Impact of calcium antagonists on the cardiovascular system: experience with lacidipine

Small artery remodelling in hypertension: causes, consequences and therapeutic implications

Essential hypertension is treated primarily with a view to reducing blood pressure, and not with regard to normalizing the main pathological changes: the peripheral resistance and the cardiovascular structure. The aim of this review is to discuss whether normalization of the latter parameters, in particular resistance vessel structure, may also be a target for therapy. The review presents first the evidence for altered structure of the resistance vasculature, an increase in the media:lumen ratio of the vessels due to inward eutrophic remodelling. Secondly the degree to which it may be possible to rectify the abnormal structure is discussed, where it is shown that there is strong evidence that this requires a therapy which causes vasodilatation in the patient concerned. Thirdly evidence is presented that altered small artery structure appears to have prognostic consequences. Fourthly, the cellular mechanisms which may be involved are discussed, where there is evidence that vasoconstriction in itself can cause inward remodelling, and that this can be prevented by vasodilators. Finally, the consequences of these findings are considered as regards clues for strategies that may be able to improve the outcome of antihypertensive therapy. The review concludes that there is reasonably strong evidence that a treatment which reduces peripheral resistance in the individual patient will, apart from reducing blood pressure, also improve the abnormal structure.

Beta-blockers and coronary flow reserve: the importance of a vasodilatory action

Coronary flow reserve (CFR) is the maximal increase in coronary blood flow (CBF) above its resting level for a given perfusion pressure when coronary vasculature is maximally dilated. Normally, hyperaemic CBF reaches values at least 2- to 3-fold greater than resting CBF. Reduction of CFR is mainly due to epicardial coronary artery stenosis or to coronary microvascular dysfunction. CFR can be determined by several techniques that measure CBF itself (e.g. positron emission tomography) or CBF velocities (Doppler methods) from which coronary flow velocity reserve is calculated. Hyperaemic coronary vasodilation can be obtained by pharmacological agents (e.g. adenosine and dipyridamole), but also by the cold pressure test. Long-term antihypertensive treatment induces significant improvement of CFR, which is parallel to the regression of left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy. First- and second-generation beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists (beta-blockers) have shown contradictory influences on CFR. This can be explained by the interaction of the effects on CBF at rest, generally reduced by these drugs, and after hyperaemia, when minimal coronary resistance appears to be either increased or reduced. Third-generation beta-blockers (e.g. carvedilol and nebivolol), which have vasodilating capacity, improve hyperaemic CBF. This occurs as a result of a reduction in minimal resistance, which can be attributed to alpha-adrenergic blockade and/or to a nitric oxide-mediated effect. This improvement is clearly beneficial in patients with coronary artery disease and indicates an improved coronary microvascular function. Changes of CFR due to vasodilating beta-blockers improve microvascular angina pectoris or silent ischaemia in patients without epicardial artery stenosis, and are also helpful in predicting the response or the further improvement of LV function to treatment.

The left ventricle and hemodynamic patterns in essential hypertension

Hemodynamic patterns in hypertensive patients by radionuclide techniques and tomographic gamma camera were evaluated. In younger hypertensive patients, the hyperkinetic state reflected an increase in heart rate and, consequently, an increased cardiac index and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Older hypertensive patients, however, showed a different hemodynamic pattern, with reduced systolic and diastolic function at rest compared with normotensive elderly people, and marked depression of cardiac systolic and diastolic reserve during exercise. They also showed strikingly higher hyperresistance and reduced peripheral perfusion. These hemodynamic differences need to be taken into account when considering antihypertensive treatment. In a study in 106 elderly hypertensive patients, treatment with four different antihypertensive drugs produced a significant decrease in total peripheral resistance and blood pressure, together with a reduction in left ventricular (LV) afterload and an increase in cardiac output and LVEF (tending towards normal values). The LV peak filling rate was also increased and evaluation of systolic and diastolic cardiac reserve during exercise showed positive changes in cardiac performance. Left ventricular hyperthropy (LVH) is a powerful predictor of cardiac events. Long-term increases in BP predispose to LVH, impaired diastolic relaxation and, ultimately, ventricular dysfunction. A reduction in LVH produces a number of different beneficial effects. Coronary flow reserve was evaluated in hypertensive patients. Coronary flow reserve was highly impaired in comparison with normotensive controls, and increases in arteriolar wall thickness, collagen content and diastolic dysfunction were also noted. A marked improvement in coronary flow reserve in patients who received antihypertensive therapy was confirmed.

Antihypertensive effects of lacidipine during effort in mild to moderate hypertension

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of chronic treatment with lacidipine on blood pressure, heart rate and double product during and immediately after physical effort in mild to moderate hypertensive patients. This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, crossover, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Eighteen hypertensive patients (56% males, median age 53 years) were randomized to lacidipine 4 mg o.i.d. followed by placebo or to placebo followed by lacidipine 4 mg o.i.d. Lacidipine compared with placebo exerted a significant antihypertensive effect, lowering SBP and DBP both at baseline and either during or after exercise test. The average incremental changes of SBP and DBP between pre-exercise stage and maximal effort did not show any significant differences between treatments. HR during treatment with lacidipine was higher than during treatment with placebo both at rest and after exercise, but at maximal effort, HR was not different from placebo. The average values of DP at maximal effort, and during recovery, did not show any significant differences. Lacidipine 4 mg was effective in lowering blood pressure and in maintaining its antihypertensive effect throughout and after physical exercise, without enhancing double product value, which is an indirect index of myocardial oxygen consumption.