The role of myelopoietic growth factors in managing cancer in the elderly

Management of the toxicity of chemotherapy and targeted therapies in elderly cancer patients

The elderly form a very heterogeneous group in relation to their general health state, degree of dependence, comorbidities, performance status, physical reserve and geriatric situation, so cancer treatment in the older patient remains a therapeutic challenge. The physiological changes associated with aging increase the risk of developing a serious toxicity induced by chemotherapy treatment, as well as other undesirable consequences as hospitalizations, dependence and non-compliance with treatment, that can negatively affect survival, quality of life and treatment efficacy. The use of hematopoietic growth factors and other active supportive interventions in the elderly can help prevent and/or alleviate these toxicities. However, we have little data on the efficacy and tolerance of support treatments in the older patient. The objective of this work is to review the most frequent toxicities of oncological treatments in the elderly and their management.

Evaluation of effectiveness of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor therapy to cancer patients after chemotherapy: a meta-analysis

The impact of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) on hematologic indexes and complications remains existing contradictory evidence in cancer patients after treatment of chemotherapy. Eligible studies up to March 2017 were searched and reviewed from PubMed and Wanfang databases. Totally 1043 cancer patients from 15 studies were included in our research. The result indicated that GM-CSF could significantly improve white blood cells count (SMD = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.71 – 1.61, Z = 5.03, P < 0.00001) and reduce the time to leukopenia recovery (SMD = -0.85, 95% CI: -1.16 – -0.54, Z = 5.38, P < 0.00001) in cancer patients after treatment of chemotherapy. It also could improve absolute neutrophil count (SMD = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.39 – 1.82, Z = 3.04, P = 0.002) and significantly shorten the time to neutropenia recovery (SMD = -1.47, 95% CI: -2.20 – -1.75, Z = 3.99, P < 0.0001). However, GM-CSF could not improve blood platelet (SMD = 0.46, 95% CI: -0.37 – -1.29, Z = 1.10, P = 0.27). And GM-CSF had significant connection with fever (RR = 3.44, 95% CI: 1.43 – 8.28, Z = 2.76, P = 0.006). The publication bias existed in the data of the impact of GM-CSF on blood platelet and complication. In conclusions, GM-CSF had an intimate association with some hematologic indexes and complications. Our study suggested that more hematological indexes and even more other indexes need to be observed in future studies.

A randomized comparison of cisplatin and oral vinorelbine as radiosensitizers in aged or comorbid locally advanced cervical cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

Chemoradiation with cisplatin is considered the standard of care for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer; however, cisplatin could be difficult to use in aged patients or patients with comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus and blood hypertension; hence, it is important to investigate nonplatinum drugs for radiosensitization. In addition, oral cytotoxics may overcome the drawbacks of intravenous infusions and could be of easier administration.

METHODS

In this small randomized trial, we tested cisplatin against oral vinorelbine as radiosensitizers in these patients. A total of 39 patients 65 years or older or diabetic and hypertensive patients of any age were randomized to cisplatin or oral vinorelbine at 40 mg/m² or 60 mg/m², respectively. Both drugs were administered weekly for 6 courses during pelvic external-beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy radiation. Efficacy and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients received oral vinorelbine, and 20 patients received cisplatin. The median cumulative dose to point A was 80.8 Gy for both groups, and the overall treatment time was 48 (42-54) and 50 (43-55) days for vinorelbine and cisplatin groups, respectively. Patients in both arms received a median of 5 applications of chemotherapy. Treatment was well tolerated in both arms. The most frequent toxicity in both arms was lymphopenia grades 2 and 3. At a median follow-up time of 16 months (4-19), there were no differences in either progression-free survival or overall survival between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that these patient populations can safely be treated with either cisplatin or navelbine as radiosensitizers; however, a larger randomized study is needed to demonstrate the noninferiority of oral vinorelbine as an easier and practical alternative for radiosensitization in cervical cancer.

Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor-induced immune priming of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone with rituximab chemoimmunotherapy in previously untreated patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and mantle cell lymphoma

Granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) has been shown to enhance CD20 antigen expression, augment antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity, and stimulate immune cell proliferation. This may lead to an improved anti-tumor effect of rituximab while reducing the severity of chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP) in sequential combination with GM-CSF priming and rituximab in previously untreated patients (n = 39) with diffuse-large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). CHOP was administered every 21 days on day 1, GM-CSF 250 μg/m(2)/day on days 9 through 15, and rituximab 375 mg/m(2) on day 15 of each cycle. The overall response rate was 87%, with complete response in 64%. At a median follow-up of 84.3 months, the overall and progression-free survival rates were 54% and 49%, respectively. The most common toxicity was myelosuppression. Sequential combination of CHOP with GM-CSF priming and rituximab was feasible and effective, warranting further evaluation.

Spanish Society of Medical Oncology consensus for the use of haematopoietic colony-stimulating factors in cancer patients

Neutropenia is a common complication of cancer chemotherapy. Colony-stimulating factors (CSF) may be used to avoid neutropenia-associated complications. The Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) recently constituted a working group to review the main issues concerning the use of CSF and carried out a consensus process about the use of CSF in cancer patients, held in Madrid on 26 May 2006. The group concluded the following recommendations: prophylactic use of CSF is recommended when a rate of febrile neutropenia (FN) higher than 20% is expected without the use of CSF or when additional risk factors for neutropenia exist; therapeutic use of CSF is recommended in order to treat FN episodes but not to treat afebrile neutropenic episodes. In addition, the use of CSF is considered effective when used to mobilise stem cells before high-dose chemotherapy and when used for chemotherapy schedule optimisation in dose-dense and in dose-intense regimens.

GM-CSF-induced CD11c+CD8a--dendritic cells facilitate Foxp3+ and IL-10+ regulatory T cell expansion resulting in suppression of autoimmune thyroiditis

GM-CSF plays an essential role in the differentiation of dendritic cells (DCs). Our studies have shown that GM-CSF treatment can induce semi-mature DCs and CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) and suppress ongoing autoimmunity in mouse models. In this study, we examined the differences in the potential of GM-CSF to exert tolerogenic function on CD8a+ and CD8a- sub-populations of DCs in vivo. We show that GM-CSF modulates CD8a-, but not CD8a+ DCs in vivo, by inhibiting the surface expression of activation markers MHC II and CD80 and production of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-12 and IL-1beta. Self-antigen [mouse thyroglobulin (mTg)] presentation by GM-CSF-exposed CD8a- DCs to T cells from mTg-primed mice induced a profound increase in the frequency of forkhead box P3 (FoxP3)-expressing T cells compared with antigen presentation by GM-CSF-exposed CD8a+ DCs and control CD8a+ and CD8a- DCs. This tolerogenic property of GM-CD8a- DCs was abrogated when IL-12 was added. GM-CSF-exposed CD8a- DCs could also induce secretion of significantly higher amounts of IL-10 by T cells from mTg-primed mice. Importantly, adoptive transfer of CD8a- DCs from GM-CSF-treated SCID mice, but not untreated mice, into wild-type CBA/J mice prevented the development of experimental autoimmune thyroiditis (EAT) in the recipient animals upon immunization with mTg. Collectively, our results show that GM-CSF renders CD8a- DCs tolerogenic, and these DCs induce Foxp3+ and IL-10+ Tregs.

Transplantation without growth factor: engraftment kinetics after stem cell transplantation for primary systemic amyloidosis (AL)

Stem cell transplantation is increasingly used in the management of immunoglobulin light-chain amyloidosis (AL). It is considered the standard of care to administer growth factors to accelerate neutrophil recovery after transplantation. However, unique toxicities occur with growth factor use in patients with AL who receive a stem cell transplant. We report a cohort of patients who underwent transplantation without receiving posttransplantation growth factors. In total, 282 patients received a stem cell transplant. A neutrophil count of 500/mul was achieved in 50, 75 and 90% of patients at 14, 16 and 22 days, respectively. A platelet count of 20 000/mul was achieved in 50, 75 and 90% of patients at 14, 20 and 31 days, respectively. Non-staphylococcal bacteremia was detected in 16% of patients. The median hospital stay was 9 days. It is feasible and reasonable to withhold growth factor therapy after autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with AL.

Docetaxel administration schedule: from fever to tears? A review of randomised studies

The anti-cancer agent docetaxel is approved for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and for the treatment of androgen-independent prostate cancer. At the recommended dose of 60-100 mg/m2 given every 3 weeks, severe neutropenia is the dose-limiting toxicity and a major concern especially when treating patients at high-risk from myelotoxic complications. A less toxic schedule, involving weekly docetaxel administration was developed for patients with poor performance status, multiple comorbidities, poor haematological reserves or those who were heavily pre-treated, elderly or patients for whom palliation is the focus of treatment. Recent randomised trials allow a comparison of efficacy and toxicity between weekly and 3-weekly treatments. Efficacy appears to be similar for the two schedules regardless of the disease while weekly docetaxel is significantly less myelotoxic. However, this benefit comes at the cost of cumulative increases in hyperlacrimation, skin- and nail-toxicity and negatively affects quality of life. Currently, 3-weekly docetaxel remains the standard schedule for treatment, whereas the weekly schedule offers a possibility of treatment individualisation for those patients where the risk of myelosuppression is considered unacceptable.

Erythropoietin modulates the anticancer activity of chemotherapeutic drugs in a murine lung cancer model

In this study, we assessed the ability of erythropoietin (EPO) to synergize with various chemotherapeutic agents and suppress the growth and metastasis of solid tumors. Animals were inoculated with Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells and treated with EPO alone, the designated chemotherapeutic drug (cisplatin, mitomycin C or cyclophoshamide) alone, or EPO and the drug. Tumor volume was monitored daily. Thirteen days following cell injection, tumor mass was determined. In addition, the number of the metastatic foci in the lungs was determined. Cisplatin alone was capable of inducing a 7-fold decrease in final tumor volume compared to tumor-bearing animals injected with saline. However, when EPO was combined with cisplatin, the animals experienced an 11-fold reduction in final tumor volume compared to saline-injected animals (P<0.001). A 2.5-fold reduction in tumor mass was observed in animals treated with cisplatin, compared to the saline-injected groups. Furthermore, injections of EPO and cisplatin induced a 4-fold reduction in tumor mass (P<0.001). Blood analysis indicated that a significant increase of more than 30% in WBC was found in animals injected concurrently with cisplatin and EPO, as compared to saline-injected mice (P<0.03). When EPO and mitomycin C were injected together, tumor mass was further reduced by 14% compared to that seen in mice treated with mitomycin C alone. However, this difference was not statistically significant. We conclude from this study that EPO can synergize with chemotherapeutic agents to further suppress the growth of tumors. The level of synergism is drug related.