Traditional and Newer Therapeutic Options for Psoriatic Arthritis

Sclerotherapy and prolotherapy for chronic patellar tendinopathies - a promising therapy with limited available evidence, a systematic review

Chronic Patellar tendinopathy (CPT) is a frequent overuse disorder in athletes and active people. Sclerotherapy (ST) and prolotherapy (PT) are, among a wide range of conservative treatment options, two promising therapies and have shown positive results in other tendinopathies. Since the treatments' efficacy and safety are still not defined, this review sought to answer questions on recommendations for use in clinical utility, safety, and how to perform the injection in the most effective way. An electronic database search was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were set up according to the PICOS-scheme. Included were athletes and non-athletes of all ages with diagnosed painful CPT. Studies including patients suffering from patellar tendinopathy which can be originated to any systemic condition affecting the musculoskeletal system (e.g. disorders associated with rheumatism) and animal studies were excluded. Methodological quality (modified Coleman Methodology Score) and risk of bias (Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 2.0) were assessed by two independent reviewers, with disagreements resolved with a third reviewer. The search yielded a total of 416 entries. After screening titles, abstracts, and full texts, ten articles were found for qualitative analysis. The mean Coleman Score was 64.57. Three randomized-controlled trials showed positive results with an increase in VISA-P score or a decrease in VAS or NPPS, respectively. The non-randomized studies confirmed the positive results as well. Among all ten studies no serious adverse events were reported. Based on this limited set of studies, there seems to be some evidence that ST and PT may be effective treatment options to treat pain and to improve function in patients with CPT. To strengthen this recommendation, more research is needed with larger volume studies and randomized controlled studies with long term follow up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Therapeutic strategies in psoriasis patients with psoriatic arthritis: focus on new agents

Psoriatic arthritis affects approximately 6-42 % of patients with psoriasis. It is useful for physicians or dermatologists managing psoriasis patients to be aware of how to concurrently manage the joint manifestations, as it is preferable and convenient to use a single agent in such patients. However, only certain therapies are effective for both. Systemic agents, which can be used for both skin and joint manifestations, include methotrexate and ciclosporin. For the group of biologic agents, the tumor necrosis factor inhibitors such as adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, golimumab and certolizumab are effective. Ustekinumab is a more recently developed agent belonging to the group of anti-IL-12p40 antibodies and has been shown to be efficacious. Newer drugs in the treatment armamentarium that have shown efficacy for both psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis consist of the anti-IL-17 agent, secukinumab, and a phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitor, apremilast. The other anti-IL-17 agents, ixekizumab and brodalumab, as well as the oral Jak inhibitor, tofacitinib, have very limited but promising data. This review paper provides a good overview of the agents that can be used for the concurrent management of skin and joint psoriasis.

Infliximab (Remicade) in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis

Elucidation of the cellular immunopathology and cytokine profile of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), a chronic inflammatory disease associated with psoriasis, has resulted in the development of a number of novel biologic therapies. Among these biologics, tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) inhibitors have been used successfully to treat patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis or psoriasis. The pivotal role of TNF-alpha in the pathogenesis and progression of PsA suggested that anti-TNF-alpha agents could be effective in controlling PsA. The results from two large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials in patients with moderate to severe PsA indicated that the anti-TNF-inhibitor, infliximab, can control both the joint and skin manifestations of the disease. This review focuses on the clinical development of infliximab as a treatment for PsA. The development of other anti-TNF-alpha biologics is also discussed.

Psoriatic arthritis

Although there is still some controversy about the existence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) as a specific form of inflammatory arthritis associated with psoriasis, epidemiological and clinical studies support the unique features of PsA. Because of lack of diagnostic or classification criteria, the disease has been thought of as uncommon. New classification criteria should facilitate case definition of PsA. Over the past several decades, it has become clear that the disease leads to serious disability and even increased mortality. Traditional medications have not been effective in preventing the progression of joint damage. New medications, including biologics, have emerged with potential to controlling the inflammation and arresting the progression of joint damage.

Psoriatic Arthritis: A Review

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a seronegative inflammatory spondyloarthropathy occurring in individuals with psoriasis. Psoriasis precedes joint disease in approximately 80% of PsA cases. The clinical course of PsA varies from mild arthritis to a severe, debilitating erosive arthropathy that affects functional capacity and quality of life of patients. The incidence of PsA is gender neutral, but a significant genetic component exists. Hallmark clinical features include dystrophic nail changes in the fingers or toes, dactylitis, and enthesitis. Many drugs indicated for use in rheumatoid arthritis have been found useful in the treatment of PsA, suggesting a similar immune-mediated etiology. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and intraarticular corticosteroids are often sufficient to manage mild PsA. Moderate to severe forms of the disease require the initiation of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs. Failure of two disease modifying antirheumatic drugs justifies the initiation of biologic therapy with tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors.

Remission, a Therapeutic Goal in Inflammatory Arthropathies?

In recent years, there have been major advances in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), leading to the development of tumour necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists. With these agents, it is possible to arrest joint damage and, by treating early in the disease course, to prevent joint damage. It is also now thought that early treatment can achieve clinical remission in a substantial proportion of patients. With these increased expectations, a change is required in the way clinical improvement and drug efficacy is measured. The existing standard endpoint commonly used in RA clinical trials, the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response measure, is inadequate for the new goals of therapy that should be based on clinical remission and radiographic assessment.Adalimumab, a fully human anti-TNF monoclonal antibody, has been shown to be effective in achieving remission and preventing radiographic progression of joint damage in patients with RA and other inflammatory arthropathies, including psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. In a placebo-controlled trial in patients with early RA, combination treatment with adalimumab plus methotrexate (MTX) has been shown to be superior to either treatment alone in inducing significant clinical remission while being generally well tolerated. Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy resulted in significantly more patients (49% vs 25%; p < 0.001) remaining in clinical remission after 2 years. Suppression of joint damage assessed by the degree of inhibition of radiographic progression was also significantly higher for patients treated with adalimumab plus MTX (and with adalimumab alone) at 6 months, 1 and 2 years than for those treated with MTX alone. These data support the notion that clinical remission is a realistic therapeutic goal in patients with RA.