Efficacy and safety of fluvastatin, a new HMG CoA reductase inhibitor, in elderly hypercholesterolaemic women

Fluvastatin for lowering lipids

BACKGROUND

Fluvastatin is thought to be the least potent statin on the market, however, the dose-related magnitude of effect of fluvastatin on blood lipids is not known.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objectiveTo quantify the effects of various doses of fluvastatin on blood total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL cholesterol), high-density lipoprotein (HDL cholesterol), and triglycerides in participants with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease.Secondary objectivesTo quantify the variability of the effect of various doses of fluvastatin.To quantify withdrawals due to adverse effects (WDAEs) in randomised placebo-controlled trials.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials up to February 2017: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2017, Issue 1), MEDLINE (1946 to February Week 2 2017), MEDLINE In-Process, MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, Embase (1974 to February Week 2 2017), the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, CDSR, DARE, Epistemonikos and ClinicalTrials.gov. We also contacted authors of relevant papers regarding further published and unpublished work. No language restrictions were applied.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised placebo-controlled and uncontrolled before and after trials evaluating the dose response of different fixed doses of fluvastatin on blood lipids over a duration of three to 12 weeks in participants of any age with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed eligibility criteria for studies to be included, and extracted data. We entered data from placebo-controlled and uncontrolled before and after trials into Review Manager 5 as continuous and generic inverse variance data, respectively. WDAEs information was collected from the placebo-controlled trials. We assessed all trials using the 'Risk of bias' tool under the categories of sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective reporting, and other potential biases.

MAIN RESULTS

One-hundred and forty-five trials (36 placebo controlled and 109 before and after) evaluated the dose-related efficacy of fluvastatin in 18,846 participants. The participants were of any age with and without evidence of cardiovascular disease, and fluvastatin effects were studied within a treatment period of three to 12 weeks. Log dose-response data over doses of 2.5 mg to 80 mg revealed strong linear dose-related effects on blood total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol and a weak linear dose-related effect on blood triglycerides. There was no dose-related effect of fluvastatin on blood HDL cholesterol. Fluvastatin 10 mg/day to 80 mg/day reduced LDL cholesterol by 15% to 33%, total cholesterol by 11% to 25% and triglycerides by 3% to 17.5%. For every two-fold dose increase there was a 6.0% (95% CI 5.4 to 6.6) decrease in blood LDL cholesterol, a 4.2% (95% CI 3.7 to 4.8) decrease in blood total cholesterol and a 4.2% (95% CI 2.0 to 6.3) decrease in blood triglycerides. The quality of evidence for these effects was judged to be high. When compared to atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, fluvastatin was about 12-fold less potent than atorvastatin and 46-fold less potent than rosuvastatin at reducing LDL cholesterol. Very low quality of evidence showed no difference in WDAEs between fluvastatin and placebo in 16 of 36 of these short-term trials (risk ratio 1.52 (95% CI 0.94 to 2.45).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Fluvastatin lowers blood total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and triglyceride in a dose-dependent linear fashion. Based on the effect on LDL cholesterol, fluvastatin is 12-fold less potent than atorvastatin and 46-fold less potent than rosuvastatin. This review did not provide a good estimate of the incidence of harms associated with fluvastatin because of the short duration of the trials and the lack of reporting of adverse effects in 56% of the placebo-controlled trials.

Estrogen/progesterone replacement versus pravastatin and their sequential association in hypercholesterolemic postmenopausal women

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to assess serum lipid changes in response to an oral estrogen combined with progesterone (Group A) as compared with pravastatin (Group B) and to evaluate the additive effects of the sequential addition of statin to hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) and of HRT to statin.

METHODS

Thirty-seven of 63 hypercholesterolemic menopausal women initially submitted to a 4-month diet were randomised to oral conjugated estrogens (0.625 mg)/micronised progesterone (200 mg) or to pravastatin (40 mg). After 6 months, each group received both medications for another 6 months.

RESULTS

Nineteen percent of women corrected their lipids below decision levels with diet alone. Low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) decreased by 8+/-5% with HRT and by 26+/-3% (P<0.001) with the statin. These single medications increased high density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) by 13+/-5% (P<0.01) and 11+/-7%, respectively. Combined interventions produced cumulative LDL-C reductions of 40+/-2 and 42+/-3% (P<0.001) and additive HDL-C augmentations of 16+/-4 and 23+/-5% (P<0.01) with proportional changes in apolipoprotein (Apo)B-100 and ApoA-1. These combined effects brought the atherogenic index (C/HDL-C) for Groups A and B, respectively, from a moderate (5.18+/-0.25 and 5.87+/-0.18) to a reduced (3.35+/-0.20 and 3.52+/-0.19) risk category. Triglycerides (TG) which were increased by HRT and decreased by the statin returned to baseline during combined treatments. No changes in diet, physical activity or anthropomorphometric measurements explained the lipid modifications.

CONCLUSIONS

In menopausal patients with elevated C not responding to diet, pravastatin was most effective to decrease LDL-C, and oral estrogen-micronised progesterone most effective to increase HDL-C. Marked reduction of the atherogenic index is achieved by sequential combinations of medications resulting from beneficial cumulative effects on both C-LDL and C-HDL.

Cost-effectiveness of initial therapy with 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors to treat hypercholesterolemia in a primary care setting of a managed-care organization

From January 1994 through May 1995, Prudential HealthCare-North Texas prospectively studied 299 member patients diagnosed with hypercholesterolemia for whom pharmacotherapy with one of four 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, also known as statins, was prescribed. The purpose of this study was to measure the relative cost-effectiveness (CE) of these drugs in a real-world setting. This study provides information to assist decision makers in managed-care organizations (MCO) in making formulary selections. The study used a prospective, randomized, balanced cohort design, examining patients who had been prescribed initial therapy with a statin drug as monotherapy. Costs (direct medical and indirect costs) and effectiveness (percent reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels) were based on approximately the first 6 months of initial therapy. Both the MCO and patient perspectives were considered. In the base case, mean CE ratios were significantly lower for fluvastatin compared with lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin from both the managed-care perspective and the patient perspective. Sensitivity analysis did not alter the CE conclusions, even under conditions of varying cost structures. Although differences were found in the effectiveness of lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin measured in this study versus efficacy measured for these drugs in controlled clinical trials, sensitivity analysis suggests that these differences alone do not determine the superior CE of fluvastatin. Finally, this study supports the idea that well-designed formularies should consider drug CE (based on safety, effectiveness, and cost) and that integration of the pharmacy benefit management with other medical management is essential. These results provide evidence that fluvastatin may represent a more cost-effective formulary choice among statin products used for initial monotherapy of hypercholesterolemia.

Fluvastatin: a review of its pharmacology and use in the management of hypercholesterolaemia

Fluvastatin, a member of the group of drugs known as HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, is used in the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolaemia. In clinical trials in patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia, fluvastatin 20 or 40 mg/day achieved marked reductions from baseline in serum levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (19 to 31%) and total cholesterol (15 to 21%), along with modest declines in serum triglyceride levels (1 to 12%) and small increases in high density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol levels (2 to 10%). These beneficial effects on the serum lipid profile were similar to those demonstrated with other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, although direct comparative trials are limited. Concomitant administration of fluvastatin plus another lipid-lowering agent, such as a bile acid sequestrant, a fibrate or nicotinic acid, usually reduced serum levels of total cholesterol and LDL-cholesterol by at least a further 5 to 10% from baseline compared with fluvastatin monotherapy. Fluvastatin has a similar tolerability profile to that of other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Gastrointestinal disturbances, which are usually mild and transient, were the most frequently reported adverse events with fluvastatin in clinical trials. Persistent elevation of serum transaminase levels occurred in approximately 1% of fluvastatin recipients, which is similar to the rate for other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Unlike other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, which have been infrequently associated with myopathy and rarely with rhabdomyolysis, these events have not been associated with fluvastatin to date, although fluvastatin has not been used as extensively as agents such as lovastatin. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors other than fluvastatin, when given in combination with drugs such as fibrates, nicotinic acid, cyclosporin or erythromycin, can increase the risk of these potentially serious adverse events. Thus far, myopathy or rhabdomyolysis have not been reported among patients receiving fluvastatin concomitantly with any of these drugs. Therefore, fluvastatin can be given with caution in combination with fibrates, nicotinic acid, cyclosporin or erythromycin. In conclusion, fluvastatin has similar efficacy and tolerability profiles to other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, which are among the most effective agents available for treating patients with hypercholesterolaemia. Pharmacoeconomic studies performed to date suggest an advantage for fluvastatin over other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, predominantly because of its relatively low acquisition costs (at least in those countries in which the evaluations were conducted). Thus, fluvastatin is effective and well tolerated in patients with hypercholesterolaemia and appears to have an economic advantage over other HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, primarily as a result of its relatively low acquisition costs.

Clinical efficacy of fluvastatin in the long-term treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia

The long-term clinical efficacy of fluvastatin was assessed in 24 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia over a total treatment period of 104 weeks. Patients received an initial fluvastatin dose of 20 mg/day for 8 weeks, which was increased to 30 mg/day for a further 16 weeks. From week 24, if serum total cholesterol remained > or = 230 mg/dL, the fluvastatin dose could be increased to 40 or 60 mg/day, as necessary. By the end of treatment, 4 patients were receiving 30 mg/day fluvastatin, 1 patient was receiving 40 mg/day, and 19 patients were receiving 60 mg/day. Serum total cholesterol and low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels showed a significant decrease from baseline at week 104 (total cholesterol, -26.8 +/- 2.4%; LDL-C, -33.1 +/- 3.3%; p < 0.001). The reductions in total cholesterol and LDL-C were dose-related. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) increases in serum high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) were observed at week 24 (12.1 +/- 5.0%) and at week 76 (11.0 +/- 3.3%), although the effect was variable. Nevertherless, at the end of treatment the LDL-C: HDL-C ratio showed a 35% reduction from baseline. Changes in triglyceride levels failed to achieve statistical significance, with a reduction from baseline of -13.9 +/- 7.3% at week 104. Changes in apolipoprotein A-I were variable, with statistically significant (p < 0.01) increases observed at week 24 (7.6 +/- 2.3%) and week 76 (8.4 +/- 2.7%). By contrast, a significant reduction from baseline in apolipoprotein B was achieved by week 12 (-15.0 +/- 2.3%; p < 0.001) and was maintained throughout the study.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)