Once-Daily Administration of Antiretrovirals

A model-based approach for the evaluation of once daily dosing of lamivudine in HIV-infected children

AIM

Little attention has been paid to the effects of compliance and prescription practice on treatment outcome in HIV-infected children. In this context, an evaluation of the role of covariates on pharmacokinetics is required to establish the impact of differences in dosing regimens. Here we investigate whether a once daily dosing regimen of lamivudine provides comparable exposure to the currently approved paediatric regimen.

METHODS

A hypothetical group of 180 patients between 3 months and 12 years old was used to evaluate the impact of body weight on systemic exposure to lamivudine. Simulation scenarios were evaluated using AUC and Cmax as parameters of interest. The analysis was performed using a population pharmacokinetic model previously implemented in nonmem v.6.2.

RESULTS

The simulations show that once daily dosing of lamivudine yields comparable exposure to historical values observed in children and adults, both for liquid and solid dosage forms. Simulated steady-state AUC(0-24 h) and Cmax values after once daily doses ranged respectively from 9.9  mg l⁻¹  h and 1.9 mg l⁻¹ for children lighter than 14 kg to 13.75 mg l⁻¹  h and 3.0 mg l⁻¹ for children heavier than 30 kg. These values are comparable or higher than historical values observed after once daily dosing in children and adults.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings illustrate how dosing regimens can be evaluated taking into account the effects of developmental growth on drug disposition. Most importantly, they suggest that the reduction in dosing frequency to once daily leads to comparable lamivudine exposure, as observed after administration of a twice daily dosing regimen.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis for HIV infection: how antiretroviral pharmacology helps to monitor and improve adherence

INTRODUCTION

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with antiretroviral drugs is a novel biomedical intervention that can prevent HIV transmission among high-risk populations. As findings from multiple PrEP studies have suggested that adherence is vital to achieve the full prevention benefits of PrEP, it is important to understand the clinical pharmacology and pharmacokinetic (PK) properties of PrEP antiretrovirals, the association of PK and PrEP efficacy, and the potential for drug concentration measurement to be used as a tool to monitor PrEP adherence.

AREAS COVERED

This review examines studies related to PrEP adherence with attention to the clinical pharmacology and PK of current and novel PrEP agents. Studies of animal models, PK, and clinical trials related to PrEP and adherence were reviewed.

EXPERT OPINION

In summary, when combined as part of a comprehensive prevention strategy that includes use of condoms and risk-reduction counseling, PrEP has tremendous promise as an adjunctive biomedical HIV prevention intervention, providing that adherence is maintained.

Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanosuspension of adefovir dipivoxil for bioavailability improvement: formulation, characterization, pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies

The present study was aimed at developing colloidal formulations like solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanosuspension (NS) for improving bioavailability of adefovir dipivoxil (AD), a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor which displays poor oral bioavailability. SLNs were prepared by solvent injection method while NS was prepared by pearl milling method. The prepared formulations were characterized for physicochemical parameters such as particle size, ζ potential, drug content, X-ray Diffraction (XRD), Differential Scanning Calorimetry (DSC). Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies were performed in mice to evaluate in vivo fate of the formulations. The SLNs showed particle size of 267 ± 18 nm and entrapment efficiency of 73.5 ± 2.12%. The particle size obtained for NS was 393 ± 13 nm against 710 ± 70 μm for bulk drug, which led to significant improvement in saturation solubility. DSC and XRD studies of NS and SLN showed reduction in crystallinity while in vitro studies showed improved dissolution rate in both cases. Pharmacokinetics studies of orally administered formulations in mice exhibited higher plasma concentration compared to plain drug. Biodistribution studies showed higher accumulation of drug in liver, kidneys, intestine and stomach. The higher concentration of AD in liver after 24 hr highlights its potential advantage for effective treatment of chronic hepatitis infection. The relative bioavailability for adefovir NS and SLN were 52.46% and 78.23% respectively compared to 34.34% bioavailability obtained after administration of adefovir micro suspension (AMS), indicating suitability of both nanoparticulate formulations for improving bioavailability. SLNs were found to performed better as compared to NS for improving the bioavailability of AD.

[Longitudinal study on adherence, treatment satisfaction, and effectiveness of once-daily versus twice-daily antiretroviral therapy in a Spanish cohort of HIV-infected patients (CUVA study)]

INTRODUCTION

Adherence is essential for successful antiretroviral therapy (ART), but complex dosing schedules compromise the adherence to and efficacy of this treatment. Once-daily (QD) ART simplifies treatment by lowering the dosing frequency and pill burden. The aim of this study, performed when QD regimens were still limited, was to determine the degree of adherence and patient satisfaction of QD dosing versus twice-daily dosing (BID) of ART.

METHODS

Non-interventional, multicenter, longitudinal study, including initial (I), simplification (S), and rescue (R) therapies. Medical visits were performed at baseline, and at 3 and 6 months. A validated, structured questionnaire was used to assess adherence, and a visual analogical scale applied by independent observers was used to assess satisfaction.

RESULTS

From May to December 2002, 978 patients were recruited. Average pill burden was 5 in QD vs. 6.1 in BID regimens. Undetectable viral load was achieved at 6 months in 83.7% (I), 87.5% (S), and 57.4% (R) of patients, with no significant differences between QD and BID. Adherence and satisfaction with ART were both significantly better in QD vs. BID regimens: 61.4% vs. 53.2% (P < .05) and 54.4% vs. 41.2% (P < .05), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed the following variables to account for 1) Adherence to ART (OR; 95% CI): treatment satisfaction (1.53, 1.30-1.80), family support (1.25, 0.98-1.61), years of HIV infection (0.97, 0.94-1.003) and intravenous drug use (0.83, 0.70-0.99); 2) Satisfaction with ART: simplification group (1.70, 1.22-2.34), QD therapy (1.33, 1.13-1.56), years of HIV infection (0.95, 0.93-0.98), and CDC stage C (0.85, 0.73-1.01); and 3) Undetectable viral load: naive group (5.08, 3.14-8.22) and adherence (1.57, 1.13-2.17).

CONCLUSION

QD antiretroviral schedules appear to be as effective as BID regimens, with better adherence and treatment satisfaction. This may positively affect treatment efficacy at long-term.

Pharmacokinetic properties of nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors

Options for antiretroviral therapy in patients infected with HIV continue to expand as new drugs are integrated into treatment regimens. Nonetheless, nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs/NtRTIs) remain the backbone of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). With the approval of emtricitabine in 2003, there are now 8 Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved NRTIs/NtRTIs. Several of these agents are effective as once-daily therapy, including didanosine, lamivudine, extended-release stavudine (FDA approved, but not currently available), tenofovir DF, and emtricitabine. Recent results from pharmacokinetic and clinical trials indicate that another NRTI, abacavir, may also be effective as a once-daily therapy, and FDA approval of once-daily dosing is anticipated. NRTIs are inactive as administered, requiring anabolic phosphorylation within target cells to achieve their antiretroviral effects. All NRTIs are converted to nucleoside triphosphates, which serve as the active metabolites (the NtRTI, tenofovir DF, only requires conversion to the diphosphate form). Frequency of drug administration is closely related to the pharmacokinetic properties of a drug. The key parameter is the half-life; however, the plasma elimination half-life of the NRTIs/NtRTIs as administered is of little use in developing a dosing schedule. Rather, the intracellular half-life of the nucleoside triphosphate is the relevant parameter. This article reviews the pharmacokinetic properties, particularly those of the various phosphorylation steps, of the NRTIs/NtRTIs.

Once-daily antiretroviral therapy: Spanish Consensus Statement

BACKGROUND

Administration of antiretroviral therapy (ART) once daily is creating extraordinary interest among the members of the scientific community and also among those who receive the therapy. However, in clinical practice, some doubts remain about its use.

OBJECTIVES

This document examines the characteristics and possibilities of treatment administered once daily.

METHODS

Consensus of 248 Spanish experts in the field.

RESULTS

Once-daily dosing is considered an added value which could favour adherence and, therefore, efficacy, as well as the quality of life of certain patients, however, the objective of adequate adherence in the long term is often difficult to achieve regardless of the treatment used. In theory, any patient can receive once-daily therapy, although some patients could particularly benefit from it, e.g. those with unfavourable social or personal circumstances, including drug users, patients whose treatment must be supervised, patients receiving multiple medications, or those who need rescue therapy after multiple treatment failures. At present, it is possible to design once-daily ART using some of the combinations of drugs considered as first-choice in national and international recommendations for antiretroviral therapy, but the options are still limited. The marketing of new drugs with this characteristic could allow us to increase the number and types of patient who can benefit from once-daily regimens, including those patients who need rescue therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-daily ART is a good alternative to regimens administered several times each day when a potent combination of active drugs is available.

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily Combination Therapy with Didanosine, Lamivudine and Nevirapine in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-Infected Patients

Background

Simplified antiretroviral regimens are needed to improve patient adherence and quality of life. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a once-daily regimen consisting of didanosine (ddI), lamivudine (3TC) and nevirapine (NVP) for adult antiretroviral-naive patients with HIV-1 infection.

Methods

This was a prospective, one-arm, multicentre pilot study. Daily drug dosage was 250 or 400 mg didanosine, 300 mg lamivudine and 400 mg nevirapine. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of patients with a plasma HIV-RNA level <50 copies/ml at 12 months on an intention-to-treat (ITT) basis.

Results

Seventy patients were enrolled in the study. At baseline, mean plasma HIV-1 RNA was 5.10 log10 copies/ml, and mean CD4 cell count was 262 cells/μl. At month 12, 67% (95% CI: 56–78) of patients maintained a viral load of <50 copies/ml in the ITT analysis and CD4 counts increased a median of 201 cells/μl. The treatment was more effective in patients with baseline CD4 counts >100 cells/μl than in those with a poorer immunological status at baseline, although the number of patients with CD4 counts <100 was low. Four patients died during the study period. Therapy was discontinued in 18 patients due to virological failure in 11, adverse events in seven, loss to follow-up or withdrawal of consent in four and death in one. Eight out of nine patients with available genotype after virological failure showed resistance mutations to NVP (Y181C and others) and 3TC (M184V/I), and four of them also had ddI resistance (L74V). The lipid profile was favourable, with a decrease in the ratio of total-to-high density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Conclusion

A once-daily combination of ddI, 3TC and NVP seems to be an effective, safe and easy-to-take regimen in antiretroviral-naive patients, at least in those who do not have severe immunodepression at baseline.

Actual medication pill burden and dosing frequency in HIV-infected patients with undetectable viral loads

Studies have shown equivalent or improved outcomes with once-daily antiretroviral (ARV) regimens, but have failed to quantify the true daily dosing frequency and pill burden of HIV-infected patients, by not considering concomitant medications. This study was conducted to describe the total daily number (pill burden) and dosing frequency for all oral medicines, and not just ARV medications in HIV-infected patients with undetectable viral loads. A retrospective chart review of patients with undetectable viral loads in an HIV primary care clinic identified dosing frequency and pill burden for all prescribed medications. These patients were divided into those with concomitant medications (WITH) and those only on ARV medications (WITHOUT). One hundred and seventeen patients qualified for the evaluation. Ninety-three were in the WITH group and 24 were in the WITHOUT group. WITH patients were older (p < 0.05), and had advanced US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)-defined HIV disease stage (p< 0.05), a longer duration of HIV infection (p= 0.03), and a longer duration of AIDS (p= 0.02). WITH patients had a significantly greater total pill burden (p<0.01) and dosing frequency (p<0.001) when considering all medications. Assessing only ARV medications, a significant difference existed only in pill burden (mean +/- SD) (WITH = 9.91 +/- 2.1 versus WITHOUT = 6.6 +/- 1; p < 0.01), and no difference existed in ARV dosing frequency of 2.09 +/- 1.9 and 1.83 +/- 1.7, respectively (p = 0.07). Higher dosing frequencies and pill burdens were present in patients with co-morbid conditions. All patients were on more than once-daily therapies. Dosing requirements for non-ARV medications should also be considered when optimizing or simplifying ARV regimens.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Summary of Efficacy and Tolerability of Atazanavir

The efficacy of HIV-1 protease inhibitors (PIs) as part of highly active antiretroviral therapy is now well established and has provided benefits to many patients with HIV infection. Atazanavir is a new azapeptide PI compound that was recently approved in the US and Europe. Atazanavir is recommended in combination with other antiretroviral agents for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. Atazanavir is rapidly absorbed and administration of a single dose of atazanavir with a light meal resulted in a 70% increase in area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC); therefore atazanavir should be taken with food. Atazanavir is 86% bound to human serum protein independently of concentration. Concentration in body fluids appeared to be lower than plasma concentration. Like other PIs, atazanavir is extensively metabolised by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A isoenzymes. The mean terminal elimination half-life in healthy volunteers was approximately 7 hours at steady state following administration of atazanavir 400 mg daily with a light meal. When atazanavir 300 mg was coadministered with ritonavir 100 mg on a once-daily dosage regimen, atazanavir AUC from 0 to 24 hours and minimum plasma concentration were increased by 3- to 4-fold and approximately 10-fold, respectively, compared with atazanavir 300 mg alone. Therefore, ritonavir boosted atazanavir regimen (ritonavir 100 mg and atazanavir 300 mg once daily) is increasingly favoured in some patients. Efavirenz, a potent CYP3A inducer, decreased atazanavir concentrations by 75% and, unexpectedly, tenofovir, a nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor, decreased atazanavir concentrations by 25%. Average predose concentrations in HIV-infected patients who received atazanavir 400mg once daily were 273 ng/mL, which was believed to be several-fold higher than protein-binding corrected 50% inhibitory concentration of wild-type viruses. In HIV-infected patients who received once-daily ritonavir (100mg) boosted atazanavir (300 mg), mean (+/-SD) trough concentration was 862 (+/-838) ng/mL. Several clinical trials showed the efficacy of atazanavir 400 mg once daily with a nucleoside analogue backbone in antiretroviral-naive patients. The atazanavir 300/ritonavir 100 mg once-daily combination coadministered with other antiretrovirals showed the efficacy of this strategy in patients receiving efavirenz or in moderately antiretroviral-experienced HIV-infected patients. Recommended once-daily doses of atazanavir taken with food are either 400 mg or 300 mg in combination with low dose ritonavir (100 mg) in moderately antiretroviral-experienced patients. Major advantages of atazanavir to date are its simplicity of administration (once-daily administration) and its less undesirable effect on the lipid profiles in patients.

Pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine, didanosine and efavirenz administered once-daily for the treatment of HIV-infected adults (pharmacokinetic substudy of the ANRS 091 trial)

OBJECTIVE

This study was conducted to investigate the pharmacokinetics of emtricitabine (FTC), didanosine (ddI), and efavirenz (EFV) when administered in a once-daily combination.

METHODS

Nine antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected adults who received FTC [200 mg once a day (q.d.)], ddI (400 mg q.d. if > or =60 kg; 250 mg q.d. if <60 kg) and EFV (600 mg q.d.) were studied. The following pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters were determined over 24 h at steady-state after 4 weeks of treatment: area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve (AUC(0-24 h)), maximum (Cmax) and minimum (Cmin) plasma concentrations, time to reach Cmax (Tmax), and the elimination half-life (t(1/2)). EFV plasma concentrations were also measured during follow-up.

RESULTS

Median PK parameters for FTC, ddI and EFV, respectively, were as follows. AUC(0-24 h): 7.2, 7.0 and 36.4 h x mg/L; Cmax: 1.8, 2.6 and 2.5 mg/L; Cmin: 0.04, <0.01 and 1.0 mg/L; Tmax: 1.8, 1.1 and 2.5 h; t(1/2): 7.4, 2.3, and 23.7 h. EFV plasma concentrations measured 10-13 h postdosing were higher during follow-up than during the PK study (2.57 vs. 1.19 mg/L, P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The simultaneous administration of FTC, ddI and EFV did not affect the PK parameters of FTC when compared to historical controls. EFV Cmax and Cmin were lower than expected, but the data may have been slightly underestimated in this study. High ddI AUC and Cmax were measured in these patients, and further studies are warranted to confirm this finding.