the comparative accuracy of risk assessment models (RAMs) to identify women during pregnancy and the early postnatal period who are at increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).

DESIGN

Systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library and two research registers were searched until February 2021.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

All validation studies that examined the accuracy of a multivariable RAM (or scoring system) for predicting the risk of developing VTE in women who are pregnant or in the puerperium (within 6 weeks post-delivery).

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two authors independently selected and extracted data. Risk of bias was appraised using PROBAST (Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool). Data were synthesised without meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies, comprising 19 externally validated RAMs and 1 internally validated model, met the inclusion criteria. The most widely evaluated RAMs were the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines (six studies), American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines (two studies), Swedish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology guidelines (two studies) and the Lyon score (two studies). In general, estimates of sensitivity and specificity were highly variable with sensitivity estimates ranging from 0% to 100% for RAMs that were applied to antepartum women to predict antepartum or postpartum VTE and 0% to 100% for RAMs applied postpartum to predict postpartum VTE. Specificity estimates were similarly diverse ranging from 28% to 98% and 5% to 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data suggest that external validation studies have weak designs and limited generalisability, so estimates of prognostic accuracy are very uncertain.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020221094.

Venous Thromboembolism Risk Score and Pregnancy

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major contributor to maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Pregnancy is associated with the development of a baseline hypercoagulable state. The two strongest risk factors for pregnancy-associated VTE are previous VTE and/or high risk thrombophilia. The others risk factors for VTE during pregnancy are well known such as maternal, pregnancy and delivery characteristics. Considering the variation in recommendation in guidelines and low-quality evidence on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment, practice differs between countries and clinical institutions. Some authors developed risk scores, enabling individualized estimation of thrombotic risk during pregnancy, and permitting implementation of a risk-adapted strategy for thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy and postpartum. This review describes the existing VTE risk scores during the antenatal and postnatal period. The important message beyond the score used is that all women should undergo VTE risk factor assessment. The use of a Computerized Clinical Decision Support System for VTE risk assessment should be explored in obstetrics.

Current opinion and emerging trends on the treatment, diagnosis, and prevention of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolic disease: a review

Pregnancy associated venous thromboembolism (PA-VTE) is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Despite the availability of international guidance on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment, practice differs between countries and clinical institutions. The evidence base in this area is limited due to the vulnerable population who are affected, with the majority of guidelines deriving their recommendations from experience in surgical and medical venous thromboembolic disease. This review includes best evidence in PA-VTE management, highlighting specific literature which supports current diagnosis, prevention, and treatment strategies. Additionally, we hope to demonstrate emerging trends in the field through discussion of ongoing trials designed to progress towards evidence-based practice in the context of PA-VTE.

Preventing postpartum venous thromboembolism: A call to action to reduce undue maternal morbidity and mortality

Postpartum venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a leading cause of maternal mortality in developed countries and can carry significant long-term morbidity. Despite being able to identify postpartum VTE risk factors in a large proportion of the obstetrical population, there is little high-quality evidence available to guide practice on who should receive postpartum thromboprophylaxis. Based on epidemiological data, women with a prior history of VTE or known potent thrombophilia are likely to benefit from an extended duration of low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis. However, significant controversy exists around the benefit and harm of postpartum thromboprophylaxis in women with more modest risk factors, such as those with mild thrombophilias or transient situational risk factors around labor and delivery, such as cesarean delivery. We review the available data for postpartum VTE risk factors and thromboprophylaxis in these patients. This review highlights the latest evidence in the area of postpartum VTE prevention, and is a call to action for further research in this area to improve maternal morbidity and mortality.

A rare case of mesenteric vessel thrombosis post caesarian section-An underdiagnosed entity

•

Mesenteric vessel thrombosis is a rare event after caesarean section.

•

It can lead to pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) and respiratory distress.

•

Pregnancy, itself is a hypercoagulable state.

•

Postpartum patients with bad obstetric history, respiratory distress must be evaluated for thrombophilic disorders.

•

High index of suspicion is required for thrombophilic disorders.

•

Prompt diagnosis and urgent intervention can save patient’s life.

Introduction

Respiratory distress is an uncommon clinical event after caesarean section and occurs due to pulmonary thromboembolism. Various causes of pulmonary thromboembolism are thrombophlebitis, ovarian venous thrombosis and mesenteric vein thrombosis.

Presentation of case

We report a case of 30 year old female who presented with respiratory distress after eight days of uneventful caesarian section. On emergency explorative laparotomy, small gut was found to be gangrenous, so resection of the segment was performed. On histopathological examination, there was ischaemic necrosis of bowel with presence of large thrombus in mesenteric vessel. On correlating radiological findings of pulmonary thromboembolism and mesenteric vessel thrombosis with bad obstetric history, a possibility of Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) was suggested in this case. Unfortunately, patient died the day following laparotomy so there was insufficient time to evaluate the patient for thrombophilic disorders.

Discussion

Pregnancy and perpeurium are associated with higher risk of thrombosis as these are hypercoagulable states. Operative delivery and history of thrombophilia in previous pregnancies (APS) are other predisposing factors which lead to increased thrombotic state and pulmonary thromboembolism.

Conclusion

High index of suspicion for thrombophilic disorders is required in postpartum patients presenting with respiratory distress as prompt diagnosis and urgent intervention can save patient’s life.

American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thromboembolism in the context of pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) complicates ∼1.2 of every 1000 deliveries. Despite these low absolute risks, pregnancy-associated VTE is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

These evidence-based guidelines of the American Society of Hematology (ASH) are intended to support patients, clinicians and others in decisions about the prevention and management of pregnancy-associated VTE.

METHODS

ASH formed a multidisciplinary guideline panel balanced to minimize potential bias from conflicts of interest. The McMaster University GRADE Centre supported the guideline development process, including updating or performing systematic evidence reviews. The panel prioritized clinical questions and outcomes according to their importance for clinicians and patients. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to assess evidence and make recommendations.

RESULTS

The panel agreed on 31 recommendations related to the treatment of VTE and superficial vein thrombosis, diagnosis of VTE, and thrombosis prophylaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a strong recommendation for low-molecular-weight heparin (LWMH) over unfractionated heparin for acute VTE. Most recommendations were conditional, including those for either twice-per-day or once-per-day LMWH dosing for the treatment of acute VTE and initial outpatient therapy over hospital admission with low-risk acute VTE, as well as against routine anti-factor Xa (FXa) monitoring to guide dosing with LMWH for VTE treatment. There was a strong recommendation (low certainty in evidence) for antepartum anticoagulant prophylaxis with a history of unprovoked or hormonally associated VTE and a conditional recommendation against antepartum anticoagulant prophylaxis with prior VTE associated with a resolved nonhormonal provoking risk factor.

Obstetric venous thromboembolism: a systematic review of dalteparin and pregnancy

A systematic review of studies published between 1 January 1985 and 31 August 2017 was performed to analyse the efficacy of the low-molecular-weight heparin, dalteparin, in venous thromboembolism (VTE) treatment and prophylaxis during pregnancy, and to evaluate dosing practices, anticoagulant monitoring and adverse events. A therapeutic dosing throughout pregnancy or followed by reduced doses effectively prevented VTE recurrence. Anti-factor Xa activity was the most commonly used method of dose monitoring. The risk of bleeding with dalteparin was generally minor. Major bleeding was observed when a high dose of dalteparin was employed during (or close to) delivery, or postpartum. Other adverse events were minor. Disparity exists in VTE treatment and thromboprophylaxis, with wide variety in the dosing regimens, treatment strategies and monitoring practices employed. Large randomised controlled trials are warranted but due to ethical reasons, and the rarity of VTE-associated obstetric complications, case-control, registry and large observational studies present more likely options.

Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis During Antepartum Admissions and Postpartum Readmissions

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis during antepartum and postpartum hospitalizations in the United States.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using the Perspective database was performed to analyze temporal trends of mechanical and pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for patients hospitalized for antepartum and postpartum indications between 2006 and 2015. Delivery hospitalizations were excluded. The association between use of prophylaxis and medical and obstetric risk factors as well as patient demographic and hospital characteristics was evaluated with unadjusted and adjusted models accounting for demographic, hospital and medical, and obstetric risk factors.

RESULTS

A total of 622,740 antepartum and 105,361 postpartum readmissions were identified and included in the analysis. Between 2006 and 2015, use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis increased from 18.5% to 38.7% for antepartum admissions (adjusted risk ratio [RR] 1.94, 95% CI 1.88-2.01) and from 22.5% to 30.6% for postpartum readmissions (adjusted RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.21-1.43). Among women readmitted postpartum, 56.4% of prophylaxis was pharmacologic and 43.6% was mechanical. For antepartum admissions, 87.2% of prophylaxis was mechanical and 12.8% was pharmacologic. Significant regional and hospital-level variation was noted with prophylaxis most common in the South. In both unadjusted and unadjusted analyses, use of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis was more common for women with thrombophilia, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, a history of venous thromboembolism, and prolonged hospitalization. Factors associated with decreased rates of prophylaxis included hyperemesis and postpartum endometritis.

CONCLUSION

Although antepartum and postpartum venous thromboembolism prophylaxis is becoming increasingly common, particularly in the setting of medical or obstetric risk factors, use of prophylaxis varies regionally and on a hospital level. Some risk factors for venous thromboembolism were associated with lower rates of prophylaxis. The heterogeneity of clinical approaches to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for these patient populations may represent an opportunity to perform outcomes research to further clarify best practices.

Personalized thromboprophylaxis using a risk score for the management of pregnancies with high risk of thrombosis: a prospective clinical study

Essentials Pregnancy is a risk factor for thrombosis. Management of thrombosis risk in pregnancy remains a challenge. Prophylaxis needs to be personalized. Our score may be a helpful tool for the management of pregnancies at high risk of thrombosis.

SUMMARY

Background Patients with thrombophilia and/or a history of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are at risk of thrombosis during pregnancy. A risk score for pregnancies with an increased risk of VTE was previously described by our group (Lyon VTE score). Objectives The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy and safety of our score-based prophylaxis strategy in 542 pregnancies managed between 2005 and 2015 in Lyon University Hospitals. Patients/Methods Of 445 patients included in the study, 36 had several pregnancies during the study period. Among these 445 patients, 279 had a personal history of VTE (62.7%), 299 patients (67.2%) had a thrombophilia marker, and 131 (29.4%) thrombophilic women had a personal history of VTE. During pregnancy, patients were assigned to one of three prophylaxis strategies according to the risk scoring system. Results In the antepartum period, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) prophylaxis was prescribed to 64.5% of patients at high risk of VTE. Among them, 34.4% were treated in the third trimester only, and 30.1% were treated throughout pregnancy. During the postpartum period, all patients received LMWH for at least 6 weeks. Two antepartum-related VTEs (0.37%; one with a score of < 3 and the other with a score of > 6) and four postpartum-related VTEs (0.73%; three with scores of 3-5 and one with a score of > 6) occurred. No case of pulmonary embolism was observed during the study period. The rate of bleeding was 0.37%. No serious bleeding requiring transfusions or surgery occurred during the study period. Conclusion The use of a risk score may provide a rational decision process to implement safe and effective antepartum thromboprophylaxis in pregnant women at high risk of VTE.

Case-crossover study to examine the change in postpartum risk of pulmonary embolism over time

BACKGROUND

Although the current guidelines recommend anticoagulation up until 6 weeks after delivery in women at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), the risk of VTE may extend beyond 6 weeks. Our objective was to estimate the risk of a pulmonary embolism in successive 2-week intervals during the postpartum period.

METHODS

In a population-based, case-crossover study, we analyzed the French national inpatient database from 2007 to 2013 (n = 5,517,680 singleton deliveries). Using ICD-10 codes, we identified women who were diagnosed with a postpartum pulmonary embolism between July 1^st, 2008, and December 31^st, 2013. Deliveries were identified during a case "period" immediately before the pulmonary embolism, and five different control periods one year before the pulmonary embolism. Using conditional logistic regression, Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidential intervals (CIs) were estimated for ten successive 2-week intervals that preceded the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism.

RESULTS

We identified 167,103 cases with a pulmonary embolism during the inclusion period. After delivery, the risk of pulmonary embolism declined progressively over time, with an OR [95%CI] of 17.2 [14.0-21.3] in postpartum weeks 1 to 2 and 1.9 [1.4-2.7] in postpartum weeks 11 to 12. The OR [95%CI] in postpartum weeks 13 to 14 was 1.4 [0.9-2.0], and the OR did not fall significantly after postpartum week 14.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that women are at risk of a pulmonary embolism up to 12 weeks after delivery. The shape of the risk curve suggests that the risk decreases exponentially over time. Future research is needed to establish whether the duration of postpartum anticoagulation should be extended beyond 6 weeks.

Development and validation of risk prediction model for venous thromboembolism in postpartum women: multinational cohort study

OBJECTIVE

 To develop and validate a risk prediction model for venous thromboembolism in the first six weeks after delivery (early postpartum).

DESIGN

 Cohort study.

SETTING

 Records from England based Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) linked to Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) and data from Sweden based registry.

PARTICIPANTS

 All pregnant women registered with CPRD-HES linked data between 1997 and 2014 and Swedish medical birth registry between 2005 and 2011 with postpartum follow-up.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

 Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to develop a risk prediction model for postpartum venous thromboembolism based on the English data, which was externally validated in the Swedish data.

RESULTS

 433 353 deliveries were identified in the English cohort and 662 387 in the Swedish cohort. The absolute rate of venous thromboembolism was 7.2 per 10 000 deliveries in the English cohort and 7.9 per 10 000 in the Swedish cohort. Emergency caesarean delivery, stillbirth, varicose veins, pre-eclampsia/eclampsia, postpartum infection, and comorbidities were the strongest predictors of venous thromboembolism in the final multivariable model. Discrimination of the model was similar in both cohorts, with a C statistic above 0.70, with excellent calibration of observed and predicted risks. The model identified more venous thromboembolism events than the existing national English (sensitivity 68% v 63%) and Swedish guidelines (30% v 21%) at similar thresholds.

CONCLUSION

 A new prediction model that quantifies absolute risk of postpartum venous thromboembolism has been developed and externally validated. It is based on clinical variables that are available in many developed countries at the point of delivery and could serve as the basis for real time decisions on obstetric thromboprophylaxis.

Does Use of Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin during Pregnancy Influence the Risk of Prolonged Labor: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Background

The use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) during pregnancy is increasing. In vitro studies and small clinical studies support the hypothesis that LMWH treatment during pregnancy may reduce duration of labor. The aim of this study was to investigate if use of LMWH is associated with a reduced risk of diagnosis of prolonged labor, after taking maternal, fetal and other delivery characteristics into account.

Methods and Findings

A population-based cohort study from the Swedish Medical Birth Register from April 2006 through December 2011. We identified 514 875 term (≥37 weeks) deliveries of live singleton infants in cephalic presentation with spontaneous or induced onsets of labor. The Birth Register was linked to the Prescribed Drug Register to retrieve information on dispensed LMWH during pregnancy and to the Patient Register for information on underlying diagnosis for use of LMWH. Diagnosis of prolonged labor in the Birth Register was retrieved from diagnosis at discharge from the delivery hospital. The risk of diagnosis of prolonged labor in relation to treatment with LMWH was assessed using logistic regression analysis to estimate unadjusted and adjusted odds ratios. A total of 5 275 (1.0%) of the pregnant women used LMWH. The absolute risk of diagnosis of prolonged labor for nulliparous women was 19.9% among women using LMWH in third trimester, and 21.2% in women without use of LMWH. For parous women the corresponding absolute risks were 4.3% and 4.7%, respectively. Compared to nulliparous women without use of LMWH, nulliparous women with LMWH during third trimester had an odds ratio (OR) of 0.92 (95% CI 0.81–1.05, p-value: 0.051) for diagnosis of prolonged labor in unadjusted analyses and after adjustments for maternal characteristics, gestational age and epidural analgesia the OR was 1.00 (95% CI 0.87–1.15, p-value: 0.673). Parous women treated with LMWH in third trimester presented the same pattern, unadjusted OR for diagnosis of prolonged labor was 0.92 (95% CI 0.76–1.12, p-value: 0.418) and after adjustments OR was 0.99 (95% CI 0.80–1.22, p-value: 0.892). One limitation with the study was that information on prolonged labor was based on discharge diagnoses from the delivery hospital according to the International Classification of Diseases (ICD).

Conclusions

Treatment with LMWH during pregnancy is not associated with a risk of diagnosis of prolonged labor after adjustments for maternal, fetal and delivery characteristics.

Thromboembolism incidence and prophylaxis during vaginal delivery hospitalizations

OBJECTIVE

Although major international guidelines recommend venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis during vaginal delivery hospitalization for women with additional risk factors, US guidelines recommend prophylaxis for a very small number of women who are at particularly high risk for an event. The purpose of this study was to characterize practice patterns of VTE prophylaxis in the United States during vaginal delivery hospitalizations and to determine VTE incidence in this population.

STUDY DESIGN

A population-level database was used to analyze VTE incidence and use of VTE prophylaxis during vaginal delivery hospitalizations in the United States between 2006 and 2012 (n = 2,673,986). We evaluated whether patients received either pharmacologic or mechanical prophylaxis. Hospital-level factors and patient characteristics were included in multivariable regression analysis that evaluated prophylaxis administration.

RESULTS

We identified 2,673,986 women who underwent vaginal delivery. Incidence of VTE increased during the study period from 15.6-29.8 events per 100,000 delivery hospitalizations. Within the cohort, 2.6% of patients (n = 68,835) received VTE prophylaxis. Pharmacologic prophylaxis was rare; <1% of women received unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin. Although patients with thrombophilia or a previous VTE event were likely to receive prophylaxis (60.8% and 72.8%, respectively), patients with risk factors for VTE such as obesity, smoking, and heart disease were unlikely to receive prophylaxis (rates of 5.9%, 3.3%, and 6.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrate that the administration of VTE prophylaxis outside a small group of women at extremely high risk for VTE is rare during vaginal delivery hospitalization. Given that VTE incidence is rising in this population, further research to determine whether broadening prophylaxis for VTE may reduce severe maternal morbidity and death is indicated.

Impact of risk factors on the timing of first postpartum venous thromboembolism: a population-based cohort study from England

Impact on the timing of first postpartum venous thromboembolism (VTE) for women with specific risk factors is of crucial importance when planning the duration of thromboprophylaxis regimen. We observed this using a large linked primary and secondary care database containing 222 334 pregnancies resulting in live and stillbirth births between 1997 and 2010. We assessed the impact of risk factors on the timing of postpartum VTE in term of absolute rates (ARs) and incidence rate ratios (IRRs) using a Poisson regression model. Women with preeclampsia/eclampsia and postpartum acute systemic infection had the highest risk of VTE during the first 3 weeks postpartum (ARs ≥2263/100 000 person-years; IRR ≥2.5) and at 4-6 weeks postpartum (AR ≥1360; IRR ≥3.5). Women with body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m(2) or those having cesarean delivery also had elevated rates up to 6 weeks (AR ≥1425 at 1-3 weeks and ≥722 at 4-6 weeks). Women with postpartum hemorrhage or preterm birth, had significantly increased VTE rates only in the first 3 weeks (AR ≥1736; IRR ≥2). Our findings suggest that the duration of the increased VTE risk after childbirth varies based on the type of risk factors and can extend up to the first 3 to 6 weeks postpartum.

The incidence of first venous thromboembolism in and around pregnancy using linked primary and secondary care data: a population based cohort study from England and comparative meta-analysis

Background

Recent linkage between primary and secondary care data has provided valuable information for studying heath outcomes that may initially present in different health care settings. The aim of this study was therefore, twofold: to use linked primary and secondary care data to determine an optimum definition for estimating the incidence of first VTE in and around pregnancy; and secondly to conduct a systematic literature review of studies on perinatal VTE incidence with the purpose of comparing our estimates.

Methods

We used primary care data from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), which incorporates linkages to secondary care contained within Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) between 1997 and 2010 to estimate the incidence rate of VTE in the antepartum and postpartum period. We systematically searched the literature on the incidence of VTE during antepartum and postpartum periods and performed a meta-analysis to provide comparison.

Findings

Using combined CPRD and HES data and a restrictive VTE definition, the absolute rate during the antepartum period and first six weeks postpartum (early postpartum) were 99 (95%CI 85–116) and 468 (95%CI 391–561) per 100,000 person-years respectively. These were comparable to the pooled estimates from our meta-analysis (using studies after 2005) during the antepartum period (118/100,000 person-years) and early postpartum (424/100,000 person-years). When we used only secondary care data to identify VTE events, incidence was lower during the early postpartum period (308/100,000 person-years), whereas relying only on primary care data lead to lower incidence during the time around delivery, but higher rates during the postpartum period (558/100,000 person-years).

Conclusion

Using combined CPRD and HES data gives estimates of the risk of VTE in and around pregnancy that are comparable to the existing literature. It also provides more accurate estimation of the date of VTE diagnosis which will allow risk stratification during specific pregnancy and postpartum periods.

Maternal obesity and venous thromboembolism

The incidence of obesity in pregnancy has increased rapidly in the last decade. Obesity is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism outside of pregnancy and previous studies of maternal death in the UK have identified obesity as a risk factor in pregnancy. As a result the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists have targeted obesity as a risk factor in evaluation of the need for thromboprophylaxis in pregnancy. This article highlights the evidence that obesity increases the risk of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and the puerperium, discusses thromboprophylaxis and appropriate dosing in obese parturients and details the anaesthetic implications of the 2009 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists' guidelines. More clinical studies are required to clarify the appropriate dose of low-molecular-weight heparin in an obese parturient.

Obstetric thromboprophylaxis: the Swedish guidelines

Obstetric thromboprophylaxis is difficult. Since 10 years Swedish obstetricians have used a combined risk estimation model and recommendations concerning to whom, at what dose, when, and for how long thromboprophylaxis is to be administrated based on a weighted risk score. In this paper we describe the background and validation of the Swedish guidelines for obstetric thromboprophylaxis in women with moderate-high risk of VTE, that is, at similar or higher risk as the antepartum risk among women with history of thrombosis. The risk score is based on major risk factors (i.e., 5-fold increased risk of thromboembolism). We present data on the efficacy of the model, the cost-effectiveness, and the lifestyle advice that is given. We believe that the Swedish guidelines for obstetric thromboprophylaxis aid clinicians in providing women at increased risk of VTE with effective and appropriate thromboprophylaxis, thus avoiding both over- and under-treatment.

Recommendations for the prevention of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism

Pregnancy is a risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE), an important cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Although there is a 4-5-fold increased risk compared to that of nonpregnant women of the same age, the absolute risk is low at no more than two episodes of VTE per 1000 pregnancies. There is uncertainty about which women require thromboprophylaxis during pregnancy or postpartum because of a lack of data from appropriate clinical trials. For this reason, recommendations for prophylaxis should be made only after explaining the available evidence to the patient and taking into account her perception of the balance of risk and benefit in thromboprophylaxis. The aim of these recommendations is to provide clinicians with practical advice to assist in decisions regarding thromboprophylaxis in women considered to be at risk of VTE during pregnancy and the postpartum. The authors are clinicians from across New Zealand and Australia representing the fields of haematology, obstetric medicine, anaesthesiology, maternal-fetal medicine and obstetrics. Authors were invited to review the relevant literature and then worked collaboratively to devise recommendations and resolve areas of controversy. The recommendations contained herein were reached by consensus and represent the opinion of the panel. The absence of randomised clinical trials in this area limits the strength of evidence that can be used, and it is acknowledged that they represent level C evidence. The panel advocates for appropriate clinical studies to be carried out in this patient population to address the inadequacy of present evidence.

Efficacy of obstetric thromboprophylaxis and long-term risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism

OBJECTIVE

To study the efficacy of thromboprophylaxis with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in pregnant women with one previous venous thromboembolic event (VTE). Secondary aims were to study the long-term risk of secondary recurrence, bleeding and obstetric complications.

DESIGN

A prospective national study of long-term LMWH thromboprophylaxis in Sweden.

SETTINGS

All hospitals in Sweden during January 1998-December 2002,

PARTICIPANTS

Pregnant women with one previous VTE and controls drawn from the Swedish Medical Birth Registry. The women were cross-matched with the Swedish Hospital Discharge Register to identify all recurrences and to ascertain the annual risk of recurrence.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Recurrence of VTE, bleeding complications at delivery and obstetric complications.

RESULTS

326 of 393 registered women could be evaluated. The relative risk reduction in VTE was 88%. There was an absolute increased risk of VTE during the thromboprophylaxis period: 1.2% compared to 0.2% among controls (p<0.001). The risk during the immediate post-treatment period (43-100 days post-partum) was increased 28-fold. The annual incidence of VTE after delivery was 1%. The risk of hematoma and major blood loss at delivery was increased during thromboprophylaxis (p<0.001). There were no differences in the incidences of preeclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction or placental abruption.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative risk reduction in VTE during thromboprophylaxis was 88%. After pregnancy, the annual long-term risk of recurrence was 1%. The risk was most pronounced in the post-treatment period. There was an increased risk of bleeding complications among women given LMWH, but there was no effect on obstetric complications.

Risk of venous thromboembolism during the postpartum period: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To determine, from the literature, the risk of venous thromboembolism during the postpartum period.

DATA SOURCES

We searched PubMed and Cochrane Library databases for all articles (in all languages) published in peer-reviewed journals from database inception through May 2010 for evidence related to incidence of venous thromboembolism in postpartum women.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

We included studies reporting relative risk, incidence rate, or cumulative incidence of venous thromboembolism in postpartum women.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

We included 15 articles reporting findings from 13 studies. Two studies directly comparing venous thromboembolism during the first 6 weeks postpartum to nonpregnant, nonpostpartum women reported relative effect measures of 21.5 (rate ratio; 95% confidence interval [CI] unable to be calculated) and 84 (odds ratio; 95% CI 31.7-222.6), respectively. A third study reported relative effect measures for deep venous thrombosis (15.2, 95% CI 13.2-17.6; standardized incidence ratio) and pulmonary embolism (9.2, 95% CI 6.5-12.7) separately. Three studies reported incidence rates of venous thromboembolism during the postpartum period (range 25-99 per 10,000 woman-years). We compared these incidence rates to baseline rates among nonpregnant, nonpostpartum women reported in the literature to generate rate ratios; these rate ratios ranged from 2.5 to 21.5. Nine studies reported cumulative incidence proportions of postpartum venous thromboembolism, ranging from 0.14 to 3.24 per 1,000 deliveries at 6 weeks postpartum. Incidence of venous thromboembolism was highest immediately after delivery (standardized incidence ratio for deep venous thrombosis 115.1 [95% CI 96.4-137.0], and for pulmonary embolism 80.7 [95% CI 53.9-117.9]); between 4 and 6 weeks postpartum, risk declined but was still approximately five-times to seven-times that of nonpregnant, nonpostpartum women.

CONCLUSION

During the first 6 weeks postpartum, women's risk of venous thromboembolism increased 21.5-fold to 84-fold from baseline in nonpregnant, nonpostpartum women in studies that included an internal reference group. Although incidence of venous thromboembolism declined quickly after delivery, when this risk returns to baseline is not clear from current data.

Use of imaging for investigation of suspected pulmonary embolism during pregnancy and the postpartum period

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is recognized as a leading cause of maternal mortality in the developed world; however, it is a very difficult diagnosis to make on clinical grounds, and in most cases imaging is required. Pregnancy is a recognized risk factor for venous thromboembolism, and symptoms of normal pregnancy including shortness of breath, tachycardia and leg swelling are included in clinical tools for risk stratification for PE in the non-pregnant population. This results in a very low threshold for imaging, despite concerns regarding the risk of exposure to ionizing radiation both for the fetus and the maternal breast. We reviewed the results of all ventilation/perfusion scans and computed tomography pulmonary angiograms performed in pregnant women at a single institution to identify how many of these tests were positive for PE, and which clinical features may identify a low-risk group. A total of 386 scans were performed to investigate 375 episodes of suspected PE, representing 1.3-1.5% of pregnant women. Fifteen patients were diagnosed with PE, giving an incidence of one in 2000 maternities. The only statistically significant factors associated with PE were smoking or the presence of multiple risk factors. Clinical features of tachycardia and leg swelling did not provide significant diagnostic value; however, the absence of pleuritic chest pain had a negative predictive value of 97.8%. Arterial blood gas and D-dimer were statistically different between those with and without PE but not to a clinically useful degree. Currently available clinical and laboratory tools are not adequate to exclude a diagnosis of PE in a pregnant patient, thus imaging is justified to exclude PE. Further longitudinal studies to identify a low-risk group who do not require imaging is vital.

Thrombosis and embolism in pregnancy and the puerperium, reducing the risk: what proportion of patients reach the threshold for thromboprophylaxis?

In November 2009 the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists published an updated guideline, 'Reducing the risk of thrombosis and embolism during pregnancy and the puerperium'. This includes a clear and simple score-based risk assessment tool, designed for antenatal and postnatal patients. Thresholds are given at which thromboprophylaxis should be offered. However the proportion of patients who reach the threshold is not estimated in the guideline, and we are not aware of any published data regarding this. In this cross-sectional study, we studied the case-notes of all 109 deliveries conducted over a one-week period, including elective caesarean sections. Of those, 7% met the threshold for antenatal thromboprophylaxis and 41% met the threshold for postnatal thromboprophylaxis.

The effect of low molecular weight heparin (dalteparin) on duration and initiation of labour

It has recently been reported that women treated with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) during pregnancy had 3 h shorter duration of delivery. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether LMWH (dalteparin) affects labour. From January 1996 to December 2005, 217 consecutive pregnancies, out of 34 216 newborn (prevalence 0.6%) that were given thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin (usually 5,000 IU once daily). These 217 consecutive pregnancies were compared to an unselected control group (n = 1,499) of gravidae. Main outcome was time in first and second stage of labour and gestational age at delivery. Among nulliparous women, there were significantly fewer women with prolonged first stage of labour as compared to controls (4.1% vs. 8.5%, P = 0.047). In addition, the duration of first stage of labour was 1 h shorter among those treated with LMWH (5.2 vs. 6.2 h, P = 0.06). There were no such differences among parous women. The risk of prematurity, profuse blood loss, and postpartum anaemia was almost doubled among those treated with LMWH (11.5% vs. 5.9%, P = 0.002, 10.6% vs. 5.9%, P < 0.001, and 12.9% vs. 8.7%, P = 0.048, respectively). Treatment with a prophylactic dose of LMWH (dalteparin) during pregnancy was related to fewer women with prolonged first stage of labour, but also to an increased risk of prematurity and blood loss complications.