Benzodiazepine-like substances and hepatic encephalopathy : implications for treatment

Benzodiazepine receptor antagonists for hepatic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

Hepatic encephalopathy may be associated with accumulation of substances that bind to a receptor-complex in the brain resulting in neural inhibition. Benzodiazepine receptor antagonists may have a beneficial effect on patients with hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of benzodiazepine receptor antagonists for patients with hepatic encephalopathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible trials were identified through The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE (last search: January 2004), reference lists of relevant articles, authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing any benzodiazepine receptor antagonist versus placebo or no intervention for hepatic encephalopathy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently included trials and extracted data. Binary outcomes are reported as risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on a random effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was explored by a chi-squared test with significance set at P < 0.1. The inconsistency across trials was assessed by I(2). Potential sources of heterogeneity were explored through subgroup analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen randomised trials with 805 patients were included. Eight trials used a crossover design. All trials were double-blind and assessed flumazenil versus placebo. Data on all outcomes could not be extracted from all trials. The included patients had a favourable prognosis (361/390 [93%] survived in the flumazenil group versus 345/376 [92%] in the placebo group). Flumazenil had a significant beneficial effect on improvement of hepatic encephalopathy at the end of treatment (RD 0.28; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.37, eight trials). Flumazenil had no significant effect on recovery (RD 0.13; 95% CI -0.09 to 0.36, two trials) or mortality RD 0.01; 95% CI -0.05 to 0.07, 10 trials). Flumazenil may be associated with adverse events, but trial results were heterogeneous.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Flumazenil had a significant beneficial effect on short-term improvement of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis and a highly favourable prognosis. Flumazenil had no significant effect on recovery or survival. Considering the fluctuating nature of hepatic encephalopathy, future trials should use a parallel design and assess if treatment with flumazenil leads to a sustained improvement or increased recovery and survival. Until this has been demonstrated, flumazenil may be considered for patients with chronic liver disease and hepatic encephalopathy, but cannot be recommended for routine clinical use.

New insights into the role of the GABA(A)-benzodiazepine receptor in psychiatric disorder

BACKGROUND

In the 40 years since the first benzodiazepine was brought into clinical use there has been a substantial growth in understanding the molecular basis of action of these drugs and the role of their receptors in disease states.

AIMS

To present current knowledge about the role of the GABA(A)-benzodiazepine receptor in anxiety disorders, new insights into the molecular biology of the receptor complex and neuroimaging studies suggesting involvement of these receptors in disease states.

METHOD

An overview of published literature, including some recent data.

RESULTS

The molecular biology of this receptor is detailed. Molecular genetic studies suggesting involvement of the GABA(A)-benzodiazepine receptor in animal behaviour and learning are outlined; possible parallels with human psychopathology are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

Current insights into the role of the GABA(A)-benzodiazepine receptor in the action of benzodiazepines and as a factor in disease states, in both animals and humans, may lead to new, more sophisticated interventions at this receptor complex and potentially significant therapeutic gains.

Effects of benzodiazepines on triphasic waves: implications for nonconvulsive status epilepticus

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is often diagnosed based on abolition of rhythmic sharp waves by benzodiazepines. It is possible that sharp waves resulting from metabolic (nonepileptic) encephalopathies may also respond to benzodiazepines and are potentially misdiagnosed as NCSE. The authors hypothesized that triphasic waves (TW) resulting from metabolic encephalopathy are abolished by benzodiazepines. They retrospectively identified patients with TW resulting from metabolic encephalopathy who had EEG recordings before, during, and after benzodiazepine administration. Benzodiazepines were given either because of the possibility of NCSE or for a medically indicated purpose. All patients were diagnosed definitively with a metabolic cause of encephalopathy and not NCSE. Ten patients (mean age, 59 years) met the criteria and were reviewed. TW resolved persistently in four patients and intermittently in six patients. Background activity slowed in five patients and was attenuated in five patients. Unresponsive patients did not arouse and three of five drowsy patients became less responsive. Rhythmic sharp waves resulting from metabolic encephalopathy are abolished by benzodiazepines, similar to NCSE, but without improvement in mental status. This suggests that definitive electrographic diagnosis of primary NCSE should not be based entirely on abolition of sharp waves by benzodiazepines. This also implies that gamma-aminobutyric acid neurotransmission is important in the expression of TW.

Benzodiazepine receptor antagonists for acute and chronic hepatic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy is unknown. It has been suggested that liver failure leads to the accumulation of substances that bind to a receptor-complex in the brain resulting in neural inhibition which may progress to coma. Several trials have assessed benzodiazepine receptor antagonists for hepatic encephalopathy, but the results are conflicting.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of benzodiazepine receptor antagonists for patients with acute or chronic hepatic encephalopathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible trials were identified through The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of relevant articles, authors of trials, and the pharmaceutical company known to produce benzodiazepine receptor antagonists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing any benzodiazepine receptor antagonist versus placebo or no intervention for hepatic encephalopathy were included, regardless of language or publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial inclusion and data extraction were made independently by two contributors. Depending on the presence or absence of significant heterogeneity (P<0.1) a random or fixed effect model was used. Potential causes for heterogeneity were explored by sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve randomised trials with 765 patients were included. Eight trials used a crossover design. All trials were double-blind and assessed flumazenil versus placebo. Data on all outcomes could not be extracted from all trials. The included patients had a favourable prognosis (341/370 (92%) survived in the flumazenil group versus 325/356 (91%) in the placebo group). Flumazenil had no significant effect on full recovery (two trials), survival (nine trials), or on the occurrence of adverse events (five trials). However, flumazenil was associated with a significant effect on improvement of hepatic encephalopathy compared to placebo at the end of treatment (103/346 (30%) versus 23/332 (7 %), risk difference 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.28, five trials).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Flumazenil had no significant effect on recovery or survival from hepatic encephalopathy. However, flumazenil had a significant effect on short-term improvement of hepatic encephalopathy in some patients with chronic liver disease and a highly favourable prognosis. Considering the fluctuating nature of hepatic encephalopathy, future trials should use a parallel design and assess if treatment with flumazenil leads to a sustained improvement or increased recovery and survival. Until this has been demonstrated, flumazenil may be considered for patients with chronic liver disease and hepatic encephalopathy, but cannot be recommended for routine clinical use.