Treatment and outcomes for elderly patients with small cell lung cancer

Real-world data of atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide in elderly patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide combination chemotherapy in elderly patients with extensive-disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 65 SCLC patients who received atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide for ED-SCLC in nine study institutions between August 2019 and September 2020. Clinical efficacy, assessed according to response rate and survival, and toxicity were compared between the elderly (n = 36 patients; median age: 74 years [range: 70-89 years]) and the non-elderly group (n = 29 patients; median age: 67 years [range: 43-69 years]).

RESULTS

The response rate was 73.8% (80.5% in the elderly group and 65.5% in the non-elderly group). There was no significant difference in both the median progression-free survival (5.5 months vs. 4.9 months, p = 0.18) and the median overall survival (15.4 months vs. 15.9 months, p = 0.24) between the elderly group and the non-elderly group. The frequencies of grade ≥3 hematological adverse events in the elderly patients were as follows: decreased white blood cells, 36.1%; decreased neutrophil count, 61.1%; decreased platelet count, 8.3%; and febrile neutropenia, 8.3%. One treatment-related death due to lung infection occurred in the elderly group.

CONCLUSION

Despite hematologic toxicities, especially decreased neutrophil count, atezolizumab, carboplatin, and etoposide combination chemotherapy demonstrates favorable effectiveness and acceptable toxicity in elderly patients. Thus, atezolizumab plus carboplatin and etoposide could be the preferred standard treatment modality for elderly patients with ED-SCLC.

Patterns of Symptom Distress in Adults Receiving Treatment for Lung Cancer

Knowledge of the patterns of symptom distress in adults receiving treatment for lung cancer is an important first step in developing interventions that can potentially lessen symptom distress. The purposes of this secondary analysis were to describe the changes in patterns of symptom distress over time in adults receiving treatment for lung cancer, and to examine the relationship of selected demographic and clinical characteristics to symptom distress. Complete data were available for 117 patients. The patterns of symptom distress in adults receiving treatment for lung cancer varied between treatment groups and over time. Symptom distress scores were moderate to high on entry into the study, indicating that symptom management in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients is essential and should begin early in the course of illness. Moreover, clinical interventions should be tailored to the type of treatment. Various demographic and clinical variables were weak and inconsistent predictors of symptom distress, underscoring the importance of examining the role of psychosocial factors in mediating symptom distress.

Topotecan monotherapy for the treatment of relapsed small cell lung cancer in elderly patients: A retrospective analysis

Background

Topotecan is one of the most active chemotherapeutic drugs for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). However, its efficacy in elderly patients with SCLC has not been validated. This study evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of topotecan monotherapy in elderly patients with relapsed SCLC.

Methods

Between January 2000 and March 2017, 43 patients aged ≥ 70 years received topotecan monotherapy for relapsed SCLC at four institutions. The clinical outcomes and adverse events of treatment were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

Twenty‐nine patients (median age 75 years; range: 70–83 years) had sensitive‐type relapse, while 14 (median age 78 years; range: 71–82 years) had refractory relapse. The median number of treatment cycles was two (range: 1–6). The response rate was 7.0% (10.3% and 0% in sensitive and refractory patients, respectively), while the disease control rate was 23.2% (20.6% and 42.8% in sensitive and refractory patients, respectively). Median progression‐free survival was 1.9 months in sensitive patients and 1.4 months in refractory patients (P = 0.87). The median survival time from the start of topotecan therapy was 5.5 months in sensitive patients and 4.0 months in refractory patients (P = 0.64). Grade ≥ 3 hematological toxicities were as follows: leukopenia, 37.2%; neutropenia, 51.1%; anemia, 0%; thrombocytopenia, 32.5%; and febrile neutropenia, 9.3%. No treatment‐related deaths occurred.

Conclusion

Although hematological toxicities (particularly neutropenia) were severe, topotecan showed favorable disease control in both sensitive and refractory patients. Topotecan may thus be a preferred treatment for elderly patients with relapsed SCLC.

A retrospective study of amrubicin monotherapy for the treatment of relapsed small cell lung cancer in elderly patients

Purpose

Amrubicin is one of the most active chemotherapeutic drugs for small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Previous studies reported its effectiveness and severe hematological toxicity. However, the efficacy of amrubicin monotherapy in elderly patients with SCLC has not been described. The objective of this study was to investigate the feasibility of amrubicin monotherapy in elderly patients and its efficacy for relapsed SCLC.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study design was used. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical effects and adverse events of amrubicin treatment in elderly (≥70 years) SCLC patients with relapsed SCLC.

Results

Between November 2003 and September 2015, 86 patients (aged ≥70 years) received amrubicin monotherapy for relapsed SCLC at four institutions. There were 42 cases of sensitive relapse (S) and 44 of refractory relapse (R). S cases with median age of 75 years (range 70–85 years) and R cases with median age of 74 years (range 70–84 years) were included in our analysis. The median number of treatment cycles was three (range 1–9), and the response rate was 33.7% (40.5% in the S and 27.2% in the R cases). Median progression-free survival time was 4.0 months in the S and 2.7 months in the R patients (p = 0.013). Median survival time from the start of amrubicin therapy was 7.6 months in the S and 5.5 months in the R cases (p = 0.26). The frequencies of grade ≥3 hematological toxicities were as follows: leukopenia, 60.4%; neutropenia, 74.4%; anemia, 11.6%; thrombocytopenia, 16.2%; and febrile neutropenia, 17.4%. Treatment-related death was observed in one patient.

Conclusion

Although hematological toxicities, particularly neutropenia, were severe, amrubicin showed favorable efficacy, not only in the S but also in the R cases, as shown in previous studies. Amrubicin could be a preferable standard treatment in elderly patients with relapsed SCLC. These results warrant further evaluation of amrubicin in elderly patients with relapsed SCLC by a prospective trial.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00280-017-3403-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Amrubicin monotherapy for elderly patients with previously treated lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The novel anthracycline agent amrubicin, has been approved in Japan to treat small and non-small cell lung cancers (SCLC and NSCLC). The present study evaluates the toxicity and effect of amrubicin especially in elderly patients with previously treated lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed data from 51 patients (<70 years of age, n=29; > oor =70 years of age, n=22) with lung cancer (NSCLC, n=21; SCLC, n=30) who were treated with amrubicin at our hospital, between July 2003 and October 2009. All patients had recurrent or refractory lung cancer after one or more chemotherapy regimens. We compared the outcomes of patients younger and older than 70 years of age. Amrubicin (30-40 mg/m(2)/day) was infused depending on patient performance status and laboratory data over a period of 5 minutes on days 1-3, with courses repeated at intervals of at least 3 weeks. The dose was modified according to myelosuppression.

RESULTS

The mean number of treatment cycles, mean dose and mean interval of amrubicin administration did not significantly differ between patients aged <70 and > or =70 years. The rate of hematological toxicities (> or = Grade 3) also did not significantly differ between the two age groups (leukopenia, 48.3% and 59.1% for age <70 and > or =70 years, p=0.573; neutropenia, 65.5% vs. 77.3%, p=0.536; anemia, 20.7% vs. 22.7%, p=1.000; thrombocytopenia, 13.8% vs. 31.8%, p=0.173). The incidence of grade 2-4 non-hematological toxicities also did not significantly differ between the groups. The response rate of SCLC and disease control rate of NSCLC were similar in the younger and older groups.

CONCLUSION

Amrubicin monotherapy might be equally tolerated by elderly and younger patients. Further studies are needed to investigate the benefit of amrubicin monotherapy among elderly patients with previously treated lung cancer.

[Age and management decisions in patients with primary lung cancer]

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic decisions are difficult in elderly patients because of the heterogeneity of this population. Our objective was to evaluate the role of age in the management of patients suffering from primary lung cancer seen in the department of respiratory diseases of the Limoges regional teaching hospital between 2002 and 2004.

METHODS

A cross sectional study analysed the management of 363 patients suffering from primary lung cancer. The patients were divided into two groups according to their age (less than seventy or seventy and over). A comparison was made between the management of the two groups.

RESULTS

The comparisons according to age produced evidence of reduced activity, greater dependence, an increased Charlson score, less frequently administered radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and more frequent symptomatic treatment in the elderly group (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The geriatric assessment of patients suffering from primary lung cancer should make allowance for the physiological age of the patient and adapt the management to ensure the best quality of life.

Evaluation of trends in the cost of initial cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Despite reports of increases in the cost of cancer treatment, little is known about how costs of cancer treatment have changed over time and what services have contributed to the increases.

METHODS

We used data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked database for 306,709 persons aged 65 and older and diagnosed with breast, lung, colorectal, or prostate cancer between 1991 and 2002 to assess the number of patients assigned to initial cancer care, from 2 months before diagnosis to 12 months after diagnosis, and mean annual Medicare payments for this care according to cancer type and type of treatment. Mutually exclusive treatment categories were cancer-related surgery, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and other hospitalizations during the period of initial cancer care. Linear regression models were used to assess temporal trends in the percentage of patients receiving treatment and costs for those treated. We extrapolated our results based on the SEER data to the US Medicare population to estimate national Medicare payments by cancer site and treatment category. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

For patients diagnosed in 2002, Medicare paid an average of $39,891 for initial care for each lung cancer patient, $41 134 for each colorectal cancer patient, and $20,964 for each breast cancer patient, corresponding to inflation-adjusted increases from 1991 of $7139, $5345, and $4189, respectively. During the same interval, the mean Medicare payment for initial care for prostate cancer declined by $196 to $18261 in 2002. Costs for any hospitalization accounted for the largest portion of payments for all cancers. Chemotherapy use increased markedly for all cancers between 1991 and 2002, as did radiation therapy use (except for colorectal cancers). Total 2002 Medicare payments for initial care for these four cancers exceeded $6.7 billion, with colorectal and lung cancers being the most costly overall.

CONCLUSIONS

The statistically significant increase in costs of initial cancer treatment reflects more patients receiving surgery and adjuvant therapy and rising prices for these treatments. These trends are likely to continue in the near future, although more efficient targeting of costly therapies could mitigate the overall economic impact of this trend.

Randomized controlled drug trials on very elderly subjects: descriptive and methodological analysis of trials published between 1990 and 2002 and comparison with trials on adults

BACKGROUND

Very elderly subjects (VES; aged 80 years or older) constitute a special population as they frequently present multiple diseases (polypathology). Results from trials on general adult populations therefore cannot be extrapolated to VES. We performed a census of randomized controlled trials (RCT) on VES published between 1990 and 2002, and carried out a descriptive and methodological analysis of these RCT/VES, comparing them with matched RCT on general adult populations (control RCT, RCT/C).

METHODS

We searched for RCT/VES in two international databases (EMBASE and MEDLINE) and then manually. RCT/C were matched to RCT/VES for disease area and year of publication. The methodological quality of each RCT was assessed with Chalmers' scale.

RESULTS

We identified 84 RCT/VES, 63 of which were conclusive and 21, inconclusive. Subjects were institutionalized in 48 RCT, and community dwelling in 11 RCT (unspecified in 25 RCT). Efficacy was the main criterion in 75 RCT; tolerance in 9 RCT. Twenty-six RCT were published by geriatrics journals, and 58 by general medical journals. The RCT/VES covered most of the disease areas of geriatrics. The 84 RCT/VES had a mean methodological quality score of 0.578 +/- 0.157. The matched 84 RCT/C had a mean methodological quality score of 0.592 +/- 0.116 (p = .466). The methodological quality score of RCT/VES increased with the number of included subjects (p = .004) and the year of publication (p = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The methodological quality of RCT/VES is equivalent to that of RCT in general adult populations. Nevertheless, RCT/VES remain very scarce, and neglect certain diseases. RCT/VES and the inclusion of very elderly subjects in RCT on adults should be strongly encouraged.

Sequential versus concurrent paclitaxel and carboplatin for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients and patients with poor performance status: results of two Phase II, multicenter trials

The primary objective of these trials was to determine the 1-year survival of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (ANSCLC) patients (> or =70 years with PS 0-2 or > or =18 years with PS 2) receiving sequential paclitaxel and carboplatin (P --> C) or concurrent P + C. The secondary objectives were assessment of toxicities and quality of life. A total of 121 patients with NSCLC were treated. P--> C patients received paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) weekly x 3, followed by 1 week of rest; these 4-week cycles were repeated until relapse. At relapse, patients received carboplatin (AUC = 5, IV) on Day 1 of each 3-week cycle until evidence of further progression or lack of improvement. P + C patients received paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (AUC = 2), weekly x 3, followed by 1 week of rest, until relapse. Patients in both studies were premedicated prior to paclitaxel administration. Sequential P + C resulted in a median survival of 8.2 months (range: <1-18.8) and P + C patients had a median survival of 9.2 months (range: <1-22.0). In both groups (P--> C) and P + C), the 1-year survival was 31%. For patients treated sequentially, treatment-related AEs (TRAE, > or =Grade 3) included fatigue (7%), neuropathy (5%), and leukopenia and diarrhea (3%, each). Grade 4 AEs were limited to neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and sepsis (1 episode each). For patients receiving concurrent P + C, TRAE included neutropenia and leukopenia (15%, each) and shortness of breath and bilateral bone pain (10%, each). Leukopenia (n = 2) and neutropenia (n = 1) were the only Grade 4 events reported. The analysis of quality of life (QOL) questionnaires indicated that there were no obvious differences between treatment groups during the study. These drugs and treatment schema were well-tolerated when administered in the community setting and resulted in survival rates that were similar to what is reported in the literature with combination therapy administered to "high risk" patients. Finding the optimal chemotherapy regimen, that can be tolerated, remains a challenge in elderly patients.

Results of a phase II study of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 2, or age > or = 70 years

PURPOSE

To determine the 1-year survival, response rate (RR), time to progression (TTP), and safety of weekly paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PC) in patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer (ESCLC) with an Eastern Cooperative Performance Status performance status (PS) of 2 or an age > or = 70 years.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were treated with PC (paclitaxel 80 mg/m(2) and carboplatin area under the curve = 2) by intravenous infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 4-week cycle for up to six cycles.

RESULTS

Between July 2000 and December 2001, 77 eligible patients (50.6% were male, 97.4% were white, 44.2% had PS of 2, with median age of 74 years) with ESCLC were enrolled. Among the 66 patients who were assessable for response, 25 responded to treatment (one complete response and 24 partial responses), for an objective RR of 38%. There were eight cases of stable disease (12.1%) and 33 cases of progressive disease (50%). The median survival was 7.2 months (range, < 1 to 24.4 months), and the estimated 1-year survival rate was 30%. The median TTP was 3.5 months (range, < 1 to 21.2 months), and the estimated 1-year progression-free survival rate was 8%. The median duration of response was 4.5 months (range, 1.6 to 17.5 months). One death (sepsis) was possibly related to the study drugs. Grades 3 and 4 toxicities experienced by > or = 5% of patients included neutropenia (22.1%), fatigue (8.6%), anemia (5.2%), and nausea/vomiting (5.2%).

CONCLUSION

This regimen produced relatively few toxicities (only two of the 66 assessable patients received fewer than two cycles because of toxicity), and both the median and 1-year survival were similar to other regimens. This regimen may be a preferable treatment choice for patients with ESCLC who have a poor PS or who are aged > or = 70 years.

Treatment of small cell lung cancer in the elderly based on a critical literature review of clinical trials

At diagnosis, 25-40% of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) are 70 years of age or older, and many of them have been undertreated because of fear of excessive toxicity associated with chemotherapy. Papers retrieved by a Medline search using the key words "elderly or older" and "small cell lung cancer" and by a manual search were classified into the three types: (1) case-series studies, (2) subgroup analyses of phase II and phase III trials by age, and (3) prospective clinical trials in the elderly. Treatment regimens, delivery, toxicity, antitumor activity, and patient survival were reviewed in elderly patients with good and poor general condition. The standard chemotherapy regimens for the general population could be applied to elderly patients in good general condition (performance status of 0-1, normal organ function, and no comorbidity), but etoposide and carboplatin regimen with dose modification was frequently used for unselected elderly patients. A combination of full-dose thoracic radiotherapy and chemotherapy was the treatment of choice for limited SCLC in the elderly. Full cycles of chemotherapy were tolerable by 80% of the elderly patients with good general condition, but two cycles may be optimal for unselected elderly patients. Although the evidence levels based on clinical trials available today are low, these results are helpful for clinical practice and future clinical trials for elderly patients with SCLC.

Do age and comorbidity impact treatment allocation and outcomes in limited stage small-cell lung cancer? a community-based population analysis

PURPOSE

The effects of age and comorbidity on treatment and outcomes for patients with limited stage small-cell lung cancer (L-SCLC) are unclear. This study analyzes relapse and survival in a community-based population with L-SCLC according to age and comorbidity.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed on 174 patients with L-SCLC referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver Island Centre, between January 1991 and December 1999. Patient and treatment characteristics, disease response, relapse, and survival were compared among three age cohorts: <65 years (n = 55, 32%), 65-74 years (n = 76, 44%), and > or =75 years (n = 43, 25%); and according to Charlson comorbidity scores 0, 1, and > or =2. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify independent prognostic factors associated with treatment response and survival.

RESULTS

Patient factors that significantly differed with age were functional status classified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and number of comorbidities. Increasing age was significantly associated with fewer diagnostic scans. Combined modality chemoradiotherapy (CRT) was given in 86%, 66%, and 40% of patients ages <65, 65-74, and > or =75 years, respectively, (p <0.0001). Thoracic irradiation use was comparable among the age cohorts (p >0.05), but chemotherapy use varied significantly with less intensive regimens, fewer cycles, and lower total doses with advancing age (p <0.05). Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was used in 41 patients, only 3 of whom were age >70 years. Overall response rates to primary treatment significantly decreased with advancing age: 91%, 79%, and 74% in patients ages <65, 65-74, and > or =75 years, respectively (p = 0.014). Treatment toxicity and relapse patterns were similar across the age cohorts. Overall 2-year survival rates were significantly lower with advancing age: 37%, 22%, and 19% (p = 0.003), with corresponding median survivals of 17, 12, and 7 months among patients ages <65, 65-74, and > or =75 years, respectively. On multivariate analysis, age and Charlson comorbidity scores were not significantly associated with treatment response and survival. Independent prognostic factors favorably associated with survival were good performance status, normal lactate dehydrogenase, absence of pleural effusion, and > or =four cycles of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Increasing age was associated with decreased performance status and increased comorbidity. Older patients with L-SCLC were less likely to be treated with CRT, intensive chemotherapy, and PCI. Treatment response and survival rates were lower with advancing age, but this may be attributed to poor performance status and suboptimal treatment rather than age.

Treatment of lung cancer in elderly part II: small cell lung cancer

There is a general trend worldwide of an increasing incidence of elderly population. Age is the greatest risk factor for cancer; therefore, this demographic shift is a main reason for an increase of cancer incidence. Lung cancer is a typical disease of the elderly patients. Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancer cases. This review summarises the issues of treatment of SCLC in elderly. The number of randomised phase III trials concerning treatment of SCLC in elderly patients are very limited. Although currently most treatment decisions are based on lower grades of evidence, some conclusions can be drawn from the current studies. Age alone is a very uncertain prognostic criteria for outcome or tolerability of treatment. Much more important is the geriatric assessment of each individual patient. Current treatment standards for limited disease (LD)-SCLC (polychemotherapy plus local thoracic irradiation and additional prophylactic cranial irradiation in case of complete remission) seems to be also feasible for 'fit' elderly (>70 years) LD-SCLC patients with a good performance and full functional capacities. There are preliminary data indicating that a similar outcome in elderly patients can probably be achieved a with reduced number of treatment schedules (e.g. 2 instead of 4 cycles in combination with radiotherapy. Surgical resection is also feasible in selected elderly patients with very early stage SCLC, where this maybe an appropriate approach, although no phase III data are available, which demonstrated the benefit of additional surgery compared to chemotherapy alone in early stage SCLC. In patients with extensive disease-SCLC age alone does not necessarily restrict the use of multiagent regimen, although the risk of haematological toxicity seems to be higher than in the younger patients. When standard treatment is not feasible due to co-morbidity or loss of functional capacity, several alternative combination regimens are available, which appear to be slightly superior to single agent treatment, although randomised data for elderly on that issue are sparse. Carboplatin and etoposide seems currently the most appropriate two-drug combination in elderly patients, but there are a variety of active and low toxic third generation agents like taxanes, gemcitabine and vinorelbine which are active in both, non-small cell lung cancer and SCLC. For the comparison of trials in elderly patients it will be of key importance to include a comprehensive and standardised geriatric assessment in such studies.

Epidermal growth factor receptors and cyclooxygenase-2 in the pathogenesis of non-small cell lung cancer: potential targets for chemoprevention and systemic therapy

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is part of a family of plasma membrane receptor tyrosine kinases that control many important cellular functions, from growth and proliferation to cell death. Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 is an enzyme which catalyses the conversion of arachidonic acid to prostagladins and thromboxane. It is induced by various inflammatory stimuli, including the pro-inflammatory cytokines, Interleukin (IL)-1beta, Tumour Necrosis Factor (TNF)-alpha and IL-2. Both EGFR and COX-2 are over-expressed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and have been implicated in the early stages of tumourigenesis. This paper considers their roles in the development and progression of lung cancer, their potential interactions, and reviews the recent progress in cancer therapies that are directed toward these targets. An increasing body of evidence suggests that selective inhibitors of both EGFR and COX-2 are potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of NSCLC, in the adjuvant, metastatic and chemopreventative settings.

Chemotherapy-induced pulmonary toxicity in lung cancer management

Chemotherapy is the cornerstone of therapy in many stages of lung cancer. Many diagnostic options have to be taken into account when a patient suffering from lung cancer presents with nonspecific, respiratory, clinical manifestations. A multidisciplinary diagnostic approach is then warranted. The top priority is to rule out those life-threatening causes, such as lung infection, that could be properly treated if a right diagnosis is early. To reach a definite diagnosis frequently requires that one or more diagnostic, pneumologic techniques are performed. Regarding to drug-induced pulmonary disease, prevention is mandatory. In this review we have tried to highlight the risk and characteristics of cytostatic-induced pulmonary toxicity caused by those agents that have been commonly employed to treat lung cancer for the last decades. When treating lung cancer patients, a high clinical suspicion of chemotherapy-induced lung toxicity should be kept in mind since an early withdrawal of the offending drug is the most efficacious therapy.