Antihypertensive duration of action of cilazapril in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension

Blood pressure lowering efficacy of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors for primary hypertension

BACKGROUND

ACE inhibitors are widely prescribed for hypertension so it is essential to determine and compare their effects on blood pressure (BP), heart rate and withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAE).

OBJECTIVES

To quantify the dose-related systolic and/or diastolic BP lowering efficacy of ACE inhibitors versus placebo in the treatment of primary hypertension.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2007, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1966 to February 2007), EMBASE (1988 to February 2007) and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Double-blind, randomized, controlled trials evaluating the BP lowering efficacy of fixed-dose monotherapy with an ACE inhibitor compared with placebo for a duration of 3 to 12 weeks in patients with primary hypertension.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed the risk of bias and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. WDAE information was collected from the trials.

MAIN RESULTS

Ninety two trials evaluated the dose-related trough BP lowering efficacy of 14 different ACE inhibitors in 12 954 participants with a baseline BP of 157/101 mm Hg. The data do not suggest that any one ACE inhibitor is better or worse at lowering BP. A dose of 1/8 or 1/4 of the manufacturer's maximum recommended daily dose (Max) achieved a BP lowering effect that was 60 to 70% of the BP lowering effect of Max. A dose of 1/2 Max achieved a BP lowering effect that was 90% of Max. ACE inhibitor doses above Max did not significantly lower BP more than Max. Combining the effects of 1/2 Max and higher doses gives an estimate of the average trough BP lowering efficacy for ACE inhibitors as a class of drugs of -8 mm Hg for SBP and -5 mm Hg for DBP. ACE inhibitors reduced BP measured 1 to 12 hours after the dose by about 11/6 mm Hg.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no clinically meaningful BP lowering differences between different ACE inhibitors. The BP lowering effect of ACE inhibitors is modest; the magnitude of trough BP lowering at one-half the manufacturers' maximum recommended dose and above is -8/-5 mm Hg. Furthermore, 60 to 70% of this trough BP lowering effect occurs with recommended starting doses. The review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with ACE inhibitors because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in many of the trials.

Effects of cilazapril on vascular structure and function in essential hypertension

Hypertension is associated with an altered design of resistance vessels and decreased endothelium-dependent vasodilator response to acetylcholine. A role of angiotensin II in both defects is suggested by animal experiments in which angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition reverted structural and functional changes. We investigated the effects of 20 weeks of therapy with the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril (5 mg twice daily) on the endothelium-dependent response to brachial artery infusions of acetylcholine and the endothelium-independent vascular relaxation after sodium nitroprusside in 22 subjects with mild to moderate essential hypertension. In addition, we measured minimal forearm vascular resistance (ratio of mean arterial pressure and forearm blood flow after heating, ischemia, and ischemic exercise) as an indirect estimate of vascular structure. Cilazapril decreased blood pressure (151 +/- 14/99 +/- 7 mm Hg during placebo to 138 +/- 17/89 +/- 8 mm Hg after cilazapril treatment, P<.01) and baseline (42.2 +/- 12.6 to 37.1 +/- 10.6 U, P<.05) and minimal (3.0 +/- 1.1 to 2.4 +/- 0.7 U, 15.9 +/- 20.2%; P<.05) forearm vascular resistances. The change in minimal forearm vascular resistance was unrelated to age, duration of hypertension, or changes in blood pressure. Sodium nitroprusside increased forearm blood flow from 2.6 +/- 1.0 to 11.4 +/- 5.9 mL/min per 100 mL and acetylcholine to 21.5 +/- 17.8. Both responses did not change after cilazapril. The data provide indirect evidence that cilazapril therapy may improve vascular structure in human hypertension. The lack of relationship between vascular and blood pressure changes would be compatible with experimental evidence supporting a role for angiotensin II in the development and regression of vascular changes, but this needs further study. Therapy with cilazapril for 20 weeks, like other antihypertensive therapy, does not seem to influence endothelial vasodilator function in humans to a significant degree.

Effects of cilazapril on renal haemodynamics and function in hypertensive patients: a randomised controlled study versus hydrochlorothiazide

In this study the efficacy and safety of short-term cilazapril administration on renal haemodynamics were evaluated in mild to moderate hypertensive subjects. Our final goal was to evaluate whether the reduction in blood pressure achieved by treatment was associated with maintained renal function. After a run-in period with placebo, 40 hypertensive subjects without renal or cardiac diseases were randomly allocated to a double-blind 4 week controlled trial with cilazapril 5 mg once a day (20 patients) or hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg once a day (20 patients). Renal haemodynamics measurements included effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by radionuclide study using 131I-hippuran and 99mTc, according to the methods described by Schlegel and Gates, respectively. Effective renal blood flow [ERBF = ERPF/(1-Ht)], filtration fraction (FF = GFR/ERPF) and renal vascular resistance (RVR = MBP x 80/ERBF) were calculated. At the end of cilazapril and hydrochlorothiazide administration significant decreases (p < 0.001) in SBP, DBP and MBP vs baseline values were observed. In the cilazapril group a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in RVR and FF and a significant increase (p < 0.001) in ERPF and ERBF were also found. In the hydrochlorothiazide group a significant decrease (p < 0.001) in RVR was found. No important side effects were observed with either treatment. In conclusion our data indicate that both cilazapril and hydrochlorothiazide reduced blood pressure equally well but only cilazapril improved renal blood flow and reduced filtration fraction.