Peginterferon-??-2a (40kD)

Novel long-acting ropeginterferon alfa-2b: Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety in a phase I clinical trial

AIMS

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b is a novel, long-acting pegylated interferon alfa-2b. We aimed to evaluate its safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD).

METHODS

Thirty-six subjects received single subcutaneous injection of ropeginterferon alfa-2b at doses ranging from 24 to 270 μg, and 12 subjects received pegylated IFN alfa-2a subcutaneously at 180 μg. Primary endpoints were safety/PK profiles of ropeginterferon alfa-2b, while secondary endpoints were to compare PK/PD parameters with pegylated IFN alfa-2a.

RESULTS

Adverse events in ropeginterferon alfa-2b and pegylated IFN alfa-2a groups were similar, and most of them were mild or moderate. Mean C_max increased from 1.78 to 24.84 ng/mL along with the dose escalations in ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups and was 12.95 ng/mL for pegylated IFN alfa-2a. At 180 μg, ropeginterferon alfa-2b showed statistically significant C_max geometric mean ratio (1.76; P = .0275). Mean T_max ranged from 74.52 to 115.69 h for ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups, and was 84.25 h for pegylated IFN alfa-2a. Mean AUC_0-t increased from 372.3 to 6258 ng•h/mL with the dose escalations in the ropeginterferon alfa-2b groups, while for pegylated IFN alfa-2a it was found to be 2706 ng•h/mL in pegylated IFN alfa-2a. For neopterin and 2',5'-oligoadenylate synthase, mean E_max , T_max and AUC_0-t of ropeginterferon alfa-2b were similar to those of pegylated IFNα-2a at 180 μg.

CONCLUSION

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b up to 270 μg was safe and well tolerated. The PK/PD parameters of ropeginterferon alfa-2b showed increase in dose-response. Ropeginterferon alfa-2b had higher drug exposures and showed similar safety profile when compared to pegylated IFN alfa-2a at the same dose level.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of two "pegylated" interferon alpha-2 formulations in healthy male volunteers: a randomized, crossover, double-blind study

BACKGROUND

Interferon (IFN) alpha conjugation to polyethylene glycol (PEG) results in a better pharmacokinetic profile and efficacy. The aim of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and safety properties of a new, locally developed, 40-kDa PEG-IFN alpha-2b preparation with a reference, commercially available PEG-IFN alpha-2a in healthy male volunteers.

METHODS

A randomized, crossover, double-blind study with a 3-weeks washout period, was done. A single 180 micrograms PEG-IFN alpha-2 dose was administered subcutaneously in both groups. Sixteen apparently healthy male subjects were included. Serum PEG-IFN concentration was measured during 336 hours by an enzyme immunoassay (EIA). Other clinical and laboratory variables were used as pharmacodynamic and safety criteria.

RESULTS

The pharmacokinetic comparison by EIA yielded a high similitude between the formulations. In spite of a high subject variability, the parameters' mean were very close (in all cases p > 0.05): AUC: 53623 vs. 44311 pg.h/mL; Cmax: 333 vs. 271 pg/mL; Tmax: 54 vs. 55 h; half-life (t1/2): 72.4 vs. 64.8 h; terminal elimination rate (lambda): 0.011 vs. 0.014 h(-1); mean residence time (MRT): 135 vs. 123 h for reference and study preparations, respectively. There were no significant differences with respect to the pharmacodynamic variables either: serum neopterin and beta-2 microglobulin levels, stimulation of 2'5' oligoadenylate synthetase expression, and serum IFN antiviral activity. A strong Spearman's rank order correlation (p < 0.01) between the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic concentration-time curves was observed. Both products caused similar leukocyte counts diminution and had similar safety profiles. The most frequent adverse reactions were leukopenia, fever, thrombocytopenia, transaminases increase and asthenia, mostly mild.

CONCLUSIONS

Both formulations are fully comparable from the pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and safety profiles. Efficacy trials can be carried out to confirm clinical similarity.

Telbivudine for the treatment of hepatitis B disease

Chronic hepatitis B affects approximately 350 million individuals worldwide leading to approximately 500,000 deaths annually. Current therapy includes immune modulators such as IFN-α and the oral antiviral agents, nucleoside analogs such as lamivudine and entecavir, and nucleotide analogs such as adefovir and tenofovir. Recently, telbivudine was approved in the USA for treatment of HBV disease. It is a synthetic nucleoside analog of thymidine that requires phosphorylation to convert to the active triphosphate form. Telbivudine is rapidly absorbed with a long half-life allowing for once-daily dosing. Clinical trials have demonstrated superior antiviral efficacy compared with lamivudine. Telbivudine has shown good correlations between antiviral efficacy at 24 weeks and a favorable outcome at 2 years. Telbivudine is well-tolerated, although monitoring for myopathies is recommended. Telbivudine resistance rates were lower compared with lamivudine. Telbivudine is an option for monotherapy in naive patients or for use in combination therapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B.

Telbivudine

Telbivudine, the unmodified L-enantiomer of the naturally occurring nucleoside D-thymidine, is a potent synthetic nucleoside analogue. It acts as a hepatitis B virus (HBV) polymerase inhibitor and preferentially inhibits HBV second strand (DNA-dependent) compared with first strand (RNA-dependent) DNA synthesis. More telbivudine than lamivudine recipients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B and similar proportions of telbivudine or lamivudine recipients with HBeAg-negative disease achieved a therapeutic response at 52 weeks in the large 2-year GLOBE trial. In a phase III trial in Chinese patients, greater reductions in serum HBV DNA occurred with telbivudine than lamivudine at 52 weeks. Reductions in serum HBV DNA at 24 weeks were greater with telbivudine than adefovir in the 1-year switching trial. A lower residual viral load at 52 weeks was seen in patients who received telbivudine or who switched from adefovir to telbivudine at 24 weeks than in patients receiving adefovir. In the 1-year lamivudine switching trial in patients with serum HBV DNA levels >3 log10 copies/mL despite having received prior treatment with lamivudine for a mean of [almost equal or equal to]7 months, those randomised to telbivudine therapy achieved greater reductions in serum HBV DNA levels at 24 weeks than patients randomised to continue lamivudine therapy. Telbivudine was generally well tolerated and most adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. The incidence of severe ALT flares with telbivudine was half that seen with lamivudine at both 52 and 104 weeks in the GLOBE trial.

Appropriate use of interferon for treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Hepatitis B is not only a preventable but now treatable disease. Five drugs have been approved for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection: standard interferon-alpha (IFN), pegylated IFN, lamivudine, adefovir dipivoxil and entecavir. Among these agents, the responses to interferon therapy are invariably influenced by both host and viral factors. Therefore, understanding these factors is important for practicing hepatologists, and it may help design individualized medicine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. HBV genotypes affect the disease progression and outcomes of HBV-related chronic liver disease, as well as the response to antiviral treatments. Existing data indicate a better sustained response to standard IFN-alpha in HBeAg positive genotype B patients than genotype C patients, and in genotype A patients than genotype D patients. Nevertheless, conflicting results exist regarding the response to pegylated IFN, and more studies are needed. As to HBV genetic polymorphisms, a recent study showed that an IFN sensitivity-determiningregion may not exist within the whole genome of HBV subgenotype Ba, and host factors as well as virus-host interactions may be more important than viral factors alone in determining the treatment outcomes with IFN. Regarding host genetic polymorphisms, single nucleotide polymorphisms within eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2 and MxA promoter regions may be associated with the responsiveness to standard IFN-alpha treatment in patients with HBeAg positive chronic hepatitis B. In the foreseeable future, individualized chronic hepatitis B treatment algorithms should be tailored to host (immune status, ALT level and genomic polymorphisms), virus (HBeAg status, HBV DNA level, genotype, precore/basal core promoter mutants and pre-S deletion mutant) as well as liver disease status (hepatitis activity and fibrosis stage).