Budesonide. An appraisal of the basis of its pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life benefits in asthma

Design Comorbidity Portfolios to Improve Treatment Cost Prediction of Asthma Using Machine Learning

Comorbidity is an important factor to consider when trying to predict the cost of treating asthma patients. When an asthmatic patient suffered from comorbidity, the cost of treating such a patient becomes dependent on the nature of the comorbidity. Therefore, lack of recognition of comorbidity on asthmatic patient poses a challenge in predicting the cost of treatment. In this study, we proposed a comorbidity portfolio design that improves the prediction cost of treating asthmatic patients by regrouping frequently occurred comorbidities in different cost groups. In the experiment, predictive models, including logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, classification regression tree, and backpropagation neural network were trained with real-world data of asthmatic patients from 2012 to 2014 in a large city of China. The 10-fold cross validation and random search algorithm were employed to optimize the hyper-parameters. We recorded significant improvements using our model, which are attributed to comorbidity portfolios in area under curve (AUC) and sensitivity increase of 46.89% (standard deviation: 4.45%) and 101.07% (standard deviation: 44.94%), respectively. In risk analysis of comorbidity on cost, respiratory diseases with a cumulative proportion in the adjusted odds ratio of 36.38% (95%CI: 27.61%, 47.86%) and circulatory diseases with a cumulative proportion in the adjusted odds ratio of 23.83% (95%CI: 15.95%, 35.22%) are the dominant risks of asthmatic patients that affects the treatment cost. It is found that the comorbidity portfolio is robust, and provides a better prediction of the high-cost of treating asthmatic patients. The preliminary characterization of the joint risk of multiple comorbidities posed on cost are also reported. This study will be of great help in improving cost prediction and comorbidity management.

Novel Pyrrolidine Derivatives of Budesonide as Long Acting Inhaled Corticosteroids for the Treatment of Pulmonary Inflammatory Diseases

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) represent the first line therapy for the treatment of asthma and are also extensively utilized in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Our goal was to develop a new ICS with a basic group, which can allow solid state feature modulation, achieving at the same time high local anti-inflammatory effect and low systemic exposure. Through a rational drug design approach, a new series of pyrrolidine derivatives of budesonide was identified. Within the series, several compounds showed nanomolar binding affinity ( K_i) with GR that mostly correlated with the effect in inducing GR nuclear translocation in CHO cells and anti-inflammatory effects in macrophagic cell lines. Binding and functional cell-based assays allowed identifying compound 17 as a potent ICS agonist with a PK profile showing an adequate lung retention and low systemic exposure in vivo. Finally, compound 17 proved to be more potent than budesonide in a rat model of acute pulmonary inflammation.

The impact of budesonide and other inhaled corticosteroid therapies in the management of asthma in children and adults

BACKGROUND

Since the recognition that asthma is characterized by extensive inflammation of the airways, the use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) as controller therapy has become central to successful disease management. As the prevalence of asthma increases worldwide, there is concern about increasing numbers of patients with untreated or undertreated asthma, which may lead to deterioration in disease control, with direct effects on morbidity and mortality rates. The costs attributed to asthma translate into a considerable economic burden, from the direct costs of medical treatment to the costs incurred through lost work or school days. International treatment guidelines currently recommend early intervention with ICS therapy to improve lung function and disease control.

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews the role of therapy with ICSs, particularly budesonide, in improving the management of asthma in patients of all ages and in reducing the economic and social burdens of this disease.

RESULTS

Randomized, controlled clinical studies confirm the efficacy of early intervention with ICSs in patients with mild persistent asthma. Regular use of an ICS can reduce the number of exacerbations and hospitalizations in patients of all ages and with all disease severities.

CONCLUSIONS

Budesonide has a well-established efficacy and safety profile. Its once-daily dosing may contribute to improved adherence and cost-effectiveness.

The impact of reducing dose frequency on health outcomes

BACKGROUND

Dosing schedules may be one important factor determining whether patients take their prescribed medication. Schedules may influence whether a patient stays on the prescribed therapy and, if so, the degree to which the regimen is followed. Both factors are important determinants of health outcomes and health care costs.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of reducing dose frequency on health outcomes and health care costs.

METHODS

Articles from peer-reviewed journals were identified from the medical literature databases MEDLINE, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and HealthSTAR for the years 1985 through 2002. The search included all references that reported on the impact of a change of dose frequency on chronic disease. Search terms used were combinations of dose frequency, dose schedule, and dosing and efficacy, safety, clinical effectiveness, preferences, adherence, compliance, persistence, health-related quality of life, patient satisfaction, resource use, and costs.

RESULTS

Reducing the number of daily doses through extended-release formulations or newer drugs has frequently been shown to provide the patient with better symptom control in a number of disease states. Overall improvements were seen in adherence, patient quality of life, patient satisfaction, and costs. However, results of some studies indicate that not all patients, medications, or diseases may be candidates for reduced dosing due to the potential effects on symptom control, incidence of adverse events, and overcompensation for missed doses.

CONCLUSION

Where feasible, reducing dose frequency may offer benefits for the patient in terms of health outcomes and for the health care budget holder in terms of costs.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of inhaled corticosteroids in asthma: a review of the analytical standards

PURPOSE

To determine whether published cost-effectiveness studies on inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in asthma adhered to basic analytical standards as defined in health economic textbooks and in guidelines assessing and comparing efficacy and safety.

METHODS

Original cost-effectiveness studies published between 1990 and 2000 in general medical or economic journals were reviewed to assess the adherence to five fundamental methodological principles: (1) design of the study, (2) choice of perspective and corresponding costs, (3) choice of outcome measure, (4) marginal cost analysis, and (5) sensitivity analysis and discussion about external validity. For each principle, the studies were ranked as high, medium or low quality.

RESULTS

Most of the 18 studies included were ranked medium on the first two principles. The studies adhered to a higher degree to the remaining three principles. Only three studies were high ranked in all five principles. The number of principles fulfilled increased over time. Studies comparing pharmaceutical products from competing companies were typically short-term studies, designed for other purposes than health economic analyses, and, in general, did not use therapeutically equivalent dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Attention should be drawn to the study design, the weak correspondence between perspective and costs, and especially to the impact of bias in health economic results when comparing different doses of ICSs.

Cost effectiveness of guideline advice for children with asthma: a literature review

Asthma is an important chronic disease among children. This study reviews the cost effectiveness of interventions in the long-term care of asthmatic children and compares these results with treatment advice in four current guidelines. Cost-effectiveness studies were searched for in Medline, Embase, Healthstar, Biosis, and the Office of Health Economics-Health Economic Evaluations Database (OHE-HEED), and the Cochrane Library was searched for meta-analyses of clinical trials. In the four reviewed guidelines, cost effectiveness is not explicitly used as a criterion. The cost-effectiveness studies show sufficient evidence for the cost effectiveness of treatment with inhaled steroids and for self-management programs for severe asthmatic patients. Inclusion of these results in the guidelines would not lead to significant changes in current treatment advice. The effectiveness of various measures for trigger avoidance is not fully proven, and hence neither is their cost effectiveness. Available information on the cost effectiveness of cromolyn could be used to focus the guidelines. Finally, evidence exists that organizational interventions, e.g., the employment of asthma nurses, can result in cost savings, but it is unclear to what extent these results can be generalized. More cost-effectiveness studies are needed, especially on long-acting bronchodilators and self-management programs for mild and moderate asthma, in order to help make the guidelines more informative and reduce the differences between them.

The impact of asthma on health-related quality of life

Although a substantial body of epidemiological and economic literature on asthma exists, relatively little is known about the impact of asthma on health-related quality of life (HRQL). The purpose of this review was to synthesize results from recent studies, profile the factors influencing HRQL in asthmatics, discuss the impact of treatment on HRQL outcomes, and offer recommendations for further research. The results of this review support the premise that asthma can adversely affect the physical, psychological, and social domains of HRQL. Published data suggest that females, those from lower socioeconomic groups, and ethnic minorities experience poorer quality of life as a result of their asthma symptoms. Results of published clinical trials indicate treatment regimens can have a significant impact on HRQL outcomes. Pharmacological interventions appear to effect change primarily in the physical domain and behavioral interventions lead to improvements in both physical and psychosocial domains. Future research should focus on precise a priori delineation of research hypotheses, including the selection of primary and secondary endpoints, the clarification and consistent application of criteria for defining asthma severity, thoughtful selection of HRQL instruments appropriate for the research hypotheses and target population, and careful delineation of clinically meaningful change scores of asthma-specific outcome measures.