Felodipine. A review of the pharmacology and therapeutic use of the extended release formulation in cardiovascular disorders

Felodipine enhances aminoglycosides efficacy against implant infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, persisters and biofilms

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), biofilms, and persisters are three major factors leading to recurrent and recalcitrant implant infections. Although antibiotics are still the primary treatment for chronic implant infections in clinical, only few drugs are effective in clearing persisters and formed biofilms. Here, felodipine, a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, was reported for the first time to have antibacterial effects against MRSA, biofilm, and persisters. Even after continuous exposure to sub-lethal concentrations of felodipine, bacteria are less likely to develop resistance. Besides, low doses of felodipine enhances the antibacterial activity of gentamicin by inhibiting the expression of protein associated with aminoglycoside resistance (aacA-aphD). Next, biofilm eradication test and persisters killing assay suggested felodipine has an excellent bactericidal effect against formed biofilms and persisters. Furthermore, the result of protein profiling, and quantitative metabonomics analysis indicated felodipine reduce MRSA virulence (agrABC), biofilm formation and TCA cycle. Then, molecular docking showed felodipine inhibit the growth of persisters by binding to the H pocket of ClpP protease, which could lead to substantial protein degradation. Furthermore, murine infection models suggested felodipine in combination with gentamicin alleviate bacterial burden and inflammatory response. In conclusion, low dose of felodipine might be a promising agent for biomaterial delivery to enhance aminoglycosides efficacy against implant infections caused by MRSA, biofilm, and persisters.

•

Felodipine inhibits MRSA gene expression associated with aminoglycoside resistance and biofilm formation.

•

Felodipine eradicates formed biofilm and persisters on the surface of implants.

•

Felodipine induces proteolysis of MRSA and decreases energy metabolism.

•

Felodipine in combination with gentamicin alleviates murine periprosthetic joint infection.

Lipid-Polymer Hybrid Nanocarriers for Oral Delivery of Felodipine: Formulation, Characterization and Ex Vivo Evaluation

Purpose: Felodipine, is a calcium-channel antagonist used for hypertension and angina pectoris. It is practically insoluble in aqueous media and shows low oral bioavailability (15%-20%). This investigation aims to prepare and characterize oral felodipine lipid-polymer hybrid nanocarriers (LPHNs) to increase solubility and control delivery for increasing bioavailability and enhance patient compliance. Methods: The newly microwave-based method was prepared with felodipine LPHNs (H1-H35) successfully. The (H1-H35) were subjected to thermodynamic stability experiments. After that, select nine felodipine LPHNs (F1-F9) that have smart physical stability for further optimization of different characterization processes. Results: The felodipine LPHNs (F4) are considered the most optimized formula. It was characterized by lower particle size (33.3 nm), lower PDI (0.314), high zeta potential (13.6 mV), entrapment efficiency is (81.645% w/w), drug loading is (16.329% w/w), the pH value is 4, excellent percent of light transmittance (95.5%), pseudoplastic rheogram, significantly high (P < 0.05) dissolution rate with sustained drug delivery and success ex-vivo intestinal permeation attributes. The (F4) subject for further investigations of Fourier transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The results of FTIR, AFM, and TEM indicate there is no interaction between the felodipine and excipients and that the particulate system in the nanoscale dispersion system confirms the high stability. Conclusion: The optimized felodipine LPHNs (F1-F9) formulations were smart formulations for sustained oral delivery of felodipine and that F4 was the most optimized formula according to its characterization processes.

A genome resource for green millet Setaria viridis enables discovery of agronomically valuable loci

Wild and weedy relatives of domesticated crops harbor genetic variants that can advance agricultural biotechnology. Here we provide a genome resource for the wild plant green millet (Setaria viridis), a model species for studies of C4 grasses, and use the resource to probe domestication genes in the close crop relative foxtail millet (Setaria italica). We produced a platinum-quality genome assembly of S. viridis and de novo assemblies for 598 wild accessions and exploited these assemblies to identify loci underlying three traits: response to climate, a 'loss of shattering' trait that permits mechanical harvest and leaf angle, a predictor of yield in many grass crops. With CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, we validated Less Shattering1 (SvLes1) as a gene whose product controls seed shattering. In S. italica, this gene was rendered nonfunctional by a retrotransposon insertion in the domesticated loss-of-shattering allele SiLes1-TE (transposable element). This resource will enhance the utility of S. viridis for dissection of complex traits and biotechnological improvement of panicoid crops.

How to Improve Effectiveness and Adherence to Antihypertensive Drug Therapy: Central Role of Dihydropyridinic Calcium Channel Blockers in Hypertension

Essential hypertension is a complex clinical condition, characterized by multiple and concomitant abnormal activation of different regulatory and contra-regulatory pathophysiological mechanisms, leading to sustained increase of blood pressure (BP) levels. Asymptomatic rise of BP may, indeed, promote development and progression of hypertension-related organ damage, which in turn, increases the risk of major cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events. A progressive and independent relationship has been demonstrated between high BP levels and increased cardiovascular risk, even in the high-to-normal range. Conversely, evidence from randomized controlled clinical trials have independently shown that lowering BP to the recommended targets reduces individual cardiovascular risk, thus improving event-free survival and reducing the incidence of hypertension-related cardiovascular events. Despite these benefits, overall rates of BP control remain poor, worldwide. Currently available guidelines support a substantial equivalence amongst various antihypertensive drug classes. However, several studies have also reported clinically relevant differences among antihypertensive drugs, in terms of both BP lowering efficacy and tolerability/safety profile. These differences should be taken into account not only when adopting first-line antihypertensive therapy, but also when titrating or modulating combination therapies, with the aim of achieving effective and sustained BP control. This review will briefly describe evidence supporting the use of dihydropyridinic calcium channel blockers for the clinical management of hypertension, with a particular focus on barnidipine. Indeed, this drug has been demonstrated to be effective, safe and well tolerated in lowering BP levels and in reducing hypertension-related organ damage, thus showing a potential key role for improving the clinical management of hypertension.

Tri-block co-polymer nanocarriers for enhancement of oral delivery of felodipine: preparation, in vitro characterization and ex vivo permeation

This study aimed to prepare, optimize and characterize novel felodipine-loaded polymeric nanomicelles, using a pluronic mixture of F127 and P123. Thin-film hydration method was adopted for the preparation of different polymeric nanomicelles (T1-T12) according to a 4¹.3¹ full factorial design. Factors studied were: Pluronic®:drug ratio (P:D ratio) (10, 20, 30 and 40 w/w) and percent of hydrophilic polymer (F127%) (33.33%, 50% and 66.67% w/w). Optimization criteria were to maximize transmittance percent (T%) and entrapment efficiency percent (EE%) and to minimize particle size (PS) and polydispersity index (PDI). The optimized formulation was further characterized by DSC, FTIR and ¹H NMR studies. It was also subjected to stability testing and ex vivo permeation using rabbit intestines. Spherical nanomicelles of particle size ranging from 26.18 to 87.54 nm were successfully obtained. The optimized formulation was found to be the already prepared formulation T12 (P:D ratio of 40 and 66.67% F127) with suitable T% and EE% of 95.12% and 91.75%, respectively. DSC, FTIR and ¹H NMR studies revealed felodipine (FLD) incorporation within T12 nanomicelles. T12 enhanced the ex vivo intestinal permeation of FLD when compared to a drug suspension and showed good stability. Therefore, pluronic nanomicelles could be promising for improved oral delivery of FLD.

Differential effects of enalapril-felodipine versus enalapril-lercanidipine combination drug treatment on sympathetic nerve traffic and metabolic profile in obesity-related hypertension

Scanty information is available on the effects of combination drug treatment based on an ACE inhibitor and a calcium channel blocker on the neurometabolic alterations characterizing obesity-related hypertension (OHT). After 2-week run-in with enalapril (20 mg), 36 OHTs were randomized according to a double-blind crossover design to a combination therapy with either lercanidipine 10 mg (L) or felodipine extended release 5 mg (F), each lasting 8 weeks. Measurements included clinic and ambulatory blood pressure (BP) and heart rate, homeostasis model assessment index, plasma norepinephrine, and muscle sympathetic nerve activity. Patients with uncontrolled BP were then uptitrated to 20 mg/d (L) and 10 mg/d (F) combined with enalapril 20 mg, respectively, for further 8 weeks. For similar BP reductions, enalapril-lercanidipine (EL) caused norepinephrine and MSNA increases significantly less pronounced than those seen with enalapril-felodipine, the lesser sympathoexcitation observed with EL being coupled with a significant improvement in homeostasis model assessment index. This was the case also when L and F were uptitrated in the combination. In OHT, at variance from enalapril-felodipine, EL combination is almost entirely devoid of any major sympathoexcitatory effect and is associated with an improvement in insulin sensitivity.

Calcium channel blockers and hypertension

Effective treatment of high blood pressure (BP) represents a key strategy for reducing the burden of hypertension-related cardiovascular and renal diseases. In spite of these well-established concepts, hypertension remains poorly controlled worldwide. In order to improve BP control in patients with hypertension, several interventions have been proposed, among which (1) preferred use of more effective, sustained, and well-tolerated antihypertensive drug aimed to ensure adherence to prescribed medications and (2) extensive use of rational, integrated, and synergistic combination therapies, even as first-line strategy, aimed to achieve the recommended BP targets. Within the possible antihypertensive drug classes currently available for the clinical management of hypertension, both in monotherapy and in combination therapy, drugs inhibiting the renin-angiotensin system and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have demonstrated to be effective and safe in lowering BP levels and achieving the recommended BP targets with a good tolerability profile. In particular, CCBs have been one of the most widely used classes of antihypertensive agents in the last 20 years, based on their effectiveness in reducing BP levels, good tolerability, and abundant evidence on reducing cardiovascular and renal consequences of hypertension. This article provides an updated overview of the evidence supporting the use of CCBs-based antihypertensive regimen, both in monotherapy and in combination therapies with different classes of antihypertensive drugs.

Improvement in antihypertensive and antianginal effects of felodipine by enhanced absorption from PLGA nanoparticles optimized by factorial design

Objective of the present investigation was to enhance the bioavailability of felodipine by targeting the M cells of Peyer's patches using PLGA nanoparticles (NPs). Felodipine exhibits poor bioavailability due to limited aqueous solubility and extensive first pass metabolism. NPs were prepared using nanoprecipitation and optimized by 3(2) factorial design. Particle size (PS) and entrapment efficiency (% EE) were dependent on Drug/PLGA ratio (X1) and Pluronic F-68 (X2) concentration. % EE, PS and Zeta potential for optimized batch were 91.56±3.21%, 161.3±2.23 nm and -25.7±2.52 mV respectively. DSC, XRD and FTIR studies confirmed compatibility of PLGA and drug. TEM image confirmed the spherical shape. The in vitro and ex vivo studies using rat stomach and intestinal segment confirmed sustained release from NPs. Pharmacodynamic studies in rats showed control of blood pressure and ECG changes for extended duration. Hence, NPs can be a suitable alternative to the current available therapy in hypertension and angina by enhancing the bioavailability.

Excretion and ecotoxicity of pharmaceutical and personal care products in the environment

The presence and fate of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) in the environment is undergoing increasing scrutiny. The existing clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics data for 81 common compounds were examined for cues of ecotoxicity. Of these the proportions excreted were available for 60 compounds (i.e., 74%). The compounds had a low (< or =0.5%), a moderately low (6-39%), a relatively high (40-69%), or a high (> or =70%) proportion of the parent compound excreted. More than half of the compounds evaluated have low or moderately low proportions of the parent compound excreted. However, the proportions excreted were negatively but moderately correlated (r = -0.50; n = 13; P = 0.08) with the concentrations of the compounds in the aquatic environment, suggesting that the compounds that have low proportions excreted may also have inherently low degradability in the environment. Solubility, logK(ow), and pKa work well in predicting the behavior of PPCPs under clinical conditions and have been used in the environmental assessment of PPCPs prior to approval. However, these parameters did not correlate with the proportion of PPCPs excreted in the environment or their concentration in the environment, underscoring the need for research into the behavior of PPCPs in the environment. PPCPs occur in low concentrations in the environment and are unlikely to elicit acute toxicity. An ecotoxicity potential that is based on chronic toxicity, bioavailability, and duration of exposure to nontarget organisms is described as a guide in assessing the potency of these compounds in the environment.

Blood-pressure control for renoprotection in patients with non-diabetic chronic renal disease (REIN-2): multicentre, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

In chronic nephropathies, inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) is renoprotective, but can further renoprotection be achieved by reduction of blood pressure to lower than usual targets? We aimed to assess the effect of intensified versus conventional blood-pressure control on progression to end-stage renal disease.

METHODS

We undertook a multicentre, randomised controlled trial of patients with non-diabetic proteinuric nephropathies receiving background treatment with the ACE inhibitor ramipril (2.5-5 mg/day). We randomly assigned participants either conventional (diastolic <90 mm Hg; n=169) or intensified (systolic/diastolic <130/80 mm Hg; n=169) blood-pressure control. To achieve the intensified blood-pressure level, patients received add-on therapy with the dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker felodipine (5-10 mg/day). The primary outcome measure was time to end-stage renal disease over 36 months' follow-up, and analysis was by intention to treat.

FINDINGS

Of 338 patients who were randomised, three (two assigned intensified and one allocated conventional blood-pressure control) never took study drugs and they were excluded. Over a median follow-up of 19 months (IQR 12-35), 38/167 (23%) patients assigned to intensified blood-pressure control and 34/168 (20%) allocated conventional control progressed to end-stage renal disease (hazard ratio 1.00 [95% CI 0.61-1.64]; p=0.99).

INTERPRETATION

In patients with non-diabetic proteinuric nephropathies receiving background ACE-inhibitor therapy, no additional benefit from further blood-pressure reduction by felodipine could be shown.

Ramipril/Felodipine Extended-Release Fixed-Dose Combination

Ramipril/felodipine extended release (ER) [Triapin and Triapin Mite, Unimax] is a once-daily fixed-dose combination of the ACE inhibitor ramipril and the ER formulation of the dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist felodipine. It is indicated in adult patients with essential hypertension whose blood pressure (BP) is inadequately controlled with ramipril or felodipine monotherapy. In this patient population, commercially available fixed-dose combinations (i.e. 2.5 mg/2.5 mg and 5 mg/5 mg) of ramipril and felodipine ER are more effective at controlling hypertension than the individual components used as monotherapy at the same dosages. Likewise, the 5 mg/5 mg combination is as effective as felodipine ER 10 mg, and more effective than ramipril 10 mg administered as monotherapy. The addition of low-dose ramipril plus felodipine ER (fixed-dose or combination of individual components) to the existing antihypertensive regimen also appears to provide adequate BP control and renal protection in hypertensive patients with non-diabetic chronic renal disease. In these patients, the low-dose combination of ramipril and felodipine ER was as effective as standard-dose felodipine ER, but more effective than standard-dose ramipril, in providing diastolic BP (DBP) control, and as effective as standard-dose ramipril, but more effective than standard-dose felodipine ER, in slowing the rate of regression of glomerular filtration. The ramipril/felodipine ER combination is as well tolerated as ramipril or felodipine ER monotherapy administered at the same dosages, and is better tolerated than felodipine ER monotherapy given at twice the dosage used in the combination. Overall, ramipril/felodipine ER appears to be an effective option for the treatment of adults with essential hypertension that is poorly controlled with monotherapy. In addition, a fixed, low-dose combination of ramipril/felodipine ER is a potential alternative to monotherapy for the initial management of essential hypertension.

Effects of low-dose treatment with felodipine versus fosinopril in Chinese patients with nonischemic heart failure and normal blood pressure: A double-blind, randomized, crossover study

BACKGROUND

Two second-generation calcium channel blockers, felodipine and amlodipine besylate, have been associated with similar high mortality rates in patients with ischemic heart failure (HF) but not in patients with nonischemic causes of HF. In patients with nonischemic HF, amlodipine might have a beneficial effect on survival. However, no difference in mortality rates was found between felodipine and placebo in a nonischemic HF group. Felodipine 10 mg/d was used in 1 large study, a dose considered high for nonischemic HF usually associated with normal blood pressure (BP).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of 12-week, low-dose treatment with felodipine versus those of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, fosinopril sodium, in patients with nonischemic HF and normal BP.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomized, crossover trial was conducted at Taipei Medical University Hospital (Taipei, Taiwan). Patients aged ≥ 18 years with angiographically proved, nonischemic HF and normal BP who were being treated with an optimal regimen of digitalis and diuretics were enrolled. After a 2-week run-in period, patients were randomized to first receive 12 weeks of treatment with felodipine tablets (2.5 mg/d) or fosinopril tablets (7.5 mg/d) and, after a 2-week washout period, were crossed over to the opposite treatment. Efficacy analysis was performed before (baseline) and after treatment and included symptomatic assessment using a 7-grade clinical scale; 2-dimensional echocardiography (2-D echo); exercise tests; and neurohumoral data, including plasma renin activity, plasma aldosterone, and 24-hour urinary epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE) measurements. The primary end point was death due to HF, and the secondary end point was hospital admission due to worsening HF. Compliance was measured using a pill count at the end of each treatment period.

RESULTS

We enrolled 33 patients. One developed worsening HF during the run-in period and was admitted. A total of 32 patients entered the study (18 men, 14 women; mean [SD] age, 48.2 [6.3] years [range, 34-56 years]; mean [SD] systolic BP, 117.2 [9.8] mm Hg [range, 100-138 mm Hg]; mean [SD] diastolic BP, 59.4 [5.7] mm Hg [range, 50-72 mm Hg]). No hospital admission or cardiac death due to HF occurred during 12 weeks of treatment. Twenty-seven patients were included in the felodipine assessment, and 30 patients were included in the fosinopril assessment. Significant improvement in clinical score was noted in both treatment groups (both P < 0.01). The clinical scores did not differ significantly between the 2 treatments. No significant differences were found in 2-D echo parameters between treatments or within groups after treatment versus baseline. Significant improvement in exercise duration was noted with both study drugs after treatment versus baseline (both P < 0.01). No significant difference in exercise duration was found between the 2 treatments. Urinary E and NE were not significantly different between treatments or after treatment with either study drug compared with baseline.

CONCLUSION

The present findings suggest that, in Chinese patients with moderate to severe HF who have normal BP and insignificant coronary artery disease and were being treated with diuretics and digitalis, a 12-week, low-dose course of felodipine (2.5 mg/d) as a vasodilator was associated with as satisfactory an outcome as standard treatment with fosinopril (7.5 mg/d).

Calcium-channel blockers and end-stage renal disease: pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To characterize the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the different calcium-channel blockers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Calcium-channel blockers have been in use for some time in the end-stage renal disease population. Their primary use has been as antihypertensive and antianginal therapies. In this regard, they are effective agents. Recently, it has been noted that dialysis-related hypotension occurs less frequently in calcium-channel blocker treated patients. Also, access patency and overall patient survival are improved with calcium-channel blocker therapy.

SUMMARY

Calcium-channel blockers are useful agents for the control of hypertension in end-stage renal disease patients and appear to favorably influence survival in this population. Calcium-channel blockers are not dialyzable and their pharmacokinetics do not substantially change with renal failure therefore they do not require dose adjustment based on level of renal function. Too few studies exist to determine if individual calcium-channel blockers differ in their effects. Prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trials are needed in the end-stage renal disease population to better understand the role of calcium-channel blockers in the excess cardiovascular disease burden of this population.

Compliance with aspirin or placebo in the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) study

OBJECTIVE

The Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) study is a large, prospective trial aimed at defining the level of diastolic blood pressure required during anti-hypertensive therapy in order to achieve maximal protection against cardiovascular complications. A further aim is to assess the effects on morbidity and mortality of a 75 mg daily dose of aspirin compared with placebo.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Compliance with double-blind administration of aspirin or placebo added to anti-hypertensive treatment was evaluated for 1 year in a subset (n = 530) of the study population (n = 18 790) by placing the medication in a container closed with an electronic cap that records precisely the time of each opening.

RESULTS

The 1-year compliance rate (percentage of days with one opening per day) could be assessed in 501 patients. It averaged 78.3 +/- 25% in aspirin-treated patients (n = 236, mean +/- SD), compared with 78.5 +/- 25% in patients having received placebo (n = 265), and was not influenced by age, sex or country (Germany, Italy, Switzerland, UK). The compliance rate was also similar irrespective of whether the patients had reached their target blood pressure, but was significantly better during the first than the second 6-month monitoring period (84.1 +/- 22% versus 72.3 +/- 32%, n = 501).

CONCLUSIONS

The high rate of compliance with aspirin or placebo observed in the HOT study suggests that the patients were highly motivated and may account for the unusually good blood pressure control achieved in this trial during long-term anti-hypertensive treatment.

Clinical pharmacokinetics of vasodilators. Part I

Understanding the mechanism of action and the pharmacokinetic properties of vasodilatory drugs facilitates optimal use in clinical practice. It should be kept in mind that a drug belongs to a class but is a distinct entity, sometimes derived from a prototype to achieve a specific effect. The most common pharmacokinetic drug improvement is the development of a drug with a half-life sufficiently long to allow an adequate once-daily dosage. Developing a controlled release preparation can increase the apparent half-life of a drug. Altering the molecular structure may also increase the half-life of a prototype drug. Another desirable improvement is increasing the specificity of a drug, which may result in fewer adverse effects, or more efficacy at the target site. This is especially important for vasodilatory drugs which may be administered over decades for the treatment of hypertension, which usually does not interfere with subjective well-being. Compliance is greatly increased with once-daily dosing. Vasodilatory agents cause relaxation by either a decrease in cytoplasmic calcium, an increase in nitric oxide (NO) or by inhibiting myosin light chain kinase. They are divided into 9 classes: calcium antagonists, potassium channel openers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin-II receptor antagonists, alpha-adrenergic and imidazole receptor antagonists, beta 1-adrenergic agonist, phosphodiesterase inhibitors, eicosanoids and NO donors. Despite chemical differences, the pharmacokinetic properties of calcium antagonists are similar. Absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is high, with all substances undergoing considerable first-pass metabolism by the liver, resulting in low bioavailability and pronounced individual variation in pharmacokinetics. Renal impairment has little effect on pharmacokinetics since renal elimination of these agents is minimal. Except for the newer drugs of the dihydropyridine type, amlodipine, felodipine, isradipine, nilvadipine, nisoldipine and nitrendipine, the half-life of calcium antagonists is short. Maintaining an effective drug concentration for the remainder of these agents requires multiple daily dosing, in some cases even with controlled release formulations. However, a coat-core preparation of nifedipine has been developed to allow once-daily administration. Adverse effects are directly correlated to the potency of the individual calcium antagonists. Treatment with the potassium channel opener minoxidil is reserved for patients with moderately severe to severe hypertension which is refractory to other treatment. Diazoxide and hydralazine are chiefly used to treat severe hypertensive emergencies, primary pulmonary and malignant hypertension and in severe preeclampsia. ACE inhibitors prevent conversion of angiotensin-I to angiotensin-II and are most effective when renin production is increased. Since ACE is identical to kininase-II, which inactivates the potent endogenous vasodilator bradykinin, ACE inhibition causes a reduction in bradykinin degradation. ACE inhibitors exert cardioprotective and cardioreparative effects by preventing and reversing cardiac fibrosis and ventricular hypertrophy in animal models. The predominant elimination pathway of most ACE inhibitors is via renal excretion. Therefore, renal impairment is associated with reduced elimination and a dosage reduction of 25 to 50% is recommended in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment. Separating angiotensin-II inhibition from bradykinin potentiation has been the goal in developing angiotensin-II receptor antagonists. The incidence of adverse effects of such an agent, losartan, is comparable to that encountered with placebo treatment, and the troublesome cough associated with ACE inhibitors is absent.

Effect of felodipine on regional blood supply and collateral vascular resistance in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease

This double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study was designed to investigate the acute effect of felodipine on regional blood supply and collateral vascular resistance in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD). Thirty men with PAOD were treated with a single dose of 5 mg felodipine or placebo. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), Doppler ankle pressure (DAP), calf blood flow (CBF) by venous occlusion plethysmography and calf transcutaneous oxygen tension (tcpO2) were measured during a cycle ergometry. Felodipine reduced SBP significantly (from 149 to 136 mmHg, p < 0.05), while placebo did not. DAP increased slightly but not significantly in both groups. The pressure gradient between SBP and DAP fell significantly in the felodipine group (60 vs 39 mmHg, p < 0.01) but not in the placebo group (59 vs 56 mmHg). There was a trend for lower velocity in tcpO2 decrease during the stress test and higher velocity of tcpO2 increase during recovery from exercise in the felodipine group although the differences between both groups were not significant. In the felodipine group, CBF increased by 35.6% (p < 0.05) whereas it did not change in the placebo group. In conclusion, while lowering SBP, felodipine increased slightly, or at least maintained, the blood supply to the calves in PAOD patients, which probably results from reducing collateral vascular resistance.

Lacidipine, hydrochlorothiazide and their combination in systolic hypertension in the elderly

OBJECTIVE

To compare with placebo the efficacies of once-daily administrations of lacidipine and hydrochlorothiazide separately and in combination to elderly patients with systolic hypertension.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Nineteen elderly subjects (five men and 14 women, median age 71 years, range 62-79 years) participated in the study, which had a randomized double-blind crossover design. For each subject there were four treatment phases, each of duration 4 weeks. The initial treatments in each phase were 2 mg lacidipine once a day and 25 mg hydrochlorothiazide once a day, separately and in combination, and placebo. Doses of each agent could be doubled after 2 weeks in each phase if the patient's goal systolic blood pressure had not been achieved. The numbers of subjects administered the higher dose of each treatment were 13 for placebo, 14 for lacidipine, 11 for hydrochlorothiazide and eight for lacidipine plus hydrochlorothiazide.

RESULTS

End-of-phase mean clinic blood pressures were 164/85 mmHg with placebo, 159/82 mmHg with lacidipine, 157/84 mmHg with hydrochlorothiazide and 152/82 mmHg with lacidipine plus hydrochlorothiazide. Systolic blood pressure was significantly reduced during all active treatment phases compared with placebo and that for the lacidipine plus hydrochlorothiazide phase was also significantly less than those for both of the other active treatment phases. There was no difference between sitting and standing blood pressure for any phase. Factorial analysis of the main effects of treatment indicated that the effects of lacidipine and hydrochlorothiazide on clinic blood pressure were additive and also that heart rate was higher when hydrochlorothiazide had been administered. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring confirmed the pattern of the responses of blood pressure and showed that administration of hydrochlorothiazide had a significantly greater effect on systolic blood pressure and a longer duration of action than did administration of lacidipine. There was no difference in the frequency of adverse effects among any of the phases.

CONCLUSIONS

In treating elderly systolic hypertensives the diuretic hydrochlorothiazide is a more effective antihypertensive agent with a longer duration of action than is the calcium channel antagonist lacidipine. In combination the effects of these two drugs on blood pressure are additive.

Cardiovascular effects of a low-dose combination of ramipril and felodipine in spontaneously hypertensive rats

1. Cardiovascular effects of submaximal antihypertensive doses of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, ramipril (0.25 mg kg-1 day-1 in the food), and the calcium channel blocker, felodipine (0.4 mg kg-1 day-1 subcutaneously by osmotic minipump), both alone and in combination, were examined in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) in a four-week study. 2. Both ramipril and felodipine as monotherapy decreased systolic blood pressure. The antihypertensive effect of the drug combination was more than that of ramipril treatment alone, but not significantly better than that of felodipine monotherapy. Ramipril or felodipine treatments did not significantly affect the heart rate, either alone or in combination. 3. The beneficial effect of ramipril monotherapy on left ventricular hypertrophy was more prominent than that of felodipine. The cardioprotective effect of felodipine was improved when combined to ramipril. The systolic blood pressure at the end of the experimental period correlated only weakly with left ventricular hypertrophy. 4. Responses of mesenteric arterial rings in vitro were examined at the end of the four-week study. Ramipril and felodipine monotherapies as well as their combination markedly improved the endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation responses to acetylcholine. The combination of ramipril and felodipine slightly enhanced the endothelium-independent vascular relaxation responses to sodium nitroprusside. Ramipril treatment alone slightly diminished the vascular contractile responses to noradrenaline. Neither ramipril nor felodipine alone or in combination affected the vascular contractile responses to potassium chloride. 5. Ramipril treatment, both alone and in combination with felodipine, caused a three fold increase in plasma renin activity. Serum aldosterone, fasting blood glucose level, serum insulin and the 24 hour urinary excretions of sodium, potassium, magnesium, calcium, phosphorus or protein were not significantly affected by the drug treatments. 6. Our findings suggest that a better overall control of hypertension and end-organ damages, without an increase in adverse effects, can be achieved by the combination of submaximal antihypertensive doses of felodipine and ramipril than by monotherapy with either drug alone.

Felodipine and amlodipine in stable angina pectoris: results of a randomized double-blind crossover trial

A randomized, double-blind, crossover study tested the antiischemic and antianginal efficacy of felodipine, extended-release 5-10 mg, versus amlodipine, 5-10 mg once daily. Fifty-two patients with documented exercise-induced angina pectoris and myocardial ischemia during 24-h electrocardiographic monitoring were included in the study. Forty-seven patients completed the 8-week treatment period, whereas five patients withdrew from the study. The mean number of ischemic episodes/24 h was reduced from 19.9 at baseline to 2.3 during amlodipine and to 2.4 during felodipine; the total duration of ischemic episodes decreased from 69.8 min/24 h to 15.2 min and 15.5 min during amlodipine and felodipine, respectively (for both variables, p = 0.83 and p = 0.53 between treatments, and for both treatments, p < 0.001 compared with baseline). Eighteen (38%) patients receiving amlodipine and 19 (40%) patients receiving felodipine showed no ST-segment depression during treatment. Maximal ST-depression was reduced from an average of 2.1 mm to 1.1 and 1.2 mm on amlodipine and felodipine, respectively (p = 0.68 between treatments and p < 0.001 compared with baseline). Mean heart rate remained unchanged compared with baseline. Anginal attacks were reduced from 16.4/week at baseline to 4.7/week with amlodipine and to 4.3/week with felodipine (p = 0.26 between treatments, and p < 0.001 vs. baseline). Accordingly, nitrate consumption was reduced from 14.7 capsules per week to 4.0 and 3.8 with amlodipine and felodipine, respectively (p = 0.40 between treatments, and p < 0.001 compared with baseline). Adverse reactions were infrequent and distributed similarly between the two treatments. It is concluded that both drugs effectively reduced ischemic episodes and anginal attacks and were well tolerated in patients with stable angina pectoris. There was no evidence that the two regimens were different in their antiischemic and antianginal properties.

The effect on 24 h blood pressure control of an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (perindopril) administered in the morning or at night

OBJECTIVE

To determine the clinic and ambulatory blood pressure when the same dose of perindopril (4 mg) is administered in the morning (0900 h), or at night (2100 h), in particular, to determine whether the early morning blood pressure rise, the duration of effect and the pattern of response differed.

METHODS

Twenty male patients with diastolic blood pressure 95-110 mmHg when seated and 24 h mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure > 85 mmHg after 4 weeks' placebo were allocated randomly to be administered 4 mg perindopril at 0900 h or at 2100 h. Clinic blood pressure (with the patient seated and erect) was measured 2 and 4 weeks after the therapy had been started and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring with a SpaceLabs device was performed for 26 h during week 4. The patients then crossed over to the other time of dosage and the measurements were repeated. The study was conducted from a hospital clinic.

RESULTS

The clinic analysis concerned all 20 patients but the ambulatory analysis concerned 18 patients because the ambulatory blood pressure monitor data sets were inadequate for two patients. Compliance was high (97 +/- 3%), with a suggestion that it was better with the 0900 h dose. Clinic blood pressure (with the patient seated and erect) was lower under both regimes and the blood pressure with night-time administration of perindopril tended to be lower than that with daytime administration (P = 0.05-0.10). Twenty-four-hour mean, daytime and night-time means were lower with both doses than they were with placebo and did not differ. Both regimes reduced the early morning peak blood pressure rise and the effect tended to be greater with the 2100 h dose (P = 0.05-0.10). The 0900 h dose had an effect that persisted for > 24 h but the effect of the 2100 h dose had dissipated 18 h after the dose. There was no excessive night-time fall in blood pressure with the 2100 h dose. The trough : peak ratio with the 0900 h dose was 0.86 for systolic and 0.70 for diastolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSION

The early morning blood pressure rise is reduced more when 4 mg perindopril is administered at 2100 h. However, the 2100 h dose regime does not reduce blood pressure over 24 h whereas 24 h control is achieved with the 0900 h dose. In clinical practice the 2100 h dose would have been titrated to the next dose range in more patients. This study indicates that the response profile obtained with an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor cannot be transformed from one dose time to another automatically and that chronobiology has important effects on a drug's action.

Felodipine or hydrochlorothiazide/triamterene for treatment of hypertension in the elderly: effects on blood pressure, hypertensive heart disease, metabolic and hormonal parameters

The aim of the study was to compare the antihypertensive efficacy of either felodipine or the diuretic combination hydrochlorothiazide/triamterene in a group (n = 65) of elderly (> or = 70 years) hypertensives (office blood pressure > or = 160/95 mmHg) with special regard to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, hypertensive heart disease and metabolic parameters. This was a randomized, double-blind study with a treatment period of 6 months. Reduction of office and 24-hr ambulatory blood pressure was comparable with both treatment regimens; after 6 months. 18 of 29 patients in the felodipine group (62%) and 20 of 27 patients in the diuretic group (74%; p = 0.4) were controlled. While episodes of ischemic type ST-segment depression were significantly reduced in the felodipine group (from 49 to 9 episodes), there was no significant change in the diuretic group (from 24 to 21 episodes). Both regimens decreased left ventricular wall thickness, but the decline in left ventricular muscle mass index was significant only for felodipine. Felodipine did not induce any change in metabolic or hormonal parameters; the diuretic combination significantly increased serum creatinine, uric acid, plasma renin activity, and plasma prorenin. Thus, the antihypertensive efficacy of felodipine and the diuretic combination was comparable in elderly hypertensives; only felodipine, however, improved parameters of hypertensive heart disease and showed a neutral metabolic and hormonal profile.

Does prophylactic treatment with felodipine, a calcium antagonist, prevent low-osmolar contrast-induced renal dysfunction in hydrated diabetic and nondiabetic patients with normal or moderately reduced renal function?

Twenty-seven patients (15 diabetics and 12 non-diabetics) with normal to moderately reduced renal function underwent femoral angiography with a low-osmolar contrast agent, iohexol (Omnipaque), under perexaminatory hydration. Fourteen patients were randomised to pretreatment with oral felodipine extended release (Plendil) 10 mg and 13 patients to placebo 3-4 h before angiography. GFR measured with [51Cr] EDTA-clearance decreased 24 hours after the angiography in the felodipine group from GFR 52.5 +/- 18.6 (mean +/- SD) to 46.2 +/- 16.5 ml/min (p < 0.01) and in the placebo group from 70.6 +/- 18.6 to 62.6 +/- 26.4 ml/min (p < 0.01). Serum creatinine increased significantly in the felodipine group from 128 +/- 61 to 139 +/- 67 mumol/l (p < 0.05) but not in the placebo group (122 +/- 54 to 125 +/- 51 mumol/l (ns)). The values of serum creatinine returned to baseline levels 7 days after angiography. During hydration there was only a slight reduction of GFR after angiography with iohexol. Thus, felodipine had no major effect on GFR after iohexol but, as baseline GFR tended to be lower in the felodipine pre-treated patients, it might have had some renoprotective effect in patients with more advanced renal failure.

Comparison of effects on peak oxygen consumption, quality of life, and neurohormones of felodipine and enalapril in patients with congestive heart failure

Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibition is currently the cornerstone of congestive heart failure (CHF) therapy, but these drugs are not tolerated in up to 20% of patients. For these patients, therapeutic alternatives with comparable efficacy are needed. Felodipine, a vasoselective dihydropyridine calcium antagonist with a slow onset of action and a long plasma half-life, may be such an agent. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of felodipine were examined and compared with enalapril using a double-blind design. We studied 46 patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction < 0.40, peak oxygen consumption < 20 ml.min-1.kg-1, and symptoms of CHF despite therapy with diuretics and digoxin. After 16 weeks of therapy, there were no statistically significant differences in peak oxygen consumption (felodipine +1.6, enalapril +2.5 ml.min-1.kg-1) and exercise tolerance (felodipine +61 seconds, enalapril +64 seconds). Quality-of-life parameters were affected slightly better by felodipine than by enalapril. Plasma norepinephrine decreased by 143 pg.ml-1 with enalapril and by 12 pg.ml-1 with felodipine (p < 0.20 between groups). Both drugs were generally well tolerated. These data suggest that felodipine and enalapril have comparable effects on exercise parameters in patients with CHF. Neurohumoral activation was not observed with either drug.

Effects of felodipine, metoprolol and their combination on blood pressure at rest and during exercise and on volume regulatory hormones in hypertensive patients

The effects on blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR), at rest and during bicycle exercise, of the vascular selective calcium antagonist felodipine, the cardio-selective beta-blocker metoprolol, and of the two drugs in combination, were assessed in a double-blind, three-way cross-over study comprising 23 patients with essential, mild to moderate hypertension. All three treatment regimens were given to each patient in randomised order for 4 weeks after a 4 week placebo run-in period. Felodipine 10-20 mg daily, metoprolol 100-200 mg daily and the combination of felodipine 10-20 mg plus metoprolol 100 mg daily were all effective antihypertensive treatments both at rest and during exercise. The two drugs seemed to have additive effects and the effect on BP of the combination was greater than that of either drug given as monotherapy. The mean sitting BP was 148/103 mmHg at randomisation, after 4 weeks of placebo treatment, and 134/88, 134/94 and 121/84 mmHg, respectively, after 4 weeks' treatment with felodipine, metoprolol and the combination. Maximal exercise capacity was similar irrespective of treatment regimen, and the normal response to exercise BP and HR was maintained during all active treatments. Changes observed in volume regulatory hormones (PRA, aldosterone and ANP) were consistent with a direct tubular natriuretic-diuretic effect of felodipine and of beta-blocker attenuated release of renin. All treatment regimens were well tolerated and adverse events reported were usually mild and transient.

A crossover comparison of extended release felodipine with prolonged action nifedipine in hypertension

In a crossover design, control of blood pressure by extended release felodipine was compared with control by prolonged action nifedipine in 21 children with renal hypertension. Compliance with once daily felodipine was higher than with nifedipine, at 95.6 (SEM 2.7)% v 78.9 (6.0)% (p = 0.02). Mean diastolic blood pressure was lower during the day with felodipine than with nifedipine, at 77.6 (2.4) v 84.4 (2.8) mm Hg (p = 0.05). Similarly, blood pressure load (the percentage of the day during which the child had blood pressure exceeding the upper limits of normal for age) was lower for felodipine than for nifedipine: 43.5 (5.5)% v 61.3 (6.3)%. There was an opposite trend during the night, though this did not reach statistical significance. These data suggest that once a day felodipine is effective in children with hypertension. This may be because of improved compliance.

Divergent effects of dihydropyridine and phenylalkylamine calcium channel antagonist classes on autonomic function in human hypertension

Calcium channel antagonists differ by class in reported frequency of side effects that suggest reflex sympathoadrenal activation. Do such differences result from differential effects on autonomic and baroreflex function? The present study compared acute and chronic effects of two classes of calcium channel antagonists, the dihydropyridine type (felodipine) and the phenylalkylamine type (verapamil), on efferent sympathetic outflow and baroreflex slope in 15 essential hypertensive subjects. Blood pressure, heart rate, hemodynamics, and biochemistries were determined at baseline and after acute (first dose) and chronic (4 weeks) administration of the drugs versus placebo. Acutely, felodipine caused a greater decrease in blood pressure associated with a larger decline in systemic vascular resistance than the corresponding effects produced by verapamil. Chronically, there were similar, significant declines in blood pressure (P = .001) and systemic vascular resistance (P = .001) after each drug. Acutely, increased sympathetic activity after felodipine was suggested by reflex tachycardia (from 69 +/- 3 to 74 +/- 2 beats per minute, P = .014) and elevation of plasma norepinephrine (from 264 +/- 25 to 323 +/- 25 pg/mL, P = .037), whereas after verapamil the corresponding changes were closely similar to those after placebo.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of felodipine on systemic hemodynamics of spontaneous mild-hypertensive aged rats

The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of felodipine, a dihydropyridinic calcium ions channels blocker, on mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), cardiac output (CO), peripheral resistances (TPR) and blood flow distribution in spontaneously mildly hypertensive female Wistar 30-34 months old rats. Under pentobarbital anesthesia, CO and regional organ blood flow were measured by the radioactive microspheres method, before and 30 min after administration of felodipine 0.5 mumol/kg b. w. by gastric gavage. They were compared to the corresponding values in normotensive rats of the same strain and age. Fifteen (from twenty five) rats were hypertensive with a MAP averaging 139 +/- 2 mm Hg. CO and TPR were slightly higher in these hypertensive rats. Cerebral blood flow (CBF) was lower, though the difference did not reach significant values. MAP significantly decreased after felodipine with no significant changes in CO and TPR in hypertensive as well as in normotensive animals. Renal blood flow (RBF) was similar before and after felodipine which significantly decreased renal vascular resistance in both groups. Felodipine administration did not induce significant changes in CBF but a significant increase in portal venous inflow (PVI) in hypertensive rats only. In conclusion, in old female rats with mild spontaneously hypertension, acute felodipine oral administration reduced arterial blood pressure without diminishing CBF.

Nimodipine. Potential for drug-drug interactions in the elderly

Nimodipine is indicated for a variety of conditions in elderly patients. Elderly patients often have multiple morbidity and receive treatment with a variety of drugs. Therefore, it is important to investigate the possible pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of nimodipine with various drugs commonly prescribed for elderly patients. There were no clinically relevant interactions of nimodipine with any of the following specific agents studied: the antiarrhythmics mexiletine, propafenone, disopyramide or quinidine, digoxin, the beta-adrenoceptor antagonists propranolol or atenolol, nifedipine, warfarin, diazepam, indomethacin, ranitidine or glibenclamide (glyburide). However, there were some notable interactions. In epileptic patients taking the anticonvulsants carbamazepine, phenobarbital (phenobarbitone) and/or phenytoin, there was a 7-fold decrease in the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) and an 8- to 10-fold decrease in the maximum plasma concentration of nimodipine. These effects were to be expected, considering the hepatic enzyme-inducing properties of these anticonvulsant drugs. Therefore concomitant use of these agents with oral nimodipine is not recommended. In contrast, epileptic patients treated with nimodipine and valproic acid (sodium valproate) showed an increase in both the AUC (approximately 50%) and maximum plasma concentrations (approximately 30%) of nimodipine, which may be explained by valproic acid inhibiting the presystemic oxidative metabolism of nimodipine. Concomitant administration of cimetidine produced an approximate doubling of the bioavailability of nimodipine. This again was to be expected, considering the known inhibitory effect of cimetidine on cytochrome P450. However, no changes in haemodynamics, clinical or laboratory status or tolerability were observed, and dose adjustment did not appear to be clinically necessary.

Comparison between felodipine and isosorbide mononitrate as adjunct to beta blockade in patients > 65 years of age with angina pectoris

Coronary artery disease is an increasingly common medical problem in the elderly, and relatively few studies investigating drug therapy focus on this population. To assess the efficacy and safety of the calcium channel blocker, felodipine, and isosorbide mononitrate (ISMN), as adjunct to optimal beta-blocker therapy in elderly patients, a placebo-controlled, double-blind study was conducted in 46 patients, aged between 65 and 80 years, with documented stress-induced angina pectoris and myocardial ischemia. With use of a latin-square design, with 3 periods of 4 weeks each, exercise testing was performed after each period. Felodipine, 5 mg once daily, significantly improved both time to ischemic threshold and pain threshold (p = 0.02 and p = 0.003, respectively, vs placebo), and tended to increase total exercise time (p = 0.06 vs placebo). In contrast, ISMN, 20 mg twice daily, did not significantly affect these parameters. Comparison of the 2 active treatment arms showed that, overall, felodipine was more effective than ISMN, with a statistically significant difference for time to ischemic threshold (p = 0.02). With regard to safety, felodipine was also better tolerated than ISMN, which led to more patients discontinuing study medication with ISMN (p < 0.05 between ISMN and felodipine). It is concluded that in elderly patients who are treated with optimal beta blockade, felodipine, but not ISMN, leads to an additional significant reduction in ischemic parameters during exercise.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Short-term effects of felodipine in hypertensive type II diabetic males on sulfonylurea treatment

OBJECTIVES

To study the effects on blood pressure and glucose homeostasis of felodipine, a calcium antagonist.

DESIGN

A double-blind randomized cross-over study comparing felodipine ER and placebo.

SETTING

A university centre of diabetic care in Malmö, Sweden.

SUBJECTS

Seventeen hypertensive type II diabetic males on oral sulfonylurea (glibenclamide) treatment.

INTERVENTIONS

Four-week treatment periods separated by a 2-week wash-out period. Felodipine 10-20 mg once daily was given.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Blood pressure, heart rate, HbA1c and response to oral glucose tolerance test; glucose, insulin and c-peptide. Measured before randomization and at the end of each double-blind treatment period.

RESULTS

Blood pressure was significantly reduced during felodipine treatment and heart rate slightly increased. Felodipine did not influence insulin or c-peptide levels. There was no significant change in glucose levels but an increase in HbA1c.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that felodipine is an effective agent for type II diabetic patients on glibenclamide treatment. The effect on HbA1c is noteworthy even if not of clinical significance in the short term. Controlled long-term studies in diabetic patients are needed to fully evaluate antihypertensive agents.

Effects of felodipine versus nifedipine on exercise tolerance in stable angina pectoris

The effects of single doses of felodipine (5 and 10 mg) and nifedipine (10 and 20 mg) on chronic stable effort angina pectoris were assessed in a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover study of 24 patients receiving beta blockers and short-acting nitroglycerin. The effects were measured by repeated bicycle ergometer tests. The total work, and time until 1 mm of ST depression increased significantly by 9 to 31% after both active drugs at both dose levels in comparison with placebo. The differences were not significant between drugs or doses. At rest, blood pressure decreased (10 to 15%) and heart rate increased (5 to 10%) significantly after both active drugs. During exercise at the highest comparable work load, systolic blood pressure decreased significantly (23 to 26%), whereas heart rate was not affected after felodipine and nifedipine compared with placebo. The 2 drugs were well tolerated, and side effects were mild. Therefore, single doses of 5 and 10 mg of felodipine, and 10 and 20 mg of nifedipine have similar antianginal and anti-ischemic properties. However, felodipine has a longer duration of action, which may improve compliance.