Sirolimus-Associated Proteinuria and Renal Dysfunction

Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Is There a Role for Autophagy?

Autosomal-Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD) is a monogenic disorder initiated by mutations in either PKD1 or PKD2 genes, responsible for encoding polycystin 1 and polycystin 2, respectively. These proteins are primarily located within the primary cilia. The disease follows an inexorable progression, leading most patients to severe renal failure around the age of 50, and extra-renal complications are frequent. A cure for ADPKD remains elusive, but some measures can be employed to manage symptoms and slow cyst growth. Tolvaptan, a vasopressin V2 receptor antagonist, is the only drug that has been proven to attenuate ADPKD progression. Recently, autophagy, a cellular recycling system that facilitates the breakdown and reuse of aged or damaged cellular components, has emerged as a potential contributor to the pathogenesis of ADPKD. However, the precise role of autophagy in ADPKD remains a subject of investigation, displaying a potentially twofold impact. On the one hand, impaired autophagy may promote cyst formation by inducing apoptosis, while on the other hand, excessive autophagy may lead to fibrosis through epithelial to mesenchymal transition. Promising results of autophagy inducers have been observed in preclinical studies. Clinical trials are warranted to thoroughly assess the long-term safety and efficacy of a combination of autophagy inducers with metabolic and/or aquaferetic drugs. This research aims to shed light on the complex involvement of autophagy in ADPKD, explore the regulation of autophagy in disease progression, and highlight the potential of combination therapies as a promising avenue for future investigations.

Rapamycin treatment induces tubular proteinuria: role of megalin-mediated protein reabsorption

Introduction: Rapamycin is an immunosuppressor that acts by inhibiting the serine/threonine kinase mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1. Therapeutic use of rapamycin is limited by its adverse effects. Proteinuria is an important marker of kidney damage and a risk factor for kidney diseases progression and has been reported in patients and animal models treated with rapamycin. However, the mechanism underlying proteinuria induced by rapamycin is still an open matter. In this work, we investigated the effects of rapamycin on parameters of renal function and structure and on protein handling by proximal tubule epithelial cells (PTECs). Methods: Healthy BALB/c mice were treated with 1.5 mg/kg rapamycin by oral gavage for 1, 3, or 7 days. At the end of each treatment, the animals were kept in metabolic cages and renal function and structural parameters were analyzed. LLC-PK1 cell line was used as a model of PTECs to test specific effect of rapamycin. Results: Rapamycin treatment did not change parameters of glomerular structure and function. Conversely, there was a transient increase in 24-h proteinuria, urinary protein to creatinine ratio (UPCr), and albuminuria in the groups treated with rapamycin. In accordance with these findings, rapamycin treatment decreased albumin-fluorescein isothiocyanate uptake in the renal cortex. This effect was associated with reduced brush border expression and impaired subcellular distribution of megalin in PTECs. The effect of rapamycin seems to be specific for albumin endocytosis machinery because it did not modify renal sodium handling or (Na⁺+K⁺)ATPase activity in BALB/c mice and in the LLC-PK1 cell line. A positive Pearson correlation was found between megalin expression and albumin uptake while an inverse correlation was shown between albumin uptake and UPCr or 24-h proteinuria. Despite its effect on albumin handling in PTECs, rapamycin treatment did not induce tubular injury measured by interstitial space and collagen deposition. Conclusion: These findings suggest that proteinuria induced by rapamycin could have a tubular rather than a glomerular origin. This effect involves a specific change in protein endocytosis machinery. Our results open new perspectives on understanding the undesired effect of proteinuria generated by rapamycin.

Proximal Tubule Autophagy Differs in Type 1 and 2 Diabetes

BACKGROUND

Evidence of a protective role of autophagy in kidney diseases has sparked interest in autophagy as a potential therapeutic strategy. However, understanding how the autophagic process is altered in each disorder is critically important in working toward therapeutic applications.

METHODS

Using cultured kidney proximal tubule epithelial cells (PTECs) and diabetic mouse models, we investigated how autophagic activity differs in type 1 versus type 2 diabetic nephropathy. We explored nutrient signals regulating starvation-induced autophagy in PTECs and used autophagy-monitoring mice and PTEC-specific autophagy-deficient knockout mice to examine differences in autophagy status and autophagy's role in PTECs in streptozotocin (STZ)-treated type 1 and db/db type 2 diabetic nephropathy. We also examined the effects of rapamycin (an inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR]) on vulnerability to ischemia-reperfusion injury.

RESULTS

Administering insulin or amino acids, but not glucose, suppressed autophagy by activating mTOR signaling. In db/db mice, autophagy induction was suppressed even under starvation; in STZ-treated mice, autophagy was enhanced even under fed conditions but stagnated under starvation due to lysosomal stress. Using knockout mice with diabetes, we found that, in STZ-treated mice, activated autophagy counteracts mitochondrial damage and fibrosis in the kidneys, whereas in db/db mice, autophagic suppression jeopardizes kidney even in the autophagy-competent state. Rapamycin-induced pharmacologic autophagy produced opposite effects on ischemia-reperfusion injury in STZ-treated and db/db mice.

CONCLUSIONS

Autophagic activity in PTECs is mainly regulated by insulin. Consequently, autophagic activity differs in types 1 and 2 diabetic nephropathy, which should be considered when developing strategies to treat diabetic nephropathy by modulating autophagy.

Effect of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Free, Everolimus-Based Immunosuppressive Regimen on Albuminuria and Glomerular Filtration Rate After Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Albuminuria in maintenance heart transplantation (HTx) is associated with poor renal response when switching to a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)-lowered or CNI-free immunosuppressive regimen using everolimus (EVR), but the significance of albuminuria associated with EVR treatment after early CNI withdrawal in de novo HTx is unknown.

METHODS

We tested if measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR, by chrome-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid clearance) was associated with urine albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) post-HTx in a subgroup of patients included in the Scandinavian Heart Transplant Everolimus De Novo Study With Early Calcineurin Inhibitor Avoidance trial, where de novo HTx patients (n = 115) were randomized to EVR with complete CNI elimination 7 to 11 weeks post-HTx or standard CNI immunosuppression.

RESULTS

In 66 patients, UACR measures were available at 1 year. In 7 patients in the EVR group, a CNI was reintroduced within 12 months. Median mGFR was significantly higher in the EVR group both 1 and 3 years post-HTx (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.03, respectively). Median UACR at 1 year was significantly higher in the EVR group (P = 0.002). There was no correlation between log(UACR) at 1 year and mGFR at 1 or 3 years (r = -0.01, P = 0.9 and r = 0.15, P = 0.26, respectively) and in the EVR group between log(UACR) at 1 year and change in mGFR (Δ1-3 years) (r = 0.27, P = 0.14). Excluding patients in the EVR group in whom a CNI was reintroduced did not significantly change the results.

CONCLUSIONS

The effects of EVR with early CNI withdrawal after HTx on albuminuria and renal function seem dissociated; hence, the clinical significance of albuminuria in this setting is uncertain and should not necessarily rule out EVR-based immunosuppression.

Effect of Sirolimus on Disease Progression in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease and CKD Stages 3b-4

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The effect of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors has never been tested in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and severe renal insufficiency.

DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS

In this academic, prospective, randomized, open label, blinded end point, parallel group trial (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT01223755), 41 adults with ADPKD, CKD stage 3b or 4, and proteinuria ≤0.5 g/24 h were randomized between September of 2010 and March of 2012 to sirolimus (3 mg/d; serum target levels of 5-10 ng/ml) added on to conventional therapy (n=21) or conventional treatment alone (n=20). Primary outcome was GFR (iohexol plasma clearance) change at 1 and 3 years versus baseline.

RESULTS

At the 1-year preplanned interim analysis, GFR fell from 26.7±5.8 to 21.3±6.3 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (P<0.001) and from 29.6±5.6 to 24.9±6.2 ml/min per 1.73 m(2) (P<0.001) in the sirolimus and conventional treatment groups, respectively. Albuminuria (73.8±81.8 versus 154.9±152.9 μg/min; P=0.02) and proteinuria (0.3±0.2 versus 06±0.4 g/24 h; P<0.01) increased with sirolimus. Seven patients on sirolimus versus one control had de novo proteinuria (P=0.04), ten versus three patients doubled proteinuria (P=0.02), 18 versus 11 patients had peripheral edema (P=0.04), and 14 versus six patients had upper respiratory tract infections (P=0.03). Three patients on sirolimus had angioedema, 14 patients had aphthous stomatitis, and seven patients had acne (P<0.01 for both versus controls). Two patients progressed to ESRD, and two patients withdrew because of worsening of proteinuria. These events were not observed in controls. Thus, the independent data and safety monitoring board recommend early trial termination for safety reasons. At 1 year, total kidney volume (assessed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography imaging) increased by 9.0% from 2857.7±1447.3 to 3094.6±1519.5 ml on sirolimus and 4.3% from 3123.4±1695.3 to 3222.6±1651.4 ml on conventional therapy (P=0.12). On follow-up, 37% and 7% of serum sirolimus levels fell below or exceeded the therapeutic range, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Finding that sirolimus was unsafe and ineffective in patients with ADPKD and renal insufficiency suggests that mTOR inhibitor therapy may be contraindicated in this context.

Rapamycin reduces proteinuria and renal damage in the rat remnant kidney model

Rapamycin is an immunosuppressive drug used to prevent acute allograft rejection in solid organ transplantation. It shows less nephrotoxicity than calcineurin inhibitors. We evaluated the effect of rapamycin in rats undergoing 5/6 nephrectomy, a model of proteinuric and progressive renal failure. Fourteen days after surgery rats were randomized either to receive rapamycin or to remain untreated (control). Rats were humanely killed on day 91; serum creatinine, creatinine clearance, and proteinuria were assessed. Renal sections were stained with periodic acid-Schiff to evaluate glomerular volume (Gv), glomerulosclerosis (GS) and tubulointerstitial damage (TIS); we evaluated GS and TIS by Sirius red staining (SR). Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Rapamycin affected neither serum creatinine nor creatinine clearance; it reduced Gv (controls, 5.9 +/- 3.1 x 10(6); rapamycin, 1.3 +/- 0.7 x 10(6) microm(3)) and proteinuria (control, 349 +/- 146; rapamycin, 56 +/- 27 mg/24 h; P < .05); rapamycin ameliorated GS (control, 78 +/- 7; rapamycin, 36 +/- 7%; P < .05; SR: control, 13.2 +/- 3.5; rapamycin, 3.8 +/- 1.0%; P < .05), and TIS (control, 3.25 +/- 0.5; rapamycin, 1.0 +/- 0.1; P < .05; SR: control, 29 +/- 3; rapamycin, 11 +/- 3%; P < .05). Rapamycin reduced alphaSMA (control, 3.25 +/- 0.5; rapamycin, 1.0 +/- 0.1; P < .05), VIM (control, 3.5 +/- 0.6; rapamycin, 1.0 +/- 1.4; P < .05), and CD68(+) cells infiltration (control, 110 +/- 43; rapamycin, 24 +/- 1 cells; P < .05). Rapamycin slows the progression of renal damage in the rat remnant kidney and may represent a novel approach to the treatment of chronic kidney disease.

Transition from cyclosporine-induced renal dysfunction to nephrotoxicity in an in vivo rat model

Cyclosporin A (CsA), a calcineurin inhibitor, remain the cornerstone of immunosuppressive regimens, regardless of nephrotoxicity, which depends on the duration of drug exposure. The mechanisms and biomarkers underlying the transition from CsA-induced renal dysfunction to nephrotoxicity deserve better elucidation, and would help clinical decisions. This study aimed to clarify these issues, using a rat model of short- and long-term CsA (5 mg/kg bw/day) treatments (3 and 9 weeks, respectively). Renal function was assessed on serum and urine; kidney tissue was used for histopathological characterization and gene and/or protein expression of markers of proliferation, fibrosis and inflammation. In the short-term, creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels increased and clearances decreased, accompanied by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) reduction, but without kidney lesions; at that stage, CsA exposure induced proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1), factor nuclear kappa B (NF-κβ) and Tumor Protein P53 (TP53) kidney mRNA up-regulation. In the long-term treatment, renal dysfunction data was accompanied by glomerular and tubulointerstitial lesions, with remarkable kidney mRNA up-regulation of the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and the antigen identified by monoclonal antibody Ki-67 (Mki67), accompanied by mTOR protein overexpression. Transition from CsA-induced renal dysfunction to nephrotoxicity is accompanied by modification of molecular mechanisms and biomarkers, being mTOR one of the key players for kidney lesion evolution, thus suggesting, by mean of molecular evidences, that early CsA replacement by mTOR inhibitors is indeed the better therapeutic choice to prevent chronic allograft nephropathy.

Serum and renal tissue markers of nephropathy in rats under immunosuppressive therapy: cyclosporine versus sirolimus

Cyclosporin (CsA) has been progressively replaced by other drugs with putatively fever side effects, including nephrotoxicity and hypertension. Sirolimus (SRL) is one of the main options for management of kidney transplant patients in the post-CsA era. It shows identical efficacy with apparently less cardiorenal side effects than CsA. However, doubts remain concerning the mechanisms of putative renoprotection by SRL as well as the best serum and/or tissue markers for nephropathy, as assessed in this study employing CsA- and SRL-treated rats. Three groups (n = 6) were treated orally during a 6-week protocol: control (vehicle); CsA (5 mg/kg body weight per day Sandimmun Neoral); SRL (1 mg/kg body weight per day Rapamune). Blood pressure and heart rate were assessed with a "tail cuff". Renal dysfunction and morphology were characterized using serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels as well as hematoxylin and eosin and periodic acid Schiff staining, respectively. We examined serum concentrations of interleukin (IL)-2, IL-1β, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, tumor necrosis factor TNF-α, and vascular endothelial growth factor and kidney mRNA expression of interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor protein 53 (TP53), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), as well as markers of lipid peroxidation in the kidney and serum. Both CsA and SRL induced significant increases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, but only CsA caused tachycardia. CsA-treated rats also displayed increased serum creatinine and BUN levels, accompanied by mild renal lesions, which were almost absent among SRL-treated rats, which presented hyperlipidemic and hyperglycemic profiles. CsA-induced nephrotoxicity was accompanied by kidney overexpression of inflammatory and proliferative mRNA markers (IL-1β, mTOR and PCNA), which were absent among SRL group. In conclusion, the antiproliferative and antifibrotic character of SRL may explain its less nephrotoxic profile. Renal over expression of mTOR in the CsA-treated group, associated with renal dysfunction and structural damage, reinforces the potential beneft of SRL as a strategy to reduce CsA-evoked nephrotoxicity.

Calcineurin inhibitor-free mycophenolate mofetil/sirolimus maintenance in liver transplantation: the randomized spare-the-nephron trial

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and sirolimus (SRL) have been used for calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) minimization to reduce nephrotoxicity following liver transplantation. In this prospective, open-label, multicenter study, patients undergoing transplantation from July 2005 to June 2007 who were maintained on MMF/CNI were randomized 4 to 12 weeks after transplantation to receive MMF/SRL (n = 148) or continue MMF/CNI (n = 145) and included in the intent-to-treat population. The primary efficacy endpoints were the mean percentage change in the calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and a composite of biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft lost, death, and lost to follow-up 12 months after transplantation. Patients were followed for a median of 519 days after randomization. MMF/SRL was associated with a significantly greater renal function improvement from baseline with a mean percentage change in GFR of 19.7 ± 40.6 (versus 1.2 ± 39.9 for MMF/CNI, P = 0.0012). The composite endpoint demonstrated the noninferiority of MMF/SRL versus MMF/CNI (16.4% versus 15.4%, 90% confidence interval = -7.1% to 9.0%). The incidence of BPAR was significantly greater with MMF/SRL (12.2%) versus MMF/CNI (4.1%, P = 0.02). Graft loss (including death) occurred in 3.4% of the MMF/SRL-treated patients and in 8.3% of the MMF/CNI-treated patients (P = 0.04). Malignancy-related deaths were less frequent with MMF/SRL. Adverse events caused withdrawal for 34.2% of the MMF/SRL-treated patients and for 24.1% of the MMF/CNI-treated patients (P = 0.06). The use of MMF/SRL is an option for liver transplant recipients who can benefit from improved renal function but is associated with an increased risk of rejection (but not graft loss).

Current trends in immunosuppressive therapies for renal transplant recipients

PURPOSE

Current trends in immunosuppressive therapies for renal transplant recipients are reviewed.

SUMMARY

The common premise for immunosuppressive therapies in renal transplantation is to use multiple agents to work on different immunologic targets. The use of a multidrug regimen allows for pharmacologic activity at several key steps in the T-cell replication process and lower dosages of each individual agent, thereby producing fewer drug-related toxicities. In general, there are three stages of clinical immunosuppression: induction therapy, maintenance therapy, and treatment of an established acute rejection episode. Only immunosuppressive therapies used for maintenance therapy are discussed in detail in this review. The most common maintenance immunosuppressive agents can be divided into five classes: (1) the calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) (cyclosporine and tacrolimus), (2) costimulation blockers (belatacept), (3) mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (sirolimus and everolimus), (4) antiproliferatives (azathioprine and mycophenolic acid derivatives), and (5) corticosteroids. Immunosuppressive regimens vary among transplantation centers but most often include a CNI and an adjuvant agent, with or without corticosteroids. Selection of appropriate immunosuppressive regimens should be patient specific, taking into account the medications' pharmacologic properties, adverse-event profile, and potential drug-drug interactions, as well as the patient's preexisting diseases, risk of rejection, and medication regimen.

CONCLUSION

Advancements in transplant immunosuppression have resulted in a significant reduction in acute cellular rejection and a modest increase in long-term patient and graft survival. Because the optimal immunosuppression regimen is still unknown, immunosuppressant use should be influenced by institutional preference and tailored to the immunologic risk of the patient and adverse-effect profile of the drug.

Everolimus as primary immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: experience in conversion from calcineurin inhibitors

BACKGROUND

We analyzed our clinical experience with everolimus (EVL) and identified prognostic factors for a successful conversion.

METHODS

Retrospective study of 220 kidney recipients consecutively converted to EVL with calcineurin inhibitor elimination. We studied risk factors for proteinuria at 1 year after conversion, decline in renal function, and graft survival.

RESULTS

Baseline creatinine clearance was 52.4±17.8 mL/min vs. 53.4±20.1 mL/min 1 year after conversion (P=0.150). Median proteinuria increased from 304 mg/day (interquartile range 160-507) to 458 mg/day (interquartile range 238-892; P<0.001). Risk factors for development of proteinuria ≥900 mg/day (P75) at 1-year postconversion were creatinine clearance less than 60 mL/min (odds ratio [OR] 3.37; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-9.89), serum triglycerides ≥150 mg/day (OR 4.35; 95% CI: 1.70-11.17), no treatment with prednisone (OR 3.04; 95% CI: 1.22-7.59), baseline proteinuria ≥550 mg/day (OR 10.37; 95% CI: 3.99-26.99), and conversion ≥3 years after transplant (OR 5.77; 95% CI: 1.89-17.59). An interaction was observed between baseline proteinuria and time to conversion: in patients with baseline proteinuria ≥550 mg/day, the risk of developing proteinuria ≥900 mg/day was 77.1% if they were converted after ≥3 years posttransplant. However, this risk was 29.8% in the subgroup converted before (P=0.02). Actuarial graft survival at 1 and 4 years postconversion was 98.2% and 86.5%, respectively. Baseline proteinuria ≥550 mg/day was a risk factor for graft loss in patients converted after the third year but not in patients converted before this time. EVL discontinuation rate was 24% in the first year postconversion.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion to EVL and elimination of calcineurin inhibitors is safe. Success depends on not making late conversions and not converting patients with high baseline proteinuria.

Oxidative stress indices in rats under immunosuppression

Immunosuppressants lead to generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Oxidative stress (OxS) can initiate chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN). The most active antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dysmutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), are present in erythrocytes. Glutathione peroxidase (GPx) is produced in the proximal tubules of nephrons. Malonyldialdehyde (MDA) concentrations are a marker of OxS intensity in plasma. In vitro and animal model studies have shown increased or decreased OxS during treatment with tacrolimus (Tac) or cyclosporine (CyA). Results obtained in humans after solid organ transplantation have been contradictory, because of confounding factors such as ischemia-reperfusion injury, donor and recipient ages, endothelial injury, and comorbidity. The aim of this study was to assess the intensity of OxS among rats under chronic immunosuppression (IS) without a transplantation. We examined 49 male Wistar rats. IS started at 12 weeks of age was continued for 6 months: group I were controls (n=7); group II, Tac+sirolimus (Rapamycin [Rapa])+corticosteroids (CS; n=6); group III, CyA+Rapa+CS (n=4 of which 2 died); group IV, Rapa+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)+CS (n=6); group V, CyA+MMF+CS (n=6); group VI, CsA+MMF+CS for 3 months followed by conversion to Rapa (n=6); group VII, Tac+MMF+CS (n=6 rats); and group VIII, Tac+MMF+CS for 3 months followed by conversion to Rapa (n=6). The drug doses were as follows: Tac 4 mg/kg/d; MMF 20 mg/kg/d; CyA 5mg/kg/d; Rapa 0.5 mg/kg/d; and CS 4 mg/kg/d. Multiple regression analysis revealed that all IS drugs decreased GPx activity (P<.001) except CS, which increased it (P<.0001). Multiple regression analysis showed that CsA and Tac decreased plasma MDA concentrations (P<.01), whereas CS increased them (P<.05). In conclusion, all IS drugs except CS damage proximal tubules of nephrons.

Steroid or tacrolimus withdrawal in renal transplant recipients using sirolimus

BACKGROUND

Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) and steroid (ST) withdrawal are strategies under investigation to reduce long-term toxicities associated with current immunosuppressive regimens. We conducted a single center, prospective trial comparing the efficacy and safety of CNI or ST withdrawal in kidney transplant recipients receiving sirolimus-based immunosuppressive regimen.

METHODS

Forty-seven recipients of first renal transplant with non-HLA-identical living donors received sirolimus (SRL), tacrolimus (TAC), and ST without induction therapy and were randomized to undergo ST (TAC/SRL group, n = 24) or TAC (SRL/ST group, n = 21) withdrawal 3 months after transplantation. Primary efficacy and safety endpoints were the incidence of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) and renal function at 12 months.

RESULTS

No differences were observed in the incidence of BCAR (4.2% vs. 9.5%), graft (95.8% vs. 95.6%), and patient (95.8% vs. 95.6%) survivals or in renal function (60 ± 11.5 vs. 63.4 ± 10.5 ml/min, P = 0.361). Higher mean cholesterol concentration was observed in the SRL/ST group (191.9 ± 63.3 vs. 241.6 ± 61.5 mg/dl, P = 0.019). Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events occurred in 12.5% of patients in TAC/SRL group and 21.7% in SRL/ST group.

CONCLUSION

Within this short period of observation, our study was unable to detect any significant difference in major transplant outcomes comparing CNI and ST elimination strategies.

Prospects for mTOR inhibitor use in patients with polycystic kidney disease and hamartomatous diseases

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is the core component of two complexes, mTORC1 and mTORC2. mTORC1 is inhibited by rapamycin and analogues. mTORC2 is impeded only in some cell types by prolonged exposure to these compounds. mTOR activation is linked to tubular cell proliferation in animal models and human autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). mTOR inhibitors impede cell proliferation and cyst growth in polycystic kidney disease (PKD) models. After renal transplantation, two small retrospective studies suggested that mTOR was more effective than calcineurin inhibitor-based immunosuppression in limiting kidney and/or liver enlargement. By inhibiting vascular remodeling, angiogenesis, and fibrogenesis, mTOR inhibitors may attenuate nephroangiosclerosis, cyst growth, and interstitial fibrosis. Thus, they may benefit ADPKD at multiple levels. However, mTOR inhibition is not without risks and side effects, mostly dose-dependent. Under certain conditions, mTOR inhibition interferes with adaptive increases in renal proliferation necessary for recovery from injury. They restrict Akt activation, nitric oxide synthesis, and endothelial cell survival (downstream from mTORC2) and potentially increase the risk for glomerular and peritubular capillary loss, vasospasm, and hypertension. They impair podocyte integrity pathways and may predispose to glomerular injury. Administration of mTOR inhibitors is discontinued because of side effects in up to 40% of transplant recipients. Currently, treatment with mTOR inhibitors should not be recommended to treat ADPKD. Results of ongoing studies must be awaited and patients informed accordingly. If effective, lower dosages than those used to prevent rejection would minimize side effects. Combination therapy with other effective drugs could improve tolerability and results.

Adverse effects of nicotine and immunosuppression on proximal tubular epithelial cell viability, tissue repair and oxidative stress gene expression

BACKGROUND

Renal dysfunction in non-renal transplantation is a major arbiter of poor late allograft outcomes. Tobacco recidivism is an important modifiable risk marker for cardiac allograft loss, but its effects on renal dysfunction remain poorly studied.

METHODS

In a 96-well plate, 10(-5) proximal tubular epithelial (PTE) cells (HK-2, American Type Culture Collection) were cultured overnight and treated with sirolimus (SRL; 100 nmol/liter), nicotine (N; 10(-7) mol/liter) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF; 10 micromol/liter), alone or in combination for 24 hours. Cell viability was quantified by treatment with tetrazolium salt WST-1 and calculated as the difference in percent inhibition with respect to the optical densitometry (OD) of treated and untreated cells. Gene and protein expression was analyzed using real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blot techniques.

RESULTS

OD decreased with SRL (-52.7 +/- 2.85%), N (-47.3 +/- 3.84%) and MMF (-53.3 +/- 2.4%) in isolation. Further reduction in OD occurred when N was combined with SRL (-63 +/- 2.3%, p < 0.04), MMF (-64.3 +/- 1.45%, p < 0.02) or the combination of SRL and MMF (-78.2%, p < 0.007). Compared with control, treatment of PTE cells with N increased mRNA expression of transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta; 10-fold), connective tissue growth factor (CTGF; 25-fold), osteopontin (OPN; 10-fold) and NADPH oxidase components (p22(phox), NOX-1 and Rac-1 at 18-, 16- and 12-fold, respectively). The pre-treatment of cells with inhibitor of superoxide generator diphenylene iodonium (DPI) reversed these effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Nicotine adversely amplified the effects of SRL and MMF on tissue repair and oxidative stress markers, subsequently modulating PTE viability. However, caution is advised in extrapolating these in vitro findings to the human model.

Minimization and withdrawal of steroids in pancreas and islet transplantation

For reducing the corticosteroid (CS)-related side-effects, especially cardiovascular events, CS-sparing protocols have become increasingly common in pancreas transplantation (PT). Lympho-depleting induction antibodies, such as rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) or alemtuzumab, have been widely used in successful trials. The results of various CS-sparing protocols combining calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) and mycophenolate or sirolimus, have been mixed for rejection and survival rates. Most of the studies were uncontrolled trials of low-risk patients, therefore the grade of evidence is limited. Large-scale prospective studies with long-term follow up are necessary to assess risks and benefits of CS-sparing regimens in PT before recommending such strategies as standard practice. Islet allo-transplantation for patients with brittle type 1 diabetes mellitus, less invasive and safer procedure than PT, has been attempted since late 1980s, but diabetogenic immunosuppressants at maintenance, mainly CS and high-dose CNI, prevented satisfactory results (10% insulin-independence at 1-year post-transplant). Since 2000, CS-free and CNI-reducing protocols, including more potent induction [daclizumab, OKT3gamma1(ala-ala) anti-CD3 antibody, rATG] and maintenance (sirolimus, mycophenolate) agents, have significantly improved short-term outcomes whereas long-term are still inadequate (from 80% to 20% insulin-independence from 1- to 5-year post-transplant). Main limitations are allo- and autoimmunity, immunosuppression-related islet and systemic toxicity and transplant site unsuitability, which tolerogenic protocols and biotechnological solutions may solve.

Development of proteinuria after switch to sirolimus-based immunosuppression in long-term cardiac transplant patients

Calcineurin-inhibitor therapy can lead to renal dysfunction in heart transplantation patients. The novel immunosuppressive (IS) drug sirolmus (Srl) lacks nephrotoxic effects; however, proteinuria associated with Srl has been reported following renal transplantation. In cardiac transplantation, the incidence of proteinuria associated with Srl is unknown. In this study, long-term cardiac transplant patients were switched from cyclosporine to Srl-based IS. Concomitant IS consisted of mycophenolate mofetil +/- steroids. Proteinuria increased significantly from a median of 0.13 g/day (range 0-5.7) preswitch to 0.23 g/day (0-9.88) at 24 months postswitch (p = 0.0024). Before the switch, 11.5% of patients had high-grade proteinuria (>1.0 g/day); this increased to 22.9% postswitch (p = 0.006). ACE inhibitor and angiotensin-releasing blocker (ARB) therapy reduced proteinuria development. Patients without proteinuria had increased renal function (median 42.5 vs. 64.1, p = 0.25), whereas patients who developed high-grade proteinuria showed decreased renal function at the end of follow-up (median 39.6 vs. 29.2, p = 0.125). Thus, proteinuria may develop in cardiac transplant patients after switch to Srl, which may have an adverse effect on renal function in these patients. Srl should be used with ACEi/ARB therapy and patients monitored for proteinuria and increased renal dysfunction.