Risk management of simvastatin or atorvastatin interactions with CYP3A4 inhibitors

Potentially harmful drug-drug interactions in the therapeutic regimens of persons with spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVES

Individuals with spinal cord injury deal with multiple health complications that require them to use many medications. The purpose of this paper was to find the most common potentially harmful drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in therapeutic regimens of persons with spinal cord injury, and the risk factors associated with it. We further highlight the relevance of each of the DDIs specific to spinal cord injury population.

DESIGN

Observational design and cross-sectional analysis.

SETTING

Community; Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Individuals with spinal cord injury (n = 108).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/ANALYSIS

The main outcome was the presence of one or more potential DDIs that can lead to an adverse outcome. All the reported drugs were classified as per the World Health Organization's Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification system. Twenty potential DDIs were selected for the analysis based on the most common medications prescribed to people with spinal cord injury and severity of clinical consequences. The medication lists of study participants were analyzed for selected DDIs.

RESULTS

Among the 20 potential DDIs analyzed in our sample, the top 3 prevalent DDIs were Opioids + Skeletal Muscle Relaxants, Opioids + Gabapentinoids, and Benzodiazepines + ≥ 2 other central nervous system (CNS)-active drugs. Of the total sample of 108 respondents, 31 participants (29%) were identified with having at least one potential DDI. The risk of having a potential DDI was highly associated with polypharmacy, though no associations were found between the presence of a drug interaction and age, sex, level of injury, time since injury, or cause of injury among the study sample.

CONCLUSION

Almost three out of ten individuals with spinal cord injury were at risk of having a potentially harmful drug interaction. Clinical and communication tools are needed that facilitate identification and elimination of harmful drug combinations in the therapeutic regimens of patients with spinal cord injury.

Treatment of Fingernail Onychomycosis with Efinaconazole 10% Solution in a Patient with Scleroderma: A Case Report

Introduction

Oral antifungals are typically preferred over topicals for moderate to severe onychomycosis due to efficacy and shorter treatment courses. However, systemics are contraindicated or cautioned in patients with liver dysfunction and with some autoimmune diseases, and in those taking interacting medications. Efinaconazole 10% solution is a topical antifungal therapy, but application for fingernail onychomycosis has not been adequately studied.

Case Presentation

We present a case of a 78-year-old female with scleroderma and moderate onychomycosis of the right 4th fingernail successfully treated with topical efinaconazole 10% solution.

Conclusion

We review the literature on contraindications to oral antifungals for onychomycosis, precautions with terbinafine in patients with some autoimmune diseases, and topical onychomycosis therapies. Topical efinaconazole may represent an effective alternative for patients with fingernail onychomycosis who have contraindications to oral medications.

Safety assessment of concurrent statin treatment and evaluation of drug interactions in China

Objectives

Acute muscle injury and potentially fatal rhabdomyolysis may occur with the use of statins and certain enzyme inhibitors, but data on this topic from China are quite limited. This study aimed to measure the concomitant exposure of patients to different statins and their enzyme inhibitors or interacting medications in 76 hospitals in six Chinese cities.

Methods

Prescription database was retrieved from Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperation Project from January 2015 to December 2015, covering 76 tertiary facilities in six cities in China. Every evidence-based enzyme inhibitor was included, and labeled enzyme inhibitors and other relevant information were identified and obtained using the Drug Safety Update from the UK Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency. The proportions of different statin types among all patients and those co-medicated with their inhibitors were examined.

Results

A total of 296,765 patients exposed to statins were included in this study. 80% of patients (n = 144,863, 80.5%) were concomitantly prescribed a CYP3A4-metabolized statin with an interacting drug during the study period. Among those prescribed a non-CYP3A4-metabolized statin, 40.0% of patients were concomitantly given an interacting drug, and approximately 20% of patients were concomitantly given a labeled inhibitor, predominantly calcium channel blockers, other statins, and fibrates. Rates of co-prescription were higher in patients aged over 65 years and in patients taking high-dose statins.

Conclusion

Statins were frequently co-prescribed with metabolic inhibitors in China, where drug safety strategy on highlighting warnings and contraindications of statins are still lacking. For high-dose statins patients who are over 65 years and co-administered with any metabolic inhibitors, prescribers and pharmacists should be more concerned in order to prevent adverse drug reactions.

Diplomats' Mystery Illness and Pulsed Radiofrequency/Microwave Radiation

Importance: A mystery illness striking U.S. and Canadian diplomats to Cuba (and now China) "has confounded the FBI, the State Department and US intelligence agencies" (Lederman, Weissenstein, & Lee, 2017). Sonic explanations for the so-called health attacks have long dominated media reports, propelled by peculiar sounds heard and auditory symptoms experienced. Sonic mediation was justly rejected by experts. We assessed whether pulsed radiofrequency/microwave radiation (RF/MW) exposure can accommodate reported facts in diplomats, including unusual ones. Observations: (1) Noises: Many diplomats heard chirping, ringing or grinding noises at night during episodes reportedly triggering health problems. Some reported that noises were localized with laser-like precision or said the sounds seemed to follow them (within the territory in which they were perceived). Pulsed RF/MW engenders just these apparent "sounds" via the Frey effect. Perceived "sounds" differ by head dimensions and pulse characteristics and can be perceived as located behind in or above the head. Ability to hear the "sounds" depends on high-frequency hearing and low ambient noise. (2) Signs/symptoms: Hearing loss and tinnitus are prominent in affected diplomats and in RF/MW-affected individuals. Each of the protean symptoms that diplomats report also affect persons reporting symptoms from RF/MW: sleep problems, headaches, and cognitive problems dominate in both groups. Sensations of pressure or vibration figure in each. Both encompass vision, balance, and speech problems and nosebleeds. Brain injury and brain swelling are reported in both. (3) Mechanisms: Oxidative stress provides a documented mechanism of RF/MW injury compatible with reported signs and symptoms; sequelae of endothelial dysfunction (yielding blood flow compromise), membrane damage, blood-brain barrier disruption, mitochondrial injury, apoptosis, and autoimmune triggering afford downstream mechanisms, of varying persistence, that merit investigation. (4) Of note, microwaving of the U.S. embassy in Moscow is historically documented. Conclusions and relevance: Reported facts appear consistent with pulsed RF/MW as the source of injury in affected diplomats. Nondiplomats citing symptoms from RF/MW, often with an inciting pulsed-RF/MW exposure, report compatible health conditions. Under the RF/MW hypothesis, lessons learned for diplomats and for RF/MW-affected civilians may each aid the other.

Drug-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Standardized Patient Case for Clerkship Students

INTRODUCTION

Drug-induced nephrotoxicity is a common yet preventable cause of acute renal failure. With the upward trend of prescription and over-the-counter medication use, it has become increasingly important for health care professionals to not only be able to identify acute renal failure precipitated by medications, but also to recognize medications that are eliminated by the kidneys and adjust dosages accordingly to prevent further damage.

METHODS

In this activity, third-year clerkship medical students are presented with a standardized patient portraying an acute medical problem in which students must ascertain the underlying cause of the problem and draw from their knowledge of pharmacology, pharmacokinetic principles, and clinical therapeutics to develop a plan to address the patient's medical concerns.

RESULTS

We found that few students were able to identify the underlying cause of the patient's acute condition, and none were successful at applying pharmacokinetic principles appropriately.

DISCUSSION

Implementing this case with third-year medical students has identified the need to revisit pharmacokinetic principles in an applied setting. As a result, this topic is being added to a course that highlights the relevance of basic sciences in clinical contexts for clerkship students.

High-Dose Metformin May Increase the Concentration of Atorvastatin in the Liver by Inhibition of Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2

In this study, we evaluated the effect of coadministered metformin on the biliary excretion and liver concentration of atorvastatin. To investigate the inhibitory effect of metformin on biliary efflux transporters, the transport of atorvastatin in MDCKII-MDR1, BCRP, and MRP2 was evaluated. The effects of metformin on the steady state liver concentration and biliary excretion of atorvastatin and 2-hydroxyatorvastatin were evaluated in SDR and Mrp2-deficient EHBR. Metformin did not inhibit the transport of atorvastatin via BCRP and MDR1. However, metformin significantly inhibited the transport of atorvastatin and 2-hydroxyatorvastatin via MRP2 (apparent IC₅₀ = 12 and 2 μM). Coadministered metformin significantly increased the K_p,liver and C_liver (1.7- and 1.6-fold) and decreased the biliary clearance of atorvastatin (2.7-fold) in SDR, but it did not affect the plasma concentration and total clearance of atorvastatin. Similar effects by metformin were observed for 2-hydroxyatorvastatin. In addition, coadministered metformin did not have any effect in EHBR. Therefore, coadministered metformin increases the liver concentration of atorvastatin via inhibition of the Mrp2 in rats, without affecting the plasma concentration. This "silent interaction" by metformin in atorvastatin and metformin combination therapy may be related to the unnoticeable pharmacological synergism or unpredicted side effects of atorvastatin in the liver.

The safety of ezetimibe and simvastatin combination for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia

INTRODUCTION

In the light of the most recent and stricter dyslipidemia treatment guidelines, the need for combination hypolipidemic therapy is increasing. Ezetimibe plus simvastatin is available as a fixed dose therapy offering an efficient hypolipidemic treatment choice. Based on the positive results of the IMProved Reduction of Outcomes: Vytorin Efficacy International Trial (IMPROVE-IT) trial, the use of this drug combination is expected to increase in the next years.

AREAS COVERED

This review discusses the current evidence regarding the safety of ezetimibe/simvastatin combination. Current evidence regarding possible associated side effects (musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, endocrine, hematological, renal, ophthalmologic, allergic, malignancy) and drug interactions of this combination is thoroughly discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Ezetimibe and simvastatin treatment, either as a single pill or the combined use of the individual compounds, offers limited additional risk compared with simvastatin monotherapy and comprises a safe and efficient choice for dyslipidemia treatment in high-risk and diabetic patients.

Co-medication of statins with contraindicated drugs

Background

The concomitant use of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) metabolized statins (simvastatin, lovastatin, and atorvastatin) with CYP3A4 inhibitors has been shown to increase the rate of adverse events.

Objective

This study was performed to describe the co-medication prevalence of CYP3A4-metabolized statins with contraindicated drugs.

Methods

The patients aged 40 or older receiving CYP3A4-metabolized statin prescriptions in 2009 were identified using the national patient sample from a Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database. Contraindicated co-medication was defined as prescription periods of statins and contraindicated drugs overlapping by at least one day. Co-medication patterns were classified into 3 categories as follows: co-medication in the same prescription, co-medication by the same medical institution, and co-medication by different medical institutions. The proportion of co-medication was analyzed by age, gender, co-morbidities, and the statin’s generic name.

Results

A total of 2,119,401 patients received CYP3A4-metabolized statins and 60,254 (2.84%) patients were co-medicated with contraindicated drugs. The proportion of co-medication was 4.6%, 2.2%, and 1.8% in simvastatin, lovastatin, and atorvastatin users, respectively. The most frequent combination was atorvastatin-itraconazole, followed by simvastatin-clarithromycin and simvastatin-itraconazole. Among the co-medicated patients, 85.3% were prescribed two drugs by different medical institutions.

Conclusion

The proportion of co-medication of statins with contraindicated drugs was relatively lower than that of previous studies; however, the co-medication occurring by different medical institutions was not managed appropriately. There is a need to develop an effective system and to conduct outcomes research confirming the association between co-medication and the risk of unfavorable clinical outcomes.

A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and verapamil in humans

BACKGROUND

Verapamil is a calcium channel blocker commonly used in treatments of hypertension. Verapamil and its active metabolite, norverapamil, are known to be CYP3A4 inhibitors. Co-administration of verapamil with CYP3A4 substrates can alter the pharmacokinetics of the substrates. Simvastatin, a commonly used HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. Therefore, concomitant use of simvastatin and verapamil can increase simvastatin plasma concentration levels, resulting in a higher risk of rhabdomyolysis, a serious adverse drug reaction. Even though, pharmacokinetic data regarding the interaction between both drugs have been published, their use is limited to semiquantitative applications. Therefore, we aimed to develop a mathematical model describing drug-drug interaction between simvastatin and verapamil in humans.

METHODS

Eligible pharmacokinetic interaction study between simvastatin and verapamil in humans was selected from PubMed database. The concentration-time courses from this study were digitally extracted and used for model development.

RESULTS

The drug-drug interaction between simvastatin and verapamil was modeled simultaneously with a two compartment model for verapamil with its active metabolite, norverapamil and a one compartment model for simvastatin with its active form, simvastatin hydroxy acid. The effects of verapamil and norverapamil on pharmacokinetics of simvastatin and its active form, simvastatin hydroxy acid were described by Michaelis-Menten equation. Simulated simvastatin and simvastatin hydroxy acid concentrations obtained from the final model produced a good fit to the dataset from a literature. The final model adequately describes pharmacokinetic interaction between simvastatin and verapamil which can be helpful in prediction of rhabdomyolysis in patients with concurrent use of these drugs.

A pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and clarithromycin in humans

BACKGROUND

Simvastatin is a HMG-CoA reductase Inhibitor and a substrate of CYP3A4. Clarithromycin is a commonly used macrolide antibiotics and a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4. When co-administered with simvastatin, clarithromycin can significantly increase simvastatin plasma concentration levels, thereby, increase the risk of rhabdomyolysis. At present, pharmacokinetic data of the interaction between both drugs are available. However, they are being used for semi-quantitative application only, not for quantitative prediction. We aimed to develop a mathematical model describing a drug-drug interaction between simvastatin and clarithromycin in humans.

METHODS

Selected pharmacokinetic interaction study was obtained from PubMed search. Concentration-time course data were subsequently extracted and used for model development. Compartmental pharmacokinetic interaction model was developed using Advanced Continuous Simulating Language Extreme (ACSLX), a FORTRAN language-based computer program.

RESULTS

The drug-drug interaction between simvastatin and clarithromycin was modeled simultaneously with a parent-metabolite model for clarithromycin and a one-compartment model for simvastatin linked to its active form, simvastatin hydroxy acid. The simulated simvastatin concentrations obtained from the final model displayed satisfactory goodness of fit to the data from the literature.

CONCLUSION

Our model could successfully describe concentration-time course of simvastatin-clarithromycin interaction. The resulting interaction model can be able to use for further development of a quantitative model predicting rhabdomyolysis occurrence in patients concurrently receiving simvastatin and clarithromycin.

Pharmacokinetic modeling of simvastatin, nelfinavir and their interaction in humans

BACKGROUND

Simvastatin, a commonly used HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, is extensively metabolized by CYP3A4. Therefore, co-administration of simvastatin and CYP3A4 inhibitor can affect simvastatin pharmacokinetics. Nelfinavir, a protease inhibitor, and its major metabolite (M8) are known to be potent CYP3A4 inhibitors. When simvastatin and nelfinavir are co-administered, simvastatin pharmacokinetics is significantly altered and may result in an increased risk of rhabdomyolysis.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a mathematical model describing a drug-drug interaction between simvastatin and nelfinavir in humans.

METHODS

Eligible pharmacokinetic studies were selected from Pubmed database and concentration time course data were digitally extracted and used for model development. Compartmental pharmacokinetic models for simvastatin and nelfinavir were developed separately. A drug-drug interaction model of simvastatin and nelfinavir was subsequently developed using the prior information. Finally, the final drug-drug interaction modeled was validated against observed simvastatin concentrations.

RESULTS

Three compartmental pharmacokinetic models were successfully developed. Simvastatin pharmacokinetics was best described by a one compartment model for simvastatin linked to its active form, simvastatin hydroxy acid. Nelfinavir pharmacokinetics could be adequately described by a one compartment parent-metabolite model. Our final drug-drug interaction model predicted an increase in simvastatin exposure which is in line with clinical observations linking the simvastatin-nelfinavir combination to an increased risk of rhabdomyolysis.

CONCLUSION

Simvastatin-nelfinavir pharmacokinetic interaction can be explained by our final model. This model framework will be useful in further advanced developing other mechanism based drug-drug interaction model used to predict the risk of rhabdomyolysis occurrence in patients prescribed simvastatin and nelfinavir concurrently.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between simvastatin and setipiprant, a CRTH2 antagonist

PURPOSE

Setipiprant, a selective oral CRTH2 antagonist, has been investigated for the treatment of allergic rhinitis and asthma. In vitro data showed that setipiprant has a weak induction potential on CYP3A4. An interaction at the hepatic level between setipiprant and CYP3A4 substrates was not expected even at the dosing regimen of 1,000 mg setipiprant b.i.d. due to the high plasma protein binding. However, at this dosing regimen, interactions at the gut level could not be excluded.

METHODS

In this single-center, open-label study, 40 mg of simvastatin was administered orally on Day 1, and then concomitantly with setipiprant on Day 10 following 9 days of setipiprant 1,000 mg b.i.d. to 22 healthy male subjects.

RESULTS

In the presence of setipiprant, the simvastatin concentration-time profile was similar to that of simvastatin alone. The concentrations of simvastatin were, however, slightly lower, resulting in a 9 % decrease in C max (geometric mean ratio (GMR) 0.91, 90 % confidence interval (CI) (0.73, 1.13)) and in a 16 % lower AUC0-∞ (GMR 0.84, 90 % CI (0.72, 0.99)). Exposure to simvastatin acid was similar when comparing simvastatin with or without setipiprant. The GMR and 90 % CI for AUC0-∞ were within the 0.8 to 1.25 limits, whereas those for C max were outside (GMR 2.73, 90 % CI (2.11, 3.53)). Moreover, the median t max of simvastatin acid occurred earlier (1.8 h) when combined compared to 3.0 h when administered alone.

CONCLUSIONS

As setipiprant has little impact on simvastatin pharmacokinetics, it does not modulate CYP3A4 in a clinically relevant manner.

Clinical manifestation of macrolide antibiotic toxicity in CKD and dialysis patients

Macrolide antibiotics, erythromycin, clarithromycin and azithromycin are commonly prescribed for upper respiratory infection, and their use has recently been further linked to immunomodulatory effects. With the widespread and expanded use of macrolides, special attention should be paid to their potential adverse effects. We reported two cases of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who developed hallucinations such as vivid images of worms after taking clarithromycin. Similar to previous case reports of clarithromycin neurotoxicity, the visual hallucination resolved upon cessation of clarithromycin. Furthermore, we discussed the pharmacokinetic properties and other toxicities of macrolide antibiotics in patients with chronic kidney disease and ESRD.

Life-threatening rhabdomyolysis following the interaction of two commonly prescribed medications

We report an interaction between erythromycin and simvastatin resulting in life-threatening rhabdomyolysis in an elderly patient. Drugs that inhibit CYP3A4 enzyme can cause elevated serum levels of statins which amplifies the risk of statin-induced rhabdomyolysis. Physicians should be aware of potential drug interactions of statins, which are widely used in the community.

Pharmacokinetic interactions of almorexant with midazolam and simvastatin, two CYP3A4 model substrates, in healthy male subjects

PURPOSE

Pre-clinical experiments have shown that almorexant, a dual orexin receptor antagonist, is able to inhibit cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4). Therefore, a study was conducted to investigate the effects of multiple-dose almorexant on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and simvastatin, two CYP3A4 model substrates.

METHODS

Fourteen healthy male subjects were enrolled in an open-label, randomized, two-way crossover study. Treatment period A consisted of a single oral dose of 2 mg midazolam on day 1 and 40 mg simvastatin on day 3. In treatment period B, subjects received 200 mg almorexant once daily for 9 days together with a single oral dose of midazolam on day 7 and simvastatin on day 9.

RESULTS

Concomitant administration of midazolam with almorexant at steady-state levels, achieved within 4-5 days, resulted in an increase of 1.2-fold [90 % confidence interval (CI) 1.0-1.4], 1.4-fold (90 % CI 1.2-1.6), and 1.3-fold (90 % CI 1.2-1.4) in the maximum plasma concentration (C(max)), area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-∞)), and terminal half-life (t(1/2)), respectively, of midazolam; the time to peak plasma concentration (t(max)) was unchanged. Whereas C(max) and t(max) were not influenced by almorexant, the AUC(0-∞) of hydroxy-midazolam increased by 1.2-fold (90 % CI 1.1-1.4) and the t(1/2) by 1.3-fold (90 % CI 1.0-1.5). Concomitant administration of simvastatin with almorexant at steady-state resulted in an increase of 2.7-fold (90 % CI 2.0-3.7) and 3.4-fold (90 % CI 2.6-4.4) in C(max) and AUC(0-∞), respectively, for simvastatin; the t(1/2) and t(max) were unchanged. The C(max) and AUC(0-∞) of hydroxyacid simvastatin both increased by 2.8-fold, with 90 % CIs of 2.3-3.5 and 2.2-3.5, respectively; the t(max) increased by 2 h and the t(1/2) was unchanged. The urinary 6-β-hydroxycortisol/cortisol ratio was unaffected by almorexant.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that the observed interaction was caused by the inhibition of CYP3A4 activity, most probably at the gut level.

Drug-drug interaction through molecular structure similarity analysis

BACKGROUND

Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are responsible for many serious adverse events; their detection is crucial for patient safety but is very challenging. Currently, the US Food and Drug Administration and pharmaceutical companies are showing great interest in the development of improved tools for identifying DDIs.

METHODS

We present a new methodology applicable on a large scale that identifies novel DDIs based on molecular structural similarity to drugs involved in established DDIs. The underlying assumption is that if drug A and drug B interact to produce a specific biological effect, then drugs similar to drug A (or drug B) are likely to interact with drug B (or drug A) to produce the same effect. DrugBank was used as a resource for collecting 9454 established DDIs. The structural similarity of all pairs of drugs in DrugBank was computed to identify DDI candidates.

RESULTS

The methodology was evaluated using as a gold standard the interactions retrieved from the initial DrugBank database. Results demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 0.68, specificity of 0.96, and precision of 0.26. Additionally, the methodology was also evaluated in an independent test using the Micromedex/Drugdex database.

CONCLUSION

The proposed methodology is simple, efficient, allows the investigation of large numbers of drugs, and helps highlight the etiology of DDI. A database of 58 403 predicted DDIs with structural evidence is provided as an open resource for investigators seeking to analyze DDIs.

Statin medication in patients treated with antiepileptic drugs in Norway

PURPOSE

The lipid-lowering response of statins metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) has previously been shown to be diminished by concurrent use of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs). The aim of this study was to compare statin prescription in patients receiving EIAEDs versus non-enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (NEIAEDs), before and after introduction of prescribing restrictions for statins in Norway.

METHODS

The Norwegian Prescription Database was used to extract data on patients using antiepileptic drugs and statins during 2004 and 2008. Statin type and dose used were compared between patients treated with at least one EIAED (i.e., carbamazepine, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone) and those receiving NEIAEDs only (i.e., all other antiepileptic drugs).

RESULTS

The number of included patients co-medicated with statins and AEDs was 4855 in 2004 and 9880 in 2008. Among these patients, 2827 and 3160, respectively, were treated with EIAEDs. The CYP3A4 statins (i.e., simvastatin, atorvastatin and lovastatin) accounted for 85% of all statins in 2004, increasing to 93% in 2008. There was no significant difference in the likelihood of being prescribed a CYP3A4 statin versus a non-CYP3A4 statin among patients receiving EIAEDs and NEIAEDs. The average daily dose of individual CYP3A4 statins was not different between the AED groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows that the interaction risk between CYP3A4-metabolized statins and EIAEDs is largely overlooked in Norwegian clinical practice. To avoid therapeutic failure of statin treatment in patients using AEDs, implementation of strategies for systematic management of drug interactions is warranted.

Clarithromycin-induced rhabdomyolysis: a case report

Rhabdomyolysis is a clinical and laboratory syndrome that is caused by various etiologies, involving the skeletal muscle. Clarithromycin, like other macrolides, is an inhibitor of CYP450 3A4, the major enzyme responsible for the metabolism of several drugs, in particular some statins. Rhabdomyolysis related to macrolide–statin interaction has previously been described. To date, rhabdomyolysis induced by clarithromycin has been described in only one previous report. We describe the case of a 90-year-old Caucasian male, admitted to the University Hospital of Pisa for dyspnea, who developed rhabdomyolysis associated with clarithromycin administration.

Co-administration of statins with cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors in a UK primary care population

PURPOSE

The co-administration of cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors with simvastatin or atorvastatin (CYP3A4-metabolised statins) is associated with increased statin exposure and can increase the risk of adverse drug reactions. The aim of this study was to measure the concomitant exposure of patients to CYP3A4-metabolised statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors in the UK primary care population.

METHODS

The co-administration of statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors during 2008 was examined in the General Practice Research Database, a large nationally representative UK primary care database. All known inhibitors were included with labelled inhibitors identified using the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency Drug Safety Update and UK summary of product characteristics for statins. Exposure was examined in patients overall, patients 65 years and older and those prescribed higher doses of statins.

RESULTS

There were 364,574 patients included in the analyses. Ninety-three percent of the patients were prescribed CYP3A4-metabolised statins, most whom received simvastatin (72%) and atorvastatin (24%). Approximately one third (30%) of the patients prescribed a CYP3A4-metabolised statin had also been prescribed a concomitant CYP3A4 inhibitor during the study period, including 11% prescribed a concomitant labelled inhibitor, with an annualised median days of concomitant use of 173 days, predominantly involving macrolide antibiotics and calcium channel blockers co-prescriptions. Rates were higher in the subgroup aged 65 and over and in those on high dose statins.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-prescription of CYP3A4-metabolised statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors is common in UK primary care. This co-prescription suggests the limited appreciation of potential interactions and Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency safety advice, with the potential to increase likelihood for side effects amongst patients. Strategies to reduce drug interactions with potential adverse effects should be targeted at prescribers and pharmacists.

Luciferin IPA-based higher throughput human hepatocyte screening assays for CYP3A4 inhibition and induction

The authors report here higher throughput screening (HTS) assays for the evaluation of CYP3A4 inhibition and CYP3A4 induction in human hepatocytes using a novel CYP3A4 substrate, luciferin IPA (LIPA). Using human recombinant CYP450 isoforms, LIPA was found to be metabolized extensively by CYP3A4 but not by CYP1A2, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, or CYP2E1. In the 384-well plate CYP3A4 inhibition assay, the known inhibitors 1-aminobenzotriazole, erythromycin, ketoconazole, and verapamil were found to cause extensive (maximum inhibition of >80%), dose-dependent, statistically significant inhibition of LIPA metabolism. The non-CYP3A4 inhibitors diethyldithiocarbamate, quercetin, quinidine, sulfaphenazole, ticlopidine, and tranylcypromine were found to have substantially lower (maximum inhibition of <50%) or no apparent inhibitory effects in the HTS assay. In the 96-well plate induction assay, the CYP3A4 inducers rifampin, phenobarbital, carbamazepine, phenytoin, troglitazone, rosiglitazone, and pioglitazone yielded dose-dependent induction of LIPA metabolism, whereas the CYP1A2 inducers omeprazole and 3-methylcholanthrene did not display any induction in the CYP3A4 activity. The high sensitivity and specificity of the assays, the relative ease of execution, and reduced cost, time, and test material requirements suggest that the HTS assays may be applied routinely for screening a large number of chemicals in the drug discovery phase for CYP3A4 inhibitory and inducing potential.

The influence of high-dose simvastatin and diltiazem on myocardium in rabbits: a haemodynamic study

INTRODUCTION

Simvastatin and diltiazem are often prescribed together for the treatment of hypercholesterolaemia in patients with hypertension and/or angina pectoris. However, diltiazem, a CYP3A inhibitor, is a well-recognized risk factor of skeletal muscle myopathy. It is not known whether such interaction also affects myocardial efficiency causing haemodynamic changes. The aim of the experiment was to establish the impact of simvastatin co-administered with diltiazem on the haemodynamic parameters after continuous infusion of dopamine.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The experiments were performed on 28 New Zealand white rabbits. The animals were divided into four groups receiving: 0.2% MC - methylcellulose (control group); diltiazem; simvastatin; simvastatin + diltiazem, for 14 days (po). The following haemodynamic parameters were estimated: cardiac output index (CI), heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean blood pressure (MBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and total peripheral resistance index (TPRI). The registration of haemodynamic parameters was performed by the Doppler method and during the experiments the animals were anaesthetized with α-chloralose (75 mg/kg bw) and urethane (500 mg/kg bw).

RESULTS

Dopamine did not cause a statistically significant increase in CI in rabbits receiving simvastatin alone. Diltiazem significantly increased CI if given simultaneously with simvastatin, which might suggest the improvement of cardiac efficiency resulting from such interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

The possibility of another mechanism of drug-drug interaction than the one based on CYP3A inhibition, and its impact on cardiac or skeletal muscle, might be considered.

Gender differences, polypharmacy, and potential pharmacological interactions in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze pharmacological interactions among drugs taken by elderly patients and their age and gender differences in a population from Porto Alegre, Brazil.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the database provided by the Institute of Geriatric and Gerontology, Porto Alegre, Brazil. The database was composed of 438 elderly and includes information about the patients' disease, therapy regimens, utilized drugs. All drugs reported by the elderly patients were classified using the Anatomical Therapeutic and Chemical Classification System. The drug-drug interactions and their severity were assessed using the Micromedex® Healthcare Series.

RESULTS

Of the 438 elderly patients in the data base, 376 (85.8%) used pharmacotherapy, 274 were female, and 90.4% of females used drugs. The average number of drugs used by each individual younger than 80 years was 3.2±2.6. Women younger than 80 years old used more drugs than men in the same age group whereas men older than 80 years increased their use of drugs in relation to other age groups. Therefore, 32.6% of men and 49.2% of women described at least one interaction, and 8.1% of men and 10.6% of women described four or more potential drug-drug interactions. Two-thirds of drug-drug interactions were moderate in both genders, and most of them involved angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory, loop and thiazide diuretics, and β-blockers.

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients should be closely monitored, based on drug class, gender, age group and nutritional status.

Concomitant use of statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors in administrative claims and electronic medical records databases

BACKGROUND

Patients may experience increased risk of adverse drug interactions when statins are administered concomitantly with cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE

To determine patient numbers in routine clinical practice with concomitant exposure to CYP3A4-metabolized statins and CYP3A4 inhibitors and highlight potential risk for adverse drug interaction.

METHODS

Exposure to prescription medications over 1 year (2005-2006) was evaluated from patient records: US PharMetrics Integrated Patient-Centric administrative claims database and the US General Electric Medical System (GEMS) database. Rates of concomitant prescribing of statins with CYP3A4 inhibitors (listed in United States of America product labels and all identified potential inhibitors) were examined in the cohort overall, in those aged ≥65 years, and in those receiving higher doses of statins.

RESULTS

Overall, 951,166 patient records were included (PharMetrics n = 650,825; GEMS, n = 300,341). Of these, 792,081 (83%) patients used a CYP3A4-metabolized statin as opposed to a non-CYP3A4-metabolized statin (17%). Findings from both databases were consistent. Overall, 25-30% of patients given a CYP3A4-metabolized statin were concomitantly exposed to a CYP3A4 inhibitor, including approximately 9% concomitantly exposed to a labeled inhibitor, findings consistent with those in patients aged ≥65 years, and patients on higher doses of statins.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians frequently co-prescribe CYP3A4-metabolized statins with CYP3A4 inhibitors. Physician education regarding the impact of these inhibitors on the metabolism of lovastatin, simvastatin, and atrovastatin is needed. Further studies are also needed to determine whether concomitant administration of a non-CYP3A4-metabolized statin (such as fluvastatin, pravastatin, or rosuvastatin) with a CYP3A4 inhibitor, may reduce adverse event rates in routine clinical practice.