The Importance of Intra-aortic Pulse Pressure After Anterior ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

The prognostic role of intra-aortic pulse pressure measured before percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with chronic coronary syndrome: a single-center, retrospective, observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

The relationship between pulse pressure and prognosis in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) is contradictory. In the present study, we aimed to examine the relationship between intra-aortic pulse pressure (IAPP) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with CCS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

A total of 139 CCS patients who underwent elective PCI with regular one-year follow-up, were stratified into two subgroups according to IAPP. The primary outcomes included the occurrence of MACE, defined as cardiovascular death, acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation (STEMI), acute myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI), target vessel revascularization (TVR), and stroke.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 57.6 ± 10.4 years, 32% of whom were female. The mean IAPP, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were 54.0 ± 17.6 mmHg, 129.7 ± 20 mmHg, and 75.8 ± 11.8 mmHg, respectively. SBP, IAPP, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were significantly higher in the high IAPP group (p < .001, p < .001, p = .001, respectively). The MACE rate was significantly higher in the low IAPP group than in the high IAPP group (30.4% vs. 8.6%, p = 0,001). The LVEF (OR = 0.93, CI:0.88-0.99, p = .025) and IAPP (OR = 0.89, CI:0.83-0.95, p = .001) were found to be independent predictors of MACE. The IAPP value of 39.5 mmHg was identified as an effective cutoff point for prediction of MACE-free survival rates (AUC:0.853, CI:0.768-0.937).

CONCLUSION

Invasively measured IAPP has prognostic information about cardiovascular outcomes in patients with CCS. The risk of MACE is significantly greater in CCS patients with low IAPP compared with those who have high IAPP values.

Predictors and impact of low diastolic blood pressure and widened pulse pressure following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

The association between post-operative diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and pulse pressure (PP) with outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear. We sought to assess the prevalence, predictors, and impact of post-operative DBP and PP on presence of post-procedural aortic insufficiency (AI) and mortality in adults undergoing TAVR.

METHODS

The study population included 194 patients who underwent TAVR from 2016 to 2017 at an academic tertiary medical center, of which 176 had invasive arterial pressures available postoperatively. Low DBP and widened PP were defined as ≤40 mmHg and ≥80 mmHg respectively on invasive arterial line on post-operative day 1. Clinical outcomes of interest included post-procedural AI and 1-year all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Post-operative low DBP and widened PP were noted in 32.4% and 58.5% of the study population. No significant association between post-operative AI and low DBP (p = 0.82) or widened PP (p = 0.32) was noted. There was a trend toward higher rates of mortality in patients with low DBP (19.3% vs 9.2%, p = 0.06) but no difference in mortality in patients with widened PP (10.7% vs 15.1%, p = 0.39) or those with ≥1+ post-procedural AI (16.7% vs 10.7%, p = 0.32). In multivariable analysis, low DBP was associated with a trend toward higher rates of 1-year mortality [odds ratio (OR) 2.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.97-6.11, p = 0.06]. When excluding patients with a post-operative invasive systolic blood pressure < 80 mmHg, low DBP was associated with significantly higher risk-adjusted mortality at 1 year [OR 2.75, 95% CI (1.07-7.07), p = 0.04].

CONCLUSIONS

In this contemporary study of adults undergoing TAVR, low DBP and widened PP were widely prevalent post TAVR. Low DBP was associated with a trend toward higher rates of 1-year mortality but not with post-procedural AI.