Drug treatment of scleroderma

Treatment of systemic sclerosis complications: what to use when first-line treatment fails--a consensus of systemic sclerosis experts

OBJECTIVES

There is a need for standardization in systemic sclerosis (SSc) management.

METHODS

SSc experts (n = 117) were sent 3 surveys to gain consensus for SSc management.

RESULTS

First-line therapy for scleroderma renal crisis (SRC) was an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi). For SRC there were not many differences between treating mild or severe SRC. In general, Second-line was to add either a calcium channel blocker (CCB) or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and then an alpha-blocker (66% agreed). Endothelin receptor agonists (ERAs) were the first treatment in mild pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) (72%), followed by adding a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) (77%) and then a prostanoid (73%). For severe PAH, initial treatment was 1 of the following: a prostanoid (49%), combination of a ERA and a PDE5i (18%), or combination of a ERA and a prostanoid (16%) (71% agreed). For mild Raynaud's phenomenon (RF), after a CCB and adding a PDE5i (35%), trying an ARB (32%) and finally a prostanoid (23%) was suggested. For more severe RF, 54% agreed on adding a PDE5i (45%) or prostanoid (32%) to a CCB. In the prevention of digital ulcers (DU), initial treatment was a CCB (73%), then adding a PDE5i, then use of a ERA, and then a prostanoid (44% agreed). In interstitial lung disease/pulmonary fibrosis, for induction, usually intravenous cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or azathioprine were chosen. For maintenance, MMF was chosen by three-fourths (56% agreed). For gastroesophageal reflux disease, >50% would exceed the maximum recommended proton pump inhibitor dose if required (72% agreed). For skin involvement after methotrexate, MMF was usually chosen (37% agreement). For SSC-related inflammatory arthritis, methotrexate therapy (60%) was followed by adding corticosteroids (37%) or hydroxychloroquine (31%) (62% agreed).

CONCLUSIONS

Discrepancies in drug choices occurred in treatment after first line in SSc. Not all algorithms had good agreement. This study provides some guidance for SSc management.

Agreement with Guidelines from a Large Database for Management of Systemic Sclerosis: Results from the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group

Objective.

We determined congruence with published guidelines from the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/EULAR Scleroderma Trials and Research group, for systemic sclerosis (SSc) investigations and treatment practices within the Canadian Scleroderma Research Group (CSRG).

Methods.

Investigations and medication use for SSc complications were obtained from records of patients with SSc in the CSRG to determine adherence to guidelines for patients enrolled before and after the guidelines were published.

Results.

The CSRG database of 1253 patients had 992 patients with SSc enrolled before publication of the guidelines and 261 after. For pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) treatment, there were no differences in use before and after the guidelines, yet annual echocardiograms for PAH screening were done in 95% of patients enrolled before the guidelines and in only 86% of those enrolled after (p <0.0001), and fewer followup echocardiograms were done 1 year later in the latter group (88% vs 59%). No differences were found for the frequency of PAH-specific treatment; 60% had ever used calcium channel blockers for Raynaud’s phenomenon, with no differences in the groups before and after the guidelines. But the use of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (which does not have guidelines) was increased in the after-guidelines group. Proton pump inhibitors were used in > 80% with gastroesophageal reflux disease before and after the guidelines. One-quarter with gastrointestinal symptoms were taking prokinetic drugs. For those with past SSc renal crisis, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors was not different before and after the guidelines. For early diffuse SSc < 2 years, ever-use of methotrexate was similar (one-quarter of each group); and for symptomatic interstitial lung disease, 19% had ever used cyclophosphamide before the guidelines and 9% after (p = nonsignificant). CSRG practices were generally comparable to recently published guidelines; however, use of iloprost and bosentan was low for digital ulcers because these drugs are not approved for use in Canada.

Conclusion.

There did not seem to be an increase in adherence to recommendations once the guidelines were published. For many guidelines, 25% to 40% of patients who would qualify received the recommended treatment.

Vascular involvement in systemic sclerosis (scleroderma)

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an acquired multiorgan connective tissue disease with variable mortality and morbidity dictated by clinical subset type. The etiology of the basic disease and pathogenesis of the systemic autoimmunity, fibrosis, and fibroproliferative vasculopathy are unknown and debated. In this review, the spectrum of vascular abnormalities and the options currently available to treat the vascular manifestations of SSc are discussed. Also discussed is how the hallmark pathologies (ie, how autoimmunity, vasculopathy, and fibrosis of the disease) might be effected and interconnected with modulatory input from lysophospholipids, sphingosine 1-phosphate, and lysophosphatidic acid.

Gold standard medical therapy for glaucoma: defining the criteria identifying measures for an evidence-based analysis

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, several new medical therapies have become available for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). A systematic evidence-based approach for identifying an optimal therapeutic agent is lacking.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this review were to critically evaluate published treatment recommendations for POAG and, based on a systematic review of the literature, to develop criteria that would define a "gold standard" medical therapy that reflects new treatment advances and established therapeutic goals.

METHODS

A MEDLINE search spanning the years 1966 to 2002 and using the search terms gold standard, drug of choice, agent of choice, benchmark, ophthalmology, eye, and glaucoma was conducted and the results reviewed by a panel of 15 experts in the field of glaucoma. Published treatment recommendations for POAG were discussed. Criteria, anchored to medical evidence, for distinguishing a standard of medical therapy for POAG were defined.

RESULTS

The terms connoting a gold standard therapy were found in only 258 of approximately 368,000 ophthalmology-related citations and 53 of almost 23,000 glaucoma citations, validating the need to define therapeutic standards. The lack of recommendations for the use of new classes of ocular hypotensive agents was acknowledged. Criteria identified to evaluate intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering agents as gold standards included the following: efficacy in reducing IOP consistently over a 24-hour period to a level that will preserve the visual field and protect the optic nerve without inducing tachyphylaxis and tolerance, paucity of local and systemic adverse effects, promotion of patient compliance, and applicability in diverse patient populations.

CONCLUSIONS

These criteria should be employed as measures for evidence-based analyses to evaluate available and future IOP-lowering medical therapies for POAG. The conceptual framework presented may be applicable to other therapeutic areas.

Update on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs in the treatment of systemic sclerosis

Treatment of systemic sclerosis has been somewhat haphazard and treatment has often been "borrowed" from the experience gained from treating other connective tissue diseases. There was a period of time that was focused mainly on organ-specific manifestations of systemic sclerosis and some advance in preventing vital organ damage (such as renal crisis) was achieved. The vast improvement in mortality from the use of ACE inhibitors raises one's hopes for other effective therapeutic interventions. At this juncture, the evidence is strong that the ACE inhibitors that are used in scleroderma renal crisis are disease-modifying, even without proving it by a randomized controlled trial. The evidence is strong that the use of epoprostenol for primary pulmonary hypertension is life-saving; however, whether epoprostenol is life-saving in the pulmonary hypertension in scleroderma remains to be proven. There are suggestions that bosentan (for the pulmonary hypertension of scleroderma), cyclophosphamide (for SSc alveolitis), stem cell transplant, interferon-gamma (for interstitial pulmonary fibrosis), and methotrexate (for the skin thickening of diffuse scleroderma) may improve organ function or functional activities, but whether they are truly disease-modifying remains to be proven. As we increase our understanding of the pathophysiology of systemic sclerosis and we learn how better to design trials for systemic sclerosis, we may be more successful in developing optimal disease-modifying therapy. Although the treatment of systemic sclerosis remains difficult, there are an increasing number of potentially effective regimens that are undergoing clinical investigations. A rational approach to therapy seems possible, based on a hypothesis of the pathogenesis of systemic sclerosis. Thus, there is accumulating evidence that supports the use of prostacyclin derivatives to treat systemic sclerosis, some evidence that antifibrotic regimens may be effective, and moderate evidence that immunosuppression also may be effective in certain stages of this disease.