What Is the Best Strategy for Converting from Twice-Daily Divalproex to a Once-Daily Divalproex ER Regimen?

Valproate (depakine-chrono) in the acute treatment of outpatients with generalized anxiety disorder without psychiatric comorbidity: Randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study

Objective

Anxiety disorders are highly prevalent in population of European countries. However, the effect of Valproate (depakine-chrono) on generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has not been studied in a double-blind placebo-controlled design.

Method

Eighty patients (all men) were washout from the all medications. Each patient was randomized to receive either depakine-chrono (40 patients) for 6 weeks or matched placebo (40 patients) in a double-blind manner. Eligible participants, in addition to meeting the DSM-IV criteria for GAD and having a minimum score of 25 and more on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, were required to be between 18 and 65 years. Response was defined as a 50% reduction in the Hamilton anxiety scale score. Response and side effects with depakine-chrono and placebo were compared by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests. Six patients did not return for at least one subsequent assessment, leaving 74 patients (36 taking depakine-chrono and 38 taking placebo) in the valuables study group.

Results

Twenty six of the 36 depakine-chrono-treated participants responded by 6 weeks, versus six of the 38 placebo-treated participants (p< 0.001). The most common and problematic side effect in the depakine-chrono group was dizziness and nausea.

Conclusions

The authors believe this to be the first double-blind placebo-controlled randomization study to test the efficacy of a depakine-chrono in the management of anxiety disorders. They need to be replicated in a larger study group.

Comparative Absorption Profiles of Divalproex Sodium Delayed-Release Versus Extended-Release Tablets—Clinical Implications

Background:

The distinct absorption characteristics of the conventional enteric-coated, delayed-release (DR) and the novel extended-release (ER) divalproex sodium formulations are not well recognized.

Objective:

To quantitatively and qualitatively differentiate the absorption characteristics of divalproex-DR and -ER formulations.

Methods:

Healthy volunteers (N = 28) received single 1000 mg doses of divalproex-DR and divalproex-ER tablets in a crossover fashion. Noncompartmental and compartmental analyses were used to estimate valproic acid (VPA) pharmacokinetics from the plasma concentration–time profiles determined from intensive blood sampling over 48 hours.

Results:

VPA was not absorbed from divalproex-DR in the first 2 hours (absorption lag-time) after dosing. After VPA release in the intestine, approximately 63% of the dose was absorbed in less than 1 hour, that is, 2.9 hours (mean absorption time) from dosing. Maximum concentration (Cmax) was achieved approximately 4 hours after dosing. VPA absorption was complete (~93% of dose) within 3 absorption half-lives (~4.5 h) post-absorption lag-time, that is, 6–7 hours from dosing. In contrast, VPA absorption from divalproex-ER starts immediately after administration, initially at a modest rate, followed by slow and extended absorption at a constant rate for more than 20 hours; VPA concentrations at 1 and 2 hours were 28% and 40% of Cmax. Approximately 53% of the dose was absorbed within 12 hours (mean absorption time); complete absorption occurred over more than 20 hours without any dose dumping.

Conclusions:

When antihypertensive treatment options are clinically equivalent, prescribers may first consider using a verapamil SR–based strategy, especially in patients with CAD who have no history of depression. VPA absorption from enteric-coated divalproex-DR is rapid following a lag-time of approximately 2 hours and is complete within 6–7 hours of dosing. In contrast, VPA absorption from divalproex-ER starts immediately after administration, but occurs at a slow, approximately constant rate over more than 20 hours.

Population pharmacokinetics of valproic acid in pediatric patients with epilepsy: considerations for dosing spinal muscular atrophy patients

Valproic acid (VPA) dosing strategies used in recent clinical trials in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have utilized a paradigm of monitoring trough levels to estimate drug exposure with subsequent dose titration. The validity of this approach remains uncertain and could be improved by understanding sources of pharmacokinetic variability. A population pharmacokinetic analysis of VPA in pediatric patients with epilepsy was recently performed. The pooled data set included 52 subjects with epilepsy, ages 1 to 17 years, who received intravenous and/or various oral formulations. The data was best fit by a 2-compartment model; inclusion of age and weight reduced intersubject variability for clearance (41%), central volume (70%), and peripheral volume (42%) over the base model. The final model for clearance and volume parameters was clearance = 0.854 · (weight/70)(0.75); central volume of distribution = 10.3 · (weight/70)(1.0) · (age/8.5)(-0.267); peripheral volume of distribution = 4.08 · (weight/70)(1.0); and intercompartmental clearance = 5.34 · (weight/70)(0.75). Application of the model to data from a clinical trial in SMA patients suggests altered kinetics, perhaps based on underlying physiologic differences such as alterations in lean body mass. Future studies in SMA should incorporate modeling and simulation techniques to support individualized dosing and further assess if additional patient-specific factors necessitate alternative dosing strategies.

Progress report on new antiepileptic drugs: a summary of the Eigth Eilat Conference (EILAT VIII)

The Eigth Eilat Conference on New Antiepileptic Drugs (AEDs)-EILAT VII, took place in Sitges, Barcelona from the 10th to 14th September, 2006. Basic scientists, clinical pharmacologists and neurologists from 24 countries attended the conference, whose main themes included a focus on status epilepticus (epidemiology, current and future treatments), evidence-based treatment guidelines and the potential of neurostimulation in refractory epilepsy. Consistent with previous formats of this conference, the central part of the conference was devoted to a review of AEDs in development, as well as updates on marketed AEDs introduced since 1989. This article summarizes the information presented on drugs in development, including brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine acetate (BIA-2-093), fluorofelbamate, ganaxolone, huperzine, lacosamide, retigabine, rufinamide, seletracetam, stiripentol, talampanel, valrocemide, JZP-4, NS1209, PID and RWJ-333369. Updates on felbamate, gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine and new extended release oxcarbazepine formulations, pregabalin, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin, zonisamide and new extended release valproic acid formulations, and the antiepileptic vagal stimulator device are also presented.