Studies with temocillin in the hamster model of antibiotic-associated colitis

Budget impact analysis of temocillin insurance coverage for urinary tract infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens in Iran

BACKGROUND

One of the most prevalent infections with a significant disease burden is urinary tract infections (UTIs), which occurs in approximately 50% of women at least once in their lifetime. Antimicrobial resistance to pathogens causing UTIs is expanding worldwide and has been associated with increased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, including carbapenems, leading to significant costs for insurance and healthcare systems. The emergence of resistance to carbapenems has led to an increasing need for and interest in carbapenem-sparing strategies, including the use of narrow-spectrum antibiotics, such as temocillin. Temocillin has a strong bactericidal effect, along with high tolerability and a good safety profile. It is also stable toward most extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL). The purpose of our study was to design a budget impact analysis (BIA) model and estimate the budget impact of temocillin insurance coverage for the treatment of UTIs caused by ESBL-producing bacteria from the perspective of the payer.

METHODS

The BIA model with insurance payer perspective was used to estimate the impact of temocillin insurance coverage on the treatment of UTIs caused by ESBL-producing bacteria over a 1-year time horizon in Iran. Direct medicine costs, hospitalization and paraclinical costs, and side effect costs were considered in this model. To assess the impact of uncertainty on the model inputs, 1-way sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The model demonstrates that inclusion of temocillin in insurance coverage, decreasing treatment costs from $36 million to $34 million, will result in overall savings of > $1.9 million and lead to > $9 million savings in insurance costs for antimicrobial resistance.

CONCLUSION

The inclusion of temocillin in the insurance coverage in Iran for patients developing UTIs caused by ESBL-producing bacteria would be cost-saving for insurance and decrease the risk associated with emerging antimicrobial resistance.

The clinical and microbiological efficacy of temocillin versus cefotaxime in adults with febrile urinary tract infection, and its effects on the intestinal microbiota: a randomised multicentre clinical trial in Sweden

BACKGROUND

Use of third-generation cephalosporins, such as cefotaxime, is associated with an increased risk of selection for antimicrobial resistance, so alternative antibiotics need to be considered. The aim of the present study was to evaluate intestinal colonisation with third-generation cephalosporin-resistant pathogens following use of temocillin-an alternative antibiotic to cefotaxime that is potentially less prone to disturbing the intestinal microbiota-in empirical treatment of febrile urinary tract infection (UTI).

METHODS

We did a randomised, multicentre, superiority, open-label phase 4 trial in patients who had been admitted to inpatient care in 12 Swedish hospitals with suspected or diagnosed febrile UTI (complicated or uncomplicated). To meet inclusion criteria, a patient was required to have at least one sign or symptom of pyelonephritis (ie, flank pain; costovertebral angle tenderness; and changes to urinary frequency or urgency or dysuria), a fever of 38·0°C or higher, and a positive urine dipstick (for nitrites, white blood cells, or both). Participants were also required to have an indication for intravenous antibiotic treatment. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 2 g temocillin or 1-2 g cefotaxime, by local investigators opening consecutive sealed randomisation envelopes that were generated centrally in advance. Both drugs were administered intravenously every 8 h. The trial was open label for investigators and patients, but those doing the microbiological analyses were masked to the groups. Participants were treated with antibiotics for 7-10 days (or up to 14 days if they had bacteraemia), at least 3 days of which were on the study drug; at day 4 and later, participants who were showing improvement could be given an oral antibiotic (ciprofloxacin, ceftibuten, cefixime, or co-trimoxazole). Patients not showing improvement were regarded as having treatment failures. Rectal swabs were collected at three timepoints: at baseline (before the first dose), after the last dose of study drug, and 7-10 days after treatment stopped. The composite primary outcome was colonisation with Enterobacterales with reduced susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins, or colonisation with toxin-producing Clostridioides difficile, or both, to evaluate disturbance of the intestinal microbiota. The study is registered in the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2015-003898-15).

FINDINGS

Between May 20, 2016, and July 31, 2019, 207 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 55 patients were excluded. 152 participants were randomly assigned to groups: 77 (51%) patients received temocillin, 75 (49%) patients received cefotaxime. The composite primary endpoint was met by 18 (26%) of 68 participants receiving temocillin versus 30 (48%) of 62 patients receiving cefotaxime (risk difference -22% [95% CI -42% to -3%]), showing superiority of temocillin versus cefotaxime (ie, less disturbance of the intestinal microbiota). 43 adverse events were reported in 40 (52%) of 77 patients in the temocillin group, versus 46 adverse events in 34 (45%) of 75 patients in the cefotaxime group. Most events were of mild to moderate severity. 21 (27%) patients in the temocillin and 17 (23%) patients in the cefotaxime group had an adverse event that was considered to be associated with the study drug.

INTERPRETATION

Temocillin was found to be less selective than cefotaxime of Enterobacterales with reduced susceptibility to third-generation cephalosporins, and it could therefore be a favourable alternative in the empirical treatment of febrile UTI. Use of this antibiotic could reduce hospital transmission and health-care-associated infections by these pathogens.

FUNDING

Public Health Agency of Sweden.