Successful preemptive surgical division of type 2-congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt in children

Radiological and surgical differences between congenital end-to-side (Abernethy malformation) and side-to-side portocaval shunts

OBJECTIVE

Distinguishing retrohepatic end-to-side portocaval shunts (ES-PCS) and side-to-side portocaval shunts (SS-PCS) can be difficult, but it is essential for determining the treatment strategy. Our experience with retrohepatic PCS is analyzed.

METHODS

Since 2007, 9 children (5/9 ES-PCS and 4/9 SS-PCS) were surgically treated. Radiology studies included Doppler-ultrasound, CT/MRI and angiography/occlusion test (8/9).

RESULTS

CT in 5/5 ES-PCS revealed the portal vein (PV) entering the left side of the vena cava with a uniform shape. 4/4 SS-PCS showed aneurysmal PV containing the origin of the main intrahepatic portal branches (IHPB) entering the cava anterior aspect or slightly to the right with a variable length (from long to short/wide). ES-PCS anatomy showed caudate lobe absence with the fistula entering the left cava aspect free of parenchyma, but anterior through the caudate lobe in SS-PCS. With the angiography/occlusion test, the IHPB was undeveloped in ES-PCS (portal pressure > 38 mmHg) and hypoplasic in SS-PCS (portal pressure < 25 mmHg). ES-PCS treatment included: 1/5 hepatectomy and 4/5 definitive banding (one by laparoscopy); while in SS-PCS: 1/4 liver transplantation, 2/4 1-step closure (one by laparoscopy), and 1/4 definitive banding.

CONCLUSION

Fistula shape, cava relationship, IHPB and portal pressures differ between the two shunt types. A question arises regarding the need for secondary complete closure after banding.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

Successful laparoscopic division of a patent ductus venosus: report of a case

Patent ductus venosus (PDV) is a rare condition of a congenital portosystemic shunt from the umbilical vein to the inferior vena cava. This report presents the case of an adult patient with PDV, who was successfully treated with laparoscopic shunt division. A 69-year-old male was referred with hepatic encephalopathy. Contrast-enhanced CT revealed a large connection between the left portal vein and the inferior vena cava, which was diagnosed as PDV. The safety of a shunt disconnection was confirmed using a temporary balloon occlusion test for the shunt, and the shunt division was performed laparoscopically. The shunt was carefully separated from the liver parenchyma with relative ease, and then divided using a vascular stapler. Portal flow was markedly increased after the operation, and the liver function of the patient improved over the 3-month period after surgery. Although careful interventional evaluation for portal flow is absolutely imperative prior to surgery, a minimally invasive laparoscopic approach can be safely used for treating PDV.

Congenital portosystemic vascular malformations

Congenital portosystemic shunts are developmental abnormalities of the portal venous system resulting in the diversion of portal blood away from the liver to the systemic venous system. Such malformations are believed to come from an insult occurring between the fourth and eighth week of gestation during the development of hepatic and systemic venous systems, and could explain their frequent association with cardiac and other vascular anomalies. They are currently categorized into end-to-side shunts (type I) or side-to-side shunts (type II). This article aims to review the common symptoms and complications encountered in congenital portosystemic shunts, the surgical and endovascular treatment, and the role of liver transplantation in this disease. We will also focus on the current controversies and the areas where there is potential for future studies.

The role of operative intervention in management of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (CEPS) is a rare venous malformation in which mesenteric venous blood drains directly into the systemic circulation. It is still a matter of debate whether conservative or operative strategies should be used to treat symptomatic CEPS. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of operative intervention in the management of CEPS.

METHODS

Between June 2004 and August 2010, 6 consecutive patients with symptomatic CEPS were treated in our department. There were 3 male and 3 female patients, with a median age of 3.5 years (range, 1-8). Their demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were analyzed. All patients were scheduled to undergo shunt ligation or liver transplantation (LT).

RESULTS

Living donor LT was carried out in 4 patients, and shunt ligation in 2. After a median follow-up of 25 months, all the patients are alive currently with marked relief of symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Shunt ligation or LT for symptomatic CEPS is potentially curative.

Management and classification of type II congenital portosystemic shunts

BACKGROUND

Congenital portosystemic shunts (PSS) with preserved intrahepatic portal flow (type II) present with a range of clinical signs. The indications for and benefits of repair of PSS remain incompletely understood. A more comprehensive classification may also benefit comparative analyses from different institutions.

METHODS

All children treated at our institution for type II congenital PSS from 1999 through 2009 were reviewed for presentation, treatment, and outcome.

RESULTS

Ten children (7 boys) with type II PSS were identified at a median age of 5.5 years. Hyperammonemia with varying degrees of neurocognitive dysfunction occurred in 80%. The shunt arose from a branch of the portal vein (type IIa; n = 2), from the main portal vein (type IIb; n = 7), or from a splenic or mesenteric vein (type IIc; n = 1). Management included operative ligation (n = 6), endovascular occlusion (n = 3), or a combined approach (n = 1). Shunt occlusion was successful in all cases. Serum ammonia decreased from 130 ± 115 μmol/L preoperatively to 31 ± 15 μmol/L postoperatively (P = .03). Additional benefits included resolution of neurocognitive dysfunction (n = 3), liver nodules (n = 1), and vaginal bleeding (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

Correction of type II PSS relieves a wide array of symptoms. Surgery is indicated for patients with clinically significant shunting. A refined classification system will permit future comparison of patients with similar physiology.

Spontaneous thrombosis of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (Abernethy malformation) simulating inguinal hernia incarceration

Tender lumps in the inguinal region are often explored emergently to treat suspected hernial strangulation. We discuss the case of an adult male who presented acutely with a tender inguinal swelling and raised inflammatory markers and was therefore deemed as requiring surgical exploration. However preoperative abdominal computerized tomography (CT) revealed an extensive thrombosing congenital venous malformation of portosystemic origin with extension into the symptomatic inguinal canal. A potentially lethal exsanguination from surgery was thus avoided.

Clinical classification of congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunts

AIM

Congenital extrahepatic portosystemic shunt (CEPS) is a rare anomaly in which the enteric blood bypasses the liver and drains into the systemic veins through various venous shunts. Patients with CEPS often have liver tumors and complications such as cardiac or other anomalies, but portosystemic encephalopathy and gastrointestinal bleeding occur only occasionally. The clinical problems differ for each individual with CEPS, and establishing a prognosis can be very difficult.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical features of 136 reported cases of CEPS and classified these cases according to their portosystemic shunts.

RESULTS

We classified portal blood flow directly into the inferior vena cava (IVC) as type A (88 cases), portal blood flow into the renal vein as type B (36 cases), and portal blood flow into the iliac vein via an inferior mesenteric vein as type C (12 cases). Type A patients were complicated with cardiac anomalies at a higher rate than other types. Type C patients had lower prevalences of cardiac anomalies and portosystemic encephalopathy than the other types, but the prevalence of gastrointestinal bleeding was significantly higher (P < 0.0001). The prognosis of CEPS has improved, and only six deaths have been previously reported, all of which occurred in type A patients.

CONCLUSIONS

We reviewed the previously reported cases of CEPS. Classification according to the portosystemic shunt system might be useful for investigating the clinical features of CEPS.