Corticosteroid-Free Strategies in Liver Transplantation

Crocin restores the balance of Th1/Th2 immune cell response in ConA-treated human lymphocytes

BACKGROUND

Following antigen stimulation, naive CD4⁺ T cells differentiate into different T helper (Th) subsets characterized by lineage-specific transcriptional factors and cytokines. The balance between cytokines from Th1 and Th2 cells is disrupted in autoimmune disorders, asthma, and allergic reactions. Crocin, the major carotenoid of saffron, has anti-inflammatory properties. We investigated crocin modifying effects on the human lymphocytes proliferation and Th1/Th2 balance as a possible mechanism of its anti-inflammatory effects.

METHODS

The human peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated using Ficoll density gradient centrifugation. MTT was used to evaluate the effect of 72-h treatment with different concentrations of crocin with or without ConA on lymphocytes proliferation. INF-γ/IL-4 cytokine secretion and T-bet/GATA-3 transcription factor expression ratios (as indicators of Th1/Th2 response status) were measured in non-stimulated and ConA-stimulated cells in the presence or absence of crocin by ELISA and RT-qPCR methods, respectively.

RESULTS

The results showed crocin at a concentration of 50 μM and higher was toxic for human lymphocytes, and at a non-toxic concentration of 25 µM, it did not affect cell proliferation. The ratio of T-bet/GATA-3 and INF-γ/IL-4 was higher in the culture supernatant of ConA-stimulated cells compared to non-stimulated ones. Crocin-treated cells showed slightly lower T-bet/GATA-3 and INF-γ/IL-4 ratios compared to untreated cells. Crocin (25 μM) was also able to restore the increased ratio of Th1/Th2 immune response induced by ConA.

CONCLUSIONS

Crocin can alleviate inflammatory-stimulant effects of ConA on human lymphocytes by decreasing T-bet/GATA-3 and INF-γ/IL-4 ratios, which are indicative of restoring the balance of Th1/Th2 responses.

Care of the Patient with Liver Failure Requiring Transplantation

Patients undergo liver transplantation to address chronic liver failure, acute fulminant liver failure, or primary liver cancer. Depending on acuity, patients with decompensated chronic or acute fulminant liver failure generally require preoperative intensive care unit admission to manage organ dysfunction. Those with chronic liver failure are allocated an organ based on waiting list position determined by their local organ procurement organization (OPO). This position is dependent upon blood type and Model for End- Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. These patients thus are critically ill and require preoperative ICU monitoring and care. Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who require liver transplantation are given a MELD exception and rarely require preoperative ICU care. The patient’s ability to undergo liver transplant in the setting of HCC is determined by the Milan criteria or the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) criteria.

Management of the liver transplant patient

Liver transplantation is currently the definitive treatment of end-stage liver disease. This article reviews the complex multidisciplinary care of the liver transplant recipient beginning immediately after transplantation but extending into the long term. The presentation, evaluation and treatment of common post-transplant complications are outlined. Importantly, immunosuppression strategies along with the issues of acute and chronic rejection are discussed in detail with an emphasis on how practice has evolved over time. The spectrum of infectious problems is systematically presented, based on the time since transplantation and the institution of immunosuppression. Finally, the substantial challenges of recurrent disease and long-term medical comorbidities are addressed as these are clearly the primary issues that threaten the longevity and wellbeing of the liver transplant recipient.

Steroid avoidance in liver transplantation: meta-analysis and meta-regression of randomized trials

Steroid use after liver transplantation (LT) has been associated with diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and hepatitis C (HCV) recurrence. We performed meta-analysis and meta-regression of 30 publications representing 19 randomized trials that compared steroid-free with steroid-based immunosuppression (IS). There were no differences in death, graft loss, and infection. Steroid-free recipients demonstrated a trend toward reduced hypertension [relative risk (RR) 0.84, P = 0.08], and statistically significant decreases in cholesterol (standard mean difference -0.41, P < 0.001) and cytomegalovirus (RR 0.52, P = 0.001). In studies where steroids were replaced by another IS agent, the risks of diabetes (RR 0.29, P < 0.001), rejection (RR 0.68, P = 0.03), and severe rejection (RR 0.37, P = 0.001) were markedly lower in steroid-free arms. In studies in which steroids were not replaced, rejection rates were higher in steroid-free arms (RR 1.31, P = 0.02) and reduction of diabetes was attenuated (RR 0.74, P = 0.2). HCV recurrence was lower with steroid avoidance and, although no individual trial reached statistical significance, meta-analysis demonstrated this important effect (RR 0.90, P = 0.03). However, we emphasize the heterogeneity of trials performed to date and, as such, do not recommend basing clinical guidelines on our conclusions. We believe that a large, multicenter trial will better define the role of steroid-free regimens in LT.

Current concepts and perspectives of immunosuppression in organ transplantation

BACKGROUND

While early surgical success made organ transplantation possible in the 1950s and 1960s, the breakthrough in clinical organ transplantation was achieved through the discovery and invention of modern immunosuppressive agents in the early/mid-1980s. Especially during the 1990 s, a large array of immunosuppressants has expanded the armamentarium used to prevent and treat allograft rejection, resulting in an excellent short-term and an acceptable long-term outcome. However, these drugs have potent but still non-specific immunosuppressive properties and frequently show severe acute and chronic side effects, sometimes questioning the overall success.

CONCEPTS/TRENDS

As the "Holy-Grail" of the transplant community, the induction of "true donor-specific tolerance" has not been achieved yet; current immunosuppressive strategies, in particular in Europe, include "individually tailored immunosuppressive" protocols, mostly based on specific immunologic and non-immunologic risk factors. These protocols allow for optimal immunosuppressive protocols for each patient group according to their needs by choosing the most suitable, well-tolerated combination of agents and the most effective doses to avoid acute rejection episodes (incidence and severity) and minimise drug-related toxicity to reduce long-term drug-related morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, transplant recipient are still being forced to take a life-long course of chemical immunosuppressive agents to keep their graft, knowing about the possible life-threatening side effects.

SUMMARY

We review current trends of immunosuppressive protocols in liver and kidney transplantation, focusing on calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing protocols, mammalian-target-of-rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor based-protocols and corticosteroid-avoidance protocols, being aware of the fact, that most of these strategies could be applicable for other transplanted organs, too. Finally, we describe future trends and new developments that are rising on the horizon.