Emotion Processing Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease: An Overview of Behavioral Findings, Systems Neural Correlates, and Underlying Neural Biology

We described behavioral studies to highlight emotional processing deficits in Alzheimer's disease (AD). The findings suggest prominent deficit in recognizing negative emotions, pronounced effect of positive emotion on enhancing memory, and a critical role of cognitive deficits in manifesting emotional processing dysfunction in AD. We reviewed imaging studies to highlight morphometric and functional markers of hippocampal circuit dysfunction in emotional processing deficits. Despite amygdala reactivity to emotional stimuli, hippocampal dysfunction conduces to deficits in emotional memory. Finally, the reviewed studies implicating major neurotransmitter systems in anxiety and depression in AD supported altered cholinergic and noradrenergic signaling in AD emotional disorders. Overall, the studies showed altered emotions early in the course of illness and suggest the need of multimodal imaging for further investigations. Particularly, longitudinal studies with multiple behavioral paradigms translatable between preclinical and clinical models would provide data to elucidate the time course and underlying neurobiology of emotion processing dysfunction in AD.

Efficacy of Jihwangeumja (Dihuang Yinzi) on cognitive function and activities of daily living in patients with Alzheimer disease: A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This systematic review protocol describes the methods proposed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Jihwangeumja in patients with Alzheimer disease.

METHODS

The following databases, PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, National Digital Science Library, Korean Information Service System, and Korean Medical Database will be searched for relevant publications without language or publication status restrictions. Search terms will be based on "Alzheimer" for participants and "Jihwangeumja" or "Dihuang Yinzi" for interventions. Two researchers will independently extract the study data from the included studies and only randomized controlled trials will be included. The risk of bias will also be assessed independently by 2 researchers using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. We will use RevMan software random-effects and fixed-effect models for the assessment of heterogeneity and data synthesis. Any changes in the plan for documenting significant protocol amendments will require the researchers to have a revision agreement and register the international prospective register of systematic review modification.

RESULTS

The treatment effect and safety will be measured by meta-analysis and the quality of the included studies will be reviewed.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review will provide evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of Jihwangeumja.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required because individual patient data will not be included in this paper. The study findings will be disseminated through conference presentations.

OSF REGISTRATION

DOI: 10.17605/OSF.IO/HXA58.

Caregiver and care recipient characteristics as predictors of psychotropic medication use in community-dwelling dementia patients

OBJECTIVES

The current practice of prescribing psychotropic medication for the management of dementia-related behavioral disturbances is under substantial debate. Using Pearlin's stress process model as theoretical underpinning, the aim of this investigation is to identify caregiver and care recipient characteristics as predictors of anxiolytic, antipsychotic, and antidepressant use among community-dwelling dementia patients. We hypothesized that caregiving burden and patient characteristics, particularly behavior disturbances and pain, would be positively associated with psychotropic medication use.

METHODS

Data for this exploratory, cross-sectional study were drawn from the baseline assessment of the Resources for Enhancing Alzheimer's Caregiver Health II trial. Only participants with full baseline information were examined (N = 598). Caregiver characteristics, such as confidence managing problematic behaviors, and care recipient characteristics including pain, problem behaviors, cognitive impairment, and functional impairment, were examined in relation to care recipient psychotropic medication use.

RESULTS

Contrary to our hypothesis, behavioral disturbances and burden associated with these disturbances were not significantly associated with psychotropic use. Rather, caregiver characteristics such as race and overall vigilance, and care recipient characteristics such as cognitive status, functional status, and pain were significantly associated with the use of psychotropic medication. Findings differed by class of medication.

CONCLUSION

These exploratory findings suggest the utility of a holistic approach to understanding the factors associated with pharmacotherapy among community-dwelling elders with dementia. Significant associations between caregiver characteristics and care recipient psychotropic medication use suggest that educating caregivers in non-pharmacologic strategies hold promise for a more balanced biopsychosocial approach to maintaining dementia patients in the community.

Rivastigmine from capsules to patch: therapeutic advances in the management of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease dementia

OBJECTIVE

To discuss the pharmacology, mechanism of action, and chemical properties of the cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) rivastigmine; to provide a rationale for transdermal delivery and supportive clinical data, along with practical guidance on rivastigmine patch use in Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease dementia.

DATA SOURCES

Pivotal studies of rivastigmine capsules and patch were identified using PubMed and the rivastigmine US prescribing information. PubMed searches were performed in 2013 using rivastigmine as a keyword.

STUDY SELECTION

English-language articles related to rivastigmine considered of relevance to primary care physicians were included.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Pharmacologic differences exist between rivastigmine and ChEIs. Clinical studies demonstrate symptomatic efficacy of oral rivastigmine across all stages of Alzheimer's disease and mild-to-moderate Parkinson's disease dementia. However, gastrointestinal adverse events limit access to optimal therapeutic doses. Strategies that lower maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) and prolong time to Cmax, ie, transdermal delivery, may improve tolerability. Clinical registration studies have demonstrated improved tolerability of rivastigmine 9.5-mg/24-h patch versus 6-mg twice-daily capsules in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease, and a positive benefit-risk profile of 13.3-mg/24-h versus 9.5-mg/24-h patch in patients needing enhanced efficacy. Clinical data comparing 13.3-mg/24-h versus 4.6-mg/24-h patch in severe Alzheimer's disease demonstrated efficacy on cognition and activities of daily living. These data led to approval of rivastigmine patch in severe Alzheimer's disease. Transdermal delivery also has practical advantages, including simple, once-daily administration and a visual indicator of compliance. Potential application site reactions can be minimized and need not be a barrier to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In addition to practical advantages, rivastigmine patch may improve clinical outcomes throughout the course of Alzheimer's disease by providing access to high-dose efficacy without compromising tolerability.

Australian population trends and disparities in cholinesterase inhibitor use, 2003 to 2010

BACKGROUND

The Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS) first subsidized cholinesterase inhibitors (CEIs) for Alzheimer's disease in 2001, introducing a novel therapy for a previously untreatable common condition. This study aims to determine Australian rates of CEI use and to assess equality of access to treatment based on socioeconomic status and geographic remoteness.

METHODS

Pharmaceutical claims records were used to identify all Australians prescribed CEIs between January 2003 and December 2010. Age-standardized and sex-adjusted index prescription rates were derived using the total Australian population as the denominator to examine temporal trends and the impacts of socioeconomic and geographic disadvantage on CEI index prescription rates.

RESULTS

Index prescription rates peaked in 2004 at 92.5 per 100,000 person-years, declining to between 70.2 and 73.5 for years 2006 to 2010. Rates were highest in the 85- to 89-year age group and 2.6-fold higher in the least socioeconomic disadvantaged population when compared with the most disadvantaged population. In major cities in Australia, index prescription rates were 1.4 to 1.7 times greater compared with remote areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing geographic remoteness and socioeconomic disadvantage are associated with lower CEI index prescription rates, indicating inequities in the management of Alzheimer's disease in Australia.

A population-based study of dosing and persistence with anti-dementia medications

PURPOSE

Cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine are the mainstay of pharmacological intervention for the cognitive symptoms of Alzheimer's disease (AD). This study assessed the adequacy of dosing and persistence with AD medications and the predictors of these variables in the 'real world' (outside the clinical trial setting).

METHODS

The Health Service Executive-Primary Care Reimbursement Services prescription claims database in the Republic of Ireland contains prescription information for 1.6 million people. Patients aged >70 years who received at least two prescriptions for donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine and memantine between January 2006 and December 2010 were included in the study. Rates of dose-maximisation were recorded by examining the initiation dose of each AD drug commenced during the study period and any subsequent dose titrations. Non-persistence was defined by a gap in prescribing of more than 63 consecutive days. Predictors of dose-maximisation and non-persistence were also analysed.

RESULTS

Between January 2006 and December 2010, 20,729 patients aged >70 years received a prescription for an AD medication. Despite most patients on donepezil and memantine receiving a prescription for the maximum drug dose, this dose was maintained for 2 consecutive months in only two-thirds of patients. Patients were significantly more likely to have their doses of donepezil and memantine maximised if prescribed in more recent years (2010 vs. 2007). Rates of non-persistence were 30.1 % at 6 months and 43.8 % at 12 months. Older age [75+ vs. <75 years; hazards ratio (HR) 1.16, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.06-1.27] and drug type (rivastigmine vs. donepezil; HR 1.15, 95 % CI 1.03-1.27) increased the risk of non-persistence. Non-persistence was lower for those commencing therapy in more recent years (2010 vs. 2007; HR 0.81, 95 % CI 0.73-0.89, p < 0.001) and for those on multiple anti-dementia medications (HR 0.59, 95 % CI 0.54-0.65, p < 0.001). Persistence was significantly higher when memantine was co-prescribed with donepezil (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Future studies should explore the reasons underlying non-persistence and failure to maintain dose-maximisation in patients on AD medications. There may be scope to improve the dosing and persistence with these medications in the community.

Randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 48-week study for efficacy and safety of a higher-dose rivastigmine patch (15 vs. 10 cm²) in Alzheimer's disease

AIM

Determine whether patients with Alzheimer's disease demonstrating functional and cognitive decline, following 24-48 weeks of open-label treatment with 9.5 mg/24 h (10 cm(2)) rivastigmine patch, benefit from a dose increase in a double-blind (DB) comparative trial of two patch doses.

METHODS

Patients meeting prespecified decline criteria were randomized to receive 9.5 or 13.3 mg/24 h (15 cm(2)) patch during a 48-week, DB phase. Coprimary outcomes were change from baseline to week 48 on the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living domain of the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-IADL) scale and the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale (ADAS-cog). Safety and tolerability were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 1,584 patients enrolled, 567 met decline criteria and were randomized. At all timepoints, ADCS-IADL and ADAS-cog scores favoured the 13.3 mg/24 h patch. The 13.3 mg/24 h patch was statistically superior to the 9.5 mg/24 h patch on the ADCS-IADL scale from week 16 (p = 0.025) onwards including week 48 (p = 0.002), and ADAS-cog at week 24 (p = 0.027), but not at week 48 (p = 0.227). No unexpected safety concerns were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The 13.3 mg/24 h rivastigmine patch significantly reduced deterioration in IADL, compared with the 9.5 mg/24 h patch, and was well tolerated.

Alzheimer's disease and its treatment with a novel transdermal patch therapy: survey of caregiver experiences

OBJECTIVE

To investigate experiences and perceptions of caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease using transdermal patch therapy.

METHOD

Assessment methods for the pilot study comprised an interview between the caregiver and a moderator, an interview between 1 moderator and 2 caregivers, or a video diary. The subsequent quantitative study involved a 45-minute telephone questionnaire. For both studies, participants were required to be the principal caregiver of a patient with Alzheimer's disease who had been receiving transdermal patch therapy for at least 3 months. Their responses were grouped into the following 6 themes: interpersonal relationships, impact on caregivers, from symptoms to treatment, help and support for caregivers, daily routine, and caregiver experience with the patch.

RESULTS

Overall, 206 caregivers were enrolled from France, Germany, Greece, Spain, and the United States between July 2009 and January 2011 (pilot study: N = 56; quantitative study: N = 150). The studies revealed that caregivers of patients with Alzheimer's disease experienced emotional and practical impacts, and many felt that they had not received sufficient information from health care providers about Alzheimer's disease, treatment options, or available support. In the quantitative study, 47% of caregivers who had been caring for the patient prior to diagnosis (61% of total respondents) felt that there had been a delay in seeking medical advice, frequently due to slow onset of symptoms of Alzheimer's disease. In both studies, patch therapy was considered more convenient and easier to administer than oral treatments. The practical and efficacy advantages of the patch often translated into emotional benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

With recent data highlighting the importance of early initiation of symptomatic Alzheimer's disease therapy and the importance of reaching an optimal therapeutic dose, reasons for delay in treatment initiation need to be explored. Information that patients and caregivers receive at the time of diagnosis may aid therapeutic decisions.

The economic cost of Alzheimer's disease: Family or public health burden?

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) patients suffer progressive cognitive, behavioral and functional impairment which result in a heavy burden to patients, families, and the public-health system. AD entails both direct and indirect costs. Indirect costs (such as loss or reduction of income by the patient or family members) are the most important costs in early and community-dwelling AD patients. Direct costs (such as medical treatment or social services) increase when the disorder progresses, and the patient is institutionalized or a formal caregiver is required. Drug therapies represent an increase in direct cost but can reduce some other direct or indirect costs involved. Several studies have projected overall savings to society when using drug therapies and all relevant cost are considered, where results depend on specific patient and care setting characteristics. Dementia should be the focus of analysis when public health policies are being devised. South American countries should strengthen their policy and planning capabilities by gathering more local evidence about the burden of AD and how it can be shaped by treatment options.

Implications of the Impact Survey for payors across Europe

People involved with development of health care policy must be appreciative of the social and economic challenges that will likely develop as a result of the rise in Alzheimer's disease (AD) as the 21st century progresses. Their attitudes, perceptions and understanding regarding AD were captured in the IMPACT survey, a 30-minute Web-based questionnaire. Fifty health policy managers and decision-makers (payors) were recruited, 10 each from 5 European countries--France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom. Most payors felt that AD was underdiagnosed and undertreated in their country (80% and 68%, respectively). Half of all payors felt that their government did not invest enough in treating AD, and 30% felt their government hindered access to drug therapy. Payors believed that treatment should be initiated as early as possible after a diagnosis of AD (82%), and that early treatment can delay progression of the disease (82%). Even more than caregivers, payors agreed that AD can have devastating effects on the family of the sufferer (90% vs 75%; P<0.05). Payors more often cited cancer, stroke and heart disease than AD as affecting their budgets, but cited AD more often than depression, diabetes, HIV/AIDs and arthritis. Cost savings were seen as the most important factor regarding policy decisions. These attitudes of the surveyed payors towards AD and the patients and caregivers affected by it suggest that they may advocate for national and international policies that will facilitate earlier diagnosis and improved access to treatment.

Turning principles into practice in Alzheimer's disease

The prevalence of dementia is reaching epidemic proportions globally, but there remain a number of issues that prevent people with dementia, their families and caregivers, from taking control of their condition. In 2008, Alzheimer's Disease International (ADI) launched a Global Alzheimer's Disease Charter, which comprises six principles that underscore the urgency for a more ambitious approach to diagnosis, treatment and care. This review highlights some of the most important aspects and challenges of dementia diagnosis and treatment. These issues are reviewed in light of the six principles of the recent ADI Charter: promoting dementia awareness and understanding; respecting human rights; recognizing the key role of families and caregivers; providing access to health and social care; stressing the importance of optimal diagnosis and treatment; and preventing dementia through improvements in public health. The authors continue to hope that, one day, a cure for Alzheimer's disease will be found. Meanwhile, healthcare professionals need to unite in rising to the challenge of managing all cases of dementia, using the tools available to us now to work toward improved patient care.

Effects of rivastigmine on common symptomatology of Alzheimer's disease (EXPLORE)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate, in a real-world clinical setting, the efficacy of rivastigmine in the management of six symptoms commonly associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD).

METHODS

This was a naturalistic, prospective, open-label, multi-centre, post-marketing, observational study. Data were collected by the participating study physicians at their practices across Canada. Subjects had a clinical diagnosis of mild-to-moderate AD and were prescribed rivastigmine by their treating physician. Efficacy was primarily evaluated by a physician-assessed, abbreviated Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C) scale, focusing on six symptoms: attention, apathy, anxiety, agitation, irritability and sleep disturbance. Changes were assessed at months 3, 6 and 12. Several other patient-, physician- and caregiver-related assessments were also included.

RESULTS

A total of 4460 patients were recruited by 353 study physicians; 3800 were deemed evaluable, having taken at least one dose of rivastigmine and with at least one post-baseline assessment. At baseline, attention problems were present in 86.0% of evaluable patients, anxiety in 77.3%, apathy in 68.3%, irritability in 64.0%, agitation in 54.6% and sleep disturbance in 54.5%. At both month 6 and month 12, for each symptom, the percentage of patients experiencing an improvement was considerably larger than the percentage of patients who experienced symptom worsening. Among evaluable patients, the proportions improving vs. deteriorating at month 6 were 46.4 vs. 8.8% for attention; 42.8 vs. 7.2% for apathy; 41.1 vs. 9.4% for anxiety; 33.8 vs. 7.7% for agitation; 35.1 vs. 10.1% for irritability; and 30.8 vs. 5.4% for sleep disturbance.

LIMITATIONS

Open-label studies have an inherent potential for bias by both the caregiver and the physician.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that a considerable proportion of rivastigmine-treated patients experience improvements on each of the six symptoms studied. These findings add further support to previous randomised, clinical studies showing benefit of rivastigmine in AD.

What would help me stop abusing? The family carer's perspective

BACKGROUND

A third of family members caring for people with dementia report acting abusively towards them, but there are currently no evidence-based interventions to reduce or prevent such behavior. Family carers who act abusively have not previously been consulted about what may help to reduce abuse.

METHOD

We prospectively recruited a consecutive sample of 220 family carers of people with dementia referred to secondary psychiatric services. We asked carers who reported any abusive behavior in the previous three months to select from a list of services and potential interventions those that they thought might help to reduce or prevent this abusive behavior. Carers were also asked to suggest other interventions that might help prevent abuse.

RESULTS

113/115 carers who reported any abusive behavior answered questions about possible interventions. The three most frequently endorsed interventions were: medication to help the care recipient's memory (n = 54; 48.2%); written advice on understanding memory problems and what to do (n = 48; 42.9%) and more information from professionals caring for the person with dementia (n = 45; 40.2%). When asked which interventions were most important, medication to help memory (n = 21; 18.6%), home care (n = 17; 15.0%), residential respite and sitting services (both n = 12; 10.6%) were most frequently endorsed.

CONCLUSION

To prevent abuse, family carers prioritized medication for memory, good communication from professionals, written advice on memory problems, home care, residential respite and sitting services. As no interventions to reduce abuse by family carers have yet been formally evaluated, a good starting point may be the expressed wishes of family carers.