Practical considerations in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Meta-analysis of Prognostic Factors for Overall Survival Among Resected Patients with Spontaneous Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Our meta-analysis was performed to explore the prognostic factors for overall survival among post-hepatectomy patients with spontaneous ruptured hepatocellular carcinoma (SRHCC).

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were all searched up for relevant studies regarding prognostic factors with SRHCC. RevMan5.3 software and Stata 14.0 software were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

A total of nineteen studies with 1876 resected SRHCC patients were finally identified. Pooled results indicated that preoperative AFP (high vs low) (P = 0.003), concurrent liver cirrhosis (yes vs no) (P = 0.02), preoperative liver function (child A vs non-child A) (P = 0.0007), tumor size (large vs small) (P < 0.00001), tumor number (solitary vs multiple) (P = 0.002), satellite foci (yes vs no) (P = 0.0006), micro-vascular invasion (yes vs no) (P < 0.00001), type of hepatectomy (major or minor) (P = 0.04), surgical margin (R + vs R -) (P < 0.00001), and type of hepatectomy (emergency hepatectomy vs staged hepatectomy) (P = 0.005) were prognostic factors for overall survival among post-hepatectomy SRHCC patients.

CONCLUSION

Apart from some conventional prognostic factors identified in resected patients with SRHCC, numerous prognostic factors have also been unmasked, which might provide clinical reference to stratify patients with different therapeutic regimes.

Hepatocellular carcinoma: a review

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy and is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. In the United States, HCC is the ninth leading cause of cancer deaths. Despite advances in prevention techniques, screening, and new technologies in both diagnosis and treatment, incidence and mortality continue to rise. Cirrhosis remains the most important risk factor for the development of HCC regardless of etiology. Hepatitis B and C are independent risk factors for the development of cirrhosis. Alcohol consumption remains an important additional risk factor in the United States as alcohol abuse is five times higher than hepatitis C. Diagnosis is confirmed without pathologic confirmation. Screening includes both radiologic tests, such as ultrasound, computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, and serological markers such as α-fetoprotein at 6-month intervals. Multiple treatment modalities exist; however, only orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) or surgical resection is curative. OLT is available for patients who meet or are downstaged into the Milan or University of San Francisco criteria. Additional treatment modalities include transarterial chemoembolization, radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation, percutaneous ethanol injection, cryoablation, radiation therapy, systemic chemotherapy, and molecularly targeted therapies. Selection of a treatment modality is based on tumor size, location, extrahepatic spread, and underlying liver function. HCC is an aggressive cancer that occurs in the setting of cirrhosis and commonly presents in advanced stages. HCC can be prevented if there are appropriate measures taken, including hepatitis B virus vaccination, universal screening of blood products, use of safe injection practices, treatment and education of alcoholics and intravenous drug users, and initiation of antiviral therapy. Continued improvement in both surgical and nonsurgical approaches has demonstrated significant benefits in overall survival. While OLT remains the only curative surgical procedure, the shortage of available organs precludes this therapy for many patients with HCC.

Anatomic considerations in the surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the liver and is a common cause of cancer death worldwide. Treatment of HCC usually consists of combinations of locoregional therapy, surgical resection, orthotopic liver transplantation, and in advanced cases, systemic chemotherapy. The best rates of cure are achieved with surgical resection or orthotopic liver transplantation in well-selected patients. The success of surgical resection depends on the adequacy of the extent of resection, balanced with the need to preserve functional hepatic parenchyma. Nonanatomic resection for HCC has been proposed as a surgical technique to maximize residual liver mass, but has been shown by some to yield inferior oncologic outcomes compared with formal anatomic resection. This review discusses relevant surgical anatomy of the liver, classifications of hepatic resection, and the current literature regarding outcomes of anatomic and nonanatomic resection of the liver.

Surgical resection versus liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a major worldwide health problem, involving more than half a million new patients yearly, with a different incidence in different parts of the world. Hepatocellular carcinoma develops in about 80% of cirrhotic patients, and cirrhosis is considered the strongest predisposing factor for it. Surgical resection and liver transplantation are conventional treatment modalities that can offer long-term survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of surgical resection compared with those of liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) at ISI Web of Science (last search February 2013). We also searched the abstracts from annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), provided through The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group until February 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing surgical resection and hepatic transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The search strategies were run and two authors individually evaluated whether the retrieved studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

No randomised clinical trials comparing surgical resection and liver transplantation as the major methods of treating hepatocellular carcinoma were found.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no randomised clinical trials comparing surgical resection and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.

Advances in experimental and translational research in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular cancer (HCC) is the fifth-leading cause of cancer and the third-leading cause of cancer related deaths world-wide. Current treatment options are limited, as HCC has been shown to be a highly resistant type of cancer to most current treatment modalities. Novel approaches are being explored in the fields of gene therapy, viral oncolytics, radioembolization, and several new biologic therapies. This article summarizes these recent clinical findings and discusses what role they will have in the future treatment of HCC.

Long-term survival of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with transcatheter arterial chemoinfusion

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has become one of the most common treatments for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Published studies of TACE report a 5-16% risk of serious complications. Compared with TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoinfusion (TACI) may have similar efficacy and fewer side effects.

AIM

To examine the clinical outcomes of TACI.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of 345 consecutive TACI cases in 165 patients performed at a single United States medical center between 1998 and 2002. Primary outcomes were tumour response and survival rates.

RESULTS

Only seven patients were hospitalized for more than 24 h after the procedure, and only three patients had worsening of liver function within 30 days of TACI. Survival was significantly poorer for patients with tumour-node-metastasis (TNM) IV compared to those with TNM I-III and also for patients with Child's class B/C vs. A. Following adjustment for age, gender, ethnicity and aetiology of liver diseases, independent predictors of poor survival were Child's class B/C [Hazard Ratio (HR) = 1.69, P = 0.024] and TNM IV staging (HR = 1.63, P = 0.014).

CONCLUSIONS

TACI appears to be safe and effective for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with TNM stage I-III; randomized controlled trials are needed to compare TACI to TACE.

Liver-directed therapies for patients with primary liver cancer and hepatic metastases

Liver cancer, whether primary or metastatic, is a major cause of death throughout the world. The surgical management of these diseases varies according to the extent of disease and the overall health of the patient. Surgical resection of hepatic disease remains the only chance for cure. However, a large proportion of patients with liver cancer are unable to undergo a complete surgical resection. These patients are often treated with liver-directed therapies. Although not as effective as surgical resection, these approaches can help to improve the survival of patients. In patients with primary liver cancer, underlying liver disease often prohibits surgical intervention. However, survival advantages have been gained with the application of percutaneous alcohol injection and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). In patients with hepatic metastases, the number of metastases is often what prevents surgical resection. In these patients, RFA, cryoablation, and hepatic artery infusional therapy have all aided in prolonging survival. As chemotherapeutic agents improve and targeted therapies are developed, more patients will be able to undergo surgical management of their liver cancer, primary or metastatic.

Outcome of regional and local ablative therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma: a collective review

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter arterial (chemo) embolization (TACE), cryoablation (CA) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) were the first regional and local ablative techniques that came into use for irresectable HCC. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and interstitial laser coagulation (ILC) followed and have now evolved rapidly. It would not be ethical to compare resection with ablation in patients well enough to undergo major surgery. Therefore, hepatic resection and hepatic transplantation remain the only curative treatment options for HCC.

METHODS

On the basis of a Medline literature search and the authors' experiences, the principles, current status and prospects of TACE and local ablative techniques in HCC are reviewed.

RESULTS

Complete tumour necrosis can be achieved in 60-100% of patients treated with PEI (70-100%), cryoablation (60-85%), RFA (80-90%) or ILC (70-97%). After TACE significant tumour response is achieved in 17-61.9% but complete tumour response is rare (0-4.8%) as viable tumour cells remain after TACE. Five-year survival rates are available for TACE (1-8%), PEI (0-70%) and cryoablation (40%). Only PEI and RFA were compared in one RCT. RFA was associated with fewer treatment sessions and a higher complete necrosis rate. Furthermore, all techniques are associated with low morbidity and mortality, but cryoablation seems to be associated with a higher morbidity rate.

CONCLUSION

TACE has shown to be a valuable therapy with survival benefits in strictly selected patients with unresectable HCC. RFA and PEI are now considered as the local ablative techniques of choice for the treatment of, preferably small, HCC. When tumours are located close to bile ducts or large vessels, PEI remains a valuable therapy. Completeness of ablation can be more easily monitored during cryoablation and another advantage of cryoablation is the possibility of edge freezing. The results of ILC are comparable to RFA with only few side effects and high tumour response rates.

Use of Yttriurn-90 TheraSphere for the Treatment of Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

This is a retrospective analysis of a new treatment modality, intra-arterial administration of Yttrium-90 TheraSphere, for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients with HCC not amenable to surgical treatment who had satisfactory physiological function without comorbid disease or significant pulmonary shunting were eligible for treatment. Patients were categorized into complete, partial, or no response based on serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels and CT or MRI imaging. Fourteen patients were considered candidates for treatment. Three patients were excluded due to significant hepatopulmonary shunting. Eleven patients were treated with TheraSphere. One patient (9%) had a complete response, eight patients (78%) had a partial response, and two patients (18%) showed no response. Partial and complete responders with AFP-associated HCC demonstrated a median decrease in AFP levels of 79 per cent at 73 days. No patients developed liver toxicity nor died due to treatment. Five patients (45%) died of progressive disease at a median of 7 months post-treatment. Six patients (54%) were alive at a median of 11 months (range, 9 to 20 months). Okuda stage 2 and 3 patients showed a median survival of 11 months and 7 months, respectively. Yttrium-90 TheraSphere treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is well tolerated and appears to extend survival.

Experiences in liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Beside surgical resection, orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is not only effective but also the only potentially curable treatment in selected cases of small tumors. We report our experience in 11 male patients transplanted for HCC from August 1998 to July 2002. Selection criteria for OLT were unresectability of the hepatic tumor and severity of the underlying liver disease. The tumor diagnosis was confirmed by histology, imaging techniques, and tumor markers. All patients received an orthotopic liver allograft using a modified piggyback technique. Six of the 11 patients are alive; one died due to acute rejection and four died from recurrent disease. In all four patients with recurrent disease, vascular invasion was shown histologically, whereas only one patient without evidence of recurrence showed vascular invasion. To prevent recurrence after OLT the immunosuppressive regime was adjusted to the underlying disease by early cessation of prednisolone and reduction in the long-term exposure to immunosuppressive drugs. Patients were screened for recurrence by ultrasound and computed tomography. Recurrent HCC were treated symptomatically. OLT is an effective treatment for subgroups of patients with HCC. It might be possible to downstage the liver tumor by chemoembolization and/or radiofrequency ablation and allow the patients to wait for a suitable donor. After OLT the early withdrawal of prednisolone and the reduction of other immunosuppression is feasible. In conclusion, OLT can be a potentially curative therapy for HCC.

Modalidades de tratamiento para pacientes con carcinoma hepatocelular: una serie retrospectiva de una sola institución en México

BACKGROUND

To date, curative treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) include orthotopic liver transplantation or surgical resection. Most patients are detected with nonresectable or transplantable HCC due to disease extension or comorbid factors, and are therefore candidates for palliative treatments only. Few follow-up data are available in patients with HCC in Latin America. We therefore reviewed the experience of HCC treatment in a single institution over a 10-year period.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A total of 135 patients attending the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, a national referral center in Mexico, from January 1991 to December 2000 were included. In all patients etiology, stage, and diagnostic and therapeutic measures were documented. Survival time was calculated as a function of staging and therapy.

RESULTS

Of 135 patients, 77 (57%) were men and 58 (43%) were women. The mean age at diagnosis was 59.17 years (range: 16-87 years). Cirrhosis was diagnosed in 89 patients (64.4%). The median overall survival for all patients with HCC was 7.9 months. Treatment included surgical resection (n=22), hepatic artery chemoembolization (n=10), percutaneous ethanol injection (n=6), systemic chemotherapy (n=5), tamoxifen (n=11), and thalidomide (n=1). Eighty patients received support measures. The median survival in the group of patients who underwent surgical resection (37.89 months) was significantly higher than that in the groups of patients who did not undergo resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HCC who received no treatment had a median survival of 1.7 months. Hepatic resection offers the best chance of cure in patients with HCC. The strong association between HCC and cirrhotic liver disease makes surgical resection difficult in patients with low hepatic reserve.

Practical management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the ten commonest tumours in the world and occurs mainly in patients with cirrhosis. To date, in Western countries, curative treatment options include partial liver resection or liver transplantation in selected patients with small tumours. Unfortunately, most patients are detected with non-resectable or non-transplantable HCC due to disease extension, hepatic dysfunction or comorbid factors. These patients may benefit from local ablative therapy, such as percutaneous ethanol injection or radiofrequency ablation, with curative intent in patients with small tumours. In advanced HCC chemoembolization has a high response rate, but there is no clear evidence of a survival benefit. In this review we discuss practical considerations in the treatment of HCC and propose an algorithm for the selection of different treatment modalities.

Living-donor versus cadaveric liver transplantation for non-resectable small hepatocellular carcinoma and compensated cirrhosis: a decision analysis

BACKGROUND

Cadaveric liver transplantation is effective for nonresectable early hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the scarcity of cadaveric organs has prompted some centers to use living donors, which guarantees transplantation, but entails a risk to the donor. In the absence of controlled trials, decision analysis can be used to help explicate the tradeoffs involved when considering living donor versus cadaveric liver transplantation for nonresectable early hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

Using a Markov model, a hypothetical cohort of patients with Child's A cirrhosis and a single 3.5-cm tumor received one of three strategies: 1) no transplant; 2) intent to perform cadaveric liver transplantation; or 3) living donor liver transplantation. Data were obtained from natural history and retrospective studies. All probabilities in the model were varied simultaneously using a Monte Carlo simulation.

RESULTS

Living-donor liver transplantation was the best strategy, improving life expectancy by 4.5 years compared with cadaveric liver transplantation. This strategy remained dominant even when varying severity of cirrhosis, age, tumor doubling time, tumor growth pattern, blood type, regional transplant volume, initial tumor size, and rate of progression of cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Living-donor liver transplantation should confer a substantial survival advantage for patients with compensated cirrhosis and non-resectable early stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Single-dose toxicity study of hepatic intra-arterial infusion of doxorubicin coupled to a novel magnetically targeted drug carrier

The toxicity of a single hepatic intra-arterial administration of doxorubicin (DOX) coupled to a magnetically targeted drug carrier (MTC) was evaluated in a swine model. MTC is a microparticle composite of elemental iron and activated carbon. MTC-DOX is a new formulation of doxorubicin absorbed to the MTC and is designed for site-specific delivery to a solid tumor in the presence of an externally applied magnetic field. The magnetic field induces extravasation of MTCs through the vascular wall, leading to localization and retention in the tissue at the targeted site. Eighteen swine were assigned to 6 treatment groups, including 3 control groups (vehicle control, doxorubicin, MTC), and 3 experimental groups that received the MTC-DOX preparation. Animals were given a single administration of test article, evaluated over 28 days, and then sacrificed. Signs of toxicity were monitored via clinical status, total body weight, gross and microscopic pathology, and serum chemistries. Angiography was used to determine the extent of any embolization present. There were no adverse effects observed in the DOX-alone group. Biologically significant, treatment-related gross and microscopic lesions were limited to the targeted area of the liver only in groups receiving > or =75 mg of MTC (with or without doxorubicin). The severity of liver necrosis correlated to the severity of embolization following treatment. Doxorubicin was not freely circulating in any of the MTC-DOX groups, suggesting successful localization to the targeted site. The no-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) was determined to be the MTC-DOX low-dose group.

Sudden death from massive pulmonary tumor embolism due to hepatocellular carcinoma

Massive pulmonary embolism in cancer patients can be due to detached thrombi or tumor. Pulmonary tumor embolism is often undiagnosed antemortem. We report a 52-year-old Chinese man admitted for management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Computerized tomography showed tumor involvement of hepatic vein and inferior vena cava. He died suddenly on the day of admission. At autopsy the main pulmonary arteries of both lungs were blocked by large tumor emboli, the immediate cause of death. Although rapid death in patients with HCC is usually caused by intraperitoneal hemorrhage from spontaneous rupture of tumor, massive pulmonary tumor embolism should also be considered in these patients, especially when antemortem evidence of hepatic vein and/or inferior vena cava invasion is present.

Hepatocellular carcinoma

Primary hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the 10 most common tumours, and the most common primary liver malignancy, in the world. In the majority of cases, it occurs against a background of hepatitis B or C viral infection and/or liver cirrhosis, and is associated with a dismal prognosis of a few months. Current treatments in routine clinical practice are surgical resection and liver transplantation, but these therapies are applicable to only a small proportion of patients and prolongation of survival is restricted. Other treatment options include intra-arterial chemotherapy, transcatheter arterial chemoembolisation, percutaneous ethanol injection, cryotherapy, thermotherapy, proton therapy, or a wide range of their possible combinations. The current lack of definitive data, however, limits the use of these therapies. Another option is gene therapy, which although in its infancy at the present time, may have a significant role to play in the future management of hepatocellular carcinoma.